twenty-four hours a day in and through us or we perish.
In order to set our tone for this meeting I ask that we bow our
heads in a few moments of silent prayer and meditation.
I wish to remind you that whatever is said at this meeting expresses
our own individual opinion as of today and as of up to this moment.
We do not speak for A.A. as a whole and you are free to agree or
disagree as you see fit, in fact. it is suggested that you pay no
attention to anything which might not he reconcilied with what is in
the A. A. Big Book.
If vou dont have a Big Book. it's time you bought you one. Read it.
study it, live with it, loan it, scatter it, and then learn from it
what it means to be an A.A."
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1935. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Early Akron A.A. Reading List,
Part 1 of 5
From: Mel Barger . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/23/2004 8:00:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
With reference to Glenn Chesnut's information about the early Akron Manual, I
would like to add that this publication is still available from the Akron
Central Office. I picked it up yesterday while in Akron. They also offer a
"Spiritual Milestones in Alcoholics Anonymous," a "Second Reader for
Alcoholics Anonymous," and "A Guide to the Twelve Steps of Alcoholics
Anonymous," all for fifty cents a copy. Should you wish to purchase copies,
the office is: AA of Akron, 775 N. Main St., Akron, OH 44310. The phone number
is 330-253-8181, the toll-free is 800-897-6737, and the email address is:
info@akronaa.org.
Incidentally, the Akron Manual no longer lists the additional publications
reading list which caught my attention. I was given this manual at my first
meetings in the Ventura, Calif., area in October, 1948, and I definitely
remember the list. I assume it was deleted in later editions when some members
may have objected to their inclusion in the manual. But the manual still
retains its original, no-nonsense flavor and really lays it on the line for
the newcomer, demanding that he must decide to get sober and do what's
necessary for real sobriety.
Mel Barger
~~~~~~~~
Mel Barger
melb@accesstoledo.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Glenn Chesnut
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:56 AM
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] The Early Akron A.A. Reading List, Part 1 of 5
================================
The Early Akron Recommended Reading List:
The Works It Contained and their Significance for Understanding Early Akron
A.A.
Glenn C. (South Bend, Indiana)
================================
PART ONE:
A pamphlet entitled A Manual for Alcoholics Anonymous, often referred to as
the Akron Manual, was written and published by early Akron A.A. at a very
early period, as an introductory booklet to hand to newcomers when they
began the detoxification process. [Note 1] Based on things that are
mentioned in the Manual, it was most probably put together during the summer
or fall of 1939, and certainly no later than 1940. A copy of it can be found
at http://hindsfoot.org/AkrMan1.html (the first half) and
http://hindsfoot.org/AkrMan2.html (the second half) on the Hindsfoot
Foundation website ( http://hindsfoot.org ). So this small pamphlet is an
extraordinarily valuable document. It is a little window opening into the
world of early Akron A.A. shortly after the Big Book first started coming
off the press.
~~~~~~~~~~
At the very end of the Akron Manual it says "the following literature has
helped many members of Alcoholics Anonymous," and then it gives a list of
ten works as a kind of recommended reading list:
Alcoholics Anonymous (Works Publishing Company).
The Holy Bible
The Greatest Thing in the World, Henry Drummond.
The Unchanging Friend, a series (Bruce Publishing Co., Milwaukee).
As a Man Thinketh, James Allen.
The Sermon on the Mount, Emmet Fox (Harper Bros.).
The Self You Have to Live With, Winfred Rhoades.
Psychology of Christian Personality, Ernest M. Ligon (Macmillan Co.).
Abundant Living, E. Stanley Jones.
The Man Nobody Knows, Bruce Barton."
~~~~~~~~~~
THE BIBLE was the second item on the list, right behind the Big Book. But
earlier in the pamphlet it was made clear that there were certain places in
the Bible that they wanted the newcomers to especially focus on: the Sermon
on the Mount in Matthew 5-7, the letter of James, 1 Corinthians 13, and
Psalms 23 and 91. This was a typical early twentieth-century Protestant
liberal selection of passages to emphasize, but they were also especially
useful for A.A. purposes because none of them required the newcomer to
believe in the divinity of Christ or that salvation could only be found by
praying to Jesus.
~~~~~~~~~~
EMMET FOX, The Sermon on the Mount, is still well known to A.A. people
today. He was a major representative of an American religious movement
called New Thought, which was connected to, but also different from, Mary
Baker Eddy's Christian Science movement. Among present-day American
religious denominations, Unity Church is the largest group using that basic
kind of approach. Emmet Fox's position was strongly Christian in its
orientation, although the kind of Protestantism he represented was clearly
in the liberal camp.
Please note that nineteenth and early twentieth-century New Thought was most
definitely NOT the same as "New Age," which was a late twentieth-century
movement involving claims that its practitioners were able to do spirit
channeling and use the mystical properties of crystals, and things of that
sort. New Age sometimes include beliefs drawn from Wicca -- that is, ancient
witchcraft -- and other unconventional religious ideas. Or to put it another
way, New Thought was fundamentally Christian in its orientation, whereas New
Age is for the most part extremely hostile to Christianity.
~~~~~~~~~~
JAMES ALLEN, As a Man Thinketh (34 pages long). He published his book in
1908 or a little before. I would also put his ideas in the same general
category as New Thought, even though he was English. He may or may not have
read any of the American authors in the general New Thought genre, which is
why I hesitate to call him "New Thought" in the narrow sense of the term.
~~~~~~~~~~
HENRY DRUMMOND, The Greatest Thing in the World (45 pages long). His book
was a beautiful commentary on 1 Corinthians 13. He was closely associated
with Dwight L. Moody in the 1870's, so we might describe him as one of the
best examples of the richness and depth of thought which we can find in some
parts of the nineteenth century evangelistic movement.
Drummond was a Scotsman, who was Professor of Natural Science at the College
of the Free Church of Scotland, and had written a book (famous in his
lifetime but forgotten today) called Natural Law in the Spiritual World,
which was an attempt to make peace between science and religion. This is
important, because early A.A. had no sympathy whatsoever with religious
people who were completely anti-scientific in their attitudes and who tried
to deal with modern science by rejecting its findings. Early A.A. realized
that there was a spiritual dimension of reality which went beyond anything
which the scientific method could investigate, but they also realized that
the profound discoveries of modern science could neither be denied nor
neglected.
The modern evangelical movement, at its beginnings in the 1730's and 40's,
had an enormously respectful attitude toward the new science. Both Jonathan
Edwards and John Wesley, the movement's two greatest theologians, were
deeply interested in Newtonian physics, the new biological discoveries,
modern medicine, electricity, and modern psychology. The evangelical
movement remained positive in its attitude to modern science down through
most of the nineteenth century, as we see in Henry Drummond. But then the
Fundamentalist movement, with its often negative attitude toward modern
science, began developing in a series of events which took place in
1895-1919. [Note 2]
~~~~~~~~~~
E. STANLEY JONES, Abundant Living (first came out in 1942, 156 pages long).
Chapter 6-10 is one of the best discussions of prayer that I have ever read.
He ends up that section with a discussion of guidance and entering the
Divine Silence. If Richmond Walker did not read this book, he read something
in that tradition (there were similar kinds of material in The Upper Room
for example). At any rate, this book helps enormously in understanding more
of what Walker was doing in his selection and modification, in the fine
print sections of Twenty-Four Hours a Day, of various passages from God
Calling by Two Listeners.
Chapter 6 of E. Stanley Jones' book begins with a section on "Prayer is
Surrender," and Chapter 8 is entitled "The Morning Quiet Time." Jones gives
a good deal of detail on what we are supposed to be doing during this
Morning Quiet Time, including talking about the role of the subconscious in
the process, how to deal with the problem of "wandering thoughts," and what
to do when we are confronted with what the medieval tradition called aridity
(where it doesn't "feel" like we are in real contact with God, and where we
have extraordinary difficulty forcing ourselves to pray at all). On both of
these latter issues, I suspect that he as a Methodist had read John Wesley's
Standard Sermons, including especially Wesley's sermons on "Wandering
Thoughts" and "Heaviness through Manifold Temptations."
John Wesley in the 1740's was one of the two major theoreticians of the
modern evangelical movement during its beginning years. He was an Anglican
priest who taught theology and classics at Oxford University in England for
a number of years, but ended up becoming a traveling revival preacher who
founded the Methodist movement. His work was thoroughly scripturally
grounded - - he knew the New Testament by heart in the original Greek, and
knew not only Old Testament Hebrew, but also several other ancient Semitic
languages. Yet he and Jonathan Edwards (the other major formative
evangelical thinker of the 1730's and 40's) both made skillful use of the
work of the seventeenth-century British empiricist John Locke, who invented
modern psychology, and both of them knew that a knowledge of psychology was
necessary for understanding how to preach the gospel effectively and produce
real moral change in people's lives. It is totally incorrect to believe that
good evangelical theology and modern psychology are opposed to one another.
What gave the evangelical movement so much power during its early period was
its use of the best psychology of its period.
John Locke had discovered not only the basic principles of behavioral
psychology and operant conditioning, but had also discovered the way early
childhood traumas could continue to influence adult behavior in negative
ways. And he also made the first serious studies of the profoundly
psychologically disturbed who were confined in insane asylums and discovered
"the inner logic of insanity" which affected these people.
Wesley, who knew Locke's work forwards and backwards, was the first person I
have read in the modern period who used the term "psychotherapy" - - though
of course as a teacher of classics at Oxford University, it was used by him
in the original Greek form as psyches therapeia (!!!) Wesley said that good
psychotherapy (which meant "the healing of the soul") was what true
scriptural Christianity was actually about. And although he did not use the
word subconscious, he anticipated Sigmund Freud by over a century in his
understanding of the distinction between conscious thought and the
subconscious layer underneath which creates so many of our spiritual
problems. And like Freud he realized that this subconscious material came
out in both free association and dreams.
Around fifty years ago, Protestant seminaries all over the country began
putting people on their faculties with professional degrees in psychology
and psychotherapy to teach counseling techniques to their students. I had to
pass an exam in psychotherapy and counseling to obtain my degree from the
seminary at Southern Methodist University, and that was back in 1964. The
best books and articles on practical psychology today are being published by
conservative evangelical theologians, who seem to have a better
understanding of what is important. But most Christian pastors in the United
States today know that there is no conflict between good spirituality and
good psychotherapy.
~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was scanned by GatewayDefender [4]
4:20:52 AM ET - 7/21/2004
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1939. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: old preamble
From: ny-aa@att.net . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/24/2004 10:38:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
There are at least a dozen copies of that particular "Old Preamble"
around the internet. For example:
http://www.aabibliography.com/old_1940_AA-preamble.htm.
Most identify it as 1940. Some point out that it "was never official."
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1941. . . . . . . . . . . . Question from Gilbert G. on Ebby T.
From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/25/2004 11:34:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Gilbert G. has written in asking
"does anybody have any info on Ebby T's life (like the times he spent sober,
where he sobered up at, with whom, etc.) any and all info will be greatly
appreciated."
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1942. . . . . . . . . . . . NY-AA@att.net on the Old Preamble
From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/26/2004 12:14:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Lee N. (Woodstock, Maine) dcm19@megalink.net wrote on Sun, 25 Jul 2004:
An elder member who was a great friend of our Archives during my tenure, and
another member also, were close to Captain Jack near the end of his life. When
he passed from us both these folks donated a very large amount of Captain
Jack's memorabilia to the Archives, including this old Preamble which I
described in my previous post to the group. We were able to fill a display
case 4' long with his memorabilia at the Central Office where our Archives is
located. Anyway, she has passed this question to me and I would very much like
to give her an answer. How do we describe this old Preamble which we have on
display? What kind of tag or information should we put on it?
Tom E. NY_AA@att.net responded:
Hi, Folks:
Variations of that preamble were discussed in AAHistoryLovers and the earlier
AAHistoryBuffs forums. Here are some of the posts:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/247
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/271
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/826
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/827
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/828
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/829
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/836
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/841
Article 828 quotes a GrapeVine article with Searcy W taking partial credit. In
Message 841, Art Sheehan is saying that it was a Preamble from Texas but it
predated Searcy's sobriety. Lacking physical evidence, I'm not going to
attempt to validate any attribution of the source.
This Google search gets you thirty-four examples of the same or similar
preambles on web sites.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22We+are+gathered+here+because+we+are+faced+wi
th%22&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF_8&c2coff=1&filter=0 [87]
Most of these sites have no attribution or are vague. I believe they got their
information when it was argued out without agreement in the Usenet news group
alt.recovery.aa in the mid 1990s.
______________________
En2joy! Tom En2ger
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1943. . . . . . . . . . . . How to post messages on
AAHistoryLovers
From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/26/2004 1:02:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
To post messages for the AAHistoryLovers webgroup, all you need to do is write
an email to:
AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
And then all the moderator needs to do is push a button and the message will
automatically go out to everybody in the group.
If you have a question or comment you want to make to me privately, my home
email address is glennccc@sbcglobal.net . But I can't transfer stuff directly
from that email address to the AAHistoryLovers webgroup.
Glenn C. (South Bend)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1944. . . . . . . . . . . . on Ebby T.
From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/26/2004 1:08:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Gilbert G. text164@yahoo.com has written in asking "does anybody have any info
on Ebby T's life (like the times he spent sober, where he sobered up at, with
whom, etc.) any and all info will be greatly appreciated."
karlbateman2000@yahoo.com writes:
The piece by Walter L. in http://www.barefootsworld.net/aaebbyt.html is a
great article on Bill's "sponsor." He was the one that carried the message to
Bill from the Oxford groups. Ebby had various relapses until 1964.
Ebby had carried the message of the Oxford Group to Bill with great care and
dedication -- that recovery from alcoholism was possible using spiritual
principles, but only if it was combined with practical actions. Bill Wilson
never took another drink, and left Towns Hospital to dedicate the rest of his
life to carrying the message to other alcoholics.
Ebby, however, took a different path, one that caused him to have a series of
relapses. The man whom Bill Wilson called his sponsor could not stay sober
himself, and became an embarrassment. There were periods of sobriety, some
long, some short, but eventually Ebby would, "fall off the wagon," as he
called it.
Ebby drifted in and out of sobriety, and in and out of AA, with many AA
members trying to help him regain a more stable sobriety. The person who was
ultimately successful was Searcy W., who had established a hospital for
alcoholics in Texas. Early in 1953, Searcy had asked Bill what he would like
to see happen in AA, and Bill said, "I would like for Ebby to have a chance to
sober up in your clinic." Several months later, it came to pass, and after a
short slip in 1954, Ebby remained sober for seven years.
In 1961, Ebby's girlfriend died and the next day Ebby got drunk. He apparently
still believed that his sobriety was conditional on having the right woman,
and now she was gone. Ebby moved back to New York and lived at several places
for the next two years, one of which was at his brother Ken's home in Delmar,
a suburb of Albany. He had emphysema, the same disease that caused Bill's
death, and was in poor health, his weight having dropped from 170 to 122
pounds.
Ebby eventually came to Margaret and Micky McPike's farm outside Ballston Spa,
New York, in May, 1964 and it was under their loving care that he finished the
final two years of his life, dying sober on March 21, 1966.
FROM: karlbateman2000@yahoo.com
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1945. . . . . . . . . . . . keep coming back, it works if you work
it
From: David Ingram . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/26/2004 4:31:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Greetings;
I have inadequately searched the archives trying to answer this question and
thought I would try a broad appeal.
In my home group we close our meetings holding hands and reciting the Lords
Prayer, but before breaking the chain we say "keep coming back, it works if
you work it". We're trying to learn anything about the origin & introduction
of the latter statement.
Many grateful Thank You's in advance - David
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail [88] - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 1946. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: NY-AA@att.net on the Old Preamble
From: Arthur . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/26/2004 4:42:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:black;">I have a very similar preamble that was
used by the first group in Fort Worth,
Texas in 1946 (perhps earlier).
Parts of the preamble were taken (near verbatim) from the 1940 Akron
Manual.
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:black;">
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:black;">Cheers
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:black;">Arthur
*ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, INC.*
*GROUP ONE*
*REGULAR PREFACE TO MEETINGS *
We are all gathered here because we are faced with the fact that
we are powerless over alcohol and are unable to do anything about it without
the help of a Power greater than ourselves.
We feel that each person's religious views, if any, are their own
affair, and the simple purpose of the program of Alcoholics Anonymous is to
show each of us what we can do to enlist the aid of a Power Greater than
Ourselves, regardless of what our individual conception of that Power may be.
That in order to form a habit of depending upon and referring all we do to
that
Power, we must at first apply ourselves with some diligence, but by often
repeating these acts, they become habitual, and the help rendered becomes
Share with your friends: |