From: Bill Lash . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/3/2006 11:39:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Yeah, I would really love a copy of that transcript
too. If anyone wants a copy of the two CD set
of the introduction of the 12 Traditions at the
1st International Conference of AA in Cleveland OH
in 1950 (includes commentary from founding AA members),
I have then for $14 plus $2 shipping.
I specialized in recordings of early AA members
and have over 200 talks by people who came in
to AA in the 1930s and 1940s. Go with God.
Just Love,
Barefoot Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of abigapple2002
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:16 PM
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] First World Conference transcripts
I know that when the Traditions were accepted by the fellowship, Bill
had one speaker talk about two traditions in each talk. I was
wondering if anyone might know how to find transcripts or tapes of
those talks. Thank you very much.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3673. . . . . . . . . . . . AA Bulletin #1 (11/14/40)
From: Bill Lash . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/4/2006 9:52:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
THE ALCOHOLIC FOUNDATION
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS - ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS
Box 658, Church Street Annex, New York City
#1, AA BULLETIN, 11/14/40
We wish to thank our many friends and correspondents all over the country
for their cooperation in keeping the national headquarters informed of
developments in the various groups. It is through such a central exchange
that vital information and contact points can be brought to the attention of
those who seek the solution to alcoholism which means so much to us.
This bulletin is an effort to develop a mutual idea exchange sheet to
establish a closer feeling of friendship between A.A. groups from the east
coast to the west, and we hope it will prevent secession from the A.A. ranks
of our San Francisco group who threatened to call themselves
"Dipsomaniacs
Incognito" unless they heard from us more frequently. A bulletin has
been
contemplated for some time but delayed due to lack of sufficient personnel
and office facilities. We now have at least the equipment and hope to be
able to make this bulletin a periodic spree (not alcoholic).
This office has in the last year handled over 2000 inquiries answering each
by personal letter. In addition, correspondence is maintained with about 50
centers where A.A. work is in operation, varying from the solitary efforts
of single isolated A.A. members to groups of 150.
In view of the fact that in April 1939 there were only about 100 A.A.
members, and the fact that there is now a total of approximately 1400, your
efforts and ours have been exceptionally worth while. Continued A.A.
activity will mean a great deal not only to each of us as individuals, but
also to the many who are still unaware of the fact that there is an answer
to the alcoholic problem which is practicable on a large scale.
Our correspondence reaches not only the four corners of the U.S. but also
touches Alaska, Africa, England, France and Australia. Although nothing of
consequence has developed as yet in these distant places, nevertheless it is
indicative of the widespread interest in Alcoholics Anonymous, of the far
reaching results already obtained, and the possibilities for the future.
For the general information of all A.A. members, we list below those cities
where there are isolated A.A. members who have recovered either through the
book alone or through brief contact with established centers.
Cohoes, N.Y.
Buffalo, N.Y.
Denver, Colorado
Shelby, North Carolina
Greensboro, North Carolina
Aiken, South Carolina
Bellingham, Washington
Bismarck, North Dakota
Burlington, Vermont
Bennington, Vermont
Norfolk, Virginia
Kansas City, Missouri
St. Louis, Missouri
Knoxville, Tennessee
Eau Clare, Wisconsin
Phoenix, Arizona
There are several "working" A.A. members in each of the
following cities
where meetings are in a get together stage.
Pittsburgh, PA.
Boston, Mass.
Wallingford, Vermont
San Diego, California
Indianapolis, Ind.
And following is a list of communities where A.A. is well established and
weekly meetings are held:
New York City, N.Y.
South Orange, N.J.
Washington, D.C.
Richmond, VA.
Detroit, Michigan
Jackson, Michigan
Coldwater, Michigan
Chicago, Illinois
Houston, Texas
Los Angeles, Calif.
San Francisco, Calif.
Evansville, Indiana
Little Rock, Arkansas
Philadelphia, PA.
Baltimore, MD.
Waunakee, Wisconsin
Greenwich, Conn.
Cleveland, Ohio
Akron, Ohio
Toledo, Ohio
Dayton, Ohio
Youngstown, Ohio
The secretary or correspondent of each group has the name and address of at
least one member in each of the established groups for the use of traveling
or visiting members. However, at the request of many of these groups may we
ask that the New York office be used as a clearing house for all
correspondence since but few local groups are equipped to handle the
correspondence now coming to them from so many different directions. We
shall gladly give full particulars about any of the listed communities upon
request.
We all know that the A.A. solution really works if followed with patience,
honesty and sincerity so we sympathize with the new prospect who said he
certainly DID want to stop drinking but after listening a few minutes to our
A.A. story said "Oh that!! - I tried it for two weeks and it
doesn't work".
We shall appreciate receiving ideas, suggestions, criticisms, etc. of
general interest for the purpose of this bulletin is to relate the many A.A.
groups in a friendly spirit.
So best regards to all and let us hear from you at any and all times.
Ruth Hock (signed)
Secretary
P.S.
Since it is not possible at the present time for us to furnish enough copies
for distribution to every A.A. member, perhaps you will feel it advisable to
read this copy aloud at a meeting.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3674. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Re: Richard Peabody died drunk?
Documentation?
From: michael oates . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/4/2006 7:25:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Is the purpose of the question of whteher Peabody
died drunk to prove only AA founders died sober,
what is the point, because earlier on the site it
has been documented that not many of the first 100
the Big Book refers to made it to their deaths
sober, i thought this was an intellectual site
not a shrill for AA. If the purpose is anything
other than AA History then discontinue me.
______________________________
Note from the moderator:
Hi, I think you're being a little unfair.
In commenting on the way Peabody's book influenced
Bill Wilson, someone commented that the Peabody
method did not in fact work very well (something
with which everyone agrees), and went on to say that
Peabody himself in fact died drunk.
The spirit of Peabody's book is basically that
of "buck yourself up, and quit acting like a
spoiled child, and learn how to be a REAL MAN,
and start exercising some control over your drinking,
and start using some will power like REAL MEN do,
and quit being such a whimpering little sissy."
It was the spirit of Jack London novels and some
of the other "be a REAL RUGGED HE MAN and stop
being molly coddled by your over protective Mommy"
popular American literature and pop psychology
of that period.
During the 1920's and 30's, in popular American
literature, there was a fad for blaming men's
mothers for everything that was wrong with them
after they grew up. My father certainly read the
Jack London novels and the Zane Grey westerns and
all that, and believed all of that! (I was born
in 1939, so you can place this in history.)
Go see the old Hollywood cowboy movies of that
time, to understand that popular fad better, and
read some of the cheap pulp literature of that
period.
Or read the little piece by the founder of AA
in northern Indiana, Kenneth G. Merrill, "Drunks
Are a Mess" ( http://hindsfoot.org/nsbend2.html ).
Most of what he says is very good, and has things
we can learn from today. In fact it is one of
the best short introductions to the psychological
aspects of the AA program ever written. But even
Ken Merrill was a man of his times, and he slips
in one paragraph that shows the influence of the
"rugged he man" fad on the American psyche at
that period:
"But of all other causes put together, none equals
the sinister potency, in creating future alcoholics,
of a harsh, cruel, disciplinarian type of father,
coupled with an over-soft, over-affectionate,
over-possessive mother. A mom who conspires with
sonny to evade papa's wrath, who carries her
protectiveness into fields beyond the home, and
attempts ceaselessly, and usually successfully,
to insulate the child from the normal, wholesome
buffets of ordinary childhood experience. It
becomes a hideous circle. The more impossible
rules the father lays down for the child to follow,
the more failures accumulate, the more bitter the
father's persecution, the more maudlin and
sentimental the mother's attempts to protect and
compensate. Between them, believe me they do
a job."
Rich Dubiel's book on the Emmanuel Movement and
the Jacoby Club (which is very important for AA
history) says that Peabody renounced some of the
principles which the EM and the JC were using
(because the EM and JC called upon the power of
God's grace to help us do what we could never do
alone), and that this was what made Peabody's
system so weak and ineffective in practice.
The early AA people were wiser, Rich says, and
picked up the good points of the EM and JC system,
and insisted that we had to call upon God's grace
for help, and ignored Peabody's attempt to change
that vital part of the EM and JC system
( http://hindsfoot.org/kDub1.html and
http://hindsfoot.org/kDub2.html ).
It's fair game to talk about whether alcoholics
involved in AA history (including those who were
not AA members, but with whom we were in contact,
like Ebby Thacher and Rowland Hazard, and the
people involved in the Jacoby Club, which heavily
influenced early Boston AA) were able to find a
solution to their drinking problem, either
IN or OUT of AA.
It's fair game to ask how well early AA worked in
fact, and also how well some of the other systems
worked in fact (like the Oxford Group, the Emmanuel
Movement and Jacoby Club, and Peabody's method)
to see why the early AA people decided to discard
some of the principles involved in those other
groups.
Otherwise, we would NOT be honest historians, and
would in fact be running a shill for AA.
At that point, someone else wrote in and said,
don't say things like that about Peabody if you
can't prove it, otherwise it's the worst kind of
malicious gossip mongering.
And the person who originally wrote that, who is
an honest historian, had to admit that he was
stating something that he did not know for a one
hundred per cent guaranteed fact, although there
was some significant supporting evidence.
So our AA historians have been checking that
question out, simply to establish what the facts
were here. And the answer at this point seems to
be that we cannot know all of the facts surrounding
Peabody's last days for sure, and that there may
in fact have even been ameliorating circumstances
(medical doctors sometimes prescribed small amounts
of alcohol for heart patients in that period of
history, as they did for my grandfather, who was
not an alcoholic, during his last years, which
was during the 1950's).
So it is unfortunate that we cannot necessarily
come up with a one hundred percent guaranteed
answer to this particular question, but that is
the nature of all real historical research. Not
all historical questions can be answered with one
hundred percent certainty. A good professional
historian has to know, not only what we DO know
for a fact, but what we do NOT know for an absolute
fact.
Nevertheless, we CAN say that we do not have much
(if any) reliable data supporting the assertion that
the Peabody method was a very workable method of
dealing with alcoholism. And we can say that, in
spite of the popularity of his book among the
general public at that time, it wasn't going to
be a real winner when it came to effectively
dealing with the problem of alcoholism in the
United States (where it was then, and still is,
the third leading cause of death). That's why
nobody tries to use the Peabody method any more.
My own very rough observations are that, out of
all the alcoholics whom I have known who obtained
a five year survival rate (five years of unbroken
sobriety), around 1% did that by will power alone
(essentially the Peabody method), around 1% did
that by going to a conservative evangelical church
and reading the Bible and praying to Jesus as
their Lord and Savior, and the other 98% get
sober in AA. More alcoholics by far get sober in
AA than by any other way, but I know of no sensible
observer (including all of the people who regularly
contribute to this web group) who would deny that
the other two methods also sometimes work.
At the present stage of research, it seems clear
that Peabody's book, in spite of the fact that it
was very widely read and very popular for a while,
stopped being read and used because it simply
didn't work very well, if at all. And the
evidence surrounding Peabody's drinking during
his own last years gives us at least no unambiguous
evidence that the system worked for him either.
On the basic issue, the fact is that almost nothing
in the AA program was totally invented by the early
AA people themselves. Almost everything in the
AA program originally came from somewhere else,
and had been said by somebody else before. So
a decent history of early AA will be forced to
write about the earlier attempts to deal with
alcoholism in the United States from which the
early AA people learned either (a) good ideas
which they could borrow or (b) bad ideas which
they needed to leave out of their new AA program
if they wanted it to be as successful as possible.
So we have no choice, when writing a full account
of early AA history, but to write at least a
little about things like the Oxford Group; the
Emmanuel Movement and the Jacoby Club; Rowland
Hazard and Carl Jung; Peabody's book; neo-Freudian
psychiatrists like Adler; representatives of the
New Thought movement like Emmet Fox and James Allen
( http://hindsfoot.org/kML3rc1.html ); and other
ideas and movements of the early twentieth century.
These become of interest to AA historians when
it is clear that they had an effect on the way
early AA people thought and believed.
But those members of the group who are not
interested in these things, and who want to
focus solely on working out the dates and facts
surrounding the lives of early AA members and
early AA publications, should just delete these
messages about the background to early AA.
That's the advantage of being in a web group,
as opposed to having to sit through a long
conference, when one of the speakers spends
a half hour ranting about something you aren't
the slightest bit interested in (and anyway,
you don't LIKE the jerk, he's obnoxious).
Hit the delete button!
But there is NO WAY that anyone could post
messages for a group of over 1400 people all
around the world, and guarantee that each
individual member will NEVER see a message posted
that he or she finds uninteresting (grin).
Heck, I've seen strings of messages posted on
this web site on certain occasions on things
that I personally thought were unbelievably
pedantic and boring, but some of the other
members of the group found that topic fascinating,
and since they are members of the group in good
standing, they have their rights too.
In the list of topics at the beginning of
my heavily used and well worn copy of "As Bill
Sees It: The A.A. Way of Life ... selected
writings of A.A.'s cofounder" (23rd printing,
1989) there is a long list of reading on the
topic of "tolerance" for other members of the
program, warts and all (grin).
Glenn C. (South Bend, Indiana)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3675. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Significant September dates in
A.A. History
From: Bristol Fashion . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/5/2006 2:52:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Can you fit the following date in somewhere?
Sept 1971 First European Convention, Bristol, England
Yours
Sally Cousins
Archivist
______________________________
Note from the moderator:
Yes, please, AA is a movement for the whole
world. The annual Bristol Convention has become
the central gathering place for AA historians
and archivists, not just in the British Isles
(England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales)
but drawing many participants from the continent
of Europe.
It is a really first-rate gathering.
We have AAHistoryLovers members from a number
of European countries including Germany, France,
Belgium, the Scandinavian countries, Finland,
etc.
Also many other parts of the world, including
Mexico, India, Israel, Australia, New Zealand,
and so on, all over the globe.
Significant dates and historical figures and
events from all over the world are welcome and
heartily encouraged in this forum.
We're all in this together, guys.
Glenn C. (South Bend, Indiana, USA)
______________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "chesbayman56"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 4:55 AM
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Significant September dates in A.A. History
> Significant September Dates in A.A. History
> Sept 1930 - Bill wrote 4th (last) promise in family Bible to quit
> drinking.
> Sept 1939 - group started by Earl T in Chicago.
> Sept 1940 - AA group started in Toledo by Duke P and others.
> Sept 1940 - Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases gives Big Book
> unfavorable review.
> Sept 1946 - Bill and Dr. Bob both publicly endorsed National
Committee
> Education Alcoholism founded by Marty M.
> Sept 1946 - 1st A.A. group in Mexico.
> Sept 1948 - Bob writes article for Grapevine on AA "Fundamentals -
> In Retrospect".
> Sept 1949 - 1st issue of Grapevine published in "pocketbook"
size.
> Sept 1, 1939 - 1st AA group founded in Chicago.
> Sept 11, 2001 - 30 Vesey St, New York. Location of AA's first office
> is destroyed during the World Trade Center attack.
> Sept 12, 1942 - U.S. Assist. Surgeon General Kolb speaks at dinner
> for Bill and Dr Bob.
> Sept 13, 1937 - Florence R, 1st female in AA in NY.
> Sept 13, 1941 - WHJP in Jacksonville, FL airs Spotlight on AA.
> Sept 17, 1954 - Bill D, AA #3 dies.
> Sept 18, 1947 - Dallas Central Office opens its doors.
> Sept 19, 1965 - The Saturday Evening Post publishes
> article "Alcoholics Can Be Cured - Despite AA"
> Sept 19, 1975 - Jack Alexander, author of original Saturday Evening
> Post article, dies.
> Sept 21, 1938 - Bill W and Hank P form Works Publishing Co.
> Sept 24, 1940 - Bill 12th steps Bobbie V, who later replaced Ruth
> Hock as his secretary in NY.
> Sept 30, 1939 - article in Liberty magazine, "Alcoholics and
God" > by Morris
Markey.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3676. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: First World Conference
transcripts
From: ArtSheehan . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/4/2006 2:31:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi
First, a little bit of AA trivia: the 1950 event in Cleveland, OH at
which the Traditions were approved was called an "International
Conference." From the 2nd one on in 1955 (in St Louis, MO) they
started getting called an "International Convention" (probably to
not
confuse them with the General Service Conference).
A recap of the 1950 Cleveland, OH proceedings is in a September 1950
Grapevine article by Bill W titled "We Come of Age." The
"Language of
the Heart" (pgs 102-121) gives the title of the article as "We
Came of
Age." I've been using the erroneous title of the article for some
time. A full transcription of the article by Fiona Dodd (who specifies
the correct title) can be found in AAHL message #3595. An extract:
"Several thousand of us crowded into the Cleveland Music Hall for the
Tradition meeting, which was thought by most AAs to be the high point
of our Conference. Six old-time stalwarts, coming from places far
flung as Boston and San Diego, beautifully reviewed the years of AA
experience which had led to the writing of our Tradition."
Bill was then asked to sum up the Traditions. He did not recite either
the short or long form. He paraphrased a version which is an amalgam
of both forms:
"That, touching all matters affecting AA unity, our common welfare
should come first; that AA has no human authority - only God as he may
speak in our Group Conscience; that our leaders are but trusted
servants, they do not govern; that any alcoholic may become an AA
Share with your friends: |