member if he says so - we exclude no one; that every AA Group may
manage its own affairs as it likes, provided surrounding groups are
not harmed thereby; that we AAs have but a single aim, the carrying of
our message to the alcoholic who still suffers; that in consequence we
cannot finance, endorse or otherwise lend the name 'Alcoholics
Anonymous' to any other enterprise, however worthy; that AA, as such,
ought to remain poor, lest problems of property, management and money
divert us from our sole aim; that we ought to be self-supporting,
gladly paying our small expenses ourselves; that AA should remain
forever non-professional, ordinary 12th Step work never to be paid
for; that, as a Fellowship, we should never be organized but may
nevertheless create responsible Service Boards or Committees to insure
us better propagation and sponsorship and that these agencies may
engage fulltime workers for special tasks; that our public relations
ought to proceed upon the principle of attraction rather than
promotion, it being better to let our friends recommend us; that
personal anonymity at the level of press, radio and pictures ought to
be strictly maintained as our best protection, against the temptations
of power or personal ambition; and finally, that anonymity before the
general public is the spiritual key to all our Traditions, ever
reminding us we are always to place principles before personalities,
that we are actually to practice a genuine humility. This to the end
that our great blessings may never spoil us; that we shall forever
live in thankful contemplation of Him who presides over us all."
Following his recitation, Bill then asked if anyone objected. No one
did. Bill then offered them for adoption and the attendees approved
them unanimously by standing vote.
The short form of the Traditions was first published in the November
1949 issue of the Grapevine. Many folks think the short form of the
Traditions, as we know them today, were approved in 1950 at Cleveland
but that's not true. Two wording changes were subsequently made to the
November 1949 short form version: the term "primary spiritual aim"
was
changed to "primary purpose" in Tradition Six, and the term
"principles above personalities" was changed to "principles
before
personalities" in Tradition Twelve. The short form version we use
today appears to have been Conference-approved with publication of the
12and12 in 1953. In 1952, Al-Anon Family Groups adopted and adapted the
1949 version for their version of the Traditions which still uses the
earlier wording.
Bill W's notation that "Six old-time stalwarts, coming from places far
flung as Boston and San Diego, beautifully reviewed the years of AA
experience which had led to the writing of our Tradition" does not
explicitly mention that the 6 speakers reviewed 2 Traditions each. The
impression I have (and it's only an impression) is that they spoke
about the Traditions in general. If you have a source that confirms
that they talked about 2 Traditions each, I'd be most grateful to find
out what it is.
In a May 1951 Grapevine article, T.C. from Winnipeg Canada noted that
"You journey to the First International Conference at Cleveland, to
hear the Traditions confirmed. You do not hear the Traditions
confirmed. Six fine looking men, from varying walks of life, with
varying ages of sobriety - interpreted. Bill summarized: The
Traditions are lessons gained in experience, written physically by his
hand, actually by the Group Conscience; he thanked God that he had
never been allowed to assume a mantle of leadership or authority. Then
you found that you had risen to your feet with every other person
there, and were adding your little bit, to the thunderous and steady
applause. No - you did not hear the Traditions confirmed. You felt
them confirmed."
Both Bill's talk and the talks by the 6 members were offered for a
period of years on 38rpm LP records. The July 1951 Grapevine carries a
brief article that states:
There are recordings of two of the meetings of the First International
Conference in Cleveland, 1950, on sale at your General Service Office.
The Big Meeting (four sides of two Long Playing Records) Dr. Bob and
Bill speaking, sells for $8.50. The Traditions Meeting (four sides of
two LP records) with Bill and six other speakers, sells for $7.00.
Both meetings ordered together are $15.00.
I'm unable to determine if those LPs ever found their way on to
audiotapes or are available over the internet on the many web sites
that make historic AA recordings available. If you find a source where
the talks have been digitized, I'd also appreciate your letting
AAHistoryLovers know about it.
Cheers
Arthur
-----Original Message-----
From: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of abigapple2002
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 12:16 PM
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] First World Conference transcripts
I know that when the Traditions were accepted by the fellowship, Bill
had one speaker talk about two traditions in each talk. I was
wondering if anyone might know how to find transcripts or tapes of
those talks. Thank you very much.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3677. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: How to identify 1st printing 1st
edition Big Books
From: ArtSheehan . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/4/2006 4:15:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi Bob
First off, if the cover is red then it's a 1st printing, 1st edition
Big Book. The covers of all other printings, except for the 4th
printing, were in various shades of blue. Also on the title page,
under the title "Alcoholics Anonymous" if the subtitle states
"The
story how one hundred ..." it's a 1st printing.
On April, 1935 - 4,730 copies of the 1st edition of "Alcoholics
Anonymous" were published at a selling price of $3.50 ($46 in today's
dollars). The printer, Edward Blackwell, president of Cornwall Press,
was told to use the thickest paper in his shop. The large, bulky
volume became known as the "Big Book" and the name has stuck ever
since. The idea behind the large size was to convince the alcoholic he
was getting his money's worth. Ray C (whose Big Book story is "An
Artist's Concept") designed the "circus color" dust jacket.
The book
had 8 roman and 400 Arabic numbered pages. The Doctor's Opinion
started as page 1 and the basic text ended at page 174 not 164. The
manuscript story of an Akron member titled "Ace Full - Seven -
Eleven"
was dropped (reputedly, because he was not too pleased with changes
made to the first drafts of the Steps and text). 29 stories were
included (10 from the east coast, 18 from the mid-west and 1 from the
west coast which was ghost written by Ruth Hock).
There were a number of significant changes made to the 2nd printing of
the 1st edition Big Book:
In March 1941, in the 2nd printing, the wording of Step Twelve
changed. The term "spiritual experience" was changed to
"spiritual
awakening" and "as the result of these steps" was changed to
"as the
result of those steps." The story "Lone Endeavor" (of Pat C
from CA,
ghost written by Ruth Hock) was removed. Appendix II "Spiritual
Experience" was added. Many members thought they had to have a sudden,
spectacular spiritual experience similar to the one Bill had in Towns
Hospital. The appendix emphasized that most spiritual experiences
developed slowly over time and were of the "educational variety."
William James, by the way did not explicitly use the term "educational
variety" in his 1902 book titled "The Varieties of Religious
Experience - A Study In Human Nature."
From what I can glean, the first batch or so of the 1st printing, 1st
edition Big Books did not have a dust jacket. They were bound in a
clear cellophane type wrap which was attached to the inside of the
front and back covers with Scotch Tape. If your copy has tape residue
marks on the inside of the covers it would be one of the earliest
books off the printing press. The rarest of the rare versions of the
1st edition Big Book is reputedly the batch that has a green cover and
tissue like paper from the 4th printing. It was the result of World
war II rationing requirements. I've also been told by folks I consider
expert in the matter that a 1st printing, 1st edition dust jacket in
very good condition would command the same collector's price as the
book itself.
In 1956, the wording of Step Twelve changed again in the 2nd printing
of the 2nd edition Big Book. The term "as the result of those
steps"
was changed back to the original term "as the result of these
steps."
I don't know who to attribute it to (it's likely from Barefoot Bill's
web site) but info similar to that below can be found on the web for
all 15 printings of the 1st edition.
1st Edition - 1st Printing
Title states "One hundred men"
29 personal stories
Cover is red, only printing in red.
Story "Ace Full - Seven - Eleven" deleted.
Jacket spine and front flap do not have a print number.
Arabic numbers start at "Doctor's Opinion".
400 arabic numbered pages (8 roman).
Stories: 10 East Coast, 18 Midwest, 1 West Coast.
P234-L27, typo. L26 duplicated as L27.
Published by Works Publishing Company.
1st Edition - 2nd Printing
Title states "Two thousand men and women"
28 personal stories
Cover changed to navy blue, some light blue.
Gold lettering deleted from cover, remained on spine.
Added Appendix II - Spiritual Experience p399.
Jacket spine and front flap has print number.
Stayed at 400 arabic pages (8 roman)
Added footnote "See Appendix II" p35, 38, 72.
P25-L23, 80 of us to 500 of us.
P25-L26, 40-80 persons to 50-200 persons.
P63-L13, 100 people to Hundreds of People
P72-L03, Spiritual Experience to Awakening.
P72-L04, Result of These Steps to Those.
P175-L23, Many Hundreds to 500.
P234-L27, Typo corrected, 126 not repeated.
P391-L01, Added "Now We Are Two Thousand."
P397-L01, Moved "Foundation" here from p399.
1st Edition - 3rd Printing
Title changed - "Six thousand men and women"
Personal stories remain the same thru 1:16.
Cover changed to light blue.
Reduced in thickness 1/8 and height 1/16.
P25-L23, 500 of us to 1000 of us.
P27-L01, 100 Men to Hundreds of Men.
P26-L13, Sober 3years to sober 5 years.
P264-L13, (no time) to sober 5 years.
P281-L09, 9 months to past 4 tears.
P391, L01, Now we are 2,000 to 6,000.
P392,L19, 3,000 letters to 12,000 letters.
P393-L06, Increased 20 fold to 60 fold.
P393-L12, 5,000 by 01/42 to 8,000 by 01/43.
P393-L24, 9 Groups in Cleveland to 25.
P393-L24, 500 members in Cleveland to 1,000.
P393-L26, 1,000 Non-A.A. people to 2,000.
P398-L03, Touching to Touching Nationally.
Cheers
Arthur
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3678. . . . . . . . . . . . Why no amends to family on page 76?
From: Carl P. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/5/2006 9:54:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Steps Eight and Nine, making amends:
Big Book 4th edition pg 76 chapter "Into Action."
"Probably there are still some misgivings. As we
look over the list of business acquaintances and
friends we have hurt, we feel diffident about
going to some of them on a spiritual basis....."
My home group has a question regarding the above
paragraph and have asked for the AA History lovers'
views and opinions. Why in this paragraph is there
no mention made of making amends to members of our
families whom we may have harmed?
Many thanks
Carl P
Barking Big Book Study(The Way Out)
_________________________________
From the moderator: for our members in other
parts of the world, the London Borough of Barking
and Dagenham is in England, located in the County
of Greater London on the eastern side.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3679. . . . . . . . . . . . The first 27 AA groups
From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/5/2006 2:47:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The list of the first 27 AA groups in the world,
as of November 14, 1940, is an important document
for early AA history, giving us some idea of the
directions in which early AA spread from its
original foundation in Akron, Ohio, and in the
greater New York City area.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EAST COAST (including the greater New York City
area, but also New England and the Old South):
Connecticut: Greenwich
Maryland: Baltimore
Massachusetts: Boston
New Jersey: South Orange
New York City
Philadelphia: Philadelphia
Vermont: Wallingford
Virginia: Richmond
Washington, D.C.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
UPPER MIDWEST (forming a kind of
circle around the Great Lakes region):
Illinois: Chicago
Indiana: Evansville
Indiana: Indianapolis
Michigan: Coldwater
Michigan: Detroit
Michigan: Jackson
Ohio: Akron
Ohio: Cleveland
Ohio: Dayton
Ohio: Toledo
Ohio: Youngstown
Pennsylvania: Pittsburgh
Wisconsin: Waunakee
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SOUTHWEST:
Texas: Houston
Arkansas: Little Rock
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WEST COAST:
California: San Diego
California: Los Angeles
California: San Francisco
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Taken from the document in Message No. 3673 at
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/3673
sent in by Barefoot Bill L.
THE ALCOHOLIC FOUNDATION
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS
Box 658, Church Street Annex, New York City
#1, AA BULLETIN, 11/14/40
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3680. . . . . . . . . . . . Helen Worden, "New Hope for Old
Soaks"
From: John Wikelius . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/5/2006 1:31:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I have an article written by Helen Worden,
"New Hope for Old Soaks". I would like to find
out what magazine this was published in. It is
3 pages long and seems to be the size of a Time
or Newsweek magazine but that might not be
true.
Name and date of magazine needed.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3681. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Helen Worden, "New Hope for Old
Soaks"
From: Jim B . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/5/2006 4:38:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I have an article written by Helen Worden,
"New Hope for Old Soaks".
Name and date of magazine needed.
Published in Argosy Magazine, October 1944.
The same article was published in Reader's Digest, November 1944 under the
title "Maybe I can Do It too."
Jim
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3682. . . . . . . . . . . . National Archives Workshop: Sept.
14-17, 2006
From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/5/2006 3:37:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
10th Annual National Archives Workshop
September 14-17, 2006
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Because of the confusion arising over the
cancellation of the national AA archives
gathering in New Orleans in Fall 2005 (because
of the devasting hurricane), I am posting a
reminder that it WILL be held this year, in
Baton Rouge, which is in a part of Louisiana
that was not so heavily damaged by the
hurricane.
To: glennccc@sbcglobal.net
From: "Area64tnarchives.org"
(daggerrose at area64tnarchives.org)
Subject: 10th Annual National Archives
Workshop "Preserving Our Past For Our Future"
September 14-17, 2006
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Co Chairs:
Jimmy H. mailto:jhardingnola@cox.net
(jhardingnola at cox.net)
Bobby B. mailto:danieb@att.net
(danieb at att.net)
Workshops, Seminars, Speakers, Banquet
Holiday Inn South
9940 Airline Hi-Way
Baton Rouge 70816
Ph# (225) 924-7021 Fax (225) 924-9816
Mention N.A.W. by August 31, 2006
for $79.00 night rate.
Registration $35.00
Banquet $29.00
Download Workshop Flyer here.
http://www.aanationalarchivesworkshop.com/flyer06.pdf
Download Hotel Registration here.
http://www.aanationalarchivesworkshop.com/hotel.pdf
Download Workshop Schedule here
http://www.aanationalarchivesworkshop.com/NATIONAL%20ARCHIVES%20Schedule%20_
2_.p\
df [10]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3683. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Re: Richard Peabody died drunk?
Documentation?
From: ArtSheehan . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/5/2006 6:34:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The notion that many of the first 100 AA members died died drunk is a
myth sustained solely by anecdotal repetition. It's a variant of the
myth that most of the members who had their stories printed in the Big
Book died drunk and is the stuff of circuit speaker dramatics. Please
reference AAHL message #2464 which attempts to refute the myth.
The citations made regarding Peabody derive from a very well
researched academic paper written by an historian for the Journal of
Studies on Alcohol. She had no agenda or axe to grind. Asking whether
someone died drunk or sober certainly seems to be relevant to the
study and reporting of Alcoholics Anonymous history.
Cheers
Arthur
-----Original Message-----
From: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of michael oates
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 6:25 PM
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [AAHistoryLovers] Re: Richard Peabody died drunk?
Documentation?
Is the purpose of the question of whteher Peabody died drunk to prove
only AA founders died sober, what is the point, because earlier on the
site it has been documented that not many of the first 100 the Big
Book refers to made it to their deaths sober, i thought this was an
intellectual site not a shrill for AA. If the purpose is anything
other than AA History then discontinue me.
______________________________
Note from the moderator:
Hi, I think you're being a little unfair.
In commenting on the way Peabody's book influenced Bill Wilson,
someone commented that the Peabody method did not in fact work very
well (something with which everyone agrees), and went on to say that
Peabody himself in fact died drunk.
The spirit of Peabody's book is basically that of "buck yourself up,
and quit acting like a spoiled child, and learn how to be a REAL MAN,
and start exercising some control over your drinking, and start using
some will power like REAL MEN do, and quit being such a whimpering
little sissy."
It was the spirit of Jack London novels and some of the other "be a
REAL RUGGED HE MAN and stop being molly coddled by your over
protective Mommy"
popular American literature and pop psychology of that period.
During the 1920's and 30's, in popular American literature, there was
a fad for blaming men's mothers for everything that was wrong with
them after they grew up. My father certainly read the Jack London
novels and the Zane Grey westerns and all that, and believed all of
that! (I was born in 1939, so you can place this in history.)
Go see the old Hollywood cowboy movies of that time, to understand
that popular fad better, and read some of the cheap pulp literature of
that period.
Or read the little piece by the founder of AA in northern Indiana,
Kenneth G. Merrill, "Drunks Are a Mess" (
http://hindsfoot.org/nsbend2.html ).
Most of what he says is very good, and has things we can learn from
today. In fact it is one of the best short introductions to the
psychological aspects of the AA program ever written. But even Ken
Merrill was a man of his times, and he slips in one paragraph that
shows the influence of the "rugged he man" fad on the American
psyche
at that period:
"But of all other causes put together, none equals the sinister
potency, in creating future alcoholics, of a harsh, cruel,
disciplinarian type of father, coupled with an over-soft,
over-affectionate, over-possessive mother. A mom who conspires with
sonny to evade papa's wrath, who carries her protectiveness into
fields beyond the home, and attempts ceaselessly, and usually
successfully, to insulate the child from the normal, wholesome buffets
of ordinary childhood experience. It becomes a hideous circle. The
more impossible rules the father lays down for the child to follow,
the more failures accumulate, the more bitter the father's
persecution, the more maudlin and sentimental the mother's attempts to
protect and compensate. Between them, believe me they do a job."
Rich Dubiel's book on the Emmanuel Movement and the Jacoby Club (which
is very important for AA
history) says that Peabody renounced some of the principles which the
EM and the JC were using (because the EM and JC called upon the power
of God's grace to help us do what we could never do alone), and that
this was what made Peabody's system so weak and ineffective in
practice.
The early AA people were wiser, Rich says, and picked up the good
points of the EM and JC system, and insisted that we had to call upon
God's grace for help, and ignored Peabody's attempt to change that
vital part of the EM and JC system ( http://hindsfoot.org/kDub1.html
and http://hindsfoot.org/kDub2.html ).
Share with your friends: |