the AA name and with no Oxford Group affiliation.
Clarence has presentday devotees who use his methods and report wonderful
outcomes as a result. That speaks well for Clarence and ought to be
publicized for those who will accept the special points he offered. His
wife, Grace, carried on his work after his passing in 1984.
Clarence was continuously critical of Bill W. and told me that "Bill
never
had a program." Bill was always conciliatory towards Clarence and never
stopped giving him credit for his fine work in Cleveland. He would have
liked having Clarence as a warm and supportive friend, but that didn't
happen. They did have a good conversation at the International Convention
in Toronot in 1965, a meeting initiated by Bill. I hope there is now
harmony as both of them attend meetings of the Big Group in the Sky.
Mel Barger
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3700. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: APOAR and Robert Emmett Rack
From: Joe Adams . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/11/2006 12:30:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I'm not old enough to have gone through APOAR, but my
father did and
swears by it. He's now 80 with 45 years of recovery
behind him (DOS:
2/6/1961). I have one of his two copies of APOAR -
Applied Principles of
Alcoholic Recovery, subtitled "Alocholism - A
Metaphysical Malady". My
copy gives a 1965 and 1966 copyrights with no mention
of previous
editions. Library of Congress Card No. A782629
When dad tried to get sober he had several shakey
starts and credits
the APOAR approach to locking him in. They focused on
the process* of
Steps 4 thru 9 and had a good deal of success in the
early 1960s with men
of the Freedom Group in downtown Los Angeles. The
book is not very
well written but saturated with experience on doing
the Inventory and
Amends steps.
*I say "process" because the book does not refer to
the the Twelve
Steps or Alocholics Anonymous in any of the portions
I've read. It is
clearly the Inventory (listed as "Knowledge") and
Amends (identified as
"Release"). Dad stil refers to 4 and 5 as the
Knowledge Steps and 6-7-8-9
as the Release Steps. That is not in the book. If
you are familier
with the Big Book and its history, it sometimes reads
like a lawyer
advising how to avoid being sued by AA.
Somehwere in the middle they switched from Applied
Principles of
ALCOHOLIC Recovery to Applied Principles of ADDICTIVE
Recovery - I suspect
some commercial possibilities were the reason for the
change.
The opening section of the book include "To The
Overweight Society"
with comment on Applied Principles of AVOIRDUPOIS
Recovery and connections
between alcoholism and overeating, followed with a
food plan that is
amazingly similar to Overeater's Anonymous original
"Grey Sheet"
abstinence food plan. Interesting.
From my dad's discussions with me about the One Way
Group and the
author, Rob someone who took the ideas of the steps
and presented them in a
way guys from Skid Row in L.A. could grasp, with solid
action and tons
of writing. Dad was one of many men who had trouble
starting his
sobriety and credits the deep inveotry of APOAR with
his foundation. Rob R.
thought he was going to be rich and became something
of a somebody in
West Coast recovery. For a time.
Dad says Rob hit a snag and found he needed to become
a more anonymous
to work his program. Apparently Mr. R went back into
AA as an
anonymous member and reclaimed his recovery. APOAR as
a franchise ... I'm not
sure where else it was used. Prisons would be
reasonable target - APOAR
offered hard core, no nonsense Recovery without any
veneer.
I treat it as a dialect of the message from the big
book. If I could
find a way scan the book without destroying the
binding, I would. The
book (8.5 x 11, green cover, tape binding with
staples, 199 pages,
multi-lith - which was one step up from mimeograph).
I have a scan of a small "Inventory Guide" that was
used in conjunction
with the APOAR book, but was not part of their
materials. I'll send a
copy of the scan with this message for Glenn to see if
it would be
appropriate to post to the group's Files section
I have pulled a good deal from their book for working
with the men I
have sponsored over the years. The focus is on a
THOROUGH 4th, followed
by 5 thru 9 give a foundation for recovery. The ones
who have gone
through a solid 9th tend to stick around and stay
sober. In myh own
experiences - which is just one drunk - everyone who
has stopped somewhere
between 5 and 9 have gone back out.
Hope that helps.
Shakey1aa@aol.com wrote:
Is anyone familiar with APOAR(Applied Principles
of Alcoholic Recovery) by Robert Emmett Rack and
if it is still being used in Prisons and
Institutions?
I'm not in "the field" but have looked at what he
has written and wonder about its success.
--------
A closed mouth gathers no feet.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3701. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Re: Richard Peabody died drunk?
Documentation?
From: ArtSheehan . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/11/2006 12:53:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi Mel
I have found only indirect, not direct, references about Peabody but
they seem to add some substance to the probability that he didn't stay
sober. Again though in fairness, I've not yet encountered "proof
positive." It reminds me somewhat of the assertions regarding Rowland
H and whether he died sober or not - I've seen what appears to be
credible reporting on both sides. However, in the message where I said
that Peabody died drunk I really should have said that Peabody may
have died drunk based on anecdotal reports.
I doubt strongly that the absence of the word "alcoholism"
specifically stated on a death certificate would serve to prove that
Peabody died sober. For example, people die of emphysema (such as Ebby
T and Bill W) yet the death certificate might show heart failure or
something else as opposed to "smoking" as the cause of death. The
effects of alcoholism on the body is equally pernicious in causing
death as a consequence of high blood pressure, diabetes, cirrhosis and
a host of other maladies that would likely not be described as
"alcoholism" on a death certificate.
Cheers
Arthur
-----Original Message-----
From: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mel Barger
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 8:40 PM
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [AAHistoryLovers] Re: Richard Peabody died drunk?
Documentation?
Hi Arthur,
I believe the article you referred to was written by Kathy McCarthy,
who is the daughter of the late Ray McCarthy, a pioneer in alcoholism
treatment.
I knew Kathy about 20 years ago but haven't been in touch with her
recently.
I don't have the article at hand but I seem to remember that she
said something like "it is commonly believed that Peabody died
drunk,"
or something like that.
"Commonly believed" is hearsay and not real verification. Nell
Wing also thought Peabody drank again, but had no proof of it. I'm
suspecting that all this may have been rumor from an early AA such as
Jim Burwell, who may or may not have had proof to support the claim.
In fairness to Peabody's memory, somebody ought to track this down
to determine what was the real cause of Peabody's death, as reported
on his death certificate.
Unless alcoholism was specifically stated there, we cannot assume he
actually went back to drinking.
Mel Barger
melb@accesstoledo.com
(melb at accesstoledo.com)
Yahoo! Groups Links
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3702. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Orthodox Movement?
From: ricktompkins@comcast.net . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/11/2006 10:41:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Good morning AAHL group,
The conduct of some early AA members (alluded to in the last few messages
about
the First International Convention) was closer to inciting mob action than
about
fostering unity.
I have read one letter, sent across the U.S. to AA groups of the time, from
a
New Jersey AA member who wrote in 1950 against the creation of the General
Service Conference. Full of suspicion and accusations, the letter closed
with
his name as a member of the Orthodox Group.
Did an organized Orthodox "Group" or "Movement" really
exist? Actually a small
number of AAs remained at constant odds with the 1940s Alcoholic Foundation
and
Bill in NYC, but I have found very few records of an actual "Orthodox
Group."
Remember that both Bill and Dr. Bob served as AF Trustees and examine one
recurring complaint: during the 1940s both Bill and Dr. Bob were rumored to
make
lots of money in royalties from Big Book sales. Bill presented the meager
fiscal
record of payments at meetings in Ohio and elsewhere that refuted the
charges of
profiteering. The idea of Bill and Bob receiving royalties as being
"hypocritical and anti-AA" softened up a bit when communication
improved.
Truth and fact never quieted those early personalities at odds with Bill,
but I
believe we are a better Fellowship today because of their opinions.
Incidentally, Bill experienced much frustration with the inactions of
non-alcoholic AF Trustees, when it came down to their understanding of our
developing AA Traditions as well as the concept of an annual World (General)
Service Conference. The Conference idea developed from years of a consensus
search before the November 1950 pamphlet "Our Third Legacy-Will You
Accept It?"
drove the final consensus search.
To an "Orthodox Movement" of the 1940s I could toss a few more
names in that
contrarian group but there seems no need to fling around any more of their
old
mud...
A lot of talk (and, in early AA, written words) is always cheap. Here in
Illinois AA Archives are letters written between a few 1940s Illinois
members in
various cities that are full of slander and sarcasm about other AAs. The
correspondence is under the sensitive/confidential classification level and
has
little relevance to Illinois AA history outside of being an examples of
colorful, personal, negative conduct.
I have never seen any evidence that Bill's tack was to counter-balance or
politick a consensus against an Orthodox Movement.
The intent to search for consensus actually developed a relatively strong
unity
for our adolescent Fellowship. Bill (and others) gave us an effective
example
for our own conduct, to seek diverse views and move forward. Our AA group
consciences (right or wrong, correct or in error) remain the driving force
of
prudent changes or reaffirmation, but fortunately we are a Fellowship that
corrects itself! Our Tradition Two, Concept Four, and Concept Five encourage
minority views, but emphasize that abiding with an informed group conscience
is
a much more important activity. There seem to be two types of criticism from
AA
members: constructive or libelous--we grow with one of them (the former) but
our
historical survival came with both.
Yours in fellowship,
Rick T., Illinois
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3703. . . . . . . . . . . . Clarence did not write program for
1st Internat''l Conf.
From: Mitchell K. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/10/2006 7:55:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Talk about resentments, being closed minded and
misquoting.
Clarence had nothing to do with the writing of the
program for that event. The Stanley brothers were
pretty much in charge. Art says "This was all part of
Clarence Snyder's claim..." Again Art - CLARENCE HAD
NOTHING TO DO WITH THE WRITING OF THE PROGRAM - THE
FINAL COPY, THE DRAFT COPY OR THE TENTATIVE COPY!
Clarence also never claimed that the Goldrick Group
was the first to use the TERM Alcoholics Anonymous to
describe itself. There is NO evidence or documentation
(maybe there is now, like the so-called loaner stamp
on the multilith which was never there before) showing
where gatherings of members of the Fellowship called
these meetings Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. Clarence
called the meeting itself an Alcoholics Anonymous
meeting after the book of the same name - he wasn't
referring to the Fellowship or the book or the
foundation but specifically the MEETING. NOWHERE in
the archives (unless it was recently manufactured) is
there a reference to holding an Alcoholics Anonymous
meeting where a bunch of members met to share their
experience, strength and hope.
There is also NO evidence showing that Alcoholics
Anonymous was ever called AA prior to Clarence using
that term. Nell Wing said that Clarence was the first
to use the initials AA as a description of Alcoholics
Anonymous. Ergo...Clarence was the founder of AA (not
Alcoholics Anonymous but the term AA).
Cheers
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3704. . . . . . . . . . . . Two other stories removed from 4th
edition
From: Robert Stonebraker . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/10/2006 4:44:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Much to my regret two other stories were removed
in the 4th edition which I thought were historically
significant:
*FROM FARM TO CITY, by Ethel Macy (Ethel's date of
sobriety was May 8, 1941. (She was the first woman
to get sober in Akron.)
*HE THOUGHT HE COULD DRINK LIKE A GENTLEMAN, by
Abby Golrick (It was at his home where Clarence
Snyder started Cleveland's first AA meeting, just
one month after the BB was published.)
Bob S., Richmond, IN
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3705. . . . . . . . . . . . The Vicious Cycle: the puzzle solved
From: jlobdell54 . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/10/2006 7:42:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Jared L. solves the problem, also Shakey Mike notes
that there were two different editions of EXPERIENCE,
STRENGTH, AND HOPE, the first with and the second
without "The Vicious Cycle."
With other notes by Kim "Skid" Rowe, Sam Sommers,
and Maria Hoffman.
Plans for the 4th ed. BB were changed and "The
Vicious Cycle" was put back into the BB after ESH
was already out. The 2nd ed. of ESH corrected what
was now an erroneous statement (although it had
been made in good faith), and removed "The Vicious
Cycle" from this later edition.
If you get the most recent versions of the BB and
ESH, it all works out correctly now!
______________________________
From: "jlobdell54"
(jlobdell54 at hotmail.com)
Jimmy B's Story (The Vicious Cycle)
I understand the story had been dropped from the
4th edition and thus incorporated in EXPERIENCE
STRENGTH AND HOPE but the Publications Committee
decided that one story should be added back to
the Fourth Edition (I believe for reasons of length
of book) and "The Vicious Cycle" was added back,
perhaps because it had been the last one to be
omitted. But by that time ESH was in press?
______________________________
From: Shakey1aa@aol.com
(Shakey1aa at aol.com)
My 1st edition 1st printing of ESandH does have the
Vicious Cycle in it.
The 2nd editon does not have it.
GSO must have removed it after realizing they
had made a mistake.
Not their first mistake or mine.
Shakey "On the way to Baton Rouge" Mike
______________________________
The original problem which was posed: the first
edition of ESH contains "The Vicious Cycle" and
claims that it was removed from the fourth edition
of the BB. But the first printing of the fourth
edition of the BB does in fact HAVE "The Vicious
Cycle" in its story section.
Kim "Skid" Rowe, Sam Sommers, and Maria Hoffman
all reported their puzzlement at what they found
in their copies of the ESH and BB.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From: "Kimball"
(rowek at softcom.net)
Dear Mike
My copy of "Experience, Strength and Hope" is a
First Edition, First Printing, April 2003.
On pg 220 is the announcement that the following
stories were eliminated from the Big Book.
On pg 256 is the story "The Vicious Cycle."
My copy of "Alcoholics Anonymous" (Big Book) is
a Fourth Edition, First Printing, October 2001.
On pg 219 is the story "The Vicious Cycle,"
reportedly eliminated.
Just to make sure I understand your response
correctly, are you saying that your page 256 of
your copy of "Experience Strength and Hope"
does not have "The Vicious Cycle"?
Kim "Skid" Rowe
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From: "scmws"
(scmws at yahoo.com)
In my 1st edition 1st printing copy of Experience,
Strength and Hope, "The Vicious Cycle" does appear
on page 256-267. Page 219-220 is the introduction
to the section of stories deleted from the third
edition when the fourth edition of the Big Book were
published.
I agree that as a fellowship we could and should
use all the stories in ESandH and the fourth edition
of the Big Book more than we do.
Grace to you
Sam Sommers
Elkhart Indiana
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From: "momaria33772"
(jhoffma6 at tampabay.rr.com)
Thanks to the person who brought up this question.
Interesting....
I am using my First ed., First Printing of both of
these books. Mine does certainly have both stories
printed, the BB is on page 219, ESandH is on pg. 256.
Both are in Table of contents, and in the book itself.
The description given on the front Book cover,
first sentence, says, "The collection of stories
offers back to the AA fellowship the experience of
56 members whose stories are no longer available
in the book Alcoholics Anonymous."
In 2006 this is the first notice I have heard,
I guess that means I haven't made much use of the
new book. OOOPS!
Hope Baton Rouge is a fun, informative time for
all who can make it there. Enjoy!
L and S,
Maria Hoffman
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3706. . . . . . . . . . . . Is AAWS tightening up restrictions
on reprinting?
From: Mitchell K. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/14/2006 12:21:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I got an e-mail from someone asking if I've heard that AAWS is pulling
permission to reprint anything they "own." Grapevine articles,
writing
by Bill etc. He said that AAWS alone from now on will be the sole
source of anything related to AA.
Anyone hear of this?
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3707. . . . . . . . . . . . Culture Alcohol and Society Quarterly
newsletter (Brown)
From: jlobdell54 . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/14/2006 10:39:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
For those HistoryLovers who might be interested (the newsletter
contains occasional articles on AA history, tho' recently more on the
Washingtonians), issues are available free in pdf format at
www.brown.edu/Facilities/University_Library/libs/hay/collections/kirk/
casq/casq.html
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3708. . . . . . . . . . . . 2007 History and Archives Gathering
June 16th
From: jlobdell54 . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/12/2006 5:16:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The 2007 Multi-District History and Archives Gathering
will be held at least on Saturday June 16th, 2007,
somewhere in the triangle formed by Lebanon PA (2006),
Elizabethtown PA (2004) and Summerdale PA (2003
across the Susquehanna from Harrisburg).
The most likely location is Lebanon, Pennsylvania.
Please keep the date free if you're interested in
attending - - which we hope you are. I hope those
who came in any of the past years will be in touch
with me soon to let me know if they're coming
in 2007 and if they have any suggestions.
Thanks very much -- Jared Lobdell
jlobdell54@hotmail.com (jlobdell54 at hotmail.com)
P.S. Besides hearing (with suggestions) from those
who were at the past three Gatherings, we would like
to hear from others who would be interested in
coming to the 2007 Gathering, to gauge interest.
______________________________
Message #3609: Report on last year's Gathering
From: "Al Welch" welch@a-1associates.com
(welch at a-1associates.com)
Had an opportunity to attend the "Multi-District
History and Archives Gathering" in Lebanon, Pennsylvania,
last Saturday (June 24, 2006). The event was really
great.
Jared Lobdell headed up the entire event and
participated in some of the presentations.
Mitch Klein gave a really great presentation of his
experiences with Clarence Snyder. It was a warm and
genuine expression of history.
Glenn Chesnut, the lead speaker, was very explicit
in his topic of writing about AA history. He and I
had exchanged some "shaggy dog" stories over the last
Share with your friends: |