Alison sharrock

– /Manzo, Antonius (1973): “Rassegna critica di bibliografia ovidiana”, Aevum 47, 305-17.

Pawłowski, Krzysztof (1986): “Wizja pokojn w elegiach tibullma [Wunsch nach Frieden in Tibullischen Elegien]”, Meander 41, 343-54.

Pearce, T. E. V. (1974): “The Role of the Wife as CUSTOS in Ancient Rome”, Eranos 72, 16-33.

Pearson, Catherine Scozzaro (1969): Aspects of Imagery in the Works of Ovid (diss., The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore) [DA 30, 1969, 2507A-2508A].

Pellegrino, Carlo (1995): “Per l’interpretazione di Properzio 1, 21”, Latomus 54, 613-24.

Pelling, Christopher (2002): “Duplices tabellae: a Reading – and Rereading – of Propertius 3, 23”, SIFC 3a s. 20, 171-81.

Pennacini, Adriano (1974): Amore e canto nel locus amoenus (Torino).

– (1978a): “L’ars di Priapo (Tibullo 1.4)”, Sigma 11, 1, 3-15.

– (1978b): “Lettura tematica della elegia 1.4 di Tibullo”, RCCM 20, 1081-92.

Perelli, Antonella (1993): “Variazioni sul cavallo vecchio (Tibullo e altri)”, RCCM 35, 119-36.

– (2001):“Tibullo e la contradizzione elegiaca”, Scholia 3, 85-95.

Pérez, Elena (1986): “La muerte en las elegías de Tibulo”, in Actas del VII simposio nacional de estudios clásicos (Buenos Aires, 1982) (Buenos Aires), 351-8.

Perkins, Caroline A. (1993): “Love’s Arrows Lost: Tibullan Parody in Amores 3.9”, CW 86, 459-66.

– (2000): “Ovid’s Erotic vates”, Helios 27, 53-61.

– (2002): “Protest and Paradox in Ovid, Amores 3.11”, CW 95, 117-25.

Perl, Gerhard (1966): “Ovids Amores im cod. Berol. Hamilton 471 (Y)”, Philologus 110, 268-76.

Perotti, Pier Angelo (1989): “L’infinitivo perfetto in Tibullo e nel ‘corpus Tibullianum’”, Orpheus 10, 141-9.

Perrelli, Raffaele (1994): “Il sistema dei bíoi in Tibullo 1, 1”, Vichiana 5, 61-77.

– (1995): “Il ‘viaggio’ del poeta elegiaco (Tibullo I 3)”, BStudLat 25, 443-61.

– (1996): Il tema della scelta di vita nelle elegie di Tibullo. Studi di Filologia Antica e Moderna 2 (Soveria Mannelli) [A. Borgo, BStudLat 27, 1997, 240-1].

– (1998): “Tibullo nella Consolatio ad Polybium”, Paideia 53, 258-63.

– (2000a): “Properzio 1, 4, 13-14”, Vichiana 4a ser. 2, 131-5.

– (2000b): “Tibullo e i classica pulsa (I 1, 4)”, BStudLat 30, 466-75.

– (2002): Commento a Tibullo: Elegie, Libro I. Studi di Filologia Antica e Moderna (Soveria Mannelli).

Perrone, Giovanni (1989): “Alcune note filologiche su Properzio IV 4, 1-20”, CCC 10, 46-69.

– (1990): “Prop. IV,6,47-50 e l’alternanza di congiuntivo e indicativo nelle subordinate”, CCC 11, 251-6.

– (1991a): “Un problema testuale nel monologo di Tarpea (Prop. IV 4, 34)”, CCC 12, 83-6.

– (1991b): “Tarpea regina: una crux in Prop. IV 4, 55”, CCC 12, 285-95.

– (1992): “Prop. IV 4, 49 s. e la così detta nominis commutatio riflessiva”, CCC 13, 263-8.

– (1993): “Noterelle properziane”, CCC 14, 109-18.

Perutelli, Alessandro (1994) “Calipso e Ulisse (Prop. 1, 15, 9ss.)”, MD 32, 169-71.

Petersmann, Brita (1993): “Die Augusteische Ehegesetzgebung und Cornelias ‘Leges a sanguine ductae’ (Properz IV, 11)”, Ianus. Informationen zum Altsprachlichen Unterricht 14, 22-5.

Petersmann, Gerhard (1980): Themenführung und Motiventfaltung in der Monobiblos des Properz. Grazer Beiträge Suppl. 1 (Graz).

– (1983): “Cornelius Gallus und der Papyrus von Qasr Ibrim”, ANRW II 30.3, 1649-55.

– (1989): “Griechischer Mythos und lateinische Elegie”, in Jahrbuch der Universität Salzburg 1985-87 (Salzburg), 153-62.

Petrain, David (2000): “Hylas and Silva: Etymological Wordplay in Propertius 1.20”, HSPh 100, 409-21.

Phillimore, Johannes Swinnerton (1905): Index Propertianus (Oxford; ³1966).

Phillips III, Charles Robert (1980): “Love’s Companions and Ovid, Amores 1.2”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History II. Collection Latomus 168 (Bruxelles), 269-77.

Pianezzola, Emilio (1987): “Il canto di trionfo nell’elegia latina. Trasposizione di un topos”, in Filologia e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a Francesco Della Corte (Urbino), III, 131-42.

– (1990): “Militat omnis amans (Ovidio, Amores 1, 9): la struttura retorica e una scelta testuale”, Paideia 45, 337-44.

Piastri, Roberta (1998a): “I carmi di Sulpicia e il repertorio topico dell’elegia”, in Quaderni del Dipartimento di Filologia, Linguistica e Tradizione classica, Univiversità degli Studi di Torino. Pubblicazioni del Dipartimento di Filologia, Linguistica e Tradizione Classica 11 (Bologna), 137-70.

– (1998b): “Il ciclo di Sulpicia (Corpus Tibullianum III 8-18=IV 2-12)”, BStudLat 28, 105-31.

– (1999): “Un appunto filologico in merito a Tib. 3, 16, 1 (= 4, 10, 1)”, Sileno 25, 323-8.

Piccaluga, Giulia (1964): “Bona Dea: due contributi all’interpretazione del suo culto”, Studi e materiali di storia delle religioni 35, 195-237.

Pieri, Bruna (2001): “Le Olimpiadi della poesia: il proemio al mezzo delle ‘Georgiche’ e un locus vexatus properziano (III 9, 8)”. Eikasmos 12, 241-57.

Pieri, Maria-Pace (1973): “Due immagini tibulliane”, SIFC 45, 60-87.

– (1977): “Aspetti della religiosità agreste di Tibullo nell’elegia a Messalino”, RCCM 19 (= Miscellanea di studi in memoria di Marino Barchiesi), 541-52.

– (1982): “L’omaggio del libro in Ligdamo”, in QILL 4, 57-68.

– (1982/3): “La Nemesi di Tibullo”, QuadFoggia 2/3, 143-65.

– (1983): “Tibullo II 1, 57-58”, A&R 28, 67-73.

– (1984): “Il testo di Tibullo nella critica dell’ultimo decennio”, C&S 23, 89, 29-45.

– (1986): “Il dio Priapo in Tibullo I, 4. Spunti bucolici d’un elegiaco”, in Atti 1986, 69-88.

– (1988): “L’autocompianto funebre del poeta elegiaco”, in Munus amicitiae. Scritti in memoria di Alessandro Ronconi. Quaderni di filologia latina IV, 2 (Firenze), II, 98-111.

– (1989): “Suggestioni tibulliane nella poesia latina e volgare del Poliziano”, A&R 34, 117-30.

– (1998): “Fortes adiuvat ipsa Venus: metamorfosi e fortuna di un topos (ancora su Prop. 3, 16 e Tibull. 1, 2)”, in id. (ed.): Percorsi della memoria (Firenze), I, 95-119.

Piernavieja, P. (1977): “Tibulliana, I”, CFC 13, 207-12.

Pillinger, Hugh E. (1966): Propertius and Hellenistic Poetry: The Narrative Elegies (diss., Harvard University) [HSPh 71, 1966, 339-41].

– (1969): “Some Callimachean Influences on Propertius, Book 4”, HSPh 73, 171-99.

– (1971): “Tibullus 1.10 and Lucretius”, CJ 66, 204-8.

Pineda Vargas, Purificación/Rojas Rodríguez, Antonio (2001): “Los términos de color en Propercio”, AMal 24, 117-39.

Pino, Maria (1972): “Echi callimachei in Tibullo”, Maia 24, 63-5.

Pinotti, Paola (1974): “Sulle fonti e le intenzioni di Properzio IV, 4”, GIF 26, 18-32.

– (1975/6): “Alessandrinismo e poikilia stilistica nell’elegia IV, 8 di Properzio”, RAIB 64, 127-72.

– (1977): “Propert. IV,9. Alessandrinismo e arte allusiva”, GIF 29, 50-71.

– (1983): “Properzio e Vertumno: anticonformismo e restaurazione augustea”, in Colloquium 1983, 75-96.

– (1994): “Il Tibullo di Riposati”, GIF 46, 151-7.

– (1995): “Gli elegiaci. L’epica ovidiana”, in Mattioli, Umberto (ed.): Senectus. La vecchiaia nel mondo classico (Bologna), II, 137-82.

– (1996): “Aurora e Titono: le riscritture di un mito”, AION(filol) 18, 117-54.

– (2002): L’elegia latina. Storia di una forma poetica (Roma) [U. Schmitzer, AAHG 56, 2003, 200-4; D. E. Hill, G&R 51, 2004, 112-13].

– (2004): Primus ingredior. Studi su Properzio. Testi e manuali per l’insegnamento universitario del latino n.s. 84 (Bologna).

Piot, Madeleine (1987): “Poetae docti lasciuia”, BFLM 75, 157-60.

Pizzani, Ubaldo (1972): “La Vita Tibulli e l’epigramma di Domizio Marso”, in Studi classici in onore di Quintino Cataudella (Catania), III, 307-18.

– (1982): “Le vite umanistiche di Tibullo”, RPL 5.1, 253-67.

– (1986): “Il Corpus Tibullianum e le sue aporie fra medioevo e umanesimo”, in Atti 1986, 141-66.

– (1995): “Il vero e il falso Suetonio”, in Storia letturata e arte a Roma nel secondo secolo dopo Cristo. Atti del Convegno. Mantova 8.9.10 ottobre 1992 (Firenze), 81-108.

– (1996): “Le vite umanistiche di Properzio”, in Bonamente, Giorgio/Coarelli (edd.): Assisi e gli Umbri nell’antichità. Atti del convegno internazionale Assisi 18-21 dicembre 1991. Accademia properziana del Subasio di Assisi. Università degli Studi di Perugia (Assisi), 483-516.

Platnauer, Maurice (1951): Latin Elegiac Verse: a Study of the Metrical Usage of Tibullus, Propertius and Ovid (Cambridge; reprint Hamden, Conn., 1971).

Platter, Charles L. (1995): “Officium in Catullus and Propertius: a Foucauldian Reading”, CPh 90, 211-24.

Poccetti, Paolo (1986): “Sul nome preromano di Assisi, in margine alla restituzione testuale di Properzio IV,1,125”, in Atti 1986, 45-61.

Pöschl, Viktor (1959): “Ovid und Horaz”, RCCM 1, 15-25 = id.: Kunst und Wirklichkeitserfahrung in der Dichtung. Abhandlungen und Aufsätze zur Römischen Poesie. Kleine Schriften(Heidelberg, 1979), I, 257-67.

Pöstgens, Paul (1940): Tibulls Ambarvalgedicht (II 1). Kieler Arbeiten zur Klassischen Philologie 6 (Würzburg).

Poghirc, Cicerone (1979): “Fulminis sau fluminis? Conjectură la Tibul 1,9,36”, StudClas 18, 125-6.

Pohlenz, Max (1913): De Ovidi carminibus amatoriis (Universitätsprogramm, Göttingen) = id.: Kleine Schriften (Hildesheim, 1965), II, 116-38 [T. Birt, BPhW 33, 1913, 1223-31 (cf. M. Pohlenz, ibid., 1499-1501 & T. Birt, ibid., 1501-2)].

Pokrowskij, Michael (1907-10): “Neue Beiträge zur Charakteristik Ovids”, Philologus Suppl. 11, 357-404.

Poliakoff, Michael B. (1987): “The Weapons of Love and War: A Note on Propertius IV.3”, ICS 12, 93-6.

Possanza, D. Mark (1994): “Cornua and frontes in [Tibullus] 3.1.13”, CQ 44, 281-2.

Poulle, Bruno (1994): “Les jeux des mots sur le nom de Rome chez Ovide”, in Conso, Danièle/Fick, Nicole/Poulle, Bruno (edd.): Mélange François Kerlonégan (Paris), 533-8.

Pousic, Boleslaus S. (1976): “De Romanorum et nostrorum vita ut ex Ovidi Amoribus colligitur”, in : Acta 1976, 515-20.

Powell, Barry B. (1974): “The Ordering of Tibullus Book 1”, CPh 69, 107-12.

Prado, João Batista Toledo (1991): “Mito e produção de sentido em Propércio”, in Cardoso, Zelia de Almeida (ed.): Mito, religião e sociedade (Atas do II congresso nacional de estudios clássicos) (São Paulo), 75-83.

Pratt, K.J. (1965): “Rome as Eternal”, JHI 26, 25-44.

Pridik, Karl-Heinz (1970): “Bibliographie zu den Carmina amatoria (1936-1968)”, in Zinn, Ernst (ed.): Ovids Ars amatoria und Remedia amoris. Untersuchungen zum Aufbau. Der Altsprachliche Unterricht. Beiheft 2 zu Reihe 73 (Stuttgart), 110-16.

Primmer, Adolf (1982): “Datierungs- und Entwicklungsfragen bei Vergil und Ovid. 2. Ov. am. 2, 18”, WS N. F. 16, 250-9.

Privitera, Tiziana (1989): “Tib. 1,1,60 e Ov. ‘Amores’ 3,9,58: la ‘Nemesi’ incompiuta?”, in Catanzaro/Santucci 1989, 307-10.

Probst, Susanne/Probst, Veit (1992): “Frauendichtung in Rom: Die Elegien der Sulpicia”, AU 35.6, 19-36.

Puccioni, Giulio (1979): “L’elegia 4,5 di Properzio”, in Studi di poesia in onore di Antonio Traglia (Roma), 609-23.

– (1981): “Nota al 2^o frammento di Cornelio Gallo”, CCC 2, 311-13.

Puelma, Mario (1982): “Die Aitien des Kallimachos als Vorbild der römischen Amores-Elegie”, MH 39, 221-46. 285-304 = “Gli Aitia di Callimaco come modello dell’elegia romana d’amore”, A&R 28, 1983, 113-32.

Purnelle, Gérald (1990): Ovide, Amores: index verborum, listes de fréquence, relevés grammaticaux Trav. Publ. par le Centre informatique de philos. & lettres. Sér. du Lab. d’analyse statistique des langues anc. 18 (Liège) [P. Flobert, RPh 65, 1991, 68; A. Pérez Vega, CR 21, 1991, 343-4; V. Viparelli, BStudLat 21, 1991, 343-4; J. P. Borle, MH 49, 1992, 263-4; J. Dangel, REL 70, 1992, 264; P. Tordeur, AC 61, 1992, 382; J. Beato, Euphrosyne 21, 1993, 493; P. Salat, Latomus 52, 1993, 472-3; P. Pietquin, LEC 62, 1994, 298].

– (1997): Properce, Elegiae: index verborum, listes de fréquence. Alpha-Omega A 187 (Hildesheim, etc.).

Putnam, Michael C. J. (1967): “The Shrine of Vortumnus”, AJA 71, 177-9.

– (1970): “Simple Tibullus and the Ruse of Style”, Yale French Studies 45, 21-32 = Putnam 1982, 163-74.

– (1972): “Horace and Tibullus”, CPh 67, 81-8 = Putnam 1982, 152-9.

– (1973): Tibullus: A Commentary (Norman, Okl.) [A. C. F. Verity, G&R 21, 1974, 204-5; E. Burck, Gnomon 47, 1975, 208-9; R. J. Dickinson, JRS 65, 1975, 229-30; A. E & R. J. Littlewood, Phoenix 29, 1975, 203-4; R. Ball, CW 69, 1976, 328; E. J. Kenney, CR 26, 1976, 186-8; G. Luck, AJPh 97, 1976, 70-2; P. H. Schrijvers, Mnemosyne 30, 1977, 94-5].

– (1976): “Propertius 1.22: a Poet’s Self-definition”, QUCC 23, 93-123 = Putnam 1982, 177-207.

– (1977): “Propertius 3.22: Tullus’ Return”, ICS 2, 240-54 = Putnam 1982, 225-39.

– (1980a): “Propertius and the New Gallus Fragment”, ZPE 39, 49-56.

– (1980b): “Propertius’ Third Book: Patterns of Cohesion”, Arethusa 13, 97-113 = Putnam 1982, 208-24.

– (1982): Essays on Latin Lyric, Elegy and Epic (Princeton, NJ).
Quinn, Kenneth (1963): Latin Explorations: Critical Studies in Roman Literature, (London).

– (1979): Texts and Contexts: The Roman Writers and Their Audience (London, etc.).

– (1982): “The Poet and His Audience in the Augustan Age”, ANRW II 30.1, 75-180.
Rabinowitz, Jacob (2000): “Joyous Dread: Erotic Masochism and Initiatory Symbolism in the Poetry of Propertius”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.): Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History X. Collection Latomus 254 (Bruxelles), 209-31.

Rabozzi, P. (1962): “Intorno ad una elegia di Properzio”, GIF 15, 156-62.

Race, William H. (1981) : “Prole parata at Tibullus 1.10.39”, AJPh 102, 146-7.

Raimondi, Sergio (2000): “Argus amans (Prop. I 3, 19-20: Semejanza y pasión)”, Emérita 68, 103-14.

Ramage, Edwin S. (1973) : Urbanitas: Ancient Sophistication and Refinement (Oklahoma).

Rambaux, Claude (1985): Trois analyses de l’amour. Catulle: Poesies. Ovide: Les Amours. Apulee: Le conte de Psyche. Coll. d’Études anciennes (Paris).

– (1997): Tibulle ou La répétition. Collection Latomus 234 (Bruxelles) [J. Dangel, REL 76, 1998, 341-2; P. Murgatroyd, CR 48, 1998, 494-5; V. Viparelli, BStudLat 28, 1998, 237-9; J.-Y. Maleuvre, LEC 67, 1999, 100; P. Tordeur, AC 68, 1999, 396; L. Deschamps, REA 102, 2000, 560-1].

– (2001): Properce ou Les difficultés de l’émancipation féminine. Collection Latomus 261 (Bruxelles) [E. Delbey, REA 104, 2002, 591-2; S. Laigneau, RPh 76, 2002, 176-7; Viparelli 2002].

Ramires, Giuseppe (2001): “Due note a Tibullo I 5”, Vichiana 4a ser. 3, 112-20.

Ramírez de Verger, Antonio (1985): “El amor como servitium en Tibulo”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 371-7.

– (1986a): “Una lectura de los poemas a Lesbia y a Cintia”, EClás 28, no. 90, 67-83.

– (1986b): “A Note on Tibullus 1.9.21-22”, AJPh 107, 109-10.

– (1987): “La elegia I 9 de Tibulo”, Veleia 4, 335-46.

– (1988a): “Nota critica a Ovidio (Am. 1, 4, 19-20)”, Emérita 56, 229-32.

– (1988b): “The Text of Ovid, Amores 2.13.17-18”, AJPh 109, 86-91.

– (1991): “El otium de los elegíacos: una forma heterodoxa de vida”, in Gascó, Fernando/Alvar, Jaime (edd.): Heterodoxos, reformadores y marginados en la antigüedad clásica (Sevilla), 59-70.

– (1992): “Elucidations on Ovid, Amores 3.6.1-22”, LCM 17, 141-3.

– (1996): “Sacramentum amoris in Tibullus”, in Mangas, Julio/Alvar, Jaime (edd.): Homenaje a José María Blázquez (Madrid), III, 287-92.

– (2001): “La puella sapiens en Ovidio, Amores II 4, 45-46”, Emérita 69, 1-7.

– (2002): “Notas textuales a Ovidio (Amores II)”, in Defosse, Pol (ed.): Hommages à Carl Deroux. Collection Latomus 266. 267 (Bruxelles), I, 443-6.

– (2003): P. Ovidius Naso: Carmina amatoria. Amores. Medicamina faciei femineae. Ars amatoria. Remedia amoris. Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana (München/Leipzig) [E. J. Kenney, BMCRev 2004.01.13 (cf. 2004.01.14 & 2004.02.45)].

– /Baeza, Angulo Eulogio F. (1995): “Notizia sobre unos fragmentos desconocidos de la obra de Ovidio”, Emérita 63, 17-20.

– /Socas, Francisco (1991; edd.): Publio Ovidio Nasón: Obra amatoria I: Amores (Madrid) [L. Deschamps, REA 93, 1991, 421-2; P. Cid Luna, CFC(L) 2, 1992, 338-42; L. Di Salvo, Athenaum 81, 1993, 701-4; S. Viarre, AC 62, 1993, 323-4; ].

Rand, E. Karl (1907): “The Chronology of Ovid’s Early Works”, AJPh 28, 287-96.

Randall, J. G. (1979): “Mistresses’ Pseudonyms in Latin Elegy”, LCM 4, 27-35.

Rangel, Maria Lúcia Silveira (1991): “Estilo de Propércio: mitologia usada como recurso literário”, in Cardoso, Zelia de Almeida (ed.): Mito, religião e sociedade (Atas do II congresso nacional de estudios clássicos) (São Paulo), 95-101.

Rauk, John Neil (1987): The Lover’s Farewell: a Study of the Propemptikon in Greek and Latin Literature (diss., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) [DA 48, 1988, 2057A].

Rebelo Gonçalves, Maria Isabel (1988): “Helenismos onomásticos do Corpus Tibullianum. Aspectos métricos”, Euphrosyne 16, 309-27.

– (1995): “Os helenismos onomásticos do Corpus Tibullianum”, Humanitas 47, 545-67.

Reed, Joseph D. (1997): “Ovid’s Elegy on Tibullus and Its Models”, CPh 92, 260-9.

Reeve, Michael D. (1973): “The ‘Codex Eboracensis’ of Tibullus”, Maia 25, 715-16.

– (1984): “Tibullus 2.6”, Phoenix 38, 235-9 = “L’elegia 2,6 di Tibullo”, in Atti 1986, 61-7.

Reitzenstein, Erich (1935): “Das neue Kunstwollen in den Amores Ovids”, RhM 84, 62-88 = Albrecht/Zinn 1968, 206-32.

– (1936): Wirklichkeitsbild und Gefühlsentwicklung bei Properz. Philologus Suppl. 29, 2 (Leipzig) [Rez. R. Helm, PhW 28/9, 1937, 778-87].

– (1969): “Die Cornelia-Elegie des Properz (IV 11). Eine Formuntersuchung und ihre Ergebnisse für die Textkritik”, RhM 112, 126-45.

– (1970): Über die Elegie des Propertius auf den Tod der Cornelia. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur. Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse 1970, 6 (Mainz) [T. A. Suits, CW 65, 1972, 275-6].

Reitzenstein, Richard (1912a): “Noch einmal Tibulls erste Elegie”, Hermes 47, 60-116.

– (1912b): “Zur Sprache der lateinischen Erotik”, Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-historische Klasse 1912.12, 1-36.

Renz, Hans (1935): Mythologische Beispiele in Ovids erotischer Elegie (diss., Tübingen, Würzburg.

Rhorer, Catherine Campbell (1974): Tibullus: A Structural Analysis of the Elegies of the First Book (diss., Yale University, New Haven, Conn.) [DA 35, 1974, 2963A].

Richardson, jr., Lawrence (1977): Propertius, Elegies I-IV. Edited, with Introduction and Commentary (Norman, Oklahoma).

Richlin, Amy (1983): The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor (New Haven/London; Oxford/New York, ²1992) [W. Krenkel, Gnomon 56, 1984, 691-4; Dickinson, CB 61, 1985, 40-1; H. D. Jocelyn, EMC 29, 1985, 1-30; N. Kay, CR 35, 1985, 308-10; R. Minadeo, CJ 80, 1985, 364-5; J. P. Sullivan, CW 79, 1985, 611; D. W. T. Vessey, Phoenix 39, 1985, 184-5; P. Walcot, G&R 32, 1985, 104-5; Coulie, LEC 54, 1986, 416; Erichson, Helios 13.2, 1986, 171-5; M. Skinner, CPh 81, 1986, 252-7; Stuart, Latomus 45, 1986, 194-6].

Richmond, John (2002): “Manuscript Traditions and the Transmission of Ovid’s Works”, in Boyd 2002b, 443-83.

Richter, Will (1966): “Divus Julius, Octavianus und Kleopatra bei Aktion: Bemerkungen zu Properz 4, 6, 59ff.”, WS 79, 451-65.

Rieks, Rudolf (1986): “Entwicklungsstadien der römischen Elegie”, in Neukam, Peter (ed.): Reflexionen antiker Kulturen. Dialog Schule – Wissenschaft. Klassische Sprachen und Literaturen 20 (München), 100-22.

Riposati, Benedetto (1942): L’elegia a Messalino di Albio Tibullo (II, 5). Pubblicazioni dell’Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, ser. IV, Scienze Filologiche, 40 (Milano) [E. Burck, Gnomon 20, 1944, 25-32 = Burck 1966a, 276-80].

– (²1968): Introduzione alle studio di Tibullo (Milano) [J. H. Waszink, Mnemosyne 25, 1972, 95].

– (1987): “La sibilla nell’elegia a Messalino (II, 5) di Tibullo”, in Bonanno, Anthony/Vella, H. C. R. (edd.): Laurea corona. Studies in Honour of Edward Coleiro (Amsterdam), 143-51.

Ritchie, A. L. (1995): “Ovid Amores 2.11.9”, LCM 20, 20.

Rivero García, Luis (2003): “˜prosdókhton en Ovidio, Amores II 15.5: nota critica”, Emérita 71, 277-82.

– (2004): “A Reading of Ovid, Amores II 15”, Hermes 132, 186-210.

Robson, Arthur G. (1973): “The Enfolding Couplets, Their Relation to the Problems of Propertius 4,9,71-74”, Mnemosyne 26, 1973, 234-9.

Rochette, Bruno (2003) “Une évocation pythagoricienne des Enfers chez Tibulle (I, 3, 59-66)”, LEC 71, 175-80.

Rodriguez, Connie (1989): Poetry and Power: Studies on Augustan Monuments and the Poets of the Augustan Age. 2 Bde. (diss., The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore) [DA 51, 1990/1, 498A].

Rodríguez Herrera, Gregorio (1999): “Propertius 2.1.71-78 and the Latin Epitaphs”, Mnemosyne 52, 194-7.

– (2002): “The Text of Propertius 2.24b.12”, Mnemosyne 55, 209-12.

Rodríguez-Pantoja, M. (1985): “La tecnica expositiva en Tibulo”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 127-42.

Roessel, David (1990): “The Significance of the Name Cerinthus in the Poems of Sulpicia”, TAPhA 120, 243-50.

Rohr, Francesca (1994): “Non fuit obprobio celebrasse Lycorida Gallo: Ovidio e la memoria di Gaio Cornelio Gallo”, Sileno 20, 305-16.

Rohr Vio, Francesca (1997): “Una dedica in sospetto di ‘fronda’: Cornelio Gallo e il Nilo nella trilingue di Phylae”, MGR 21, 281-309.

Rohweder, C. (2000): “Eine römische Dichterin: Sulpicia”, in Späth, Thomas/Wagner-Hasel, Beate (edd.): Frauenwelten in der Antike. Geschlechterordnung und weibliche Lebenspraxis (Stuttgart/Weimar), 147-61.

Roller, Matthew (2003): “Horizontal Women: Posture and Sex in the Romane Convivium”, AJPh 124, 377-422.

Roman, Luke (1999): The Construction of Literary Autonomy in Roman Poetry (diss., Stanford University, Stanford, CA) [DAI-A 61, 2000/1, 165].

Romano, Alba (1988): “Translatio affectus in the Roman Elegists: A Study of Metonymic Affectivity”, AUMLA 69, 88-97.

Romano, Domenico (1965): Poesia e scienza. II: Albio Tibullo (Napoli).

Romano, Elisa (1980): “Amores 1, 8: l’elegia didattica e i1 genere dell’ Ars amatoria”, Orpheus 7, 269-92.

Rosa, Lucia (1954): “Sulle varianti della tradizione manuscritta degli Amores di Ovidiio”, Università di Napoli, Annali della facoltà di lettere o filosofia 4, 41-60.

Rosati, Gianpiero (1979): “L’esistenza letteraria, Ovidio e l’autocoscienza della poesia”, MD 2, 101-36.

– (1996): “Il modello di Aretusa (Prop. IV 3): Tracce elegiache nell’epica del I sec. d. C.”, Maia 48, 139-55.

– (1999): “La boiterie de Mademoiselle Élégie: un pied volé et ensuite retrouvé (aventures d’un genre littéraire entre les Augustéens et Stace)”, in Fabre-Serris/Deremetz 1999, 147-63.

Rose, Anna (2001): Filippo Beroaldo der Ältere und sein Beitrag zur Properz-Überlieferung. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 156 (Leipzig) [J. L. Butrica, BMCRev 2002.09.26].

Rosen, Ralph M./Farrell, Joseph (1986): “Acontius, Milanion, and Gallus: Vergil, Ecl. 10.52-61”, TAPhA 116, 241-54.

Rosenmeyer, Patricia (1999): “Tracing medulla as a locus eroticus”, Arethusa 32, 19-47.

Ross, David O. (1975): Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome (Cambridge) [J. E. G. Zetzel, CPh 72, 1977, 249-60; I. M. Le M. Du Quesnay, CR 28, 1978, 276-7; E. A. Schmidt, Gnomon 51, 1979, 432-5].

– (1986): “Tibullus and the Country”, in Atti 1986, 251-65.

Rosselli, Gaetano (1975): Properzio e la sua poesia. Philologica 1 (Roma).

Rostagni, Augusto (1913): Poeti alessandrini (Torino; reprint 1963).

– (1956): “L’influenza greca sulle origini dell’elegia erotica latina”, in L’influence grecque sur la poésie latine de Catulle à Ovide. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 2 (Vandœuvres/Genève), 59-82.

–(1959): “Il Panegyrico di Messalla e i componimenti a Messalla dedicati nell’Appendice Vergiliana”, RAL 74, 349-55.

– (1960): “Virgilio, Valgio e ...Codro. Chi era costui?”, in Studi in onore di Luigi Castiglioni (Firenze), I, 809-33.

Rothaus Caston, Ruth (2000): Elegiac Passion: a Study of Jealousy in Roman Love Elegy (diss., Brown University, Providence, RI) [DAI-A 61, 2000/1, 3547].

– (2003): “Rivaling the Shield: Propertius 4.6”, in Thibodeau, Philip/Haskell, Harry (edd.): Being There Together: Essays in Honor of Michael C. J. Putnam on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday (Minnesota), 145-62.

Rothstein, Max (²1920-²1924): Die Elegien des Sextus Propertius, erklärt von –. 2 Bde. (Berlin; reprint Dublin/Zürich, 1966).

Rothwell, Kenneth S. (1996): “Propertius and the Site of Rome”, Latomus 55, 829-54.

Rouveret, Agnés (2001): “Paysage des origines et quête d’identité dans l’œuvre de Properce”, in Fromentin, Valérie/Gotteland, Sophie (edd.): Origines gentium. Textes réunis. Ausonius-Publications. Études 7 (Bordeaux/Paris), 263-70.

Rudd, Niall (1976): Lines of Enquiry: Studies in Latin Poetry (Cambridge).

– (1981): “Romantic Love in Classical Times?”, Ramus 10, 140-58.

– (1982): “Theme and Imagery in Propertius 2.15”, CQ 32, 152-5.

Ruhl, Maria (2001): Die Darstellung von Gefühlsentwicklungen in den Elegien des Properz (Göttingen) [C. Eichenseer, VoxLat 37.144, 2001, 302-3; J.-Y. Maleuvre, LEC 70, 2002, 202; F. Spoth, Gymnasium 110, 2003, 73-4].

Ruiz de Elvira, Antonio (2001): “Dos nuevas notas a Propercio”, CFC(L) 21, 9-14.

– (2002): “Dánae castaen Propercio”, CFC(L) 22, 391-8.

Ruiz Sánchez, Marcos (1985): “La composición generica en la poesia de Tibulo”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 379-90.

– (1996): “Poética y símbolo en el ciclo de Sulpicia (corpus Tibullianum, 3, 8–3, 12 y 3, 13–3, 18)”, Helmantica 47, 379-413.

– /Sánchez Macanáz, O. (1985): “Tibulo y Maximiano”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 391-7.

Rulli, Gabriella (1991-3): “Valenza ideologica del ciclo mitico tebano in Properzio”, AFLPer(class) n. s. 15/16, 189-97.

– (1995): “Significato ideologico del mito in Properzio: un approccio metodologico”, Latomus 54, 305-14.

Rumpf, Lorenz (1996): Extremus labor. Vergils 10. Ekloge und die Poetik der Bucolica. Hypomnemata 112 (Göttingen).

Russo, Antonino (1974-6): “Per una lettura dell’elegia properziana”, ALGP 11-13, 296-375.

Rutherford, Ian/Naiden, Fred (1996): “Amphion’s Paean: a Note an Propertius, 3.15.42”, MD 37, 231-8.

Rutledge, Harry C. (1964/65): “Propertius’ Tarpeia: The Poem Itself”, CJ 60, 68-73.

Sabbadini, Remigio (1909): “Per la cronologia delle poesie amorose d’Ovidio”, RFIC 37, 166-9.

Sabot, A.-F. (1976a): “Ovide: De l’amour de la poesie à la poesie de l’amour”, IL 28, 125-9.

– (1976b): Ovide, poète de l’amour dans ses oeuvres de jeunesse: Amores, Héroides, Ars Amatoria, Remedia Amoris, De Medicamine Faciei Femineae (Ophrys) [J. C. McKeown, JRS 68, 1978, 235-7].

– (1983): “L’élégie à Rome. Essai de définition du genre”, in Hommages à Jean Cousin. Rencontres avec l’antiquité classique. Avant-propos par Michel Wormoff (Paris), 133-43.

– (1989): “Ovide et la societé augustéenne”, in Mactoux, Marie-Madeleine/Geny, Évelyne (edd.), Mélanges Pierre Lévêque. III: Anthropologie et societé. Annales littér. de l’Univ. de Besançon 404 (Besançon), 387-91.

Salat, Pierre (1991): “Remarques sur le vocabulaire de Tibulle”, ALMArv 18, 31-50.

Salatino de Zubiría, Maria Cristina (1988/9): “Propercio III, 1: la madurez de un género”, REC 20, 123-4.

– (1994): “Propercio III 13. La profecía del poeta”, EClás 36, 49-63 = REC 25, 1994, 145-62.

– (2001): “Retórica del ejemplo en Propercio. Algo nuevo bajo el sol”, REC 30, 117-27.

Salgado, O. N. (1986): “Quirinus (En. I 292) y Mavortius en Virgilio y en Propercio”, in Actas del VII simposio nacional de estudios clásicos (Buenos Aires, 1982) (Buenos Aires), 383-8.

Salvatore, Armando (1990): “Virgilio e Ovidio elegiaco”, in Gigante, Marcello (ed.): Virgilio e gli Augustei (Napoli), 177-202.

Sánchez Casares, J. (1985): “Dulcis tibia”, in Simposio Tibuliano 1985, 399-408.

Sánchez Martínez, Felix (1996): “La construcción personal activa: a proposito de Propercio, II,1,41-42”, CFC(L) 11, 17-27.

– (1997): “El ínfinitivo de perfecto en lugar del infinitivo de presente (Nota a Propercio, I 1, 15; I 17, 1; II 16, 3 y II 19, 32)”, Myrtia 12, 63-70.

Sandbach, F. H. (1962): “Some Problems in Propertius”, CQ 12, 263-76.

Sanders, Gabriel (1986a): “Ovide: les rigueurs du rire”, in Decreus, Freddy/Deroux, Carl (edd.), Hommages à Jozef Veremans. Collection Latomus 193 (Bruxelles).

– (1986b): “Tibulle et l’épigraphie latine versifiée. Échos, emprunts, partages”, in Atti 1986, 345-59.

Santini, Carlo (1989): “Un percorso didattico attraverso le elegie di Tibullo”, in Catanzaro/Santucci 1989, 227-35.

– (2002): “Tabulae Propertianae ovvero dell’epigrafe virtuale in Properzio”, in Defosse, Pol (ed.): Hommages à Carl Deroux. Collection Latomus 266. 267 (Bruxelles), I, 447-57.

– /Santucci, Francesco (2004; edd.): Properzio tra storia arte mito (Assisi) [F. Nau, BMCRev 2005.04.24]

– /Scivoletto, Nino (1995): “Ovidiana”, GIF 47, 299-313.

Santirocco, Matthew S. (1969): “Metamorphosis in Ovid’s Amores”, CB 45, 83-4. 95.

– (1979): “Sulpicia Reconsidered”, CJ 74, 229-39.

Sauvage, André (1969): “Tibulle et son temps”, Latomus 28, 875-93.

– (1983): “Properce et l’idéologie masculine”, Latomus 42, 819-43.

Sbordone, Francesco (1982 [1984]): “Note al probabile frammento elegiaco di Cornelio Gallo”, RAAN 57, 57-66.

Scaffai, Marco (1988): “Atteggiamenti verso la divinità in Ovidio elegiaco (Am. 3.3 e Ars am. 1.631 sgg.)”, Prometheus 14, 122-40.

Schiefer, Martin (1977): ‘Neglegentia’ oder ‘diligentia elocutionis’? Die Sorgfalt und Eigentümlichkeit der properzischen Sprache, aufgezeigt im besonderen an der Verwendung der Hilfsverben ‘posse’ und ‘cogere’ (diss., Bochum).

Schilling, Robert (1980): “Les allusions religieuses de l’élégie II, 1 de Tibulle”, in L’élégie romaine 1980, 73-78 = Letterature comparate. Problemi e metodo. Studi in onore di Ettore Paratore (Bologna, 1981), 529-35.

– (1981): “L’inspiration italique de Properce”, in Colloquium 1981, 39-58.

Schmeisser, Brigitte (1972): A Concordance to the Elegies of Propertius (Hildesheim).

Schmidt, Victor (1985a): “Corinnas psittacus im Elysium (Ovid Amores 2, 6)”, Lampas 18, 214-28.

– (1985b): “Hic ego qui iaceo: Die lateinischen Elegiker und ihre Grabschrift”, Mnemosyne 38, 307-33.

– (1987): “Het Odysseus-Penelope thema in de latijnse liefdes elegie”, Lampas 20, 131-40.

Schmidt-Berger, Ute (1992): “Tenerorum lusor amorum: Zur Lektüre von Ovids Amores”, AU 35.2, 81-100.

Schmitz, Thomas (1998): “CETERA QUIS NESCIT: Verschwiegene Obszönität in der Liebesdichtung Ovids”, Poetica 30, 317-49.

Schmitzer, Ulrich (1993): “Satiren zur Ehre Messallas. Die literarkritische Bedeutung von Tibulls Elegie 2, 1”, WS 106, 111-32.

– (1994): “Non modo militiae turbine factus eques: Ovids Selbstbewußtsein und die Polemik gegen Horaz in der Elegie am. 3, 15”, Philologus 138, 101-17.

– (1997): “Gallus im Elysium. Ein Versuch über Ovids Trauerelegie auf den toten Papagei Corinnas (am. 2, 6)”, Gymnasium 104, 245-70.

– (2001): Ovid. Studienbücher Antike 7 (Hildesheim/Zürich/New York) [C. Walde, MH 59, 2002, 260-1; W. S. Anderson, Gnomon 76, 2004, 366-9].

– (2002): “Neue Forschungen zu Ovid”, Gymnasium 109, 143-66.

– (2003): “Neue Forschungen zu Ovid – Teil II”, Gymnasium 110, 147-81.

Schniebs de Rossi, Alicia (1991): “Baco, utopia y sociedad en Tibulo”, in Pessanha, Nely Maria/Bastian, Vera Regina Figueredo (edd.): Vinho e pensamento (Rio de Janeiro), 119-30.

– (1997): “Exemplum, ironia y parodia en las Elegías 3 y 4 del libro II de Tibulo”, REC 26, 83-103.

– (1998): “Foedus amoris y organización espacial en Tibulo”, Argos 22, 149-61

Schnur, Harry C. (1961): “When Did Tibullus Die?”, CJ 56, 227-9.

Schönbeck, Hans-Peter (1992): “Das ‘hölzerne Zeitalter’: Gegenwartskritik als ‘laudatio temporis acti’ bei augusteischen Dichtern”, in Mousikòß ˜nër: Festschrift für Max Wegner zum 90. Geburtstag. Antiquitas. Reihe 3, Nr. 32 (Bonn), 365-76.

Scholz, Udo W. (1969): “Zu Properz 4, 1, 17ff.”, RhM 112, 37-48.

Schoonhoven, Henk (1983a): “The ‘Panegyricus Messallae’: Date and Relation with Catalepton 9”, ANRW II 30.3, 1681-1707.

– (1983b): “ …si parva licet componere magnis (A Note on the New Gallus Papyrus, 11, 3-5)”, ZPE 53, 73-8.

Schrijvers, P. H. (1976): “O tragoedia tu labor aeternus. Étude sur l’élégie III, 1 des Amores d’Ovide”, in Bremer, J. M./Radt, S. L. /Ruijgh, C. J. (edd.), Miscellenea tragica in honorem J. C. Kamerbeek (Amsterdam), 405-24.

Schubert, Werner (1992): Die Mythologie in den nichtmythologischen Dichtungen Ovids Studien zur klassischen Philologie 66 (Frankfurt a. M., etc.) [C. Harrauer, WS 110, 1997, 284].

– (1993): “Ovid, Am. 1, 5 und die Gestalt der Corinna”, WJA 19, 145-59.

– (1999; ed.): Ovid. Werk und Wirkung. Festgabe für Michael von Albrecht zum 65. Geburtstag. 2 Bde. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 100 (Frankfurt a. M., etc.).

Schulz-Vanheyden, Elmar (1969): Properz und das griechische Epigramm (diss., Münster) [G. Pfohl, AAHG 25, 1972, 299-302].

Schuster, Mauriz (1930): Tibull-Studien. Beiträge zur Erklärung und Kritik Tibulls und des Corpus Tibullianum (Wien).

Schwarz, Franz Ferdinand (1980): “Sehnsucht und Wirklichkeit. Reflexionen zu pax und bellum bei Tibull (I 10)”, AU 23.1, 40-58.

Schwarz, Heinrich Otto (1952): Stil und Komposition in Ovids Amores (diss., Göttingen; dactyl.).

Scivoletto, Nino (1972): “Motivi epigrammatici in un’elegia ovidiana (Am. I 14)”, in Studi classici in onore di Quintino Cataudella (Catania), III, 355-61.

– (1976): Musa iocosa. Studio sulla poesia giovanile di Ovidio. Biblioteca del ‘Giornale Italiano di Filologia’, n. s. 1 (Roma) [J. C. McKeown, JRS 68, 1978, 235-7].

– (1981): “La città di Roma nella poesia di Properzio”, in Colloquium 1981, 27-38.

Seel, Otto (1958): “Von Herodot zu Ovid (Ovid, Am. 3, 14 und Herodot 1, 8, 3)”, in Herescu 1958, 139-83.

Semmlinger, Lothar (1981): “Zu einem pompeianischen Wandepigramm”, ZAnt 31, 191-8.

– (1988): “Zur Echtheit der Elegie ‘De somnio’ = Ovid, Amores 3, 5”, in Kindermann, Udo/ Maaz, Wolfgang/Wagner, Fritz (edd.), Festschrift für Paul Klopsch. Göppinger Arbeiten zur Germanistik 492 (Göppingen), 455-75.

Senis, Gabriella (1982): “I templa deivitiora in Cornelio Gallo”, Maia 34, 59-62.

Setaioli, Aldo (1976): “I Carmina epigraphica e tre poeti latini”, Prometheus 2, 67-77.

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1956): Propertiana. Cambridge Classical Studies 14 (Cambridge; Amsterdam, ²1967).

– (1978): “Notes on Minor Latin Poetry”, Phoenix 32, 305-25.

– (1982): “Propertius 4.3.94: an Appendix”, AJPh 103, 213-4

Sharrock, Alison (1990): “Alternae Voces – Again”, CQ 40, 570-1.

– (1994): Seduction and Repetition in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria II (Oxford).

– (1995): “The Drooping Rose: Elegiac Failure in Amores 3.7”, Ramus 24, 152-80.

– (2000): “Constructing Characters in Propertius”, in Arethusa 33, 263-84.

– (2002): “Ovid and the Discourses of Love: the Amatory Works”, in Hardie 2002a, 150-62.

Shayner, John Anthony (1973): Word and Theme in Tibullus (diss., Stanford University, Stanford, CA) [DA 34, 1974, 5939A].

Shea, Christine Rita (1984): The Return of Cynthia and the Structure of Propertius Book IV (diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) [DA 45, 1985, 3343A].

– (1988): “The Vertumnus Elegy and Propertius Book IV”, ICS 13, 63-71.

Shepherd, W. G. (1987): “For Horace and Propertius”, in Radice, William/Reynolds, Barbara (edd.): The Translator's Art: Essays in Honour of Betty Radice (Harmondsworth), 163-74.

Shi Cheng Li, Williams (1985-87): “O quarto livro de Propércio”, ELF 5, 9-21.

Sicherl, Martin (1983): “Ovid, Amores 2, 1, 15”, in Händel, Paul/ Meid, Wolfgang (edd.): Festschrift für Robert Muth zum 65. Geburtstag (Innsbruck), 463-8.

Silagi, Gabriel (1999): “Definitives zu Gallus”, Rechtshistorisches Journal 18, 357-73.

Sileoni, Anna Paola (1985): “Properzio e la sua gens”, AFLM 18, 163-83.

Simposio Tibuliano 1985 = Simposio Tibuliano. Conmemoración del Bimilenario de la muerte de Tibulo (Murcia) [J. Filée, LEC 55, 1987, 360-1; A. Thill, Latomus 48, 1989, 484].

Sinigallia, C. (1982): “Appunti sull’aggettivazione e su alcune figure metrico-verbali negli Amores di Ovidio”, AFLM 15, 677-91.

Sirago, Vito Antonio (1986): “Tibullo e l’agricoltura italiana nel primo decennio d'Augusto”, in Atti 1986, 291-314.

Skiadas, Aristoxenos D. (1975): “Periuria amantum. Zur Geschichte und Interpretation eines Motivs der augusteischen Liebesdichtung”, in Monumentum Chiloniense. Studien zur augusteischen Zeit. Kieler Festschrift für Erich Burck zum 70. Geburtstag (Amsterdam), 400-18.

Skoie, Mathilde (1998): “Sublime Poetry or Feminine Fiddling? Gender and Reception: Sulpicia through the Eyes of Two 19^th Century Scholars”, in Larsen Lovén, Lena/Strömberg, Agneta (edd.): Aspects of Women in Antiquity: Proceedings of the First Nordic Symposium on Women’s Lives in Antiquity, Götebeorg 12-15 June 1997 (Jonsered), 169-82.

– (2000): “Sulpicia Americana: a Reading of Sulpicia in the Commentary by K. F. Smith”, Arethusa 33, 285-311.

– (2002): Reading Sulpicia: Commentaries 1475-1990 (Oxford) [B. Flaschenriem, AJPh 124, 2003, 489-92; J. Gaisser, Vergilius 49, 2003, 176-81; G. Liveley, JRS 93, 2003, 372-3; C. Mastroiacovo, BMCRev 2003.02.24].

Skutsch, Otto (1959): “Cum cecidit fato consul uterque pari”, Philologus 103, 152-4.

– (1963): “The Structure of the Propertian Monobiblos”, CPh 58, 238-9.

– (1966): “Zur Datierung des Lygdamus”, Philologus 110, 142-6.

– (1969a): “Lygdamus 1, 19”, Philologus 113, 156-7.

– (1969b): “Tibullus 1.4.27”, BICS 16, 62.

– (1973): “A Note on the Tibullan Pentameter”, BICS 19, 129-30.

– (1975): “The Second Book of Propertius”, HSPh 79, 229-33.

– (1980): “Lygdamus 1, 17ff.”, ZPE 37, 168.

Slavitt, David R. (2002; tr.): Propertius in Love. The Elegies. With a Foreword by Matthew S. Santirocco (Berkeley/Los Angeles) [S. J. Willett, Mouseion 46, n. s. 2, 2002, 392-401; J. L. Butrica, CR 53, 2003, 488].

Smith, Kirby Flower (1913): The Elegies of Albius Tibullus. The Corpus Tibullianum. Edited with Introduction and Notes on Books I, II and IV 2-14 (New York; reprint Darmstadt, 1964).

Smyth, William Robert (1970): Thesaurus criticus ad Sexti Properti textum. Mnemosyne Supplementum 12 (Leiden) [G. P. Goold, Phoenix 25, 1971, 294-5].

Śnieżewski, S. (1993): “The Divinity of Augustus in the Late Poetry of Horace and in Elegies of Tibullus and Propertius”, Eos 81, 61-76.

Snyder, Jane Mclutosh (1989): The Woman and the Lyre: Women Writers in Classical Greece and Rome (Carbondale) [J. de Luce, BMCRev 02.03.11].

Socas, Francisco (1991): “El problema del interlocutor en los Amores de Ovidio”, Habis 22, 223-46.

Solimani, Giannina (1970): “Il mito di Apollo e Admeto negli elegiaci latini”, in Mythos. Scripta in honorem M. Untersteiner (Genova), 255-68.

Solmsen, Friedrich (1948): “Propertius and Horace”, CPh 43, 105-9 = Solmsen 1968, 278-82 = “Properz und Horaz”, in Eisenhut 1975, 214-23.

– (1961): “Propertius in His Literary Relations with Tibullus and Vergil”, Philologus 105, 273-89 = Solmsen 1968, 299-315 = “Properz und seine literarischen Beziehungen zu Tibull und Vergil”, in Eisenhut 1975, 224-46.

– (1962): “Tibullus as an Augustan Poet”, Hermes 90, 295-325 = Solmsen 1968, 325-54.

– (1968): Kleine Schriften (Hildesheim).

Soria, C. (1963): “El paraklausíquron como presupuesto cultural de la elegia latina”, REC 8, 55-94.

– (1965): “S. Propercio IV, 11 y la moral tradicional de la matrona romana”, REC 9, 29-50.

Soubiran, Jean (1971): “Délie et Thétis”, Pallas 18, 59-78.

– (1987): “Tibulliana”, BFLM 15 (= De Virgile à Jacob Balde. Hommage à M^me Andrée Thill. Études recueilles par Gérard Freyburger), 161-70.

Sousa Medeiros, Walter de (1983/4): “A lua negra do poeta”, Humanitas 35/6, 87-103.

Spanoudakis, Konstantinos (2002): Philetas of Cos. Mnemosyne Supplementum 229 (Leiden, etc.) [H. White, Orpheus 23, 2002, 292-4].

Spelman, Christopher Cunningham (1999): “Propertius 2.3: the Chaos of Desire”, Arethusa 32, 123-44.

Spencer, Diana (2001): “Propertius, Hercules, and the Dynamics of Roman Mythic Space in Elegy 4.9”, Arethusa 34, 259-84.

Spies, Alfons (1930): Militat omnis amans. Ein Beitrag zur Bildersprache der antiken Erotik (diss., Tübingen).

Spoth, Friedrich (1992): Ovids Heroides als Elegien. Zetemata 89 (München).

Stahl, Hans-Peter (1968): “Doppeldeutigkeit bei Properz (Elegie I, 18)”, Poetica 2, 438-50.

– (1985): Propertius: ‘Love’ and ‘War’. Individual and State Under Augustus (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London) [M. Wyke, JRS 79, 1989, 170-2; A. La Penna, Gnomon 62, 1990, 512-18].

Stapleton, Michael L. (1996): Harmful Eloquence: Ovid’s Amores from Antiquity to Shakespeare (Ann Arbor) [L. Cahoon, CPh 93, 1998, 380-2; C. Martin, CLS 35, 1998, 301-3; B. R. Nagle, CW 92, 1998/9, 51-2].

Steidle, Wolf (1962a): “Das Motiv der Lebenswahl bei Tibull und Properz”, WS 75, 100-40 = id.: Ausgewählte Aufsätze (Amsterdam, 1987), 139-79.

– (1962b): “Zwei Vergil-Probleme”, in Serta philologica Aenipontana (Innsbruck), 311-34.

Stickler, Timo (2002): Gallus amore peribat? Cornelius Gallus und die Anfänge der augusteischen Herrschaft in Ägypten. Althistorische Studien der Universität Würzburg 2 (Rahden/Westf.).

Stirrup, Barbara E. (1973): “Irony in Ovid Amores 1, 7”, Latomus 32, 824-31.

(1976): “Structure and Separation: a Comparative Analysis of Amores II.11 and II.16”,Eranos 74, 32-52.

Stoessl, Franz (1970): “Ovids Lebensentscheidung. Amores I 15”, in Ableitinger, Doris/ Gugel, Helmut (edd.), Festschrift Karl Vretska. Zum 70. Geburtstag überreicht von seinen Freunden und Schülern (Heidelberg), 250-75.

Stok, Fabio (1986): “Properzio ed il ‘morir d'amore’”, in Bimillenario 1986, 335-7.

Strachan, J. C. G. (2003): “A Literary Crisis? A Reassessment of the Symbolism of Propertius I, 17”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.): Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History XI. Collection Latomus 272 (Bruxelles), 275-89.

Stramaglia, Antonio (1987): “Mezzane, maghe e divinità in Tibullo 1,5,49-56”, AFLB 30, 155-75.

Stroh, Wilfried (1971): Die römische Liebeselegie als werbende Dichtung (Amsterdam) [A. La Penna, Gnomon 47, 1975, 134-42].

– (1979): “Ovids Liebeskunst und die Ehegesetze des Augustus”, Gymnasium 86, 323-52.

– (1983): “Die Ursprünge der römischen Liebeselegie. Ein altes Problem im Licht eines neuen Fundes”, Poetica 15, 205-46.

– (1989): “Quid de obsequio suo in amore poetae elegiaci senserint”, in Catanzaro/Santucci (1989), 25-62.

– (1990): “De amore senili quid ueteres poetae senserint”, Gymnasium 98, 264-76.

– (1992): “Musa puerilis. Die Knabenliebe in der klassischen Dichtung der Römer”, in Stemmler, Theo (ed.): Homoerotische Lyrik. 6. Kolloquium der Forschungsstelle für europäische Lyrik des Mittelalters (Mannheim), 69-87.

– (2000): “Sexualität und Obszönität in römischer ‘Lyrik’”, in Stemmler, Theo/Horlacher, Stefan (edd.): Sexualität im Gedicht: II. Kolloquium der Forschungsstelle für europäische Lyrik (Tübingen), 11-49.

– (2001): “Ovids Enzyklopädie der Liebe”, in Ovid: Erotische Dichtungen. Übersetzt von Viktor von Marnitz. Mit einer Einführung von –. 3. Auflage. Kröners Taschenausgabe 263 (Stuttgart), ix-lviii [W. Schubert, MH 59, 2002, 261].

Suerbaum, Werner (1964): “Der Schluß der Einleitungselegie zum 4. Properzbuch (Zum Motiv der Lebenswahl bei Properz)”, RhM 107, 340-61.

Suits, Thomas A. (1969): “The Vertumnus Elegy of Propertius”, TAPhA 100, 475-86.

– (1976): “The Iambic Character of Propertius 1.4”, Philologus 120, 86-91.

Sullivan, John Patrick (1961): “Two Problems in Roman Love Elegy”, TAPhA 92, 522-36.

– (1964): Ezra Pound and Sextus Propertius: a Study in Creative Translation (Austin, TX).

– (1966): “Propertius: a Preliminary Essay”, Arion 5, 5–22.

– (1972): “The Politics of Elegy”, Arethusa 5, 17-34 = P. A. Miller 2002, 312-28.

– (1976): Propertius: a Critical Introduction (Cambridge) [A. C. F. Verity, G&R 24, 1977, 84; Schachter, CW 71, 1977, 149-50; E. Pasoli, Gnomon 50, 1978, 540-5; M. Hubbard, JRS 68, 1978, 232-35; Z. Udris, CPh 73, 1978, 361-4; J. H. Brouwers, Mnemosyne 33, 1980, 203-4; H. Guite, Phoenix 34, 1980, 363-5].

– (1978/9): “Prop. IV 8, 58”, MCr 13/14, 381.

– (1984): “Propertius Book IV: Themes and Structure”, ICS 9, 30-4.

– (1989): “Recent Structural and Post-Structural Studies on Propertius”, AugAge 9, 37-47.

– (1993): “Form Opposed: Elegy, Epigram, Satire”, in Boyle, Anthony James (ed.): Roman Epic (London/New York), 143-61.

Susini, G. (1981): “Gratia coniurandi (Suet. Aug. 17,2): a proposito del papiro di Gallo da Qasr Ibrîm, in Bresciani [et al.] (edd.): Scritti in onore di O. Montevecchi (Bologna), 393-400.

Sussmann, Lewis A. (1999): “Interpretating Racism in Calpurnius Flaccus Declamatio 2: The Evidence of Ovid, Amores 2.7-8 and Juvenal Satires 6”, in Schubert 1999, II, 841-60.

Suter, Ann (1989): “Ovid, from Image to Narrative: Amores 1.8 and 3.6”, CW 83, 15-20.

Sweet, Frederick Delmer (1972): “Propertius and Political Panegyric”, Arethusa 5, 169-75.

– (1973): Divinities and Religious Ideas in Propertius and Tibullus (diss., University of Toronto) [DA 37, 1976, 1529A].

Switala, William J. (1977): The Incidence and Use of Alliteration in the Elegies of Propertius (diss., University of Pittsburgh) [DA 38, 1978, 5448A].

Swoboda, Michał (1969): Tibullus. Poeta elegijny (Poznan).

– (1969/70): “Autorzy Trzeciej Księgi tzw. Corpus Tibullianum” [Die Autoren des dritten Buches des Corpus Tibullianum], Eos 58, 99-114.

– (1973): “De Panegyrico Messallae in Corpore Tibulliano asservato”, SPhP 1, 115-32.

– (1977a): “De Propertii elegiis hymnos imitantibus”, Eos 65, 131-8.

– (1977b): “De Tibulli elegiis hymnicis”, Eos 65, 245-56.

– (1978): “De Ovidii carminum elegiacorum fragmentis hymnico-precatoriis”, Eos 66, 73-90.

Syme, Ronald (1978): History in Ovid (Oxford).

Tagliente, Maria Carmela (1976/7): “Contributo alla storia del testo di Tibullo. I codici Perus. 669 (I 64) e Vat. Ott. Lat. 1345”, AFLPer 14, 474-506.

– (1977/8): “Ancora su1 Perusinus 669 (I 64)”, AFLPer 15, 12-38.

Taïfakos, Ioannis G. (1974) : Soulpikíaß ™legeídia (Corpus Tibullianum III, 13-18 = IV,7-12) (Athina).

– (1985): “A Note on Tibullus’ Indirect Tradition”, Philologus 129, 155-9.

Tanci, Marcello (1986a): “L’Olimpo pagano e il sentimento religioso di Properzio”, in Atti 1986, 63-75.

– (1986b): “La psicologia e la visione del mondo di Properzio”, in Assisi 1986, 143-59.

Tarrant, Richard John (1983): “Ovid”, in Reynolds, L. D. (ed.): Text and Transmission: a Survey of the Latin Classics (Oxford), 257-86.

– (1987): “The Authenticity of the Letter of Sappho to Phaon (Heroides XV)”, HSPh 85, 133-53.

– (1995): “Ovid and the Failure of Rhetoric”, in Innes, Doreen/Hine, Harry/Pelling, Christopher (edd.): Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday (Oxford), 63-74.

Tartari Chersoni, Marinella (1973): Struttura e funzionalità della lingua poetica di Properzio (Bologna).

Tatham, Gail (2000): “‘Just as Ariadne Lay …’: Images of Sleep in Propertius 1.3”, Scholia 9, 45-53.

Tatum, William Jeffrey (2000): “Aspirations and Divagations: the Poetics of Place in Propertius 2.10”, TAPhA 130, 393-410.

Taylor, Jennifer Hassel (1970): “Amores 3.9: a Farewell to Elegy”, Latomus 29, 474-7.

Tedeschi, Antonella (1990a): “‘Così non può continuare’ ovvero la separazione, in Alfonso/Cipriani [et al.] 1990, 157-208.

– (1990b): “Il giogo imperfetto e lo scarto in amore. A proposito di Properzio 3,24”, Aufidus 10, 53-67.

Thibault, John C. (1969): “A Difference of Metaphor Between Propertius and Ovid”, in Classical Studies Presented to B. E. Perry by His Students and Colleagues at the University of Illinois, 1924-60. Illinois Studies in Language and Literature 58 (Chicago/London), 31-7.

Thill, Andrée (1979): Alter ab illo. Recherches sur l’imitation dans la poésie personnelle à l’époque augustéenne. Collection d’Études anciennes publieé sous le patronage de l’Association G. Budé (Paris).

Thomas, Elizabeth (1964): “Variations on a Military Theme in Ovid’s Amores”, G&R ser. 2, 11, 151-64.

– (1965): “A Comparative Analyse of Ovid, ‘Amores’, II, 6 and III, 9”, Latomus 24, 599-609.

– (1969): “Ovid at the Races. Amores, III, 2; Ars amatoria, I, 135-164”, in Bibauw, Jacqueline (ed.): Hommages à Marcel Renard I. Collection Latomus 101 (Bruxelles), 710-24.

Thomas, Joël (1999): “L’imaginaire de l’amour chez les latins”, Euphrosyne 27, 31-50.

Thomas, Richard F. (1978): “Ovid’s Attempt at Tragedy (Am. 3.1.63-64)”, AJPh 99, 447-50.

– (1996): “Genre through Intertextuality: Theocritus to Virgil and Propertius”, in Harder, M. A./Regtuit, R. F./Wakker, G. C. (edd.): Theocritus. Hellenistica Groningana 2 (Groningen), 227-44 = id. (1999): Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality (Ann Arbor), 246-66.

– (2004): “‘Drowned in the Tide’: the Nauagika and Some ‘Problems’ in Augustan Poetry”, in Acosta-Hughes, Benjamin/Baumbach, Manuel/Kosmetatou, Elizabeth (edd.): Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Poseidippus (P. Mil. Vogl. VIII 309) (Cambridge, MA), 259-75.

Thüry, Günther E. (1996): “War Tibull in Gallien?”, Tyche 11, 227-8.

Tissol, Garth (1997): The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (Princeton, NJ).

Tordeur, Pol (1988): “Structures symétriques chez Properce”, Latomus 47, 105-16.

Torzi, Ilaria (1995): “Nullo limine carus eris: proposto di interpretazione dell’elegia I 4 di Properzio”, in Belloni, Luigi/Milanese, Guido/Porro, Antonietta (edd.), Studia classica Johanni Tarditi oblata (Milano), 527-36.

Tourlidis, Georgios A. (1972): “Morfaì kaì parastáseiß toû qanátou parà Tiboúllö”, in K. I. Merentíth eœß tñ tessarákonta ™thrídi têß ¢kaideutikêß ažtoû drásewß (Athina), 423-30.

– (1974): “Messálla Panhgurikóß”, in $Análekta latiniká (Athina).

– (1989) : §O diaploûß toû Aœgaíou ˜pò tòn Messállan kaì ¦ Tíboulloß (Athina).

– (1990a): “§H Énanti toû §Rwmaismoû stásiß têß Kornhlíaß e¥ß tòn Propértion (Propert. IV 11, 37-38)”, Platon 42, 40-4 = H yunaíka sth latinikë grammateía: D’ Panellënio sumpósio latinikýn spoudýn (Réqumno 2-4 Noembríou 1990) (Rethimno, 1994), 75-9

– (1990b) : “§Ermhneutikà problëmata perì tòn Tíboullon (1.3, 1-3)”, Parnassos 32, 96-101.

– (1993): “Mneîai perì xorôn eœß tòn Tíboullon”, Platon 45, 103-7.

– (1996): “$Afroasiatikaì mneîai toû Tiboúllou katà tòn diáploun toû Aœgaíou ˜pò tòn Méssalan”, Journal of Oriental and African Studies 8, 173-5.

– (1999): “‘§O Púlioß Néstwr eœß tòn Tíboullon’ [Tibull. III 7 (= IV 1), 48-53, 111-113]”, in Púloß. Diaxronikë-diepisthmonikë ™cétash. Praktikà a’ topikoû sunedríou 1-3 majou 1998 (Athina), 43-6 = Platon 51, 1999/2000, 171-5.

Tovar, Antonio (1964): “Notes on the Text of Propertius”, CPh 59, 34-6.

– (1965): “Oratoria en la poesia de Propercio IV 11, 55 (con una nota a IV 4, 94)”, Homenaje a J. V. Vives I (Barcelona), 183-7.

Tracy, Valerie A. (1976): “The Poet-Lover in Augustan Elegy”, Latomus 35, 575-81.

– (1977a): “Dramatic Elements in Ovid’s Amores”, Latomus 36, 496-500.

– (1977b): “Ovid and Corinna”, EMC 21, 86-97.

– (1978/9): “Ovid’s Self-Portrait in the Amores”, Helios 6.2, 57-62.

– (1979) : One Aspect of nequitia in Ovid’s Amores”, in Deroux, Carl (ed.): Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History I. Collection Latomus 164 (Bruxelles), 343-8.

Tränkle, Hermann (1960): Die Sprachkunst des Properz und die Tradition der lateinischen Dichtersprache. Hermes Einzelschriften 75 (Wiesbaden).

– (1968): “Beiträge zur Textkritik und Erklärung des Properz”, Hermes 96, 559-82.

– (1971): “Properz über Vergils Aeneis”, MH 28, 60-3.

– (1979a): “Das römische Vorbild für Goethes ‘Euphrosyne’ (Properz IV 7)”, Acta philol. Aenipont. 4, 74-6.

– (1979b): “Zum ersten Lygdamusgedicht”, ZPE 35, 23-8.

– (1983): “Properzio poeta dell’opposizione politica?”, in Colloquium 1983, 149-62.

– (1985): “Zu Tibulls erster Elegie”, MH 42, 174-82.

– (1986): “Die Sprache des Properz und die stilistischen Tendenzen der augusteischen Dichtung”, in Bimillenario 1986, 155-73.

– (1990): Appendix Tibulliana, herausgegeben und kommentiert. Texte und Kommentare 16 (Berlin/New York) [M. Jiménez, Helmantica 42, 1991, 350; J. Butrica, CR 42, 1992, 45-7; P. Venini, Athenaeum 80, 1992, 563-4; P. Galland-Hallyn, Latomus 52, 1993, 722-3; G. Luck, GGA 246, 1994, 70-86; P. Fedeli, Gnomon 67, 1995, 502-7; D. Mankin, CJ 91, 1995/6, 197-9].

Traglia, Antonio (1982): “...memor inmitis Glycerae (Hor. carm. I, 33, 1-2)”, in Dilke [et al.] 1982a, 29-35.

– (1985): “Rileggendo Properzio”, C&S 96, 45-57.

Traill, Ariana E. (2001): “Menander’s Thais and the Roman Poets”, Phoenix 55, 284-303

Traill, David A. (1994): “Propertius 1.21: the Sister, the Bones, and the Wayfarer”, AJPh 115, 89-96.

Traina, Alfonso (1966): “Primus dies natalis”, Maia 18, 279-80.

– (1994): “Nascita di un sintagma (me dolet, Prop. 1.16.24)”, Lexis 12, 147-9.

– (1996): “Optivo cognomine crescit: Properzio e l’ironia di Orazio (epist. 2.2.99-101)”, Lexis 14, 121-4.

– (2000): “Cinzia come Corinna. Una crux properziana: 2, 3a, 22”, RFIC 128, 38-41.

Trapp, Richard L. (1965): “Some Aspects of Imagery in Catullus, Horace, Ovid”, CB 41, 71-6.

Trappes-Lomax, John M. (2001): “Catullus 107: Removing the Hiatus and Other Textual Suggestions”, Phoenix 55, 304-12.

– (2002a): “Eleven Suggestions in Latin Poetry”, Mnemosyne 55, 581-8.

– (2002b): “Three Suggestions in Latin Poetry”, CQ 52, 609-12.

Tremoli, Paolo (1955): Influssi retorici e ispirazione poetica negli ‘Amores’ di Ovidio, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Facoltà di lettere, Istituto di filologia classica 1 (Trieste).

Troje, Hans Erich (1988): Gestohlene Liebe – Zum Problem der Rettung der Ehe (Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt).

Tronchet, Gilles (1999): “La nuit obscure des Amours: la tradition épique et sa traduction élégiaque”, in Fabre-Serris/Deremetz 1999, 85-126.

– (2000): “Le poète et ses doubles. Une approche de la réflexivité dans les Amores d’Ovide. I. Le déploiment d’un diptyque”, VL 158, 10-25.

Tronson, Adrian (1999): “What the Poet Saw: Octavian’s Triple Triumph, 29 B. C. Jeremiah Markland’s Conjectures at Propertius 3.11.52-53”, AClass 42, 171-86.

Tschiedel, Hans Jürgern (1977): “Vergil und die römische Liebeselegie”, in Neukam, P. (ed.): Lebendige Lektüre. Dialog Schule – Wissenschaft. Klassische Sprachen und Literaturen 10 (München), 120-55.

– (1992): “Die Gedichte der Sulpicia (Tib. 3, 13-18): Frauenlyrik?”, GB 18, 87-102 = Neukam, Peter (ed.): Verstehen, Übernehmen, Deuten. Dialog Schule – Wissenschaft. Klassische Sprachen und Literaturen 26 (München, 1992), 118-31.

Tuomisto, Pekka (1995): “Janus Pannonius and the Panegyricus Messallae”, AAntHung 36, 343-8.

Tupet, Anne-Marie (1976) : La magie dans la poésie latine. I: Des oriqines à la fin du regne d’Auguste (Paris).

– (1976b): “Ovide et la magie”, in Acta 1976, 575-84.

Turpin, José (1973): “Cynthia et le dragon de Lanuvium. Une élégie cryptique (Properce, IV, 8)”, REL 51, 159-71.

– (1999): “Estructura del dístico en las ‘Pequeñas elegías’ de Sulpicia”, Argos 23, 99-102.

Vahlen, Johannes (1879): “Über drei Elegien des Tibullus”, Monatsberichte der Kgl. Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Berlin 1878 = id.: Gesammelte philologische Schriften (Leipzig/Berlin, 1923; reprint Hildesheim/New York, 1970), II, 32-45.

Van Nortwick, Thomas (1990): “Huc veniet Messalla meus: Commentary on Johnson”, Arethusa 23, 115-23.

Van Sickle, John (1974/5): “Propertius (uates): Augustan Ideology, Topography, and Poetics in Eleg. IV, 1”, DArch 8, 116-45.

– (1980): “Gallus and Callimachus”, LCM 5, 109.

– (1981a): “Neget quis carmina Gallo?”, QUCC 38 n. s. 9, 125-7.

– (1981b): “Style and Imitation in the New Gallus”, QUCC 38 n. s. 9, 115-24.

Verdière, Raoul (1965): “La ‘pauvreté’ de Tibulle”, Ludus Magistralis. Centre de Latin F. Peters, Bruxelles 2, 13-15.

– (1972): “Sur un point crucial de la Vita Tibulli”, RSC 20, 154-8.

– (1985): “Analyse exégétique et psychopathologique du carmen 1, 10 de Properce”, Helmantica 36, 369-416.

– (1989): “Ovide, Am. II, 13,1-4”, Latomus 48, 190-3.

Verducci, Florence (1984): “On the Sequence of Gallus’ Epigrams molles elegi, vasta triumphi pondera”, QUCC 45 n. s. 16.1, 119-36.

Veremans, Jozef (1970): “De paíwn trítoß in het 2^e hemistichon van de pentameter. Metrisch onderzoek bij Catullus, Tibullus, Propertius en Ovidius”, in $Anámnhsiß. Gedenkboek E. A. Leeman’s (Brugae), 401-12.

– (1981): “L’anaphore dans l’oeuvre de Tibulle”, AC 50, 774-800.

– (1983a): “Le thème élégiaque de la vita iners chez Tibulle et Properce”, in Zehnacker, Hubert/Heutz, Gustave (edd.): Hommage à Robert Schilling. Collection d’Études latins. Sér. Scientifique 37 (Paris), 423-36.

– (1983b): “Tibull und der Isis- und Osiriskult”, in Händel, Paul/Meid, Wolfgang (edd.): Festschrift für Robert Muth. Zum 65. Geburtstag am 7. Januar 1981, dargebracht von Freunden und Kollegen. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft 22 (Innsbruck), 547-57.

– (1985): “Tibullus II, 4: een paraclausithyron?”, Lampas 78, 177-89 = [erweitert] “Tibulle II, 4: Un paraclausithyron”, Euphrosyne 17, 1989, 99-114.

– (1987a): “Tibulle 1, 6 et Ovide”, in Saerens, Cecilio/De Smet, Rudolf/ Melaerts, Henri (edd.): Studia varia Bruxellensia ad orbem Graeco-Latinum pertinentia. Dertig jaar Klassieke Filologie aan de Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Leuven), 125-133.

– (1987b): “Tibulle II, 6: forme et fond”, Latomus 46, 68-86.

– (1991a): “Le partage trochaïque au troisième pied dans l’hexamètre de Tibulle: contribution à la métrique verbale”, Euphrosyne 19, 89-108.

– (1991b): “Tibulle, 1,6: sens et structure”, Latomus 50, 376-94.

– (1994): “L’élégie 1, 10 de Tibulle: un poème sui generis?”, in Melaerts, Henri/De Smet, Rudolf/Saerens, Cecilio (edd.): Studia varia Bruxellensia ad orbem Graeco-Latinum pertinentia 3 (Leuven), 201-13.

– (1996): “La structure de l’enjambement chez les poètes élégiaques: Tibulle, Properce, Ovide”, Latomus 55, 525-43.

– (1998): “Lygdamus III, 1 et III, 4. Essai d’interprétation”, Euphrosyne 26, 9-24.

– (2002): “Quelques réflexions sur la vie sociale et littéraire dans le cercle de Messalla Corvinus”, in Defosse, Pol (ed.): Hommages à Carl Deroux. Collection Latomus 266. 267 (Bruxelles), I, 499-506.

Vessey, D. W. T. (1981): “Elegy Eternal: Ovid, Amores, I.15”, Latomus 40, 607-17.

Veyne, Paul (1983): L’élégie érotique romaine. L’amour, la poésie et l’Occident (Paris) [J. Filée, LEC 53, 1985, 291; M. G. Parisi, QC 8, 1986, 535-56] = La poesia, l’amore, l’Occidente. L’elegia erotica romana. Trad. di Laura Xella (Bologna, 1985) [V. Citti, Lexis 6, 1988, 241-3] = Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry and the West. Translated by David Pellauer (Chicago/London, 1988; pp. 110-5 = P. A. Miller 2002, 366-85) [M. Wyke, JRS 79, 1989, 165-70; M. C. J. Putnam, NECN 17 1989/90, 40-2; D. Fowler, G&R 37, 1990, 104-6; B. Heiden, Arion I 3, 1991, 202-8; Nielson, EMC 35, 1991, 120-4].

Viarre, Simone (1986): “L’inclusion épique dans la poesie élégiaque augustéenne”, in Decreus, Freddy/Deroux, Carl (edd.): Hommages à Jozef Veremans. Collection Latomus 193 (Bruxelles), 369-72.

– (1988): “Les images de l’espace et du temps chez Ovide”, in L’imaginaire de l'espace et du temps chez les Latins. Textes élaborés par les membres de l’Équipe pour la Recherche sur l’Imaginaire de la Latinité. Numéro organisé et coordonné par Joël Thomas. Cahiers de l’Univ. de Perpignan 5 (Perpignan), 89-106.

– (1994): “Les héroines mythologiques dans l’imaginaire de Properce”, in: Thomas, Joël (ed.): L’imaginaire religieux gréco-romain. Coll. Études Perpignan Pr. Universitaires de Perpignan (Perpignan).

– (1995): “L’enfant Amour dans la poésie augustéenne”, in Auger, Danièle (ed.): Enfants et enfances dans les mythologies: Actes du VII^e Colloque du Centre de recherchees mythologiques de l’Université de Paris-X (Chantilly, 16-18 septembre 1992) (Paris), 197-215.

– (2002): “Le livre IV des Élégies de Properce est-il sérieux?”, in Defosse, Pol (ed.): Hommages à Carl Deroux. Collection Latomus 266. 267 (Bruxelles), I, 507-14.

Videau-Delibes, Anne (1994): “Élégie et retournements de fortune, des archaïques grecs aux poèmes tibulliens”, in Conso, Danièle/Fick, Nicole/Poulle, Bruno (edd.): Mélanges François Kerlonégan Institut Felix Gaffiot. 11. Annales littéraires de l’Université de Besançon 515 (Paris), 651-66.

– (1996): “La parole dans l’élégie romaine classique”, in Dangel, Jacqueline/Moussy, Claude (edd.): Les structures de l’oralité en latin: Colloque du Centre Alfred Ernout, Université de Paris IV, 2, 3 et juin 1994 (Paris), 225-33.

Viparelli Santangelo, Valeria (1986): L’esametro di Properzio. Rapporti con Callimaco. Studi e testi dell’antichità 78 (Napoli) [C. Formicola, Vichiana 15, 1986, 320-2; M. Bonaria, BStudLat 17, 1987, 134-5; J. Hellegouarc’h, REL 65, 1987, 298-90; G. Namia, Sileno 14, 1988, 267-8; De Neubourg, Latomus 48, 1989, 687; P. Tordeur, AC 59, 1990, 361-2; D. W. T. Vessey, Gnomon 64, 1992, 441-3;

– (1987): “Rassegna di studi properziani (1982-1987)”, BStudLat 17, 19-76.

– (1988a): “Ancora su alcuni recenti studi properziani”, BStudLat 18, 58-63.

– (1988b): “Properzio 1, 21, 5. L’espunzione di ut e l’interpretazione di seruato”, BStudLat 18, 19-32.

– (1989): “Tra testo e contesto: Properzio I, 3, 16 ed il rifiuto della violenza”, CCC 10, 405-38.

– (1990): “Meccanismo retorico di uno zeugma properziano”, Vichiana 3a seria 1, 239-43.

– (2002): “Bilanci e prospettive degli studi properziani: a proposito di tre recenti volumi”, BStudLat 32, 588-616.

– (2003): “Forme di vita e di poesia d’amore: tra Catullo 76 e Properzio I 1”, in id. (ed.): Tra strategie retoriche e generi letterari. Dieci studi di letteratura latina. Domini. Linguistica e linguaggi 20 (Napoli), 179-96.

Vischer, Rüdiger (1965): Das einfache Leben. Wort- und motivgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu einem Wertbegriff der antiken Literatur. Studienhefte zur Altertumswissenschaft 11 (Göttingen).

Vitale, M. T. (1980): “Catullo negli Amores di Ovidio”, CCC 1, 331-47.

Vitucci, Giovanni (1986): “Tibullo e Messalla. Un problema di cronologia”, in Atti 1986, 267-73.

Vivona, Salvatore (1986): “Properzio ed Assisi”, in Assisi 1986, 101-23.

Vofchuk, Rosalía (1985/6): “La India en Cicerón y los liricos latinos”, Argos 9/10, 143-58.

– (1999): “Estructura del dístico en las pequeñas elegías de Sulpicia”, Argos 23, 99-102.

Voit, Ludwig (1994): “Ovid zu einem aktuellen Thema (Amores 2, 13 und 14)”, Anregung 40, 186-8.

Vretska, Karl (1955): “Tibulls ‘Paraklausithyron’ (I, 2)”, WS 68, 20-46.

– (1957): “Tibull IV 8, 6”, Gymnasium 64, 83-9.

– (1963): “Tibull I 5”, AU 6.3, 111-28 = Eisenhut, Werner (ed.): Antike Lyrik (Darmstadt, 1970), 295-320.
Wagenvoort, H. (1962): “Indo-European Paradise Motifs in Virgil’s 4^th Eclogue”, Mnemosyne 75, 133-45.

Walde, Christine (2001): Die Traumdarstellungen in der griechisch-römischen Dichtung (München/Leipzig) [C. Hartmann, Gnomon 75, 2003, 316-20; G. Weber, CR 53, 2003, 342-4].

Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew (1985): “Propaganda and Dissent? Augustan Moral Legislation and the Love-poets”, Klio 67, 1985, 180-4.

Walsh, T. J. R. (1983): “Propertius’ Tarpeia Elegy (4, 4)”, LCM 8, 75-6.

– (1987): “Propertius’ Paetus Elegy (3.7)”, LCM 12, 66-9.

Walter, Hermann (1986): “Zur Gedichtgrenze zwischen Ovid Am. 2, 13 und 14”, RhM 129, 306-21.

– (1999): “Zum Gedichtschluß von Ovid, Am. 1, 2”, in Schubert 1999, 87-97.

– (2002): “Ovid, Am. I,14,3”, in Marek, Heidi [et al.] (edd.): Metamorphosen: Wandlungen und Verwandlungen in Literatur, Sprache und Kunst von derAntike bis zur Gegenwart. Festschrift für Bodo Guthmüller zum 65. Geburtstag (Wiesbaden), 7-15.

Warden, John (1977): “Bella satis cecini: a Note on Propertius II, 10 and IV, 6”, CJ 73, 19-21.

– (1978): “Another Would-Be Amazon: Propertius 4, 4, 71-72”, Hermes 106, 177-87.

– (1980): Fallax Opus: Poet and Reader in the Elegies of Propertius. Phoenix Suppl. 74 (Toronto/Buffalo/London) [E. W. Leach, Phoenix 36, 1982, 275-8; E. Block, AJPh 104, 1983, 97-102].

– (1982): “Epic into Elegy: Propertius 4, 9, 70f.”, Hermes 110, 228-42.

– (1996): “The Dead and the Quick: Structural Correspondences and Thematic Relationships in Propertius 4.7 and 4.8”, Phoenix 50, 118-29.

Waszink, J. H. (1960): “Propertianum”, in Hommages à Léon Herrmann (Bruxelles), 786-800.

Watson, Lindsay C. (1982): “Ovid Amores I 6: a Parody of a Hymn?”, Mnemosyne 35, 92-102.

Watson, Patricia (1983): “Ovid Amores 2,7 and 8: the Disingenuous Defence”, WS 17, 91-103.

Watt, W. S. (1975): “Propertius 4.1.9”, CQ 25, 155-6.

– (1990): “Notes on Three Latin Poets”, CPh 85, 129-31.

– (1991): “Five Notes on the Corpus Tibullianum”, Maia 43, 15-16.

– (1992): “Propertiana”, MH 49, 233-8.

– (1997/8): “Notes on Latin Poetry: Ovid, Lucan, Silius Italicus, Statius, Martial, Rutilius, and Fragmentary Latin Poets”, BICS 42, 145-58.

– (2004): “Propertiana”, RhM 147, 298-302.

Watts, W. J. (1973): “Ovid, the Law and Roman Society on Abortion”, AClass 16, 89-101.

Weeber, Karl-Wilhelm (1976): “Aperto in coniuge. Adnotiuncula ad Propertium 4, 3, 49”, Latinitas 24, 211-13.

– (1977): Das 4. Properz-Buch. Interpretationen zu seiner Eigenart und seiner Stellung im Gesamtwerk (diss., Bochum).

– (1978): “Properz 4, 1, 1-70 und das 8. Buch der Aeneis”, Latomus 37, 489-506.

Weiden, Barbara M. (1980): Cynthia and Rome in the Development of Propertius’ Literary Identity (diss., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) [DA 41, 1980, 662A-663A].

Weinlich, Barbara (1999): Ovids Amores. Gedichtfolge und Handlungsablauf. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 128 (Stuttgart/Leipzig) [F. Felgentreu, BMCRev 01.04.12; N. Holzberg, CR 51, 2001, 402; R. Martin, Gnomon 76, 2004, 271-3].

– (2000): “Properz im Spiegel von Ovid: Amores II 9 als Antwort auf Properz II, 12 und 13”, Eos 87, 119-29.

Weinreich, Otto (1926): Die Distichen des Catull (Tübingen).

Welch, Tara Silvestri (1999): Poetry and Place in Propertius’ Fourth Book (diss., University of California, Los Angeles, CA) [DAI-A 60, 1999/2000, 116].

– (2004): “Masculinity and Monuments in Propertius 4.9”, AJPh 125, 61-90.

Wellesley, Kenneth (1969): “Propertius’ Tarpeia Poem (IV 4)”, ACD 5, 93-103.

Wenzel, Ursula (1969) : Properz. Hauptmotive seiner Dichtung: Lebenswahl, Tod, Ruhm und Unsterblichkeit, Kaiser und Rom (diss., Freiburg i. Br).

West, David (1983): “pauca meo Gallo”, LCM 8, 92-3.

Wheeler, Arthur Leslie (1910): “Propertius as Praeceptor Amoris”, CPh 5, 28-40.

– (1910/11): “Erotic Teaching in Roman Elegy and the Greek Sources”, CPh 5, 440-50; 6, 56-77.

Whitaker, Richard (1979): “Propertius 4.7.26 Again”, CQ 29, 485-6.

– (1979b): “The Unity of Tibullus’ 2.3”, CQ 29, 131-41.

– (1981): “A propos of the New Gallus Fragment”, AClass 24, 87-96.

– (1983): Myth and Personal Experience in Roman Love-Elegy: a Study in Poetic Technique, Hypomnemata 76 (Göttingen) [W. Hering, DLZ 105, 1984, 852-4; Youm, Salesianum 46, 1984, 921-2; J. Butrica, EMC 30, 1986, 88-90; G. Petersmann, AAHG 40, 1987, 41-44].

– (1984): “Gallus and the ‘Classical’ Augustans (Vergil and Horace)”, PLLS 4, 55-60.

– (1988): “Did Gallus Write ‘Pastoral’ Elegies?”, CQ 38, 454-8.

White, Heather (1999): “Two Notes on Propertius”, GIF 51, 99-101.

– (2003): “Textual Problems in Latin Poetry of the Golden Age”, GIF 55, 257-63.

White, Peter (1993): Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome (Cambridge, MA/London) [D. Feeney, BMCRev 94.06.16; A. M. Keith, EMC 13, 1994, 430-3; T. A. Suits, NECN 22, 1994, 80-1; A. La Penna, Maia 50, 1998, 527-38].

– (2002): “Ovid and the Augustan Milieu”, in Boyd 2002b, 1-25.

White, Ronald E. (1964): “Descriptive Power and Humor in Propertius”, in Henderson, Charles (ed.), Classical, Medieval and Renaissance Studies in Honor of Berthold Louis Ullman. Storia e Letteratura. Raccolta di Studi e Testi 93 (Roma), I, 143-57.

Wieland, Hans (1993): “Invidere – videre: eine poetische Antithese”, Glotta 71, 217-22.

– (1998): “Drei Beispiele semantischen Doppelspiels bei Ovid”, in Radke, Anna Elissa (ed.): Candide Iudex. Beiträge zur augusteischen Dichtung. Festschrift für Walter Wimmel zum 75. Geburtstag (Stuttgart), 399-406.

Wifstrand Schiebe, Marianne (1981): Das ideale Dasein bei Tibull und die Goldzeitkonzeption Vergils. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Latina Upsaliensia 13 (Uppsala/Stockholm) [W. Hering, DLZ 103, 1982, 600-3; K. Kubusch, Gnomon 54, 1982, 733-40; R. Maltby, CQ 32, 1982, 163-4; P. Johnston, Vergilius 30, 1984, 73-4].

Wildberger, Jula (1998a): “Ovid, A. A. 3, 343 und die zweite Auflage der Amores. Eine neue Konjektur”, WJA 22, 177-86.

– (1998b): “Die Überhöhung der Geliebten bei Tibull, Properz und Ovid”, Gymnasium 105, 39-64.

Wilhelm, Friedrich (1902): “Zur römischen Elegie”, RhM 57, 599-609.

– (1916): “Zur Elegie”, RhM 71, 136-42.

Wilkinson, L. P. (1955): Ovid Recalled (Cambridge).

– (1967): “Two Passages in Propertius”, CR 17, 137.

Wille, Günther (1980): “Zum Aufbau des zweiten Buches des Properz”, WJA 6a, 249-67.

– (1983): “Der Aufbau des dritten Elegienbuches des Properz”, in Händel, Paul/Meid, Wolfgang (edd.): Festschrift für Robert Muth zum 65. Geburtstag am 1. Januar 1981, dargebracht von Freunden und Kollegen. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft 22 (Innsbruck), 597-611.

– (1984): “Zum künstlerischen Aufbau von Ovids ‘Amores’”, in Oroz Arizcuren, Francisco J. (ed.): Navicula Tubingensis. Studia in honorem Antonii Tovar (Tübingen), 389-423.

Williams, Craig A. (1999): Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity (New York) [W. A. Krenkel, Gnomon 74, 2002, 446-7].

– (2002): “Ovid, Martial, and Poetic Immortality: Traces of Amores 1.15 in the Epigrams”, Arethusa 35, 417-33.

Williams, Frederick (2003): “The Hands of Death: Ovid, Amores 3.9.20”, AJPh 124, 225-34.

Williams, Gordon (1968): Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry (Oxford).

– (1980): Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry (New Haven, Conn.).

Williams, Mary Frances (1996/7): “Poetic Seacoasts: Montale’s I Morti and Propertius 3.18; 1.11; 3.5”, CML 17, 149-69.

– (2000): “Propertius 2.26b, Theocritus’ Idyll 11, and Epic Heroes”, Scholia 9, 20-42.

Willige, Wilhelm (1960): Tibull und sein Kreis. Lateinisch und deutsch. Tusculum-Bücherei (München).

Wills, Jeffrey (1996): Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion (Oxford) [A. Sharrock, G&R 44, 1997, 224; D. P. Nelis, BMCRev 98.5.17; R. G. M. Nisbet, CR 48, 1998, 298-300; J. O’Hara, JRS 88, 1998, 197; M. C. J. Putnam, AJPh 119, 1998, 295-300; B. Vine, CJ 94, 1998/9, 195-200; J. Zetzel, CPh 94, 1999, 103-11; J. Dangel, Latomus 59, 2000, 149-52].

Wilson, Marcus (1987): “Wasted Words: Rhetoric and Paradox in Ovid’s Amores”, Classicum 13, 5-13.

Wimmel, Walter (1960): Kallimachos in Rom. Die Nachfolge seines apologetischen Dichtens in der Augusteerzeit. Hermes Einzelschriften 16 (Wiesbaden).

– (1961): “Tibull II 5 und das elegische Rombild”, in Radke, Gerhard (ed.): Gedenkschrift für Georg Rohde. Aparchai 4 (Tübingen), 227-266 = Wimmel 1987a, 80-119.

– (1968): Der frühe Tibull. Studia et Testimonia Antiqua 6 (München) [J. Delz, MH 27, 1970, 185; H. Bardon, REA 72, 1970, 201-2; J. Hellegouarc’h, RPh 44, 1970, 336-7; E. J. Kenney, CR 20, 1970, 337-40; F. W. Lenz, DLZ 90, 1970, 791-4; J. H. Gaisser, CJ 66, 1971, 260-2; H. E. Pillinger, Gnomon 43, 1971, 26-31; K. Vretska, AAHG 26, 1973, 193-7].

– (1970): “Apollo – Paupertas. Zur Symbolik von Berufungsvorgängen bei Properz, Horaz und Calpurnius”, in id. (ed.): Forschungen zur römischen Literatur. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Karl Büchner (Wiesbaden), 291-7 = Wimmel 1987a, 257-63.

– (1971): “Quisquis et occurret, ne possit crimen habere, stet procul... (Zu Tibull I, 6, 41/2)”, Hermes 99, 156-63 = Wimmel 1987a, 264-71.

– (1976): Tibull und Delia. 1. Teil: Tibulls Elegie 1, 1 Hermes Einzelschriften 37 (Wiesbaden) [J.-Cl. Richard, REL 56, 1978, 515-16; J. Cousin, RBPh 57, 1979, 1044; S. Viarre, RPh 53, 1979, 358; K. Vretska, Gnomon 51, 1979, 18-22; R. Ball, CJ 75, 1979/80, 183-4; R. Hanslik, WS 14, 1980, 243; G. E. Thüry, AAHG 37, 1884, 241-4].

– (1982): “Graphischer Versuch zum Aufbau einer tibullischen Elegie (1, 1)”, Gymnasium 89, 289-95 = Wimmel 1987a, 272-8.

– (1983): Tibull und Delia. Zweiter Teil: Tibulls Elegie 1, 2. Hermes Einzelschriften 47 (Wiesbaden) [G. E. Thüry, AAHG 37, 1984, 241-4; W. Hofmann, DLZ 106, 1985, 368-71; R. Maltby, CR 35, 1985, 279-81; F. Robertson, G&R 32, 1985, 88; P. Venini, RFIC 113, 1985, 83-7; R. Rocca, Maia 38, 1986, 277-8; S. Viarre, RPh 60, 1980, 149].

– (1987a): Collectanea. Augusteertum und späte Republik (Stuttgart).

– (1987b): “Zur Rolle magischer Themen in Tibulls Elegie 1, 5”, WJA 13, 231-48.

– (1989): “Schamgefühl und seine dichterische Begründung. Überlegungen zu pudet bei Tibull (1, 5, 42) und anderen”, in Bernt, Günter/Rädle, Fidel/Silagi, Gabriel (edd.): Tradition und Wertung. Festschrift für Franz Brunhölzl zum 65. Geburtstag (Siegmaringen), 1-12.

– (1996/7): “Gallus und Thrakien bei Vergil und Horaz (zu Horaz, c. 3, 25)”, WJA 21, 229-37.

Winkler, Wilfried (1968): Die umgangssprachlichen Elemente bei Properz (diss., Wien; daktyl.).

Wistrand, Erik (1977): Miscellanea Propertiana. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia 38 (Göteborg) [E. Dahlén, Gnomon 51, 1979, 664-7].

Witczak, Krzysztof Tomasz (1993): “The Roman Elegist Servius Sulpicius: Known or Unknown”, Eos 81, 77-82.

Wohl, Birgitta (1971): Studies in Tibullus (diss., University of California, Los Angeles) [DA 32, 1972, 6401A].

– (1974): “The Phenomenon of Sperrung in Tibullus’ Elegies”, TAPhA 104, 385-428.

Woodman, A. J. (1997): “The Position of Gallus in Eclogue 6”, CQ 47, 593-7.

– (1998): “Propertius and Livy”, CQ 48, 568-9.

Woytek, Erich (1994): “Ovidius sui imitator. Die Liebe Apollos zu Daphne (met. 1, 452ff.) und das Liebeserwachen Medeas (met. 7, 10ff.) vor dem Hintergrund von Amores 1, 1 und 1, 2”, WHB 36, 44-64.

– (1995): “Die unlauteren Absichten eines Ehrenmannes (Zur Doppelbödigkeit von Ovid, Amores 1,3)”, WS 108, 417-38.

– (1997): “Cedant carminibus reges … Am. 1, 15 – ein Dokument ovidischen Selbstbewußtseins gegenüber Augustus”, WS 110, 105-31.

– (1998): “Deleantur am. 2, 11, 31sq. et 1, 14, 17-22, reviviscat Helena (ars am. 3, 440): Textkritische Beiträge zu Ovid”, WS 111, 167-89.

Wray, David (2003): “What Poets Do: Tibullus on ‘Easy Hands’”, CPh 98, 217-50.

Wyke, Maria: (1987a): “The Elegiac Woman at Rome”, PCPhS 33, 153-78 = Wyke 2002, 78-114.

– (1987b): “Written Woman: Propertius’ Scripta Puella”, JRS 77, 47-61 = Wyke 2002, 46-77.

– (1989a): “In Pursuit of Love, the Poetic Self and a Process of Reading: Augustan Elegy in the 1980s”, JRS 79, 165-73.

– (1989b): “Mistress and Metaphor in Augustan Elegy”, Helios 76, 25-47 = McClure, Laura K. (ed.): Sexuality and Gender in the Classical World: Readings and Sources (Oxford/Malden, MA), 193-219 = P. A. Miller 2002, 386-409 = Wyke 2002, 11-45.

– (1989c): “Reading Female Flesh: Amores 3.1”, in Cameron, Averil (ed.), History as Text: the Writing of Ancient History (London), 111-43 = Wyke 2002, 115-54.

– (1992): “Augustan Cleopatras: Female Power and Poetic Authority”, in Powell, Anton (ed.): Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustu (London), 98-140 = Wyke 2002, 195-243.

– (1994): “Taking the Woman’s Part: Engendering Roman Love Elegy”, Ramus 23, 110-28 = Wyke 2002, 155-91.

– (2002): The Roman Mistress: Ancient and Modern Representations (Oxford) [A. Richlin, Vergilius 48, 2002, 164-77; M. E. Rose, BMCRev 2002.11.02; Viparelli 2002; N. P. Gross, NECJ 31, 2004, 67-9].

Yardley, J. C. (1972): “Comic Influences in Propertius”, Phoenix 26, 134-9.

– (1973): “Sick-Visiting in Roman Elegy”, Phoenix 27, 283-8.

– (1977a): “Cynthia’s Ghost: Propertius 4.7 Again”, BICS 24, 83-7.

– (1977b): “The Roman Elegists, Sick Girls, and the Soteria”, CQ 27, 394-407.

– (1978): “The Elegiac Paraclausithyron”, Eranos 76, 19-34.

– (1979): “Ovid’s Other Propempticon”, Hermes 107, 183-8.

– (1980): “Paulus Silentiarius, Ovid, and Propertius”, CQ 30, 239-43.

– (1981): “Propertius 4.7.94: A Reply”, AJPh 102, 326.

– (1983): “Propertius 4.7.94 yet Again”, AJPh 104, 281-2.

– (1985): “L’influence de la comédie sur Properce”, AFLNice 50, 359-66

– (1986): “Propertius 3.6.9: a Weeping Mistress?”, Phoenix 40, 198-200.

– (1987): “Propertius 4.5, Ovid, Amores 1.6 and Roman Comedy”, PCPhS 33, 179-89.

– (1990): “Cerinthus’ pia cura ([Tibullus] 3.17.1-2)”, CQ 40, 568-70.

– (1991): “The Symposium in Roman Elegy”, in Slater, William J. (ed.): Dining in a Classical Context (Ann Arbor), 149-55.

– (1996): “Roman Elegy and Funerary Epigram”, EMC 40, 267-73.

– (2002): “Tibullus 1.2.7: Ianua difficilis domini te verberet imber”, Hermes 130, 121-2.
Zecchini, Giuseppe (1980): “Il primo frammento di Cornelio Gallo e la problematica partica nella poesia augustea”, Aegyptus 60, 138-48.

Zehnacker, Hubert (1993): “Sur quelques aspects de l’oralité dans la poésie d’Ovide”, in Vogt-Spira, Gregor (ed.), Beiträge zur mündlichen Kultur der Römer ScriptOralia 47 (Tübingen), 159-76.

Zelzer, Klaus (1966): “Zum Reim in der römischen Elegie”, WS 79, 465-77.

– (1988): “Zur Person des ‘Rivalen’ bei Tibull 1, 2, 67(65)f.”, WS 101, 259-64.

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1980): “The Earliest Transposition in Propertius”, AJPh 107, 314-5.

– (1983/4): “Re-Creating the Canon: Augustan Poetry and the Alexandrian Past”, in Hallberg, Robert von (ed.), Canons (Chicago), 107-29 = Critical Inquiry 70, 1983, 107-29.

– (1996): “Poetic Baldness and Its Cure”, MD 36, 73-100.

Zgoll, Christian (2002): “Badefreuden und Liebesleiden. Zur Interpretation und Stellung der 5. Elegie im Lygdamus-Zyklus ([Tib.] 3, 1-6)”, RhM 145, 108-19.

– (2004): Phänomenologie der Metamorphose. Verwandlungen und Verwandtes in der augusteischen Dichtung. Classica Monacensia 28 (Tübingen).

Zimmermann, Bernhard (1994): “Ille ego qui fuerim, tenerorum lusor amorum. Zur Poetik der Liebesdichtungen Ovids”, in Picone, Michelangelo/Zimmermann, Bernhard (edd.): Ovidius redivivus. Von Ovid zu Dante (Stuttgart), 1-21.

– (2000): “Properz 4, 3 und Ovids Heroides”, MH 57, 130-5.

Zimmermann, Sylvia (2001): “Geschichte und Politik – Mythos und Mythisierung: Kleopatra im Bild der Augusteischen Dichter”, in De Martino, Francesco/Morenilla, Carmen (edd.): El fil d’Ariadna: Universitat de València 3-5 de maig 2000 (Bari), 405-22.

Zuccarelli, Ugo (2002): “L’agg. fallax e il topos del servus fallax”, in Defosse, Pol (ed.): Hommages à Carl Deroux. Collection Latomus 266. 267 (Bruxelles), I, 539-43.

Zurli, Loriano (1996): “Ov. Am. 3, 15, 18”, GIF 48, 269-70.