Annual Interdisciplinary Graduate Symposium presented by the Anthropology Graduate Student Association



Download 0.8 Mb.
Page13/13
Date19.10.2016
Size0.8 Mb.
#3993
1   ...   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13

In order to determine the best way to regulate each ecotourism location, careful attention should be paid to both physiology and behavior. Managers should continue to monitor the behavior of primates under the influence of tourism, and to also quantify levels of stress with measures of cortisol. Ecotourism locations should find ways to make conservation more important to locals, and educate tourists on proper mannerisms and behaviors when in the presence of primates. Armed with both physiological and behavioral measures of stress, and the support of the local population, we can work to impress upon governments how important it is to create and enforce more stringent laws pertaining to ecotourism locations.
REFERENCES
Akers, J and Schildkraut, D.

1985 Regurgitation/reingestion and coprophagy in captive gorillas. Zoo Biology. 4, 99-109.

Behie AM., Pavelka M.S., Chapman CA. 

2010 Sources of variation in fecal cortisol levels in howler monkeys in Belize. American Journal of

Primatology. Jun;72 (7):600-6

Berman, C.M., Li, J.H., Ogawa H., Ionica, C. and Yin, H.B.

2007 Primate tourism, range restriction, and infant risk among Macaca thibetana at Mt.

Huangshan, China. Int. J. Primatol. 28: 1123-1141

Bertrand, M.

1969 The Behavioral Repertoire of the Stumptail Macque. Karger, Switzerland.

Birke, L.

2002 Effects of browse, human visitors, and noise on the behavior of captive

orangutans. Animal Welfare 11:, 189-202.

Blaney, EC, & Wells, DL.

2004 The influence of a camouflage net barrier on the behavior, welfare and public

perception of zoo-housed gorillas. Animal Welfare, 13: 111-118.

Bruffett, Dawn

2011 “Examining the Possibility of “Visitor Effect” in Western Lowland Gorillas (Gorilla



gorilla gorilla) with Respect to Crowd Density and Crowd Noise.” Zoo Projects.

University at Buffalo.

Carder, G, and Semple, S.

2008 Visitor effects on anxiety in two captive groups of western lowland gorillas.

ScienceDirect 115: 211-220.

Clarke, M., Harrison, R. and Didier, E.

1996 Behavioral, immunological, and hormonal responses associated with social changes

in Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). American journal of Primatology. 39: 223-233.

Davey, G.

2006a Visitor Behavior in Zoos: A Review. Anthrozoos 19(2): 143-157.

Davey, G.

2006b Variation in zoo visitor interest. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 9(3):

249-256

Davey, G.



2007 Visitors’ effects on the welfare of animals in the zoo: A review. Journal of Applied

Animal Welfare Science 10(2): 169-183.

Davis, N., Schaffner, C. and Smith, T.

2004 Evidence that zoo visitors influence HPA acitivity in spider monkeys (Ateles

geoffroyii rufiventris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90: 131-141.

de la Torre, S. Snowdon, C.T. and Bejarano, M.

2000 Effects of human activities on wild pygmy marmosets in Ecuadorian Amazonia. Biological

Conservation, 94, 153-163

Eagles, P. and O'Hara, E.

2004 Management recommendations for primate ecotourism. Folia Primatologica.

Fernandez, E, Tamborski, M, Pickens, S, and Timberlake, W.

2009 Animal-visitor interactions in the modern zoo: conflicts and interventions. Applied

Animal Behaviour Science 120: 1-8.

Glatston, A., Geilvoet-Soeteman, E., Hora-Pecek, E. and van Hooff, J.

1984 The influence of the zoo environment on social behavior of groups of Cotton-

Topped Tamarins, (Saguinus oedipus oedipus). Zoo Biology, 3: 241-253.

Gould, E. and Bres, M.

1986 Regurgitation and reingestion in captve gorillas: description and intervention. Zoo

Biology 5: 241-250.

Hosey, G.

2000 Zoo animals and their human audiences. Animal Welfare, 9: 343-357.

Hsu, M.J., Kao, C.C., and Agoramoorthy, G.

2009 Interactions between visitors and formosan macaques (Macaca cyclopis) at Shou-Shan Nature

Park, Taiwan. American Journal of Primatology. 71: 214-222.

Kuhar, C.

2008 Group differences in captive gorillas’ reaction to large crowds. Applied Animal

Behaviour Science, 110: 377-385.

Lutz, C.K., Tiefenbacher, S. Jorgensen, M.K. Meyer, J.S. and Novak, M.A

2000 Techniques for collecting saliva from awake, unrestrained, adult monkeys for

cortisol assay American Journal of Primatology, 52 (2), 93-99.

Maestripieri, D., Schino, G, Aureli, F. and Troisi, A.

1992 A modest proposal: displacement activities as an indicator of emotions in primates.

Animal Behaviour. 44:967-979.

Maki, S. Alford, P.L, and Bramblett, C.

1987 The effects of unfamiliar humans on aggression in captive chimpanzee groups.

American Journal of Primatology 12: 358.

Mallapur, A., Sinha, A. and Waran, N.

2005 Influence of visitor presence on the behavior of captive lion-tailed macaques

(Macaca silenus) housed in Indian zoos. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94: 341-

352.


Marechal L, Semple S, Majolo B, Oarro M, and MacLarnon A

2011 Impacts of tourism on anxiety and physiological stress in wild male Barbary

macaques. Biological Conservation, 144: 2188-2193.

Matheson, M. D., J. Hartel, C. Whitaker, L. K. Sheeran, J. H. Li and Wagner, R.S.

2007 Self-directed behavior correlates with tourist density in free-living Tibetan

macaques (Macaca thibetana) at the Valley of the Wild Monkeys, Mt. Huangshan,

China. American Journal of Primatology. 69(S1): 41–42

Mendez, D.

2010 “Visitor effects of zoo housed gorillas.” Zoo Projects. University at Buffalo

Morgan , K. and Tromberg, C.

2006 Sources of stress in captivity. Appliend Animal Behaviour Science. 102, 262-302.

Muehlenbein, M., Ancrenaz, M., Sakong, R., Ambu, L., Prall, S., Fuller, G. and Raghanti, M.

2012 Ape conservation physiology: fecal glucocorticoid response in wild Pongo

pygmaeus morio following human visitation. PLoS ON. 7(3): 1-10

Negrão, J.A., M.A. Porcionato, A.M. de Passillé and Rushen, J.

2004 Cortisol in saliva and plasma of cattle after ACTH administration and milking. American Dairy

Science Association, Journal Dairy Science, 87: 1713-1718

Oswald, M. and Kuyk, K.

1977 The behavior of three lorisoid primate species before and after the public

opening of the nocturnal house. Applied Behavioural Research at the Woodland Park Zoological

Gardens. 81-100.

Palagia E. and Norscia I.

2010 Scratching around stress: Hierarchy and reconciliation make the difference in wild

brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus). Stress 14: 93-97.

Rowell T.E and Hinde R.A

1963 Responses of rhesus monkeys to mildly stressful situations. Animal Behaviour. XI:

235-243.
Sapolsky, R.M.

2005 The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science. 308; 648-652.

Smith, T and French, A.

1997 Psychosocial stress and urinary cortisol excretion in marmoset monkeys

(Callithrix kuhli). Physiology & Behavior. 62(2), 225-232.

Smith K.N. and Kuhar C.W.

2010 Siamangs (Hylobates syndactylus) and white-cheeked gibbons (Hylobates leucogenys) show

few behavioral differences related to zoo attendance.

Wells, D.

2005 A note on the influence of visitors on the behavior and welfare of zoo-housed gorillas.

Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 93, 13-17.

Vrancken, A., L. Elsacker and Verheyen, R. F.

1990 "Preliminary study on the influence of the visiting public on the spatial distribution

in captive eastern lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla graueri)." ACTA Zoologica ET

Pathologica Antverpiensa 81: 9-15.




1 Octavio Paz, “January First,” Maps of the Imagination: The Writer as Cartographer, Peter Turchi. San Antonio: Trinity University Press, 2007.

2 “Como por sus susesores o ejecutores y permanecera desde aora para siempre.” translation mine.

3 Harold Fromm posits an ecocritical model that attempts to suture the mind/body, body/environment binary introduced by both rationalism and Christianity. For them Christianity contributed to the rift between humans and their environment a rift that Native Americans through their belief systems elided. We must, however, consider that Catholicism was present within corporate communities like Las Truchas and, that in fact, performances of faith unique to the area reinforced relationships with the land, relationships that perhaps do not cohere with the exact models these authors put forth in their respective writings within their formulation (Fromm 1996).

4 Political and legal status was arrived at via the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which ensured that citizens within New Mexico would become naturalized as United States citizens and were, “accorded the full rights, liberties and protections guaranteed to all Americans” (Van Ness 1991: 208). And according to John Phillips-Nieto New Mexicans were considered free whites with voting rights. However, he contends they were not considered equal in either political or social realms (Phillips-Nieto 2004: 47).

5 After the construction of the Office of the Surveyor General by the U.S. government in 1856 developed a new legitimizing forum, the Court of Land Claims. In 1892, the residents of Las Las Truchas submitted a petition for the legal confirmation of the Rosario grant for the heirs and legal representatives of the original grantees. The grant was surveyed in 1896 although petitioners claimed the forest service had severely impinged upon the boundaries of the original land grant. The grant was not patented; however, until 1905 (Schiller 2005).

 Nonetheless, I have found in other documents the use of varas-a type of body measurement approximately thirty-three inches long that was based on the Castillian vara. I have also found the use of both feet and yards within later warranty deeds.

6 I have found in other documents the use of varas-a type of body measurement approximately thirty-three inches long that was based on the Castillian vara. I have also found the use of both feet and yards within later warranty deeds.

7 The Virtual Museum of Surveying, “Metes and Bounds vs. Public Lands,” http://www.surveyhistory.org/metes_&_bounds_vs__public_lands.htm, accessed Nov. 2009.

8 According to Rodriguez, “The humble earthen ditches crisscrossing the fields and arable valleys along the Rio Grande and its tributaries are arguably the oldest living, non-indigenous public works system in North America,” (2006: 2).

9 John Van Ness states, “Communal landholding was a common feature of Spain in the sixteenth century when policies governing the establishment of settlements in Spanish America were being formulated.” He continues that it was a result of reconquest and resettlement of previously Muslim lands. This Spanish system seems to be the template for the system employed after the Pueblo Revolt (Van Ness 1991: 21).

10 I do not mean to minimize the violence of the conquest, yet I find it essential to consider transcultural conflict as well as productivity.

11 The center for Land grant Studies has a compiled, scanned and translated a number of land grant documents through the efforts of Malcolm Ebright, renowned land grant scholar of New Mexico, Schiller, http://www.southwestbooks.org/Las Truchas.htm#24. For more read Landgrants and Lawsuits in northern New Mexico, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1994.

12 Maps such as the “Descripcion del Indias del Norte” relays a nearly empty interior in 1601. Even as late as 1802 in the German cartographer Christian Gottlieb Reichard’s “Charte von Nordamerica,” the expanse of the southwest is simply known as “Quivira.”

13 Gonzalez states in his analysis of Hispanic landgrants that, “Poor and incomplete record-keeping,” as well as, “…vaguely defined boundaries based on natural landmarks often clouded the actual extent of the grant.” This was only exacerbated by the fact that “…conveyances originally made through oral agreement; and the relatively high cost of filing claims,” were considered hindrances for maintaining land grants in their initial form. Although his is not a sustained study of warranty deeds, as I have found none, the “vaguaries” of description as well as the oral agreements that surface within landgrant documents are similar to the issues I am broaching. To him, characteristics such as oral conveyances are viewed as limitations; however, they signal the unique modes of understanding not based on typical legal discursive practices.

14 “…en testimonio de lo cual firmamos con nuestros manos y sellos,” translation mine.



15 It might be useful to note here that I will be using the term “religion” occasionally to describe beliefs of Navajo, particularly in the context of “religious freedoms”, the term “religion” is often rejected by English-speaking Navajo as an accurate depiction of their cultural beliefs and values.

16 Original source unknown.

17 This divinity is manifested or realized by choice.

18 Not simply because I do not presume to completely understand God.

19 Such an understanding must not be accompanied by a rejection of religious institution in general, but by a true grasp of their importance vis-à-vis our socio-political-psychological and economic history.

20 This comprehension, however, very likely requires the individual mind to have reached a certain state of maturity and thus a willful rational impetus. Balestra speaks of “naïve literalist readings of Scripture” in his “In-Between Science and Religion” which may echo this idea.

21 For example, imperceptible entities at various granularities (e.g., subatomic particles), laws of nature, etc. This reflects the classical distinction of appearance vs. reality. It is the task of the rational mind to see beyond the former—appearance or sense-data—to the latter—reality, the cause of the sensory experience/perception—and explain the former via the latter. Proper scientific and philosophical inquiry does just this. It applies to the physical sciences and to the social dimensions of human life. Plato’s Allegory of the Cave vividly communicates this idea. To refine the distinction, consider this uncontroversial point. The universe involves and encompasses our sensory experiences, so both the (often incorrect) sensory experiences and their causes are part of reality, but it the task of the mind to understand that sense-perception and sense-data and discover the causes, the realities behind them that bring them about.

22 Things in the world, occurrences, natural processes, ourselves, that which has been stratified into scientific fields of inquiry: astronomy, biology, physics, psychology, etc.

23 That is, interacting in principled ways, as in natural lawfulness, “principledness” (while not necessarily committing to determinism).

24 The non-conscious physical analog of the psychological gestalt.

25 In other words, what makes these processes unities or wholes is that their progression in time (unfolding or development) is lawfully structured or causally-related with an overarching unity being a potential future state.

26 Disposition or tendency in a stronger sense.

27 Or a function of the universe.

28 Two sides to the same coin. Indeed, this mission, in some form or other, is that of any rational human being.

29 I hold that human free will exists, i.e. human beings have free will.

30 Loosely acting morally, justly and wisely toward ourselves and others; it is acting in accord with reason.

31 History presents us with examples of such dark ages, but they can be found at smaller social granularities, e.g., within the family unit.

32 Interestingly, Genesis can be seen as the Creator giving His self-conscious creation—humanity—the power to create, a power similar to His. When God says to have dominion over the Earth and subdue it (Gen 1:26-28, KJV), we see mirrored the human mind’s ability to discover the underlying rules of the universe and thus use them to positively (morally, rationally, lovingly, humbly) participate in divine creation.

33 A directive that the human mind is naturally inclined toward before socio-psychological (and other) disturbances distort the psyche of individuals and collectives.

34 This is not to say that deeds on a grand-scale are an exclusive condition for realizing one’s humanity.

35 Metaphors, it has been described, in whatever form bring people to grasp ideas that cannot otherwise be easily comprehended by common parlance or direct prose.

36 But internalizing it, in some form, is, perhaps a necessary precursor.

37 The state in which all people externalize their divine nature and cooperate to continually scientifically explore reality, create, and improve the conditions of life: the mental/psychological, the mind-external, and interpersonal and socio-political. It is a potential heaven on Earth, and wherever the noosphere (Vernadsky 1997) extends in the universe, it is possible and necessary.

38 Only bound by what reason permits.

39 Only, for Prometheus, to be attacked by those who (un)intentionally chose the contrary.

40 On July 17, 2010, the Iroquois Nationals were denied the opportunity to compete in the World Lacrosse Championship in the UK because the Haudenosaunee-issued passports were seen as insecure and invalid passports and were refused by the UK immigrations and border control. However, much media attention was devoted to this cause and the Iroquois Nationals team “let the world know that sovereign indigenous peoples are still here, still resilient, and still resolute in insisting that they have the right to be who they are” (Indian Country Today, “UK Denies Travel Visas For Iroquois Nationals,” July 20, 2010).

41 He is often mistakenly labeled as a chief in some news articles. One example includes “Moses and Chief of Tuscaroras Bury the Land-Rights Hatchet,” The New York Times, May 15, 1962.

42 Hauptman explains in his endnote, “Wallace ‘Mad Bear’ Anderson is adept at ‘pulling the leg’ of reporters and men of letters” (Hauptman 2008: 273). He then lists multiple news story headlines Anderson was involved with providing little analysis or comment on these items.



Download 0.8 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page