Multi-Party Claims (RCP rr. 27-29): more than one plaintiff or defendant, but not a class action (i.e. each person is a party); rather than having different trials for the same event, joinder allows us to put all the people in the same claim (RCPr. 5)
Recall principles of efficiency and proportionality: CJA, s. 138; rr. 1.04, 5, etc.
Can’t add someone after the fact to the existing proceeding if you couldn’t still sue the original person within
original limitation period (LimitationActs.21)
Counterclaim (RCPr.27):claim by defendant backagainstplaintiff (and potentially others) in same proceeding (not a defence etc.) facilitates convenience and efficiency (CJAs.138;RCPr.1.04(1)) *must be related to original claim
Cross-claim*co-defendants(RCPr.28):claim by defendant that arises from or is related to issues in the litigation against other defendant
(a) someone else who is responsible for all or part of the claim *trying to point blame and someone else
(b) someone who is liable to the defendant for an independent claim for damages or other relief arising out of the main action
(c) “should be bound by the determination of issue arising b/w P and D
ThirdPartyClaims(RCPr.29) claim by defendant that arises from or is related to issues in the litigation (between the P and D) against someone not currently party to the litigation; fourth party and subsequent claims (RCPr.29.11)
Consolidation(RPCr.6): melding cases into one (e.g. instead of S v R and S v RH → S v R and RH); court will consolidate separate cases where joinder would have been proper