Best and Worst Miracast Receivers 2014



Download 33.2 Kb.
Date19.10.2016
Size33.2 Kb.
#3560
Best and Worst Miracast Receivers 2014

By Marshall HonorofAUGUST 1, 2014 9:48 AM

http://www.tomsguide.com/us/miracast-receivers,review-2284.html

Broadcastinghttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adtypes/icon1.png photos, videos, music and other media from your mobile device or PC to your TV need not be a laborious process, fraught with wires and extra peripherals. Miracast, and Intel's compatible cousin technology WiDi, let you beam whatever is on your device's screen right to a television, and there's a good chance that the devices you already own have this technology built in. Most phones and tablets that run Android 4.2 Jelly Bean or later, and most PCs with recent Intel CPUs and WiFi cards already have the hardware necessary to send a Miracast signal.

If you have a Miracast-capable device, all you need is a receiver to attach to your home theater. To help you choose, Tom's Guide tested four current Miracast receivers to see which are worth your money.

NOTE: To find out if your gadgets will work, see How to Use Miracast and WiDi.

How we tested


We connected each of our four test receivers with popular mobile devices and computers: the Samsung Galaxy S4, Motorola Moto X and HTC One M8 smartphones; a Google Nexus 10 tablet; and Toshiba, Dell and Digital Storm laptop PCs. Using each device, we streamed Netflix or YouTube and a game (either Plants vs. Zombies 2 or BioShock Infinite) to gauge lag and image quality, as well as compatibility glitches. For comparison, we also tried out Apple TVhttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adtypes/icon1.png with Apple devices and Google Chromecast Screen Cast with our Android phones.

MORE : Top 10 Online Streaming Video Services


Actiontec ScreenBeam Pro Wireless Display Receiver ($70)


http://media.bestofmicro.com/c/o/447576/original/actiontech-2.jpgMiracast/WiDi aren't perfect technologies, but the Asctiontec ScreenBeam Pro Wireless Display Receiver gets as close as possible. This product received high-quality Miracast streams from almost every device we tested. 

The ScreenBeam Receiver is a small box (about 3 x 3 x 1 inches) that plugs into an HDTV via HDMI cable (included) and requires an external power source (it can't receive power via USB). The box itself requires no setup to speak of; just plug it in and stream content from a Miracast-enabled phone orPChttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adtypes/icon1.png (check our how-to for more information on how to do this).



Actiontec ScreenBeam Pro Wireless Display Receiver ($70)

$69.46On Amazon

Both videos and games ran well on the ScreenBeam Receiver when streamed from most phones and tablets, although the video on Moto X lagged behind the audio and often froze as we played Plants vs. Zombies 2. The HTC One's frame rate was somewhat inconsistent for video (sometimes the stream appeared too "fast," while other times, it skipped frames entirely). But we watched a few straight minutes of Netflix without encountering any deal-breaking flaws. We also spot-checked with a Samsung Galaxy S5, and the stream ran smoothly with this device, as well. 

The Toshiba laptop's performance was subpar (both Netflix and BioShock Infinite were laggy), but streams from the Dell and Digital Storm laptops looked gorgeous and had perfect audiovisual syncing. Neither system was ideal for screen-mirroring games due to grainy textures and noticeable input lag, but we found that gaming via screen mirroring was a dicey proposition with every device. The ScreenBeam receiver performed better than most. 

The Actiontec ScreenBeam USB Transmitter ($30) also merits a mention. When paired with the Receiver, the USB transmitter allows Windows 7 PCshttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adtypes/icon1.png and Windows 8 PCs without WiDi to screen mirror as though they did have that technology. We tested this functionality on a Dell 6430u laptop with Windows 7, and found the performance to be excellent for playing video and using productivity apps, and passable for playing games — if your games don't need split-second precision.

Works best with: Almost anything

MORE:TV Buying Guide 2014


IOGEAR GWAVR ($90)


http://media.bestofmicro.com/c/n/447575/original/iogear-2b.jpgThe IOGEAR GWAVR is a thoroughly middle-of-the-road product that works well with some devices and less well with others. If you use it, you've got about a 50/50 shot of success. The GWAVR is about the same size as the ScreenBeam and attaches to a TV in the same way. It's also equally simple to set up.

If you have a Samsung phone, you'll be pleased with how smooth the screen mirroring experience is with that brand of phone. Netflix and Android games streamed from a Galaxy S4 with no noticeable lag or picture-quality issues. This may be because IOGEAR developed the GWAVR specifically with Samsung devices in mind, according to the back of the box. The HTC One and Moto X both had significant issues with audiovisual syncing and grainy textures, while the Nexus 10 would not connect for screen mirroring at all.



http://media.bestofmicro.com/7/2/447374/original/iogear.jpg

IOGEAR GWAVR

$64.99On Amazon

The GWAVR also had a mixed record when it came to laptops. The Toshiba produced inconsistent video. Sometimes, the stream was perfect, and sometimes the audio and video went wildly out of sync and froze, with no sound whatsoever. However, both the Dell and Digital Storm worked quite nicely. WiDi was generally not fast enough for streaming PC games, as onscreen actions lagged behind user input, but video streams had a steady frame rate and no significant visual issues on the two PCs we tested.

Apple fans who want to screen-mirror can buy the GWAVR and download a free app on iOS, but the quality is variable. AirPlay on Apple TV generally works better for Apple products. We'd recommend that Samsung owners check out the GWAVR, as the quality is slightly better than even the Actiontec ScreenBeam, but there are better options for just about everyone else.

Works best with: Samsung products 


AwoX StriimCAST (35 euro — not yet available in North America)


http://media.bestofmicro.com/c/m/447574/original/striimcast-2.jpgThe AwoX StriimCAST is a small stick that plugs directly into an HDMI port and requires a USB cable (included) for power. The device fit neatly into the ports of Samsung HDTVs that we tried, and it comes with a flexible HDMI adapter for harder-to-reach spots.

For all of its attractive design, the StriimCAST is a terrible receiver. The Nexus 10, Galaxy S4, HTC One and Moto X had unreliable signals that suffered from extreme lag when they deigned to work at all. The sound syncing was bad across the board, but especially unbearable with the HTC One and the Moto X.

The Toshiba and Dell laptops did not work with the StriimCAST at all, although the Digital Storm performed adequately. The AwoX Striimcast is not currently available in the U.S., although AwoX plans to distribute it on American shores within the next few months.

Works best with: Nothing we tried


AwoX StriimSTICK ($100) 


http://media.bestofmicro.com/c/l/447573/original/striimstick-b.jpgImagine buying a $100 product that would have been embarrassingly obtuse and temperamental even in the pre-Roku era, and you've got the Awox StriimSTICK. Part Android PC and part Miracast/WiDi receiver, it fails spectacularly on both counts. This very large HDMI stick was too bulky to fit in any of our TVs' ports without the included flexible HDMI adapter. Setup involves grappling with an imprecise motion-tracking remote control and dealing with painfully slow processing speeds.

Although the StriimSTICK functions as an Android PC, it's hardly full-featured. For starters, it does not have access to the Google Play Store, instead accessing the markedly inferior 1Mobile Market, which lacks the former's extensive selection and streamlined interface. We were able to download the Netflix Android app, but it didn't do us much good; the stream was rife with both lag and blurriness. Games did not fare much better, as they exhibited similar problems. And even when we changed the default language to English, some of our notifications turned up in French. 

As a wireless receiver, the device fared even worse. Despite its name, the StriimSTICK does not receive Miracast or WiDi streams by default, and requires some jiggering deep in the Settings menu before connecting for the first time. More annoying: This is not a one-time process. We had to fool around with the settings for both the receiver and the broadcast device every time we wanted to stream something.

Even with Miracast enabled, none of our three laptops would connect, nor would our Galaxy S4. The Nexus 10 and Moto X connected sporadically, with excruciating audiovisual issues, ranging from Netflix streams without picture to games that would not load at all. The HTC One often had no picture when streaming Netflix. Even when we did connect, the device would drop our connection often and for no discernible reason.

It's not often that we review a wholly irredeemable product, but the StriimSTICK is one. We have contacted AwoX about the issues we encountered, and the company is currently investigating them.

Works best with: Nothing we tried


Miracast vs. the competition


Although Miracast promises to provide a convenient way of screen mirroring, it's hardly the best option to get content from your phone or computer onto your TV. Android users also have the choice of using Screen Cast with the Google Chromecast. Not only is the Chromecast cheaper than most Miracast devices, but we also found that it is a faster, more reliable way of screen mirroring. Apple users have the good fortune of being able to use AirPlay on an Apple TV. In our tests, AirPlay provided a very smooth experience for video, although its lag with games was no better than the best Miracast devices we tried.

The most straightforward way to get computer or mobile contenthttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adtypes/icon1.png on your TV is still to hook the device up directly with an HDMI cable (assuming your device has an HDMI port), then use wireless peripherals to control it. This may sound like a hassle, but if you need perfect fidelity, it's the only option, particularly if you intend to play games.

MORE: How to Connect a Phone, Tablet, Mac or PC to Your TV

That said, we only played with a small fraction of the Miracast devices available, and it's entirely possible that depending on your devices and setup, you could get a flawless experience. If there's a Miracast device you'd like us to look at, let us know in the comments. Otherwise, another method of screen mirroring may serve you better.



  • Best Roku Channels 2014

  • Roku vs. Apple TV vs. Chromecast: Which Device Wins?

  •  How to Buy a Set Top Box

Marshall Honorof is a Staff Writer for Tom's Guide. Contact him at mhonorof@tomsguide.com. Follow him @marshallhonorof and on Google+. Follow us @tomsguide, on Facebook and onGoogle+.

Download 33.2 Kb.

Share with your friends:




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page