Chairperson: Belinda McKenzie Web Publisher: Sabine k mcNeill eu law Specialist


The Secrecy of UK Family Courts vs Suspicions ‘in good faith’ of EU Directive 2011/92



Download 117.63 Kb.
Page2/7
Date06.05.2017
Size117.63 Kb.
#17370
1   2   3   4   5   6   7

The Secrecy of UK Family Courts vs Suspicions ‘in good faith’
of EU Directive 2011/92

In the wake of the case ‘going public’, a Penal Notice is later issued via the Family Court against the mother and her McKenzie Friend Sabine K McNeill. It appears that in obeying EU Directives and reporting suspicions of serious child abuse and murder (see sections 26, 28 & 50 EU Child Protection Law), mother and her McKenzie Friend had broken the Family Courts’ 'privacy' regulations thus potentially incurring a penalty of between 3 months to 7 years in prison.

The mother and her McKenzie Friend were forced to flee Britain while the mother's Russian parents (the children's grandparents), remain at the London family home in the hope of the children being released into the safety of their custody.

In the absence of both mother and her McKenzie Friend and Mr Christie, on 17 February 2015 a 11 day 'fact-finding' hearing was held at the High Court under the authority of Justice Pauffley. Medical and forensic evidence was submitted with forensic evidence remaining secret.

It was not evident via the recent High Court hearing exactly what evidence was presented to prove the alleged abusers innocence to the degree that Justice Pauffley was able to unequivocally state that the original allegations were false and the subsequent retractions were accurate. Her final Judgement on this case is that the mother and her partner had physically and psychologically abused the children while on a two week holiday in Morocco, in order to coach the children into reporting false allegations and with the prime motive being to discredit and incriminate the children's father Mr Ricky Dearman and thereby deny him all contact with his children.

Police Use of the Harassment Act


In addition to Barnet Council’s Court action, Barnet Police used complaints by the alleged abusers to justify visiting the homes of Sabine McNeill and, with nine constables in plain clothes, of the mother. They based their action on the false accusation that the two had published the names and addresses of the alleged abusers and that Police had received complaints.

Since they came without Arrest Warrants, another Counsel in process of advising the mother sent them away and she escaped.

It has since emerged that the threat of EU Arrest Warrants had been used by the Police and an Interpol Notice to arrest Sabine McNeill at airports had been issued. This was withdrawn without reason on 22 March 2015.

Please refer to accompanying documents and recordings related to all of the above. Please note we have included internet links where we can for easier access to relevant information and to minimise paperwork-load on points of this initial report.


In the Public Interest: the British Public and Internet Community as ‘Legally Competent Authority’


Section 28 of EU Directive 2011/92 says: Member States should encourage any person who has knowledge or suspicion of the sexual abuse or sexual exploitation of a child to report to the competent services. It is the responsibility of each Member State to determine the competent authorities to which such suspicions may be reported. Those competent authorities should not be limited to child protection services or relevant social services. The requirement of suspicion ‘in good faith’ should be aimed at preventing the provision being invoked to authorise the denunciation of purely imaginary or untrue facts carried out with malicious intent.

After Barnet and Metropolitan Police covered up rather than investigated, after Judge Mayer in Barnet Court and Mrs Justice Pauffley in the High Court did not act in the interests of the abused children, after internet corporations deleted videos, accounts and petitions, after the mainstream media supported the High Court judgement without questioning, it has become clear that the British public and the internet community are the only ‘legally competent authority’ left who are acting in the Public Interest.

Even before Mrs Justice Pauffley called us ‘evil and/or foolish’, some felt outraged, others insulted, and many expressed their feelings in online publications, as below:

Background


Mother’s Position Statement for High Court hearing on 26 January 2015:

  • http://whistleblowerkids.uk/about/position-statement/

Email to Home Secretary on 02 February:

  • http://tapnewswire.com/2015/02/courts-want-crime-kept-quiet-while-the-innocent-are-punished/

The Dame Pauffley - Hollie Greig connection:

  • http://tapnewswire.com/2015/04/warning-hampstead-intel-gathering/

Main blog:

  • www.WhistleblowerKids.uk with over 120,000 views since 21 February 2015

Links to Videos and Documents





  1. The Children's testimonies:

  • Home recordings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMplQR-5ewk

  • Police recordings Q: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H21WDONtk78

  • Police recordings P: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMiYMzREseo

  1. Their Retractions:

Professional Linguistic Analysis of Q embedded in general post with valid comments:

  • https://hampsteadresearch.wordpress.com/2015/04/25/forensic-linguistic-analysis-here/

  • https://wordsontrial.wordpress.com/2015/04/21/is-this-a-retraction/ (password sumatra)

In conclusion, this interview is at best a partial retraction of a set of claims and leaves a number of claims that have not convincingly been retracted as well as numerous avenues that required additional probing during the interview and would benefit from further investigation. It could also be argued that presenting opportunities for retraction as a positive move disqualifies this interview from the retraction genre.”

‘Amateur’ Analysis:



  • http://crimesofempire.com/2015/03/01/hampstead-analysis-of-the-september-17th-police-interview/

  1. Their Medical Reports:

  • https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Byzy22cCtwpdbERtNXNhQ0Y5RmM/view?usp=sharing

  • https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Byzy22cCtwpdYy0xdVZFcGxscXM/view?usp=sharing

  1. Extracts from a former Constable’s Witness Statements re Police Report and Police Interviews:

  • https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Byzy22cCtwpdUXhKQzc2M25nM0E/view?usp=sharing

  1. The mother's witness statement:

  • https://hampsteadresearch.wordpress.com/vid-8-ellas-witness-statement/

  1. The father's record of domestic violence:

  • Application for Non-Molestation Order (after two previous ones)

  • https://hampsteadresearch.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/dearman-crime-reports.pdf

a) His Police Interview:

  • https://hampsteadresearch.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/dearman-police-interview-transcript.pdf

b) His online record of child pornography:

  • https://hampsteadresearch.wordpress.com/vid-17-dearman-child-pornographer/

c) His interview by the BBC:

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5f9N6wmiLQ

  1. The Russian Grandparents tell their side of the story:

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF1ewVyHMVw

  1. Named Suspects and their professional status and connections:

Published by Veterans Today, alleged to have MI5 marks on the file:

  • http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/02/22/anonymous-leaks-satanic-cult-member-names-places-phone-s/

So far, 19 videos on Hampstead Research, including teachers, parents, churches:

  • https://hampsteadresearch.wordpress.com/: extensive online research, regular posts and comments about the excellent videos with facts to substantiate the children’s allegations.

  1. Family Court decisions:

  • https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Byzy22cCtwpdVEdmaWFlT01XZk0&usp=sharing

  1. Judicial Review filed on 22 December 2014, supposedly being picked up by Mrs Justice Pauffley:

  • https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Byzy22cCtwpdfm1pcUxfVGIwelJ0VmhHLU5SZFNqNmxnaWVyS3F3Ui1BT05ZcFgxZlFCeUE&usp=sharing

  1. Mrs Justice Pauffley's Judgement:

  • http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2015/26.html



  1. Witness Statements appealing Her Ladyship’s Judgement:

  • http://www.meetup.com/whistleblowerkids/pages/?op=all

  1. EU Legal Directive 2011/92 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography:

  • http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32011L0093

Infringement Notice issued by the European Commission against the UK Government on 27.01.14:

  • http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-is-new/eu-law-and-monitoring/infringements_by_country_united_kingdom_en.htm

  1. UN Report on Child Trafficking, Ritual Murder and Abuse of children and babies in London

Concluding observations on the report submitted by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland under article 12, paragraph 1, of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography:

  • http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=CRC/C/OPSC/GBR/CO/1

The UK report to the UN Committee:

  • https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Byzy22cCtwpdbXkxUDJwakFzWTQ/view?usp=sharing

NDTV – 20.06.14 - UN Warns Britain Over Child Voodoo Victims, Sex Tourists UN Warns Britain Over Child Voodoo Victims, Sex Tourists:

  • http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/un-warns-britain-over-child-voodoo-victims-sex-tourists-579629

Daily Mail – 02.08.14 - How London became the child abuse capital of the world: Trafficked here by gangs, prey to pimps, paedophiles and murderers... the booming trade in 'lost' children that shames us all:

  • http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2714200/How-London-child-abuse-capital-world-Trafficked-gangs-prey-pimps-paedophiles-murderers-booming-trade-lost-children-shames-all.html

  1. Reports of Paedophilia both Historic and Present via a multitude of UK Authorities including police, government ministers, health and child care professionals, clergy, etc.

  • http://www.yourthurrock.com/Thurrock-s-cop-Chief-Inspector-Ben-Hodder-pleads/story-26168012-detail/story.html

  • http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/10675036/Who-is-Patrick-Rock.html

  • http://news.sky.com/story/1440761/thatcher-turned-blind-eye-to-paedophile-mps

  • http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11391314/Rotherham-child-sex-abuse-scandal-council-not-fit-for-purpose.html

  • http://www.chad.co.uk/news/crime/council-in-425-000-payments-to-child-abuse-victims-1-7174791


Download 117.63 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page