308 However, the spaces, places and times of childhood, are identified with the micro- relationships that child figures have with fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters and extended family members. These relationships bring childhood to the basic notion of genealogies and traditions. Genealogies and traditions come with norms, customs and rituals that define normativity and authority. Childhood is therefore defined by these elements,
which are the basic tenets of identification for the child figure. In contemporary Nigerian fiction, these relationships are portrayed as grounds of conflict, particularly with the patriarchal configurations of the family setups in these works. In another sense, the father figure, portrayed as synonymous to the notion of genealogy and tradition becomes a significant antagonist to the already mobile, fluid, shifting, multicultural and transcultural texture of the childhood world. In this way, childhood is portrayed as problematising the notions
of genealogy and tradition, signified and embodied in the figure of the father. In fact, the notion of identity in relation to memory as well as in relation to place, space, time and history, portrayed in patriarchal configurations is contested in the narrative of childhood. Specifically, the dyadic relationships between fathers and daughters in
Purple Hibiscus and
Everything Goodwill Come and fathers and sons in Chris Abani‟s
Graceland and
The Virgin of Flames are at the centre of childhoods contestation of normative genealogies and traditions. The figure of the father therefore embodies tradition, genealogy and identity. The father, in this particular discourse of childhood carries the symbolic importance that Lacan ascribes to the father figure – the law, letter, tradition, genealogy, identity, authority, certainty and legitimacy of and within the family and society. In
Purple Hibiscus and
Everything Good Will Come, these relationships are portrayed through the sentimental disposition between the father and the daughter. The daughters, defined outside of a patriarchal and masculine genealogy exploit the sentiment that exists between them and their fathers to reconstruct an alternative genealogy that is androgynous. For instance, Kambili in
Purple Hibiscus becomes a symbolic link between her severed paternal and grand-paternal genealogy. She is heir to both the patriarchal sentiment of her grandfather Papa Nnukwu and the liberty, freedom and independence of a maternal genealogy through Aunty Ifeoma. This notion of an androgynous genealogy is
309 also reflected in Adichie‟s own literary forebears –
her work, as examined by Heather
Hewett (2005) has the texture of a transnational intertextuality” which is informed by both masculine and feminine literary traditions. Indeed, the historical connection between her and Achebe reflects the sentiment between them as father and daughter. In providing an androgynous genealogy, these micro-relationships between fathers and daughters problematise normative genealogical traditions and therefore the legitimacy, certainty and authority of patriarchal (read also adultist) frameworks of identity. On the other hand, the sons, as portrayed in Chris Abani‟s
Graceland and
The Virgin of Share with your friends: