232 insufficient
as sources to refer to, in dealing with the multicultural realities they face. Also, unlike the daughters, they have a teleological order of inheritance and therefore are not destined to occupy an ambivalent space within familial genealogy. They cannot afford luxury for patriarchal sentiment, for their world is functional yet fraught
with infinite alternatives, possibilities and potentials beyond the grasp of their sexualised identities. Therefore, the idea of false fathers is a relevant revelation for the daughters in their fathers houses, as well as the sons.
Yet for the sons, it is iconoclastic, by breaking the myth of masculinity because they confront the orthodox structure of identity that transcends the intangibility of genealogy. Their experience of the multicultural cities of Lagos and Los Angeles is more direct, their senses of the self face a more intense battle against fragmentation and tolerance/acceptance of sexual difference is conspicuous in their process of identity construction. The contemporary postcolonial and postmodern
condition as we see in Adichie, Atta and Abani‟s works is consumed more by the sons than the daughters, reflected in their performance of sexual difference through their transsexual, bisexual and transvestite dispositions.