Clinical Practice Guidelines Antenatal Care — Module II



Download 2.59 Mb.
Page28/71
Date16.08.2017
Size2.59 Mb.
#32695
1   ...   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   ...   71

6.7Risk of pre-eclampsia


Antenatal care provides an opportunity to identify women with risk factors or clinical signs of pre-eclampsia and provide advice on prevention and symptoms that may indicate a need for additional care.

Background


Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy include (Lowe et al 2008):

chronic hypertension — blood pressure ≥140 mmHg systolic and/or ≥90 mm diastolic confirmed before pregnancy or before 20 completed weeks pregnancy, without a known cause (essential hypertension), associated with a secondary cause such as existing kidney disease (secondary hypertension) or associated with measurement in a healthcare setting (white coat hypertension);

gestational hypertension — new onset hypertension (defined as a blood pressure ≥140 mmHg systolic and/or ≥90 mm diastolic) after 20 weeks pregnancy without any maternal or fetal features of pre-eclampsia, followed by return of blood pressure to normal within 3 months after the birth;

pre-eclampsia — a multi-system disorder characterised by hypertension and involvement of one or more other organ systems and/or the fetus, with raised blood pressure after 20 weeks pregnancy commonly the first manifestation and proteinuria a common additional feature (although not required to make a clinical diagnosis); and

superimposed pre-eclampsia — development of one or more of the systemic features of pre-eclampsia after 20 weeks pregnancy in a woman with chronic hypertension.

In pre-eclampsia, hypertension is accompanied by one or more of the following features (Lowe et al 2008):

impaired kidney or liver function;

haematological involvement;

neurological symptoms (headache, visual disturbances, stroke, convulsions);

pulmonary oedema;

fetal growth restriction; and/or

placental abruption.

Pre-eclampsia is a progressive disorder that worsens if pregnancy continues (Lowe et al 2008). Birth of the baby is the definitive treatment and is followed by resolution, generally over a few days but sometimes much longer (Lowe et al 2008). Decisions about management (eg induction/caesarean section or continuation of the pregnancy) are based on maternal and fetal factors (eg gestational age) (Lowe et al 2008). Early onset pre-eclampsia (<37 weeks) is associated with poorer outcomes (Lowe et al 2008).

Prevalence of pre-eclampsia


Data on the prevalence of pre-eclampsia in Australia are limited.

In 2009–10, a total of 7,738 women in Australia were hospitalised for pre-eclampsia (AIHW Hospitals Data); around 2.6% of births. There are no data on the difference in rates of pre-eclampsia between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous women.

In 2010, hypertension or pre-eclampsia were the reasons for 3.1–12.8% of labour inductions in New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territory and 2.3–4.8% of caesarean sections in Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territory. Data collection methods varied and, for other states and territories, were unavailable or unpublished (Li et al 2012).

Of the five maternal deaths due to hypertensive disease in Australia in 2003–05 (Sullivan et al 2008), two were attributed to eclampsia. One woman had pre-eclampsia in her previous pregnancy but no evidence of pre-eclampsia in the pregnancy preceding her death.

A decline in the incidence of pre-eclampsia and associated maternal mortality in high income countries occurred between 1940 and 1970 with widespread uptake of antenatal care and increased access to hospital care for timely induction of labour or caesarean section for women with severe pre-eclampsia (Goldenberg et al 2011), and more recently, with the introduction of treatment with magnesium sulphate (Duley et al 2010).

Risks associated with pre-eclampsia


Significant pre-eclampsia is associated with serious maternal morbidity and, very rarely, with death.

Women with complicated pre-eclampsia are more likely to have a caesarean section, stillbirth or neonatal death (Bhattacharya & Campbell 2005).

Neonatal complications associated with pre-eclampsia in a large cross-sectional study (n=647,392)(Schneider 2011) were small for gestational age, acute respiratory distress syndrome, postpartum neonatal hypoglycaemia and low Apgar scores.

Assessing risk of pre-eclampsia

Summary of the evidence


Whether a woman will require additional care (eg more frequent antenatal visits) is based on the presence of risk factors for and clinical features of pre-eclampsia.
Identifying women with risk factors for pre-eclampsia

Identifying risk factors for pre-eclampsia at the first antenatal visit to allow additional care to be arranged is recommended in the United Kingdom (NICE 2008; 2010) and Canada (SOGC 2008).

Factors associated with a high risk of pre-eclampsia include (NICE 2008):

a history of pre-eclampsia (Mendilcioglu et al 2004; Lain et al 2005; Ananth et al 2007; Poon et al 2010; Sibai et al 2011);

pre-existing hypertension (Lowe et al 2008; Poon et al 2010);

pre-existing kidney disease;

pre-existing or gestational diabetes (Bryson et al 2003; Yogev et al 2004; Ostlund et al 2006; HAPO 2010);

autoimmune disease such as systemic lupus erythematosis or antiphospholipid syndrome; and

raised blood pressure at the first antenatal visit.

Factors associated with a moderate risk of pre-eclampsia include (NICE 2008):

first or multiple pregnancy (eg twins or triplets);

age >40 years;

more than 10 years since the last pregnancy;

BMI greater than 35 kg/m2 at first visit (O’Brien et al 2003; Bodnar et al 2005; Erez-Weiss et al 2005; Fredrick et al 2006; Cnossen et al 2007; Getahun et al 2007; Becker et al 2008; Driul et al 2008; Aliyu et al 2010; Briese et al 2010; Mbah et al 2010; Anderson et al 2012); and

family history of pre-eclampsia (Poon et al 2010) or hypertensive disease (Qiu et al 2004; Roes et al 2005; Bezerra et al 2010; Jelin et al 2010).

Risk of pre-eclampsia may also be associated with use of ovulation induction medication and African or Indian subcontinent origin (Poon et al 2010) and Factor V Leiden (Kosmas et al 2003; Dudding et al 2008).

While there may be an association between active maternal periodontal disease during pregnancy and pre-eclampsia (Boggess et al 2003), treatment of periodontal disease does not appear to affect the level of risk (Newnham et al 2009) (see Section 10.5 of Module I).



Consensus-based recommendation v

Routinely measure blood pressure to identify new onset hypertension.


Preventive measures

Preventive treatment with low-dose aspirin in women at high risk and calcium supplementation in women with low dietary intake is recommended in the United Kingdom (NICE 2010), Canada (SOGC 2008) and Australia (Lowe et al 2008) and by WHO (2011).

Calcium: There is strong evidence that calcium supplementation is of benefit for women at risk of pre-eclampsia if dietary intake is low (Hofmeyr et al 2010; Patrelli 2012). The WHO defines low dietary intake as <900 mg per day and the Australian and New Zealand Nutrient Reference Values recommend an intake of 1,000 mg per day in pregnant women, 1,300 mg if they are younger than 18 years (NHMRC 2005). In Australia, calcium intake is low in relation to recommendations for some girls and women of reproductive age (NHMRC 2011). The sources and recommended number of serves of calcium-rich foods during pregnancy are discussed in Section .

Recommendation 12 Grade A

Advise women at high risk of developing pre-eclampsia that calcium supplementation is beneficial if dietary intake is low.

Practice point p

If a woman has a low dietary calcium intake, advise her to increase her intake of calcium-rich foods.



Effectiveness of aspirin in preventing pre-eclampsia: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have found that:

low-dose aspirin has moderate benefits when used for prevention of pre-eclampsia (relative risk [RR]: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67–0.90) (Duley et al 2007);

there was a reduction in risk among women at risk (eg with previous pre-eclampsia) (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65–0.97) but not those with low risk (Trivedi 2011);

the relative risk of developing pre-eclampsia was 0.90 (95% CI 0.84–0.97), of giving birth before 34 weeks was 0.90 (95% CI 0.83–0.98), and of having a pregnancy with a serious adverse outcome was 0.90 (95% CI 0.85–0.96) (Askie et al 2007); and

the effect was only significant for preterm pre-eclampsia (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04–0.33) (Roberge et al 2012).

Recommendation 13 Grade B

Advise women at moderate–high risk of pre-eclampsia that low-dose aspirin from early pregnancy (preferably before 20 weeks) may be of benefit in its prevention.

Vitamins: There is insufficient evidence that the risk of pre-eclampsia is reduced by supplementing vitamin B2 (Neugebauer et al 2006) or vitamins C and E (Beazley et al 2005; Rumbold & Crowther 2005; Poston et al 2006; Rumbold et al 2006; Polyzos et al 2007; Spinnato et al 2007; Klemmensen et al 2009; Rahimini et al 2009; Basaran et al 2010; Xu et al 2010; Conde-Agudelo et al 2011; Rossi & Mullin 2011; Salles et al 2012). Some studies have found associations between supplementation with vitamins C and E in women at risk of pre-eclampsia and adverse effects, including low birth weight, hypertension and premature rupture of the membranes (Poston et al 2006; Rahimini et al 2009; Xu et al 2010; Conde-Agudelo et al 2011).

Recommendation 14 Grade B

Advise women that vitamins are not of benefit in preventing pre-eclampsia.

Physical activity: A systematic review found a trend towards a protective effect from leisure time or recreational physical activity during pregnancy in case-control studies (OR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.64–0.91) but no significant effect in prospective cohort studies (Kasawara 2012). Physical activity during pregnancy has general health benefits (see Section 5.4).

Salt intake: Reducing salt intake does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia (Duley et al 2005). However, avoiding foods with added salt has other health benefits (NHMRC 2013).

Identifying women with clinical signs of pre-eclampsia

Routine measurement of diastolic and systolic blood pressure and testing for proteinuria at each antenatal visit are recommended in the United Kingdom to screen for pre-eclampsia (NICE 2008). However, routine screening for proteinuria is not recommended in the United States (USPSTF 1996; ACOG 2002) or Canada (CTFPHE 1996).

Hypertension: Women with new onset hypertension (defined as a blood pressure ≥140 mmHg systolic and/or ≥90 mm diastolic) that occurs after 20 weeks pregnancy should be assessed for signs and symptoms of pre-eclampsia (Lowe et al 2008).

Proteinuria: Routine testing for proteinuria is not helpful in predicting pre-eclampsia and should be confined to women with increased blood pressure or sudden weight gain (Alto 2005; Rhode et al 2007). When testing is indicated, numerous high and low evidence level studies confirm the correlation of protein-creatinine ratio testing against the ‘gold standard’ 24-hour urine collection, for point of care testing (Haas et al 2003; Wikstrom et al 2006; Zadehmodarres et al 2006; Aggarwal et al 2008; Chen et al 2008; Poon et al 2008a; Al et al 2009; Soni et al 2009; Nasrin et al 2010; Sethuram et al 2011; Morris et al 2011; Morris 2012; Tun et al 2012). Urine dipstick tests have high false positive/negative rates and should be confirmed by other tests such as spot urine protein-creatinine ratio (Phelan et al 2004).

Measurement of blood pressure and testing for proteinuria is discussed in Module I of the Guidelines (see Sections 7.3 and 7.4).

Recommendation 15 Grade C

Offer testing for proteinuria if a woman has risk factors for, or clinical indications of, pre-eclampsia; in particular raised blood pressure.

Where possible, women with clinical signs of pre-eclampsia (hypertension, proteinuria, growth restriction) should be referred for specialist assessment and management.

Predicting pre-eclampsia

A range of measures has been used to further predict risk of pre-eclampsia. These tests are not recommended as they have insufficient sensitivity and specificity (Meads et al 2008).

Uterine artery Doppler: Although some studies have found uterine artery Doppler to be useful in predicting pre-eclampsia when used alone (Gomez et al 2006; Pilalis et al 2007; Ghosh et al 2012) or in combination with other markers (Cnossen et al 2008a; Giguere et al 2010; Pedrosa & Matias 2011) or predictive modelling (Audibert et al 2005; Papageorghiou et al 2005; Onalan et al 2006; Sritippayawan & Phupong 2007; Diab 2008; Poon et al 2009; Kuc 2011), its sensitivity in predicting preeclampsia in low-risk first pregnancies seems poor (Myatt et al 2012). There is insufficient evidence to recommend its use.

Serum uric acid: While rising serum uric acid is associated with severe pre-eclampsia (NICE 2008) the evidence on its validity as a screening or diagnostic test is mixed; one systematic review (n=572) (Cnossen et al 2006) found insufficient evidence to support its use and a subsequent review (n=1,675) (Koopmans et al 2009) concluded that it may be useful for predicting maternal complications.

Prediction index model: A three-step approach to testing (medical examination data, specific haemostasis and coagulation tests and measurement of relative plasma volume) had a satisfactory positive predictive value and cost efficiency ratio in a small analysis of women with and without a history of pre-eclampsia (Emonts et al 2008).

Other predictive tests: There is limited evidence to support identifying women as at risk of pre-eclampsia based solely on markers for Down syndrome (pregnancy-associated placental protein-A [PAPP-A] and free beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin [-hCG]) (Morris et al 2008; Hui et al 2012) or mean arterial blood pressure (Cnossen et al 2008b; Poon et al 2008b). There is emerging evidence about the predictive accuracy of other biomarkers (Kleinrouweler et al 2012), low levels of excreted urinary calcium (Amitava 2012), immunoassays (Benton et al 2011), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of podocyte-specific molecules (Kelder 2012), intraplacental vascularisation indices (Mihu 2012) and increased plasma D-Dimer levels (Pinheiro et al 2012).

Due to the progressive nature of pre-eclampsia and a lack of therapies effective in altering its progression (Lowe et al 2008), these tests are unlikely to change interventions or outcomes (NICE 2008).

Section 6.8 includes resources on the management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Discussing risk of pre-eclampsia


It is important that women are given information about the symptoms of pre-eclampsia before 20 weeks gestation, or when they first attend for antenatal care if this occurs in the second half of pregnancy.

Practice point q

Women should be given information about the urgency of seeking advice from a health professional if they experience:

• headache;

visual disturbance, such as blurring or flashing before the eyes;

• epigastric pain (just below the ribs);

• vomiting; and/or

• rapid swelling of the face, hands or feet.

Practice summary: pre-eclampsia


When: A woman has risk factors for pre-eclampsia in the first half of pregnancy or clinical signs in the second half of pregnancy (> 20 weeks gestation).

Who: Midwife; GP; obstetrician; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Practitioner; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Worker; multicultural health worker.

Discuss risk factors for pre-eclampsia early in pregnancy: Explain that the risk of pre-eclampsia is increased if a woman has certain risk factors.

Discuss pre-eclampsia screening: Explain that if a woman has high blood pressure and/or proteinuria, she will require additional care during the rest of her pregnancy.

Discuss symptoms of pre-eclampsia with women at high risk: Explain the importance of seeking medical advice immediately if symptoms occur.

Take a holistic approach: Ask women at risk of pre-eclampsia about how many serves of calcium-rich foods they eat each day (see Section ). Discuss low cost and culturally appropriate strategies for increasing calcium intake.

Document and follow-up: Note risk factors and the results of blood pressure measurement and proteinuria testing in the woman’s antenatal record. Further investigations may be warranted if increases in blood pressure or new proteinuria are identified at subsequent visits.



Download 2.59 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   ...   71




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page