Computer engineering


Achievement of Program Outcomes



Download 2.78 Mb.
Page17/34
Date20.10.2016
Size2.78 Mb.
#5567
1   ...   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   ...   34

Achievement of Program Outcomes


The assessment process helps in making effective program improvements while being efficient and maintainable. In this section we present the following aspects of the COE assessment system for the POs:


  1. The assessment process

  2. Description of assessment tools

  3. Assessment methodology and performance criteria

  4. Rating of learning in major rubrics

  5. ABET and Assessment committees

  6. Program assessment plan

  7. Course outcomes assessment (secondary)

  8. Example of PO assessment through courses

  9. Feedback analysis from IAC, graduating student survey, and Alumni.

  10. Level of achievement of each program outcome (Rubrics, supporting courses, exit exam and exit survey)

The Assessment Process

The PO Assessment Process is shown in Figure ‎3.6 -6.



Figure ‎3.6 6. Program outcomes assessment process.



This process is based on the following three steps:

  1. Based on the Program Outcomes, the courses serving each outcome will be determined altogether with a specific level of emphasis as described in the mapping of program courses to program outcomes. In this step, it is ensured that all program outcomes are well addressed and covered in the curriculum, mainly through the core courses of the program.

  2. Secondary Outcome Assessment Process: A secondary outcome assessment process is based on course assessment aiming at locally (within the course) improving course outcomes by course instructors. Course outcomes are assessed both directly (exams) and indirectly (surveys) by course instructors. Each instructor reports, in the course file whether the course outcomes are achieved or they need improvement. In case an outcome needs improvement, the course instructor provides suggestions in the course file for improving the coverage of that outcome in the next offering of the course. The course file (syllabus, course outcome assessment, action for improving, copy of student exams, etc.) is submitted to the department office at the end of each semester for each offered course. The summary of course-based program outcome assessment for Terms 061, 062, .., 082 will be presented as part of the display material.

  3. Primary Outcome Assessment Process: The primary program outcomes assessment is independent from the course assessment (secondary) and the grading process. As program outcomes measure knowledge and skills at the time of graduation, the primary program outcome assessment is mainly based on a set of high level COE courses, a set of non-COE supporting courses (Math, Ethics, Discrete Math, English), a set of surveys, and an Exit Exam:




Rubrics Assessment: A set of Rubrics are designed to allow assessing the program outcomes based on randomly selected materials from a variety of COE courses to represent the student performance at the graduation time. Each PO is assessed using a rubric. Each rubric covers a collection of courses (Junior and Senior) that serves the POs. Randomly selected student material is considered as to represent the PO performance. Thus, each PO is assessed through more than one channel. The rubric assessment material represents a fraction of the overall course material. Each rubric is carefully analyzed and associated with a set of performance indicators which are designed to describe the outcome components both in depth and diversity. Details of rubric assessment data will be presented as part of the display material. Also a performance criteria (a threshold) is set to help determine whether a given program outcome is considered achieved or not based on a given outcome result. The ability to design experiments (Outcome b) is better assessed in COE 305 (Microprocessors) and COE 344 (Computer Networks) because these courses have a lab component with a major experimental setting. Many program outcomes are assessed using three courses which represent a culminating design experience in the program, namely COE 351 (COOP), COE 400 (Embedded Systems), and COE 485 (Senior Design Project). Outcome f is explicitly addressed in COE 390 (Seminar). The course 399 (Summer Training) contributes to the assessment of outcome g. Table ‎3.6 -16 shows the mapping between the selected courses and the PO Rubrics.

Table ‎3.6 16. Mapping between selected courses and PO Rubrics.

Course


Assessed Program Outcome (Rubrics)

a

Math

b

Exp

C

Des

d

Team

e

Form

f

Ethics

g

Com

h

Impact

i

Learn

j

Cont

k

Tool

n

H/S

COE 305 (lab)

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COE 344 (lab)

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COE 351



 







 













COE 390

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

COE 399

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

COE 400











 













COE 485



 







 
















    • A graduation exit Exam.




  • Indirect Program Outcomes Assessment

Indirect program outcomes assessment is based on a set of well designed surveys which are: (1) the Graduate Exit Survey, (2) COOP Supervisor Survey, (3) Alumni Survey, (4) Employer Survey, and (5) consultation of the Industry Advisory Committee. All surveys are available as part of the display material. A sample COOP Supervisor Survey is shown below:

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

Computer Engineering Department

Assessment Form by COOP Supervisor

Dear COOP Supervisor:

The Department of Computer Engineering (COE) at the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals employs a continuous assessment plan for its program according to the ABET engineering accreditation criterion. We are very much interested to know how our COOP students have met these criteria. Your answers will help us enhance our program and improve the quality of graduates to better serve industry.

Student Name: ___________________ Student KFUPM ID #.: _______________

Semester: __________________________Academic Year:____________________

I Program Outcomes


To what degree was the student expected to meet the criterion during the COOP program:

1: Low 5: High



Program Outcome Criteria

To what degree did the student meet the criterion during the COOP program:

1: Poor 5: Excellent



1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5
















a

Apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering to obtain solutions and formulate models of processes and systems.































b

Design and conduct experiments, and collect, analyze and interpret data.































c

Design a system, process, or component to meet desired needs subject to given constraints. Analyze and evaluate alternative solutions.































d

Function on multi-disciplinary and/or diverse teams. Take responsibility, share work, and value other viewpoints.































e

Identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. Make appropriate and necessary assumptions. Suggest and evaluate new approaches.































f

Understand professional and ethical responsibilities. Demonstrate ethical practice.































g

Use oral, written, and audio-visual techniques effectively for successful communication.































h

Understand global effects of practices, products, and events, and the impact of engineering solutions on society































i

Recognize the need for and demonstrate ability to engage in lifelong learning.































j

Know about contemporary socio-economic issues relevant to relevance to computer engineering.































k

Use techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.































l

Know probability and statistics and their applications in Computer Engineering.































m

Know discrete mathematic: e.g. Logic, Number theory, Set theory, Algorithms, Information theory.































n

Design a system that involves the integration of hardware and software
















II Comments

A Other skills required by your organization












B How do you compare KFUPM-COE COOP students with those of other universities










C Currently KFUPM-COE Program Educational Objectives aim at producing computer engineering graduates who are prepared to:

  1. Practice their profession with confidence and global competitiveness and make intellectual contributions to it;

  2. Pursue a life-long career of personal and professional growth with superior work ethics and character, and

3. Pursue advanced study and research at the graduate level.

Strengths you see in the KFUPM-COE program and its educational objectives












Other educational objectives that you believe should be added










III Contact Information

Information on the person who completed this form:



Name:






Position / Title






Department, Company






e-mail:






Date:




More details will be given in the next sub-section on the Program Outcomes Assessment Method which is used to determine under what conditions a given program outcome can be considered as met or not.




Download 2.78 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   ...   34




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page