Copyright: legal and cultural perspectives


III. Selected Additional Readings



Download 271.57 Kb.
Page8/9
Date16.01.2018
Size271.57 Kb.
#36607
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

III. Selected Additional Readings

Ad hoc committee on copyright law revision. (1976). Agreement on guidelines for classroom copying in not-for-profit educational institutions with respect to books and periodicals [classroom guidelines]. Published in House Report 94-1476.

http://www.unc.edu/~unclng/classroom-guidelines.htm
American Association of Law Libraries. (2002). First sale: The basics. http://www.aallnet.org/committee/copyright/pages/issues/firstsale.html
American Library Association. (2001a). UCITA (the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act): Concerns for libraries and the public. http://www.ala.org/washoff/ucita/index.html
American Library Association. (2001b). UCITA 101: What you should know about the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act. http://www.ala.org/washoff/ucita/ucita101.html
American Library Association. (2001c). Problems with a non-negotiated contract. http://www.ala.org/washoff/ucita/contract.html
ARL/ALA et al. (2003). Fair use and the development of e-reserve systems.

http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/fairusereserves.htm


Ashcroft, John. (2004, October 12). Prepared remarks: Release of the report of the Department of Justice’s Task Force on Intellectual Property. http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/speeches/2004/agremarksprip.htm
Association of Research Libraries. (2002). Copyright timeline: A history of copyright in the United States. http://www.arl.org/pp/ppcopyright/copyresources/copytimeline.shtml
Aufderheide, Patricia. (1999). Communications policy and the public interest: The Telecommunications Act of 1996. New York: Guilford.
Australian Attorney-General. (1994). Stopping the rip-offs: Intellectual property protection for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/rwpattach.nsf/viewasattachmentPersonal/(CFD7369FCAE9B8F32F341DBE097801FF)~stopping+the+rip-offs-no+frame.pdf/$file/stopping+the+rip-offs-no+frame.pdf
Band, Jonathan. (2004). A new day for the DMCA: The Chamberlain and Lexmark decisions. Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Journal [Bureau of National Affairs], 69(1697), 78-82. CD
Benkler, Yochai. (1999). Free as the air to common use: First Amendment constraint on enclosure of the public domain. New York Law Review, 74(354-446). [log in through the Social Science Research Network -- http://www.ssrn.com/index_sf.html] http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=168609
Bennett, Tony. (2003). The political rationality of the museum. In Justin Lewis & Toby Miller (Eds.), Critical cultural policy studies: A reader (pp. 180-187). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Bettig, Ronald V. (1997). The enclosure of cyberspace. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14(2), 138-157.
Black's law dictionary (7th ed.) (1999). St. Paul, MN: West.

http://www.palkauf.com/tools/black's_law_dictionary.htm


Boisseau, D.L. (1993). Anatomy of a small step forward: The electronic reserve book room at San Diego State University. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 18(6), 366-368.
Bollier, David, Bradford, Gigi, Racine, Laurie, & Sohn, Gigi B. (2006). So what. . . about copyright? What artists need to know about copyright and trademark. Available at http://www.publicknowledge.org/resources/artists/so-what-about-copyright
Bowrey, Kathy, & Rimmer, Matthew. (2002). Rip, mix, burn: The politics of peer to peer and copyright law. First Monday, 7(8). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_8/bowrey/index.html
Boyle, James. (1997). A politics of intellectual property: Environmentalism for the net? http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/intprop.htm
Boyle, James. (2002). Fencing off ideas: Enclosure & the disappearance of the public domain. Daedalus, 131(2), 13-25.
Boyle, James. (2007a). Cultural environmentalism and beyond. Law & Contemporary Problems, 70(2), 5-21. Also available at http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?70+Law+&+Contemp.+Probs.+5+(spring+2007)
Boyle, James. (2007b). Mertonianism unbound? Imagining free, decentralized access to most cultural and scientific material. In Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 123-144). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Braman, Sandra. (2003). Trade and information policy. In Justin Lewis & Toby Miller (Eds.), Critical cultural policy studies: A reader (pp. 282-301). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Branscomb, Anne Wells. (1994). Who owns information? From privacy to public access. New York: BasicBooks.
Braunstein, Yale M. (1981). The functioning of information markets. In Jane H. Yurow and Helen A. Shaw (Eds.), Issues in information policy (pp. 57-74). Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Department of Commerce.
Brush, Stephen B. (1993). Indigenous knowledge of biological resources and intellectual property rights: The role of anthropology. American Anthropologist, 95(3), pp. 653-686.
Carroll, Michael W. (2006). Creative commons and the new intermediaries. Michigan State Law Review, 45(1), 45-65. Also available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=782405
Caslon Analytics. (2004). Intellectual property guide. http://www.caslon.com.au/ipguide.htm

Chartier, Roger. (2002). Property & privilege in the republic of letters (trans. Arthur Goldhammer). Daedalus, 131(2), 60-66.


Clifford, Ralph D. (2003). Amicus brief supporting Satava. http://www.snesl.edu/clifford/satava/brief.pdf
Ciffolilli, Andrea. (2004). The economics of open source hijacking and the declining quality of digital information resources: A case for copyright. First Monday, 9(9). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_9/ciffolilli/index.html
Cohen, Julie E. (1996). A right to read anonymously: A closer look at “copyright management” in cyberspace. Connecticut Law Review, 28(4), 981-1040. Also available at http://www.heinonline.org.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/conlr28&id=1&size=2&collection=journals&index=journals/conlr
Cohen, Julie E. (2005). The place of the user in copyright law. Fordham Law Review, 74, 347-374. Also available at http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/document?_m=afadc327936917bd72fff08bd6d5d45a&_docnum=1&wchp=dGLbVtb-zSkVb&_md5=a1799c13cbf60e112489faabe8e06f11 and http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=814664
Colwin, Jane. (2002). Getting started: Legal and ethical resources. In Tomas Lipinski (Ed.), Libraries, museums, and archives: Legal Issues and ethical challenges in the new information era (pp. 295-302). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Copyright Clearance Center. (2005). http://www.copyright.com/
Cox, James C., & Swarthout, J. Todd. (2007). EconPort: Creating and maintaining a knowledge commons. In Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 333-347). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Creative Commons. (2004). http://creativecommons.org/
Crews, Kenneth D. (1993). Copyright, fair use and the challenge for universities: Promoting the progress of higher education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crews, Kenneth D. (1995). Copyright law and information policy planning: Public rights of use in the 1990s and beyond. Journal of Government Information, 22(2), 87-99.
Crews, Kenneth D. (2000). Copyright essentials for librarians and educators. Chicago: American Library Association.
Crews, Kenneth D. (2001). The law of fair use and the illusion of fair-use guidelines. Ohio State Law Journal, 62(2), 599-702.
Cummins, Eric. (2005, August 2.). Who owns pictures of the past? Historic photo dispute pits copyright act against contract law. San Francisco Daily Journal. Available online
Damich, Edward J. (1988). The right of personality: A common law basis for the protection of the moral rights of authors. Georgia Law Review, 23, 1-96. Also available at http://www.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/us/lnacademic/search/homesubmitForm.do
Dervin, Brenda. (1994). Information <---> democracy: An examination of underlying assumptions. In Leah A. Lievrouw (Ed.), Information resources and democracy [Special issue] (pp. 369-385). Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(6).
Digital Media Consumer Rights Act. (2005). Available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.1201:
Douzinas, Costas, & Nead, Lynda. (Eds.). (1999). Law and the image: The authority of art and the aesthetics of law. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Duke Law Center for the Public Domain. (2004). Arts Project Moving Image Contest http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/contest/finalists/
Ferullo, Donna L. (2002, summer). The challenge of e-reserves. Net connect, 33-35.
Fisher, William W. II. (2004). Promises to keep: Technology, law, and the future of entertainment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Free Software Foundation. (2004). GNU's not Unix. http://www.gnu.org/home.html
GartnerG2 & the Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School. (2003). Copyright and digital media in a post-Napster world. Publication No. 2003-05. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/2003-05
Gasaway, Laura N. (1995). White Paper – A mixed bag. Tech Trends, 40(6), 6-8.
Gasaway, Laura N. (1999). Copyright considerations for fee-based document delivery services. http://www.unc.edu/~unclng/fee-based.htm
Gasaway, Laura N. (2000). Values conflict in the digital environment: Librarians versus copyright holders. http://www.unc.edu/~unclng/Columbia-article3.htm
Gasaway, Laura N., & Wiant, Sarah K. (1994). Copyright: A guide to copyright law in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association.
Ghosh, Shubha. (2007). How to build a commons: Is intellectual property constrictive, facilitating, or irrelevant? In Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 209-246). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ginsburg, Faye. (2003). Embedded aesthetics: Creating a discursive space for indigenous media. In Justin Lewis & Toby Miller (Eds.), Critical cultural policy studies: A reader (pp. 88-99). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Ginsburg, Jane C. (1990). Creation and commercial value: Copyright protection of works of information. Columbia Law Review, 90(7), 1865-1938. Also available at http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/browse/00101958/ap030711?frame=noframe&userID=80533f15@utexas.edu/01c0a8487400504f6f1&dpi=3&config=jstor
Ginsburg, Jane C. (1993). Copyright without walls?: Speculations on literary property in the library of the future. In R. Howard Bloch & Carla Hesse (Eds.), Future libraries (pp. 53-73). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Glendon, Mary Ann. (1991). Rights talk: The impoverishment of political discourse. New York: The Free Press.
Goldstein, Paul. (1992). Copyright. Law & Contemporary Problems, 55(2), 79-92. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=lcpcf&handle=hein.journals/lcp55&id=417&size=2&rot=0&type=image
Gordon, Wendy J. (1982). Fair use as market failure: A structural economic analysis of the Betamax case and its predecessors. Columbia Law Review, 82(8), 1600-1657. Also available at http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/browse/00101958/ap030648?frame=noframe&userID=80533f15@utexas.edu/01c0a8487400504f6f1&dpi=3&config=jstor
Gordon, Wendy J. (1992). Reality as artifact: From Feist to fair use. Law & Contemporary Problems, 55(2), 93-106.
Graham, Neil E., & Mumford, Christine. (2005). Copyright office holds first roundtable on uncertainties surrounding orphan works. Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Journal [Bureau of National Affairs], 70(1731), 407-412. CD
Harper, Georgia. (2001). Copyright in the library: Licensing. http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/licrsrcs.htm
Harper, Georgia. (2005a). Fair use of copyrighted materials. http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/copypol2.htm
Harper, Georgia. (2005b). Google this. http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/googlethis.htm
Hawke, Constance S. (2001). Computer and Internet use on campus: A legal guide to issues of intellectual property, free speech, and privacy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hedstrom, Margaret. (n.d.). Digital preservation: A time bomb for digital libraries. http://www.uky.edu/~kiernan/DL/hedstrom.html
Henderson, Carol C. (1998). Libraries as creatures of copyright: Why librarians care about intellectual property law and policy. Available at http://www.ala.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Our_Association/Offices/ALA_Washington/Issues2/Copyright1/Copyright.htm
Hess, Charlotte, & Ostrom, Elinor. (2007a). Introduction: An overview of the knowledge commons. In Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 1-26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hesse, Carla. (2002). The rise of intellectual property, 700 B.C. – A.D. 2000: An idea in the balance. Daedalus, 131(2), 26-45.
Hoffman, Gretchen McCord. (2002a). What every librarian should know about copyright. Part I: The basics. Texas Library Journal, 78(2), 56-63.
Hoffman, Gretchen McCord. (2002b). What every librarian should know about copyright. Part II: Copyright in cyberspace. Texas Library Journal, 78(3), 15-18.
Hoffman, Gretchen McCord. (2002c). What every librarian should know about copyright. Part III: Frequently asked questions. Texas Library Journal, 78(4), 148-151.
Hoffman, Gretchen McCord. (2003). What every librarian should know about copyright. Part IV: Writing a copyright policy. Texas Library Journal, 79(1), 12-15.
Hollingsworth, Dana. (2001). General procedures contract checklist. http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/smallcontracts/sccklist.html
Hyde, Bob. (2001).The first sale doctrine and digital phonorecords. Duke Law & Technology Review, 18. http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2001dltr0018.html
Illegal art. (2003) http://www.illegal-art.org/
Information Infrastructure Task Force. Information Policy Working Committee. Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights. (1995, September). Intellectual property and the National Information Infrastructure: The report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights. http://www.uspto.gov/web/ipnii/ [Lehman Report, also known as the White Paper]
Interlibrary Loan Guidelines [CONTU Guidelines]. (1976). Published in U.S. Congress Conference Report, H.R. 94-1733. http://www.unc.edu/~unclng/ILL-guidelines.htm
Jaszi, Peter. (1991). Toward a theory of copyright: The metamorphoses of “authorship.” Duke Law Journal, 1991, 455-502. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/duklr1991&size=2&rot=0&collection=journals&id=463
Karlaja, Dennis S. (1997). Preemption of shrinkwrap and on-line licenses. University of Dayton Law Review, 22, 511-543. Also available at http://homepages.law.asu.edu/%7Edkarjala/Articles/DaytonLRev1997.html
Kimber, Karen. (2003). Introduction to legal research. http://www.libraries.wright.edu/services/researchguides/law/
Klages, Mary. (2001). Michel Foucault: “What is an author?” http://www.colorado.edu/English/ENGL2012Klages/foucault.html
Landow, George P. (1992). Access to the text and the author's right (copyright). In Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology (pp. 196-201). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lange, David. (1981). Recognizing the public domain. Law & Contemporary Problems, 44(4), 147-181. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp44&size=2&rot=0&collection=lcpcf&id=813
Lange, David. (2003). Reimagining the public domain. In James Boyle (Ed.), Collected papers: Duke conference on the public domain (pp. 463-483). Durham, NC: Center for the Public Domain. [This monograph also appeared as a special issue of Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1-2), 1-483.]
Lange, David, & Anderson, Jennifer. (2004???). Reading the public domain. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Lemley, Mark A. (2004). Property, intellectual property, and free riding. John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper No. 291, Stanford Law School. [log in through the Social Science Research Network -- http://www.ssrn.com/index_sf.html] http://ssrn.com/abstract=582602
Lemley, Mark A. (2005). Property, intellectual property, and free riding.
Lemley, Mark, & Reese, R. Anthony. (2004). Reducing copyright infringement without restricting innovation. Stanford Law Review, 56(6), 1345-1434. [log in through the Social Science Research Network -- http://www.ssrn.com/index_sf.html] http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=525662
Lemley, Mark A., & Volokh, Eugene. (1998). Freedom of speech and injunctions in intellectual property cases. Duke Law Journal, 48(2), 147-242. [log in through the Social Science Research Network -- http://www.ssrn.com/index_sf.html] http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=85608
Lessig, Lawrence. (1999a). Privacy. Chapter 11 in Code and other laws of cyberspace (pp. 142-163, 271-275). New York: Basic Books.
Lessig, Lawrence. (1999b). Free speech. Chapter 12 in Code and other laws of cyberspace (pp. 164-185, 275-281). New York: Basic Books.
Lessig, Lawrence. (2001b). Jail time in the digital age. First published as an editorial in the New York Times (2001, July 30). http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/US_v_Elcomsoft/20010730_lessig_oped.html
Lessig, Lawrence. (2007). Foreword. Law & Contemporary Problems, 70(2), 1-3. Also available at http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?70+Law+&+Contemp.+Probs.+1+(spring+2007)
Levine, Peter. (2007). Collective action, civic engagement, and the knowledge commons. In Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 247-276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lewis, Justin, & Miller, Toby. (Ed.). (2003). Introduction. In Justin Lewis & Toby Miller (Eds.), Critical cultural policy studies: A reader (pp. 1-9). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lievrouw, Leah A. (Ed.). (1994a). Information resources and democracy [Special issue]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(6).
Lievrouw, Leah A. (1994b). Information resources and democracy: Understanding the paradox. In Leah A. Lievrouw (Ed.), Information resources and democracy [Special issue] (pp. 350-357). Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(6).
Lipinski, Tomas A. (1998). Information ownership and control. In Martha E. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 33, pp. 3-38). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
Lipinski, Tomas A. (2002a). Librarian's guide to copyright for shared and networked resources [Special issue]. Library Technology Reports, 38(1), 7-111.
Lipinski, Tomas A. (Ed.). (2002b). Libraries, museums, and archives: Legal Issues and ethical challenges in the new information era. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Litman, Jessica. (1989). Copyright legislation and technological change. Oregon Law Review, 68, 275ff.
Litman, Jessica. (1990). The public domain. Emory Law Journal, 39(4), 965-1023. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/emlj39&size=2&rot=0&collection=journals&id=979
Litman, Jessica. (1992). Copyright and information policy. Law and Contemporary Problems, 55(2), 185-209. http://www.jstor.org/view/00239186/ap040221/04a00110/0?frame=noframe&userID=8053f82b@utexas.edu/01cce44037005015df025&dpi=3&config=jstor
Litman, Jessica. (2000a). The demonization of piracy. Presented at the Tenth Conference on Computers, Freedom, & Privacy, Toronto. http://www.law.wayne.edu/litman/papers/demon.pdf
Litman, Jessica. (2000b). Information privacy/information property. Stanford Law Review, 52, 1283-1313. http://www.law.wayne.edu/litman/papers/infoprivacy.pdf
Loring, Christopher B. (2000). Reserve, technology, and copyright. In Allen Kent (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (Vol. 66, Supp. 29, pp. 281-299). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Madison, James. (1961). Federalist paper 43. In Clinton Rossiter (Ed.), The federalist papers: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay (pp. 271-280). New York: Penguin.
Mannheimer, Katherine. (2007). Personhood, poethood, and Pope: Johnson’s life of Pope and the search for the man behind the author. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 40(4), 631-649.
Marlotta-Wurgler, Florencia. (2007). What’s in a standard form contract? An empirical analysis of software license agreements. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(4), 677-713.
Maxwell, Richard. (2003). The marketplace citizen and the political economy of data trade in the European Union. In Justin Lewis & Toby Miller (Eds.), Critical cultural policy studies: A reader (pp. 149-160). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Martin, Peter W. (2003). Introduction to basic legal citation. http://www.law.cornell.edu/citation/index.htm
Mayfield, Kendra. (2004). Digitizing archives not so easy.

http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,42842,00.html


McGowan. (2004). Copyright nonconsequentialism. Missouri Law Review, 69(1), 1-71.
McGuigan, Jim. (2003). Cultural policy studies. In Justin Lewis & Toby Miller (Eds.), Critical cultural policy studies: A reader (pp. 23-42). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
McLeod, Kembrew. (2001). Owning culture: Authorship, ownership, and intellectual property law. New York: Peter Lang.
McLeod, Kembrew. (2003). Musical production, copyright, and the private ownership of culture. In Justin Lewis & Toby Miller (Eds.), Critical cultural policy studies: A reader (pp. 240-252). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Miller, Arthur, & Davis, Michael H. (1990). Intellectual property: Patents, trademarks, and copyright in a nutshell (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
Miller, Steven. (1995). Civilizing cyberspace: Policy, power, and the information superhighway. New York: ACM Press.
Minow, Mary. (1996-2003). Library digitization projects and copyright. http://www.llrx.com/features/digitization3.htm
Minow, Mary, & Lipinski, Tomas A. (2003). The library’s legal answer book (pp. 13-84). Chicago: American Library Association.
Mohr, Kevin E. (2002). How to brief a case. http://www.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/research/brief.html

http://www.wsulaw.edu/pdf/K1_F2003_How-To-Brief-A-Case_MOHR.pdf


Molina, J. Carlos Fernández-Molina. (2003). Laws against the circumvention of copyright technological protection. Journal of Documentation, 59(1), 41-68.
Morrow, Thomas M., & Sullivan, Jeffrey D. (2004). Lexmark v. Static Control: Another circuit court reads limitations into DMCA’s sweeping statutory anti-circumvention strictures. Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Journal [Bureau of National Affairs], 69(1696), 49-53. CD
Mosco, Vincent. (1996). The political economy of communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mosco, Vincent, & Wasko, Janet. (Eds.). (1988). The political economy of information. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Murray, Laura J. (2004). Protecting ourselves to death: Canada, copyright, and the Internet. First Monday, 9(10). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_10/murray/
National Research Council. Committee for a Study on Promoting Access to Scientific and Technical Data for the Public Interest. (1999). A question of balance: Private rights and the public interest in scientific and technical databases. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in the Emerging Information Infrastructure. (2000). The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the information age. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available at http://www.nap.edu/html/digital_dilemma/
Negativland [Colin Berry]. (1995). Fair use: The story of the letter u and the numeral 2. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.01/negativland_pr.html
Negativland. (2004a). http://www.negativland.com/
Negativland. (2004b). Intellectual property issues. http://www.negativland.com/intprop.html
Netanel, Neil W. (1996). Copyright and democratic civil society. Yale Law Journal, 106(2), 283-387.
Netanel, Neil Weinstock. (2001). Locating copyright within the First Amendment skein. Stanford Law Review, 54(1), 1-86. [log in through the Social Science Research Network -- http://www.ssrn.com/index_sf.html] http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=267848
Nimmer, Raymond T., & Krauthaus, Patricia Ann. (1992). Information as a commodity: New imperatives of commercial law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 55(3), 103-130. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp55&id=821&collection=lcpcf
Oberholzer, Felix, & Strumpf, Koleman. (2004). The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis. http://www.nber.org/~confer/2004/URCs04/felix.pdf
Okediji, Ruth. (1999). Perspectives on globalization from developing states: Copyright and public welfare in global perspective. CD
Ostrom, Elinor. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor, & Hess, Charlotte. (2007). A framework for analyzing the knowledge commons. In Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 41-81). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Overman, E. Sam, & Cahill, Anthony G. (1990). Information policy: A study of values in the policy process. Policy Studies Review, 9(4), 803-818.
Palmedo, Michael. (2001). Letter to Maneesha Mithal, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission. http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/ftc-hague12072001.html
Patterson, Lyman Ray. (1968). Copyright in historical perspective. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
Patterson, Lyman Ray. (1992). Understanding fair use. Law & Contemporary Problems, 55(2), 249-266. Also available at http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp55&id=1&size=2&collection=lcpcf&index=lcpcf
Patterson, Lyman Ray. (1993). Copyright and the “exclusive right” of authors. Journal of Intellectual Property, 1(1), 37ff.
Patterson, L. Ray. (2003). What’s wrong with Eldred? An essay on copyright jurisprudence. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 10, 345ff. Also available at http://www.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/us/lnacademic/results/docview/docview.do?risb=21_T2818532101&format=GNBFI&sort=RELEVANCE&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=29_T2818532106&cisb=22_T2818532105&treeMax=true&treeWidth=0&csi=146214&docNo=10
Patterson, Lyman Ray, & Lindberg, Stanley W. (1991). The nature of copyright: A law of users' rights. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Radin, Margaret. (1993). Reinterpreting property. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Raymond, Eric S. (1999). The cathedral & the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
Reichman, J.H, & Franklin, Jonathan A. (1999). Privately legislated intellectual property rights: Reconciling freedom of contract with public good uses of information. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 147(4), 875-970. http://weblinks2.epnet.com/citation.asp?tb=1&_ua=bt+ID++UPL+shn+1+db+aphjnh+bo+B%5F+5D2C&_ug=sid+C02AA866%2D6FD7%2D4390%2D869D%2DDE452EEAE00F%40sessionmgr2+dbs+aph+8263&_us=dstb+ES+ri+KAAACB1D00194252+fcl+Aut+sm+ES+sl+%2D1+or+Date+B485&_uh=btn+N+6C9C&_uso=st%5B0+%2DJN++%22University++of++Pennsylvania++Law++Review%22++and++DT++19990401+tg%5B0+%2D+db%5B0+%2Daph+op%5B0+%2D+hd+False+63A9&cf=1&fn=1&rn=2&
Reichman, J.H., & Uhlir, Paul F. (1999). Database protection at the crossroads: Recent developments and their impact on science and technology. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 14(2), 799-821.
Richards, Donald G. (2002). The ideology of intellectual property rights in the international economy. Review of Social Economy, LX(4), 521-541.
Rose, Mark. (1993). Authors and owners: The invention of copyright. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Rubenfeld, Jed. (2002). The freedom of imagination: Copyright’s constitutionality. Yale Law Journal, 112 (1), 1-60. Also available at http://www.yale.edu/yalelj/112/112-1ab1.html
Samuelson, Pamela. (1996, January). The copyright grab. Wired, 4(1), 135-138.
Samuelson, Pamela. (2003). Mapping the public domain: Threats and opportunities. In James Boyle (Ed.), Collected papers: Duke conference on the public domain (pp. 147-171). Durham, NC: Center for the Public Domain. [This monograph also appeared as a special issue of Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1-2), 1-483.]
Samuelson, Pamela. (2004). Intellectual property arbitrage: How foreign rules can affect domestic protections. Chicago Law Review, 71, 223.
Saporita, Christopher. (2003). Reconciling human rights and sovereignty: A framework for global property law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 10(2), 255-281. Also available at http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/journals/indiana_journal_of_global_legal_studies/toc/gls10.2.html
Schmidt, C. James. (1989). Rights for users of information: Conflicts and balances among privacy, professional ethics, law, national security. In Filomena Simora (Ed.), The Bowker annual: Library and book trade almanac (pp. 83-90). New Providence, NJ: R.R. Bowker.
Schweik, Charles M. (2007). Free/open-source software as a framework for establishing commons in science. In Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 277-310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Slack, Jennifer Daryl, & Fejes, Fred. (Eds.). (1987). Ideology of the information age. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Slater, Derek. (2003). Take another little piece of my art [review of Illegal Art]. http://creativecommons.org/getcontent/features/illegalart
Stallman, Richard. (1997). The right to read. Communications of the ACM, 40(2), 85-87. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=253726&jmp=cit&dl=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=://www.lib.utexas.edu:9003/sfx_local?&CFTOKEN=www.lib.utexas.edu:9003/sfx_local?#CIT
Stefik, Mark. (1999a). The bit and the pendulum: Balancing the interests of stakeholders in digital publishing. Chapter 4 in The Internet edge: Social, legal, and technological challenges for a networked world (pp. 79-106 and 302-303). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stefik, Mark. (1999b). The digital keyhole: Privacy rights and trusted systems. Chapter 8 in The Internet edge: Social, legal, and technological challenges for a networked world (pp. 197-231 and 305-307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Suber, Peter. (2007). Creating an intellectual commons through open access. In Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 171-208). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tannen, Deborah. (1998). The argument culture: Moving from debate to dialogue. New York: Random House.
Taylor, George H., & Madison, Michael J. (2006). Metaphor, objects, and commodities. Cleveland Sate Law Review, 54(1&2), 141-174.
U.S. Congress. (1976). Agreement on guidelines for classroom copying in not-for-profit educational institutions. Agreed to by the Ad Hoc Committee on Copyright Law Revision, the Author-Publisher Group and Authors League of America, and the Association of American Publishers, Inc. http://www.musiclibraryassoc.org/Copyright/guidebks.htm
U.S. Congress. Congressional Research Service. (2001). Federal statutes: What they are and where to find them. http://www.cnie.org/nle/crsreports/information/info-16.pdf
U. S. Congress. Library of Congress. Copyright Office. (2009). Copyright of the United States.

http://www.copyright.gov/title17/


U.S. Congress. Library of Congress. Copyright Office. (2005b). Orphan works. Available at http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/
U.S. Congress. Library of Congress. Copyright Office. (2005a). Roundtable discussion on orphan works. Transcript. Available online
U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. (1986b). Intellectual property rights in an age of electronics and information. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. http://www.wws.Princeton.EDU/~ota/ns20/alpha_f.html
U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. (1989). Copyright & home copying: Technology challenges the law. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. (1990a). Critical connections: Communication for the future. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. (1990b). Helping America compete: The role of federal scientific and technical information. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. (1993). Making government work : Electronic delivery of federal services. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. (1994). Electronic enterprises: Looking to the future. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. (1994). Information security and privacy in network environments. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Commerce. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1993). The National Information Infrastructure: Agenda for action. Washington, DC: GPO.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2004). Report of the Department of Justice’s task force on intellectual property. http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/IPTaskForceReport.pdf [see Ashcroft (2004)]
U.S. General Accounting Office [Government Accountability Office as of 2004]. (1994). Information superhighway: Issues affecting development. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Walterscheid, Edward C. (1994). To promote the progress of science and useful arts: The background and origin of the intellectual property clause of the United States Constitution. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2(1). http://www.lawsch.uga.edu/~jipl/vol2/waltersc.html
Wardrop, Martin. (2002). Copyright and intellectual property protection for indigenous heritage. In Aboriginal Art Online. http://www.aboriginalartonline.com/forum/debate.php
Warwick, Shelly. (2002). Copyright for libraries, museums, and archives: The basics and beyond. In Tomas Lipinski (Ed.), Libraries, museums, and archives: Legal Issues and ethical challenges in the new information era (pp. 235-255). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Waters, Donald J. (2007). Preserving the knowledge commons. In Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 145-167). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Weber, Claire. (2002). Designing, drafting, and implementing new policies. In Tomas Lipinski (Ed.), Libraries, museums, and archives: Legal Issues and ethical challenges in the new information era (pp. 303-319). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Winner, Langdon. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136.
Woodmansee, Martha. (1984). The genius and the copyright: Economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the “author.” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 17(4), 425-448.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (c. 2004). Intellectual property and traditional knowledge. http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/publications/index.html
Young, Edward. (1759). Conjectures on original composition. Dublin.

Selected law reviews and journals of special interest to copyright
Berkeley Technology Law Journal http://www.law.berkeley.edu/journals/btlj/
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal http://www.cardozo.yu.edu/aelj/
Duke Law & Technology Review http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/
Harvard Journal of Law & Technology http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/
Intellectual Property Law Review http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/form/academic/s_lawrev.html?_m=0cd7a31f47f9114a4483775c1cafe6e4&wchp=dGLbVtz-zSkVb&_md5=592d0d3acbc667e6898e441696cad113[a more general source]
Journal of Intellectual Property Law http://www.law.uga.edu/jipl/
Journal of the Copyright Society http://www.csusa.org/html/publications/journal/journal.htm
Law and Contemporary Problems http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/lcp/
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology http://law.richmond.edu/jolt/index.asp
Stanford Technology Law Review http://stlr.stanford.edu/STLR/Core_Page/index.htm



Download 271.57 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9



The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message
    Main page
united states
public interest