Country profile report
Download 0.84 Mb.
|
Appendix 1 Below is a draft outline of decision making for thematic transport related issues as drafted by Ion Dedu during interview with him: Discussed the process of decision making (see diagram attached). Starting with a strategy, financing plan and an estimated budget. It could take as long as 6 months to get a project to the feasibility study stage and at this stage of the process, the Transport Department would be involved. Once the Feasibility Study is ready its presented to a select group of council committees: BC - Budget Committee TC – Transport Committee PC – Patrimony Committee (estate/property / heritage) LC – Legal Committee To pass through these committees could take as long as one to two months. In between the completion of the feasibility study and the presentation to the committees, there is room for negotiation. After the committees (with either the YES or NO decision), it goes to the General Council who vote on whether to support it for funding. Within this part of the process, projects will include in their presentations elements of the Technical and economic indicators. 
From here (whether Y or N) it goes into ‘storage’ to wait for the Budget Department to decide (this is dependent upon what funds they have; these funds coming from Local or EU sources and this info is only known some 45 days after the annual State budget approval process has been finalised). Process of decision making here – up to 2-months and through the same four committees before approval for budget. Once through this – its gets the approval and budget allocated. 1 Exception from this situation are Bucharest that benefited of two transport masterplans (one in 2000 by JICA and the other in 2008 by WSP), Ploiesti and Sibiu - both with transport masterplans developed in 2008 by AV Transport Planning and WSP. These transport masterplans were developed as standalone plans but included some strategic components and a list of priority projects. However, they had a weak integration with and consideration of land-use, environment, social or health issues, the emphasis being mainly on road infrastructure and car-traffic. 2 Concretely, beside inclusion in urban planning law and also development of the terms of reference the development of the growth poles’ SUMPs has been funded by EBRD with a total budget of: EUR 4,108,840 (Brasov and Constanta – EUR 904,060; Craiova, Iasi, Ploiesti – EUR 1,356,090; Timisoara and Cluj-Napoca – EUR 904,060 and Bucharest Ilfov – EUR 944,630). In addition development of Galati city SUMP received a budget of EUR 200,000 and the one of Sibiu of EUR 260,000 3 Regional Operational Programme 2014-2020, approved in May 2015, accessible at; http://www.inforegio.ro/ro/por-2014-2020/documente-de-programare.html Report completed and finalised in Dec 2015 Directory: energy -> intelligent -> projects -> sites -> iee-projects -> files -> projects -> documents energy -> Energy Invention Suppression Cases energy -> Privacy impact assessment: org name system name documents -> Project Fact Sheet Sustainable marketdriven terminal solutions for efficient freight transport (smartset) Main information energy -> Strategic Energy Policy Challenges for the 21 energy -> Table of Figures energy -> Office of Indian Energy Financial and Technical Assistance Fact Sheet energy -> Doe agency plan appendix a doe best practices energy -> Statement of work for the transaction advisor 0 the power africa program in liberia energy -> This report was produced using data, forecasts and price information current at the time of writing (2013). It should be noted that these inputs are likely to Download 0.84 Mb. Share with your friends:
|