Department of the navy (don) 18. 1 Small Business Innovation Research (sbir) Proposal Submission Instructions introduction



Download 1.02 Mb.
Page16/33
Date26.04.2018
Size1.02 Mb.
#46805
1   ...   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   ...   33

PHASE I: Develop a concept for an algorithm or series of algorithms to reduce the effect of atmospheric turbulence as discussed in the topic description. Demonstrate the feasibility of the concept via analysis or data collected with cameras provided by the vendor. The Phase I Option, if awarded, will include the initial capabilities description to build a prototype in Phase II. Develop a Phase II plan.

PHASE II: Develop and deliver a prototype algorithm or series of algorithms for performance testing and evaluation based on the results of Phase I and the Phase II Statement of Work (SOW). These algorithms must run in real time and demonstrate reduction of turbulence in accordance with the vendor’s proposal. The algorithms will be tested with data provided by the Government. Prepare a Phase III development plan to transition the technology for Navy and potential commercial use.

It is probable that the work under this effort will be classified under Phase II (see Description section for details).

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Support the Navy in transitioning the technology to Navy use via the TI-APB process. The final product from Phase III will be integrated into existing imaging systems; the company will support the transition by providing code to the integrator and offering technical and test support.

The technology should have application to any military and non-military ship-based imaging systems. The technology can be used by commercial industries for port security and navigation.

REFERENCES:

1. Frederickson, Paul A. "Measurements and modeling of optical turbulence in a maritime environment.” Naval Postgraduate School Thesis, 2006. http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/41322/Frederickson_Spie06_6303.pdf?sequence=1

2. Paskyabi, Mostafa. "Ocean near-surface boundary layer: processes and turbulence measurements.” University of Bergen, 2010. http://web.gfi.uib.no/publikasjoner/rmo/RMO-2010-1.pdf

KEYWORDS: Submarine Imaging; Naval Imaging; Turbulence at the Ocean Surface; Contrast Enhancement; Blur Removal; Blur Reduction

N181-045

TITLE: High Bandwidth Towed Array Modem

TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Battlespace, Electronics, Sensors

ACQUISITION PROGRAM: PEO IWS 5.0, Next Generation Towed Arrays

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with section 5.4.c.(8) of the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws.

OBJECTIVE: Develop a high-bandwidth modem for Next Generation Towed Arrays that meets bandwidth, form factor, power consumption, and environmental operating requirements.

DESCRIPTION: Next Generation Towed Arrays will increase mission capability and provide improved acoustic capability with innovative sensors such as multi-axis accelerometers capable of providing instantaneous Left and Right ambiguity resolution and increased array bandwidth. This will provide full spectrum coverage with a single line array vice multiple arrays. Implementing a new modem provides the increased bandwidth to the submarine signal path without the need for a fiber optic signal path. This is a significant reduction in acquisition costs in comparison to overhauling the entire submarine signal path to fiber optics. A signal path overhaul of the submarine Fleet would require tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. The Next Generation Towed Arrays will have significant production potential.

Current commercial modems do not meet requirements for Next Generation Towed Arrays. A successful solution requires an innovative approach that will meet the design requirements for Next Generation Towed Arrays. Next Generation Towed Arrays will need to pass bidirectional data between the arrays and shipboard array receivers. This will require a high-bandwidth modem. Current towed arrays modems use a transmission path of 200 to >4000 feet of 50ohm cable between the array and the array receiver. This signal path has a number of connections where the impedance is not controlled, which can alter the signal integrity. A successful solution would be able to transmit with impedances that are not controlled. Current array modems use bandwidths up to 50 Mbps. Future arrays modems will use this same signal path but will be required to be scalable in transmitting up to 225 Mbps.

In addition to data transmission requirements, the new modem needs to meet thin line towed array environmental form factors (such as temperature, pressure related to depth, and seawater corrosion) and power consumption requirements. This will require the modem to fit into a 0.75-inch diameter cylinder with a length of 5.25-inches and consume less than 5W of average power. The modem will be required to operate at industrial temperature ranges and a pressure up to 1125 psig. The modem must be able to survive at pressures up to 2,500 pounds per square inch, gauge (psig). The Navy will benefit from a high-bandwidth modem to support improved acoustic capability provided to the submarine fleet in the Next Generation Towed Array program.

The Phase II effort will likely require secure access, and NAVSEA will process the DD254 to support the contractor for personnel and facility certification for secure access. The Phase I effort will not require access to classified information. If need be, data of the same level of complexity as secured data will be provided to support Phase I work.

Work produced in Phase II may become classified. Note: The prospective contractor(s) must be U.S. Owned and Operated with no Foreign Influence as defined by DOD 5220.22-M, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, unless acceptable mitigating procedures can and have been implemented and approved by the Defense Security Service (DSS). The selected contractor and/or subcontractor must be able to acquire and maintain a secret level facility and Personnel Security Clearances, in order to perform on advanced phases of this contract as set forth by DSS and NAVSEA in order to gain access to classified information pertaining to the national defense of the United States and its allies; this will be an inherent requirement. The selected company will be required to safeguard classified material IAW DoD 5220.22-M during the advance phases of this contract.

PHASE I: Develop a concept for a high-bandwidth modem for Next Generation Towed Arrays that must show that the modem can feasibly meet the requirements in the description. Establish the feasibility through analysis and modeling of the technology. The Phase I Option, if awarded, will include the initial design specifications and capabilities description to build a prototype in Phase II. Develop a Phase II plan.

PHASE II: Based on the results of the Phase I and the Phase II Statement of Work (SOW), design, develop, and deliver a prototype high-bandwidth modem that clearly demonstrates that it meets the parameters in the description. The Navy will conduct independent functionality and environmental testing of the prototype. Demonstration will take place at a Government-provided facility. Prepare a Phase III development plan to transition the technology for Navy production and potential commercial use.

It is probable that the work under this effort will be classified under Phase II (see Description section for details).

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Assist the Government in transitioning the high-bandwidth modem for Next Generation Towed Arrays for Navy use within a Towed Array for the submarine fleet to allow for further experimentation and refinement. The implementation of the modem will integrate Towed Array components with the modem components to show a fully functional modem.

A high-bandwidth Towed Array modem would be of great interest to the seismic oil exploration industry. It would support development of higher fidelity seismic arrays and improve beamforming/processing capability. Current arrays do not require a modem but will likely require one in the future. These high-fidelity arrays would increase survey speeds (and thus reduce costs) for sub-bottom mapping in oil exploration and other water-borne geophysical applications.

REFERENCES:

1. Strangio, Christopher. “Data Communications Basics.” CAMI, 2016. http://www.camiresearch.com/Data_Com_Basics/data_com_tutorial.html

2. Lemon, S. G. "Towed-Array History, 1917-2003." IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 2, April 2004, pages 365-373. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1315726/

KEYWORDS: Next Generation Towed Array; High Bandwidth Modem; Multi-axis Accelerometers; Signal Path; Future Arrays Modems; Small Form Factor.

N181-046

TITLE: Tracking Algorithm(s) for Determining Highest Probability Predicted Intercept Points(s) in the AEGIS Combat System

TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Battlespace, Electronics, Sensors

ACQUISITION PROGRAM: Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare System (PEO IWS) 1.0 – AEGIS Combat System.

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with section 5.4.c.(8) of the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws.

OBJECTIVE: Develop tracking software algorithm(s) that instantly and accurately predict the highest probability of kill intercept points for multiple simultaneous and/or staggered threats.

DESCRIPTION: The Navy is seeking a tracking software application that can instantaneously address targets in raiding or swarming configurations and provide optimal engagement options to the Sailor. The AEGIS Combat System (ACS) utilizes the predicted intercept point (PIP) of the interceptor to the target to determine weapons engagement sequencing. A PIP is the intersection of two moving or one stationary object by an interceptor(s) and is calculated using tracking data collected from multiple systems within the ACS. Commercially developed software algorithms concentrate on single point intersections and do not necessarily account for environmental factors, or engagement clutter and debris associated with military applications. Evolving threats, and the prolific manner in which they are deployed, necessitate the calculation of multiple PIPs to: (1) maintain the highest probability of kill for a single threat and (2) successfully eliminate multiple threats. Hundreds of data sets comprise a single predicted intercept point and the calculation of a PIP requires the use of hundreds of thousands of algorithmic calculations. Tracking software algorithms are needed that can instantly calculate the highest probability of kill for numerous simultaneous intercept points to improve engagement sequencing (scheduling performance) of AEGIS Weapons Systems (AWS).

The Navy seeks an innovative tracking software algorithm(s) that accurately and reliably provides the increased capability to determine the highest probability of kill for numerous simultaneous intercept points while accounting for variations in threat types, the number of threats, operational and test environment conditions, clutter and debris. A solution will not increase combat system processing time to achieve its primary objective. It will integrate with all elements of the ACS. This includes track managers, weapons, and missile systems. Because of the planned implementation in both operational and testing environments, the software will permit realistic testing of interceptor versus evolving threat types and configurations in a dynamic test environment. Track visualization will be delivered through existing ACS console Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) to support operator track management and decision-making. It shall also be able to integrate with the AEGIS Test Bed (ATB) to facilitate system evaluation against more advanced and prolific threats. This will enable shortening of testing and certification timelines for new AEGIS baselines as compared to current timelines. This will also help in maintaining or improving product quality through the early detection of deficiencies in the product. The speed and accuracy of the solution must exceed existing ACS performance attributes resonant in the ATB by 10% or better.

The tracking software application developed under this effort will provide an enhanced capability to address targets in raiding or swarming configurations and provide optimal engagement options to the Sailor. This will increase mission capability and effectiveness against the latest threats. Because of the planned implementation in both operational and testing environments, the software will permit realistic testing of interceptor versus evolving threat types and configurations in a dynamic test environment. The modeling and simulation will optimize weapon system testing; thereby reducing test costs associated with fielding new ACS baselines.

The Phase II effort will likely require secure access, and NAVSEA will process the DD254 to support the contractor for personnel and facility certification for secure access. The Phase I effort will not require access to classified information. If need be, data of the same level of complexity as secured data will be provided to support Phase I work.

Work produced in Phase II may become classified. Note: The prospective contractor(s) must be U.S. Owned and Operated with no Foreign Influence as defined by DOD 5220.22-M, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, unless acceptable mitigating procedures can and have been implemented and approved by the Defense Security Service (DSS). The selected contractor and/or subcontractor must be able to acquire and maintain a secret level facility and Personnel Security Clearances, in order to perform on advanced phases of this contract as set forth by DSS and NAVSEA in order to gain access to classified information pertaining to the national defense of the United States and its allies; this will be an inherent requirement. The selected company will be required to safeguard classified material IAW DoD 5220.22-M during the advance phases of this contract.

PHASE I: Define and develop a concept for tracking software algorithm(s) for instant and accurate prediction of the highest probability of kill intercept points for multiple simultaneous and/or staggered threats. The concept must show that it will feasibly support the test and operational environments identified in the description. Feasibility will be established through assessment of the logic in mathematical algorithms developed to accurately represent the highest probability of kill PIPs and the approach to integrate the capability into the ATB environment. The Phase I Option, if awarded, will include the initial design specifications and capabilities description to build a prototype in Phase II. Develop a Phase II plan.

PHASE II: Based upon the results of Phase I and the Phase II Statement of Work (SOW), design, develop, and deliver a prototype tracking software application for PIPs. Implement the application into an existing Government-approved modeling and simulation environment to validate performance. The prototype must be capable of demonstrating the implementation and integration of the tracking software as described in the description. The demonstration will be conducted in a Government-provided facility. Prepare a Phase III development plan to transition the technology for Navy use and Program of Record.

It is probable that the work under this effort will be classified under Phase II (see Description section for details).

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Support PEO IWS 1.0 in transitioning the prototype tracking software applications to allow for further experimentation and refinement. The prototype tracking software application will be incorporated into the AEGIS baseline testing modernization process. This will consist of integration into a baseline definition, incorporation of the baselines existing and new threat capabilities, validation testing, and combat system certification.

Tracking algorithms could provide assistance to air traffic controllers in monitoring potential collisions.

REFERENCES:

1. Pulford, Graham. “Taxonomy of Multiple target tracking methods.” IEE Proceedings - Radar Sonar and Navigation, November 2005. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Graham_Pulford/publication/3357875_Taxonomy_of_multiple_target_tracking_methods/links/54b6dbaf0cf2bd04be337d08/Taxonomy-of-multiple-target-tracking-methods.pdf?origin=publication_detail

2. Gokhan, Soysal and Efe, Murat. “Performance Comparison of Tracking Algorithms for a Ground Based Radar.” Ankara University, Communications Faculty Sciences, Series A2-A3, V.51(1) pp 1-16 (2007). http://acikarsiv.ankara.edu.tr/browse/4015/3733.pdf

KEYWORDS: Tracking Software Algorithm(s); Highest Probability of Kill; Numerous Simultaneous Intercept Points; Operator Track Management and Decision-making; Advanced and Prolific Threats; Predicted Intercept Point

N181-047

TITLE: Decompression of Atmosphere Onboard Distressed Submarine

TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Ground/Sea Vehicles

ACQUISITION PROGRAM: PMS391, SUBMARINE ESCAPE AND RESCUE PROGRAM OFFICE

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with section 5.4.c.(8) of the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws.

OBJECTIVE: Develop a means to reduce the internal atmospheric pressure of a Distressed Submarine (DISSUB) without the need for ship’s electrical power.

DESCRIPTION: The Navy has a safety requirement to provide the capability for the escape and rescue of crewmembers in the event of a DISSUB situation. A method to bring DISSUB internal atmosphere to 1 atm would significantly increase the chance of survival by crewmembers. There is currently no means for a DISSUB to lower its internal atmospheric pressure. Research and development (R&D) is needed, as there is no known commercial technology available technology that would fit the Navy’s requirements.

There is a high probability that a Distressed Submarine (DISSUB) that ends up on the ocean bottom with all or some crewmembers alive, will have an internal atmosphere pressurized above 1 atm. This can be due to a number of reasons, such as flooding compressing the air in a compartment to a smaller volume, damage to high-pressure air banks/piping causing them to vent into a compartment, and crew use of Emergency Air Breathing system to fight casualties. A high internal atmospheric pressure can cause significant problems such as nitrogen narcosis, oxygen toxicity, and decompression sickness.

Develop a prototype device that can lower the internal atmospheric pressure of a DISSUB by at least 1 atm, with a goal of lowering the pressure from 5 atm to 1 atm. The prototype device cannot require the availability of shipboard electrical power as power may not be available. The prototype device may rely on the stored energy of the ship’s high-pressure air banks, seawater pressure, or self-contained battery power. It must not require more than four people to operate or require significant operator physical exertion. Decompression must happen at a safe rate to prevent decompression sickness of crewmembers.

Work produced in Phase II may become classified. Note: The prospective contractor(s) must be U.S. Owned and Operated with no Foreign Influence as defined by DOD 5220.22-M, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, unless acceptable mitigating procedures can and have been implemented and approved by the Defense Security Service (DSS). The selected contractor and/or subcontractor must be able to acquire and maintain a secret level facility and Personnel Security Clearances, in order to perform on advanced phases of this contract as set forth by DSS and NAVSEA in order to gain access to classified information pertaining to the national defense of the United States and its allies; this will be an inherent requirement. The selected company will be required to safeguard classified material IAW DoD 5220.22-M during the advance phases of this contract.

PHASE I: Define and develop a concept for reducing the internal atmospheric pressure of a DISSUB as outlined in the description. Demonstrate the feasibility of the concept by performing modeling and simulation to approximate the performance. The Phase I Option, if awarded, will include the initial design specifications and capabilities description to build a prototype solution in Phase II. Develop a Phase II plan.

PHASE II: Based on the results of Phase I and the Phase II efforts, fabricate, validate, and deliver a prototype device capable of test demonstration in a simulated DISSUB environment. Provide a detailed test plan to demonstrate the deliverable meets the intent of program requirements. A Phase III qualification and transition plan will also be provided at the end of Phase II.

It is probable that the work under this effort will be classified under Phase II (see Description section for details).

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Support the Navy in transitioning the technology to Navy use. Deliver the Phase II-developed prototype in a form factor and configuration that is ready for temporary installation onboard a Navy submarine. Participate in shipboard testing to prove functionality in an operational environment.

This technology could be used by commercial manned submersibles and underwater research facilities. Additionally, this technology could be sold to other countries for use onboard their submarines.

REFERENCES:

1. Harabin, A.L. “An analysis of decrements in vital capacity as an index of pulmonary oxygen toxicity.” Journal of Applied Physiology 63(3), 1 Sept 1987: 1130-1135. http://jap.physiology.org/content/63/3/1130.long

2. Demchenko, Ivan. “Similar but not the same: normobaric and hyperbaric pulmonary oxygen toxicity, the role of nitric oxide.” American Journal of Physiology (Lung and Cellular Molecular Physiology) 293, 9 July 2007: L229-L238. http://ajplung.physiology.org/content/293/1/L229


Directory: osbp -> sbir -> solicitations -> sbir20181
solicitations -> Army 16. 3 Small Business Innovation Research (sbir) Proposal Submission Instructions
solicitations -> Air force 12. 1 Small Business Innovation Research (sbir) Proposal Submission Instructions
solicitations -> Army 14. 1 Small Business Innovation Research (sbir) Proposal Submission Instructions
solicitations -> Navy small business innovation research program submitting Proposals on Navy Topics
solicitations -> Navy small business innovation research program
solicitations -> Armament research, development and engineering center
solicitations -> Army 17. 1 Small Business Innovation Research (sbir) Proposal Submission Instructions
solicitations -> Navy 11. 3 Small Business Innovation Research (sbir) Proposal Submission Instructions
sbir20181 -> 18. 1 Defense logistics agency (dla) small business innovation research (sbir) program proposal Submission Instructions general
sbir20181 -> Army 18. 1 Small Business Innovation Research (sbir) Proposal Submission Instructions

Download 1.02 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   ...   33




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page