a real-world threat with the goals of training and measuring the
effectiveness of the people,
processes, and technology used to defend an environment.
Assumptions, bias, misunderstandings, and disbelief have a significant impact on the security operations of an environment. Red Teams provide formidable, honest assessments of internal practices and security controls
by challenging assumptions, disregarding norms, and exposing atrophy and bias. An unbiased analysis using Red Teaming measures the gap between "what is" and "what should be. The application of red teaming provides unbiased ground truth and a deep understanding of security operations as a whole.
Red Teaming epitomizes the practice of attacking problems from an adversarial point of view. This mindset challenges an idea to help prove its worth,
identify weaknesses, or identify areas to improve.
Complex systems are developed, designed,
and implemented by skilled, trusted professionals. These individuals are well respected and trusted in their field and are highly capable of designing and developing functional systems. Although these systems are highly functional and capable, the ideas,
concepts, and thoughts can sometimes be "boxed in" leading to incorrect assumptions about how a system honestly operates.
People build systems, and people make assumptions about capability,
functionality, and security. These assumptions lead to flaws in which a threat may take advantage.
Red Teaming provides a means to challenge and test conventional wisdom and thought. A few standard methods to apply Red Teaming scenarios are:
Share with your friends: