Do remittances have a flip side? A general equilibrium analysis of remittances, labor supply responses and policy options for Jamaica* Maurizio Bussolo and Denis Medvedev


General equilibrium approach: advantages, model description, and key data



Download 202.47 Kb.
Page2/9
Date18.10.2016
Size202.47 Kb.
#2208
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

1General equilibrium approach: advantages, model description, and key data

1.1Modeling economy-wide effects of increased remittance inflows


Increased remittance flows may raise reservation wages and reduce labor supply; they can also increase pressure on the real exchange rate and worsen export performance.3 The sign and magnitude of these complex links depend on many direct and indirect effects and are largely determined by the structural features of the economy and the relevant elasticity values. Tracing these effects requires a general equilibrium model where endogenous labor supply decisions are explicitly incorporated and enough sectoral detail exists to allow for different degrees of tradability across goods.

The computable general equilibrium (CGE) model used in this study is based on a standard neoclassical general equilibrium model. The main features of this model are presented in Annex 4.2 and will be familiar to readers accustomed with the CGE literature. We solve the model in a comparative static mode, and our discussion of the results is based on a comparison between the before- and after- the shocks’ equilibria.4 The remittance shock is imposed as a one-time adjustment in the level of international remittances and is completely exogenous. In this way, increased remittances are analogous to any other increase in current transfers to households from abroad and are not preceded by emigration of an income-earning household member. While this is a simplification of reality, one may think of several cases where this assumption may be appropriate: increase in the living standards of migrants living abroad, reduction of money transfer fees charged by financial institutions, etc. In any case, the objective of this study is not to substitute for the microeconomic studies that investigate the many links between remittances, migration, household labor supply decisions, and within-household distribution of income, but to complement this literature with an analysis that explicitly takes into account general equilibrium effects on macroeconomic aggregates and the external sector.

In order to isolate the specific channels transmitting remittance shocks through the economy, consider first a small open economy model with no leisure-consumption tradeoff. In this setup, an increase in remittances is equivalent to a (permanent) increase in incomes of the households. Assuming that non-tradables are normal goods, this positive income shock increases spending on both tradables and non-tradables. Since Jamaica is a price taker in international markets, growing demand does not raise prices of tradables. However, since the prices of non-tradables are determined in the domestic economy, they increase due to additional demand (the so-called ‘spending effect’). There is also a ‘resource movement effect’. The relative price change between tradables and non-tradables makes production in the latter more profitable. Output growth in the non-tradable sectors will push up factor demands, especially for those factors used intensively in these sectors. Increased factor demand by the expanding sectors will be accommodated by factors released from other sectors (the resource movement effect) and, depending on the behavior of total supply of factor, will normally result in higher factor returns in the final equilibrium. The price shift and resource reallocation in favor of non-tradables erode the competitiveness of export oriented sectors and hurt import competing sectors.

In order to allow changes in remittance inflows to influence the household decision to supply labor, this simple model is modified by introducing a consumption-leisure tradeoff in the household utility function, similar to the approach of Barzel and McDonald (1973), de Melo and Tarr (1992), and Annabi (2003). Consider a Stone-Geary utility function and a budget constraint of the following form:



s.t. (1)

In this utility function, Ci denotes the consumption of good i with leisure (C0) being a normal good, θi are usually interpreted as consumption minima,5 and the share parameters μi (including μ0) must sum to unity. T denotes the total time a household has available for work and leisure activities, and the amount of resources available for non-leisure consumption is limited by non-labor income (y) and total wage income (ignoring saving and taxes for simplicity).6 Constrained maximization gives rise to the familiar linear expenditure system (LES) demand functions:



(2)

The household labor supply is the difference between total time available and the time allocated to consumption of leisure, and substituting the budget constraint into the demand function yields:



(3)

Partially differentiating the labor supply equation with respect to non-labor income and the wage rate yields the following elasticities:



(4)

(5)

While the labor supply is decreasing in non-labor income, the sign of the wage elasticity depends on the ratio of non-labor income to the total “committed” consumption expenditures.7

With an endogenous labor supply, the “Dutch disease” effects of increased remittances can be exacerbated. An increase in non-labor income, as is the case with remittances, leads to a reduction in the labor supply. In a general equilibrium setting, wages are set to clear the labor market and reduced labor supply implies higher wages. This triggers second order effects: higher wages raise the opportunity cost of leisure and the substitution effect can push individuals to increase their labor supply, up to the point where the income effect dominates (the backward bending labor supply curve). Within a range of reasonable labor supply elasticity values, the new equilibrium will be achieved with a lower labor supply and higher average wages, which translate into higher domestic production costs. Therefore, in the current model setup the introduction of an endogenous labor supply leads to a further loss in international competitiveness and exacerbates the effects of real exchange rate appreciation described earlier.


Directory: media -> Documents
Documents -> Embargo until 12/17/12
Documents -> Bird use, bird hazard risk assessment, and
Documents -> Cosida teleconference: Collegiate Communications Issues & Challenges: With an nfl perspective michael signora
Documents -> Suny cortland red dragons athletic awards (Updated: 8/15/11) all-america name Sport Honor
Documents -> Cosida st. Louis Convention Schedule as of June 18, 2012 (subject to change) Saturday, June 23
Documents -> For release: Friday, May 31 – 12 noon (edt) Please visit the Capital One Academic All-America® website
Documents -> Time location 9 am – 10 am Lindell Program Committee Meeting
Documents -> James ramsey of florida state headlines capital one academic
Documents -> Division II basketball teams
Documents -> Matt howard of butler, austin meier of msoe

Download 202.47 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page