The implementation of a candidate project will reduce the crash rate at the project location by certain amount. We incorporate a crash reduction factor which is useful in estimating the annual savings from crashes avoided after the project has been implemented. For example, a crash reduction factor of 0.1 indicates 10% reduction in crashes. Thus for each project, the monetized benefits from crashes avoided are given as follows:
and the benefit-cost ratio is given by:
where
is the capital cost of the project, and
N is project lifetime in years.
The benefits are estimated on a yearly basis and thus the total cost of the project is amortized over the lifetime of the project to obtain an equivalent annual cost of the project.
A non-monetized version of the benefit-cost analysis, known as cost-effectiveness ratio is described by:
The AADT, crash rate, capital cost of project, roadway length influenced by the project and project lifetime are considered to be the deterministic parameters in the model. Uncertain parameters in the model are the cost and the frequency (percentage) of occurrence associated with each type of crash, and the crash reduction factor (crashes avoided per crash). The uncertainty is addressed using interval analysis of the low and high bounds on the value of each uncertain parameter.
The costs associated with each of the three types of crash are provided in Table 1. These estimates are adopted from NCHRP-A (1999). Analyst can change these values in the prototype software.