whom they know little, if anything at all. What good could come of that
Apathy is inherent to mass democratic voting systems, DAT
Macedo, Stephen. Against Majoritarianism Democratic Values and Institutional Design
Boston University Law Review, Vol. 90:1029.
Mass elections for legislatures or executives in constitutional democracies often empower governments that represent only pluralities of the public, rather than majorities. In these real world systems, moreover, the choices that voters face are typically highly constrained a limited number of parties, perhaps only two, compete for our support. Moreover, the office of modern citizen is not such as to elicit a high level of responsibility. It is nob binsult to observe, with Schumpeter, that being one citizen among millions is like being a member of an
enormously large committee – the incentive to do one’s homework before meetings is weak. Mass popular elections surely do – as they ought – matter greatly in modern representative systems, and legislative deliberation is often highly admirable, well-informed, conscientious, and dignified. But there is no insult orb baffront – either to the voters or to the democratic principle of political equality – if, in designing and
adopting popular constitutions, additional mechanisms are adopted to further improve the quality of
collective deliberation expert administrative agencies, politically arm’s-length commissions, and courts
Share with your friends: |
