Bromley (20 participant)
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question 5.d: To what extent do you think the architecture in your neighbourhood has changed in the last 5 years?
|
Spitalfield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No change
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
9,09
|
Somewhat changed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
9,09
|
Changed
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
5
|
45,45
|
Changed extensively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
36,36
|
Bromley (20 participant)
|
No change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Somewhat changed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Changed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Changed extensively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question 5.e: Do you like or dislike the change in architecture in your neighbourhood during the last 5 years and why?
|
Spitalfield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
10,00
|
Neither like or dislike
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
1
|
6
|
60,00
|
Dislike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
3
|
30,00
|
Bromley (20 participant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Neither like or dislike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Dislike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Appendix 2: Images of defensive architecture
Image An example of ‘pig’s ears’. Photo taken in Bromley by Bow (06/06/16).
Image An example of ‘anti-homeless spikes’. Picture taken in Spitalfields (06/06/16).
Image An example of a ‘Bum-proof’ bench. Photo taken in Bromley by Bow (06/06/16)
Share with your friends: |
