FY 2001 President's Budget Request 0,464

1. Congressional Adjustments $-10,337

a) Distributed Adjustments $8,500

i) Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS) $8,500

b) Undistributed Adjustments $0

c) Adjustments to meet Congressional Intent $0

d) General Provisions $-18,837

i) Defense Working Capital Fund Rate Stabilization (Sec 8085, P.L. 106-259, FY 2001 Appn Act) $-9,515

Government-Wide Rescission (Sec 1403, Chapter 14, General Provisions, Division A, P.L. 106-544) $-1,670

2. Program Increases and Decreases $4,530

a) Transfers $12,875

i) Transfers In $12,875
1) Classified Program Transfer $12,875

Classified program transfers from Subactivity Group Tactical Intelligence and Special Activities to Subactivity Group Global C3I and Early Warning.

i) One-time Costs $0

The FY 2001 Flying Hour Program was repriced to reflect the latest CY 2000 AF Cost Analysis Improvement Group (AFCAIG) approved cost factors which are based on the most current consumption data available. Included in this reprice are AVPOL, Depot Level Reparables (DLRs), and consumable supplies purchased through General Support Division of the AF Working Capital Fund and by IMPAC card. The most significant changes have occurred in the costs of General Support supplies and Depot Level Reparables.

2) Satellite Communications Terminal (FY 2001 Base $69,576) $866

Net program increase in contractor support for safety, survivability, vulnerability, harness surveillance, reliability and maintainability analyses. Analyses provide needed information to sustain aging systems.

i) One-time Costs $0

Program decrease reflects curtailed sustainment efforts for the integration of Milstar EHF/UHF ground command post terminal (S-280), a Ground Nuclear Detonation Detection System Terminal (GNT), and a Multi-Media Communications Shelter (MMCS).

2) Global Command & Control System (FY 2001 Base $50,054) $-1,541

Program reduction reflects the decrease of funding for replacement and upgrade of user equipment for contract services and equipment maintenance.

Under the North American Air Defense Modernization (NAADM) agreement, the cost of the North Warning System (NWS) is shared by the US and Canada. Program decrease reflects the reduction in cost/share ratio (schedule debt repayment) as the US reconciles unpaid commitments to Canada.

4) E-4B National Airborne Operations Center (NAOC) (FY 2001 Base $54,115) $-1,366

Program reduction in contractor logistics support including Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM) rescheduling. All related costs of the four-year PDM costs were re-estimated and adjusted to reflect a smaller effort.

5) Realignment of Funds $-1,275

The FY 2001 Flying Hour Program reprice, based on the CY 2000 AFCAIG consumption factors, resulted in an overall shortfall which Air Force cash flowed from other Air Force Operation and Maintenance programs. After careful consideration of the alternatives, funds were realigned from this Sub Activity Group. While we recognize the detrimental impact on this Sub Activity Group, this one-time realignment was necessary to ensure continued aircrew readiness and safety of flight, and will be restored in subsequent years.

This decrease reflects deferral of software upgrades due to constrained resources in FY01.

3. Reprogrammings: $10,372

a) Defense Working Capital Fund Rate Stabilization (Sec 8085, P.L. 106-259, FY 2001 Appn Act) $9,515

b) Foreign Currency Fluctuation Transfer $857

4. Price Change $21,760

5. Transfers $7,870

a) Transfers In $7,870

i) Federally Funded Research and Development $3,570

Transfer of Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation funding to Operation and Maintenance for contractor positions to support AFSPC program realignment.

Funds Joint Data Exchange Center operating costs, operational testing, and International Cooperative Administrative Support Services (ICASS) costs paid through the US Embassy in Moscow.

Funding transfer from RDT&E to O&M to sustain existing and additional international warning sites.

6. Program Increases $188,264

a) Annualization of New FY 2001 Program $0

b) One-time FY 2002 Costs $2,945

i) Rescission Restoration $1,670

Restoration of FY01 Government-Wide Rescission.

ii) Flying Hour Reprice Restoration $1,275 When the FY 2001 Flying Hour Program was repriced to reflect the CY 2000 AFCAIG

approved cost factors, the resultant shortfall was cash flowed from other Air Force

operation and maintenance programs. Funds realigned from this Subactivity Group

in FY 2001 have been restored in full for FY 2002.

c) Program Growth in FY 2002 $185,319

i) MILSATCOM Terminals (FY 2001 Base $0) $38,095

Increase reflects the realignment of sustainment responsibilities for the Milstar system which include Army/Navy/Air Force terminals and the Mission Control Segment from the Space and Systems Missile Center (SMC) and Electronic Systems Center (ESC) to AFSPC.
ii) Ballistic Missile Early Warning Systems (FY 2001 Base $52,025) $26,341

Increase supports Solid State Phased Array Radar System (SSPARS) operation and maintenance contract with operations at Clear AFS, AK, Thule AB, Greenland, and Fylingdales, UK., and Thule Greenland contract to purchase manpower and services to support the missile warning mission. With the declaration of Initial Operational Capability (IOC) of the Clear Radar Upgrade, this adds a requirement to support the supply needs of a second SSPARS within this program. Funding also supports shortfalls in the Thule Greenland contract.

Funding supports the AFSPC Space Analysis Center (ASAC) which involves the following missions: Defensive Counter Space attack reporting, Counter Space infrastructure, and space test range programs. No current HQ or National Security Space analysis capacity exists today. The ASAC will provide the analytical support for developing future space capabilities and operations employment assessments.

Increase is due to a Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM) on one of the primary

E-4B aircraft in FY02. There are no PDMs scheduled in FY01. Funds also cover sustainment issues – purchasing super high frequency components due to diminishing manufacturing sources.

v) Defense Support Program (FY 2001 Base $43,691) $15,513

Increase reflects costs associated with the phase-down and deactivation of the DSP surveillance mission which is being replaced by the Space Based Infrared System (SBIRS). Funding supports DSP orbital incentives and mission unique Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) integration costs.
vi) North Warning System (FY 2001 Base $22,566) $15,302

Amount is to pay Canada for residual imbalance for 1985 – 1997, resulting from the North American Air Defense Modernization (NAADM) program memorandum of understanding signed in 1985 which agreed to a 60/40 split of costs between the 2 countries.

Increase attributed to operation and maintenance (O&M) support of the Perimeter Acquisition Radar Attack Characterization System (PARCS) and Solid State Pased Array Radar System (SSPARS) contracts and sustainment engineering (SE) costs for the PARCS and PAVE Phased Array Warning System (PAWS). O&M contract support costs include items such as additional manning support to maintain the Intrusion Detection and Alarm System, emergency depot level maintenace, and inspection, repair and corrosion control that has been deferred at PAVE PAWS sites. Multiple subsystems are obsolete and unsupportable due to lack of sources for repair and parts. SE funds support analysis and corrective actions to avoid imminent problems, such as outages, and allow continued operational capability of these systems.

Increase reflects the increment of the Integrated Space Command and Control (ISC2) contractor’s Integrated Master Evolution Plan (IMEP) to sustain existing systems, migrate existing systems to a common integrated architecture and new capabilities, increase interoperability among CINC’s command and operation centers, and enable external integration with other DOD systems.

Program increase for additional FAA contracts and PACAF contract services to operate, maintain, and repair the radar and associated communication equipment. Funding supports operations in Canada and Florida and sustainment costs. Also, the FY 02 PACAF contract switched to a “Best Value” versus the previous “Low Bid” contract and added funding for the award fee. In FY 02, fuel purchases for the vehicle fleet will be made at local Alaska prices, and the Defense Logistics Agency will no longer be funding for barge traffic from the depot to the sites.

Increase for realignment of funding from NCMC-TW/AA to CINC’s MCCC to support integration, maintenance, and operation of MCCC which supports USCINCSPACE and CINCNORAD in a trans/post attack environment.

Increase reflects the transition of sustainment responsibilities, which includes Army/Navy/Air Force terminals and the Mission Control Segment from the Space and Systems Missile Center (SMC) and Electronic Systems Center (ESC) to AFSPC.

Provides funding for the Shared Early Warning System which includes a Joint Data Exchange Center (JDEC) and a Pre- and Post-Launch Notification System. The funding increase includes annual unit operating costs for the new JDEC, a joint US-Russian manned operations center in Moscow.

Funding reflects realignment to support contract services and equipment maintenance for minor upgrades and maintenance replacement of user computing and terminal equipment (disks drives, printers, and memory upgrades).

Program increase is due to announcement of an A-76 cost comparison/direct conversion. After a careful review, the Air Force has designated these activities/functions as not military essential. A cost comparison study/direct conversion is underway to determine whether the workload will be contracted or remain in-house in accordance with the guidelines in OMB Circular A-76.

Increase reflects funding to support sustainment costs for the Integrated Correlation and Display System and Ground NUDET Detection System Terminal which continue to increase due to the age of the systems. Funds also support increased costs for maintenance of the trouble report database due to the increase in the number of trouble calls.

Program increase is the result of operating costs associated with the overall Strategic War Planning System (SWPS) modernization efforts. Funds will be used to support the Theater Integrated Planning System (TIPS) Phase I, which will provide improvements in the existing planning tools and interfaces.

Increase funding supports the depot level reparables (DLR) for a wide range of equipment installed in the Launch Control Facilities. Additionally, these funds support Higher Authority Communication/Rapid Message Processing Element (HAC/RMPE) Software Support Facility (HSSF) communication hardware used to test Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP) communications software.

7. Program Decreases $-57,478

a) One-time FY 2001 Costs $-8,500

One time funding decrease. FY01 DoD Appropriations Act funded Tethered

Aerostat Radar System (TARS) operations and maintenance requirements of the

three Gulf Coast sites - Matagorda, TX, Morgan City, LA, and Horseshoe Beach, FL.

Prior to FY00, OSD Drug Enforcement Policy & Support funded these three sites.

b) Annualization of FY 2001 Program Decreases $0

c) Program Decreases in FY 2002 $-48,978

i) Satellite Communications Terminal (FY 2001 Base $69,540) $-38,095

Decrease funding realign sustainment responsibilities for the Milstar from the Space and Systems Missile Center (SMC) and Electronic Systems Center (ESC) to AFSPC.
ii) Communications (FY 2001 Base $23,994) $-4,315

The Air Force is using modern vendor-provided telecommunication services through Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) & Federal Telecommunications Services (FTS) to a greater degree in place of using in-house unique and older high maintenance command & control equipment. This results in programmed savings.

The decrease is a result of a revised estimate of Universal Fund requirement for services provided by the Defense Information Services Agency.

The decrease reflects an Air Force decision to terminate Air Combat Command (ACC) funding for SBIRS because ACC performs no functions related to the SBIRS program.

v) NMCS-Wide Support Communications (FY 2001 Base $10,756) $-1,936

Circuit costs to support the Improved Emergency Message Automatic Transmission

System (IEMATS) are no longer required for FY02 since IEMATS is scheduled for

deactivation in FY01.

Joint Surveillance System (JSS) Sites

CONUS 40 40 40

Alaska 12 12 12

CONUS 1 1 1

Alaska 1 1 1

Iceland 1 1 1

Minimally Attended Radars (MARs) 15 15 15

Unattended Radars (UARs) 39 39 39
North Atlantic Defense System (NADS)

Minimally Attended Radars (MARs) 4 4 4

East Coast Site 1 1 1

West Coast Site 1 1 1
Mobile Consolidated Command Centers

USSTRATCOM 1 1 1

AFSPC 1 1 1

IV. Performance Criteria and Evaluation Summary (Cont’d):
FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
NAOC E-4B

PAA 3 3 3

TAI 4 4 4

Flying Hours 1,374 1,710 1,710

APAI 3 3 3

Avg. Flying Hours Per APAI 458 570 570

PAA 1 1 1

TAI 1 1 1

Flying Hours 590 720 720

APAI 1 1 1

Avg. Flying Hours Per APAI 590 720 720

V
I.