Marine bioregional plan for the North Marine Region prepared under the


S1.1 How were the pressures on conservation values analysed?



Download 0.96 Mb.
Page7/20
Date19.10.2016
Size0.96 Mb.
#4691
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   20

S1.1 How were the pressures on conservation values analysed?


The pressure analysis process considered the impact of pressures on a region’s conservation values, with a focused evaluation of the effectiveness of current mitigation and management arrangements in place to respond to those pressures. For the purpose of this plan, pressures are defined broadly as human-driven processes and events that do or can detrimentally affect the region’s conservation values. Table S1.1 lists the type and source of pressures available for inclusion in the analysis. Only those pressures relevant to the conservation value being analysed were considered.

The analysis enabled pressures to be categorised in terms of their relative importance and has contributed to identification of regional priorities for the North Marine Region. Regional priorities are described in section 4.1 of the plan. The conservation values selected for the pressure analysis are discussed in Part 3 of the plan.



Table S1.1: Pressures and sources of pressures available for selection in the North Marine Region pressure analysis

Pressure

Source

Sea level rise

Climate change

Changes in sea temperature

Climate change

Urban development

Changes in oceanography

Climate change

Ocean acidification

Climate change

Changes in terrestrial sand temperature

Climate change

Chemical pollution/contaminants

Shipping

Vessels (other)

Aquaculture operations

Renewable energy operations

Urban development (urban and/or industrial infrastructure)

Agricultural activities

Onshore and offshore mining operations

Nutrient pollution

Aquaculture operations

Agricultural activities

Urban development

Changes in turbidity

Dredging (spoil dumping)

Land-based activities

Onshore and offshore mining operations

Climate change (changes in rainfall, storm frequency)

Marine debris1

Land-based activities

Fishing boats

Shipping

Vessels (other)

Oil rigs

Aquaculture infrastructure

Renewable energy infrastructure

Urban development

Noise pollution

Seismic exploration

Urban development

Defence/surveillance activities

Shipping

Vessels (other)

Aquaculture infrastructure

Renewable energy infrastructure

Onshore and offshore mining operations

Onshore and offshore construction

Light pollution

Oil and gas infrastructure

Fishing boats

Vessels (other)

Land-based activities

Onshore and offshore activities

Renewable energy infrastructure

Onshore and offshore mining operations

Physical habitat modification

Fishing gear (active and derelict)

Dredging (and/or dredge spoil)

Shipping (anchorage)

Defence/surveillance activities

Telecommunications cables

Offshore construction and installation of infrastructure

Onshore and offshore construction

Offshore mining operations

Ship grounding

Tourism (diving, snorkelling)

Climate change (changes in storm frequency etc.)

Urban/coastal development

Human presence at sensitive sites

Aquaculture operations

Seismic exploration

Tourism

Recreational and charter fishing (burleying)

Research

Defence/surveillance activities

Aircraft

Nuisance species2

Aquaculture operations

Extraction of living resources3

Commercial fishing (domestic or non-domestic)

Recreational and charter fishing

IUU fishing (domestic or non-domestic)

Indigenous harvest

Commercial fishing—prey depletion

Commercial, recreational and charter fishing
—fisheries discards

Bycatch4

Commercial fishing

Recreational and charter fishing

IUU fishing (domestic or non-domestic)

Oil pollution

Shipping

Vessels (other)

Oil rigs

Onshore and offshore mining operations

Collision with vessels

Shipping

Fishing

Tourism

Collision/entanglement with infrastructure

Aquaculture infrastructure

Renewable energy infrastructure

Oil and gas infrastructure

Disease

Aquaculture operations

Fishing

Shipping

Tourism

Invasive species

Shipping

Fishing vessels

Vessels (other)

IUU fishing and illegal immigration vessels

Aquaculture operations

Tourism

Land-based activities

Changes in hydrological regimes

Land-based activities

Aquaculture infrastructure

Renewable energy infrastructure

Climate change (e.g. changes in rainfall, storm frequency)

IUU = illegal, unreported and unregulated

Levels of concern for the interactions between pressures and conservation values

Based on a review of scientific and expert literature, and informed by the findings of relevant environmental and impact assessment studies, risk assessments and expert opinion, the interaction between selected conservation values and each pressure was assigned a level of concern. The levels of concern are:



of concern

of potential concern

of less concern

not of concern.

A pressure is of concern for a conservation value when:

there is evidence that it interacts with the conservation value within the region and there are reasonable grounds to expect that it may result in a substantial impact (Box S1.1), and

there are no management measures in place to mitigate the impact(s), or there is inadequate or inconclusive evidence of the effectiveness of management measures within the region.

A pressure is of potential concern for a conservation value when:

there is evidence that the conservation value is vulnerable to the type of pressure, although there is limited evidence of a substantial impact within the region, and

the pressure is widespread or likely to increase within the region, and

there are no management measures in place to mitigate potential or future impacts, or there is inadequate or inconclusive evidence of the effectiveness of management measures.

A pressure is of less concern for a conservation value either when:

there is evidence of interaction with the conservation value within the region and there are reasonable grounds to expect that the impacts are unlikely to be substantial, or

there is evidence of interaction with the conservation value within the region and there are reasonable grounds to expect that current management measures in place are effective in minimising or mitigating the impact.

A pressure is not of concern for a conservation value when:

the pressure is rare or absent from the region, or

there are reasonable grounds to expect that the impacts are minimal or the pressure does not interact with the conservation value, or

there is evidence that the pressure is managed effectively through routine management measures.

In some instances, where a pressure operating outside of the region is having a substantial impact on a region’s conservation value, consideration has been given to it.

Only those interactions between conservation values and pressures assessed as being of concern and of potential concern are described in this Schedule. Further information on the findings of the pressure analyses can be found in the conservation value report cards.

Box S1.1 What is a substantial impact?

A pressure was considered likely to cause a substantial impact on a conservation value if there was a reasonable possibility that it would have any of the following effects:

introduction of a known or potential pest or invasive species

extensive modification, destruction, fragmentation, isolation or disturbance of


habitat, which results in changes to community composition and/or trophic relationships and/ or ecosystem services

modification, destruction, fragmentation, isolation or decline in availability of quality habitat important for a species of conservation value, to the extent that the species’ conservation status is affected or its recovery is hindered

substantial change in air or water quality, which may adversely impact biodiversity, ecological function or integrity, social amenity or human health

introduction of persistent organic chemicals, heavy metals or potentially harmful chemicals, which adversely impact on biodiversity, ecosystem function or integrity, social amenity or human health

change in community dynamics or structure that results in adverse impacts on biodiversity, ecological function or integrity, social amenity or human health

increase in mortality of conservation values to an extent that may affect their conservation status or hinder recovery

reduction in the area of occupancy of a species of conservation value, which may affect its conservation status or hinder recovery

fragmentation of populations of conservation value

reduced breeding success of a species or population of conservation value

extensive or prolonged disturbance that affects the conservation status of a species or population of conservation value.

Note that the criteria above for defining substantial impact have been informed by EPBC Act Policy Statement 1.1—Significant Impact Guidelines.






Download 0.96 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   20




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page