Oklahoma department of environmental quality


EUG 3 –Coal Preparation Plant



Download 2.8 Mb.
Page6/27
Date16.08.2017
Size2.8 Mb.
#33136
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   27
EUG 3 –Coal Preparation Plant

EU Name

Particulate Matter Emission Factors

(lbs/ton coal)

PM Emissions (TPY)




2003 Actual

PTE

Railcar Unloading

0.0859

22.3

35.2

Radial Stacker

Grizzly Feeder










Coal Sizer/Crusher

0.2

51.9

82.0

Conveying

0.02

5.19

8.20

Coal Bunkers

0.02

5.19

8.20

Coal Feeders

Closed Process

No emissions



Pulverizers



EUG 4 – PP-1 Pulp Processing Units
This EUG is reserved for future Subpart S applicable units. HAP and VOC emission calculations are included in EUG 6 – VOC Sources Not Subject to an NSPS or NESHAP.



EUG 5 – Subpart KK Flexographic Printing

Printing Presses


Emissions of HAPs are limited by Subpart KK to 400 kilograms per month. In addition to restrictions on HAP emissions, these units have a large amount of VOC emissions. VOC emissions for the printers are illustrated in the discussion of emissions for EUG 6, VOC Sources Not Subject to an NSPS or NESHAP, and are not repeated here.



EUG 6 – VOC Sources Not Subject to an NSPS or NESHAP


PP-1 Pulp Processing Units

Emission factors for these units were developed in a comprehensive emissions testing program by The National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI). Lengthy discussion of this program, with details concerning applicant’s participation may be found in the memorandum associated with the pending Part 70 permit. The Pulp Processing emission factors developed in this program are used to estimate total VOC and HAP emissions for all pulping systems. This action was taken in the discussion for the Part 70 permit, which concluded that such an approach is reasonable since all systems use similar processes and raw materials to produce similar products. The primary difference in the Systems lies in the bleaching agent and/or sequence. Emission factors for the systems were developed by applying the production rate-normalized emission factors from the two areas tested. In every case where the choice of bleaching agent created a difference in emissions, the higher factors were selected and applied to the maximum expected production rates for the pulping system, producing conservatively high results. An overall factor of 0.45 lbs of VOC per ton of pulp processed is the highest value shown in the NCASI study. Paper production requires approximately 100 tons of pulp for every 95 tons of finished product. The following table uses this factor in a comparison of 2002-2003 average actual emissions with current project PTE.




Paper production (TPY)

Pulp use

(TPY)

Emission factor

VOC Emissions (TPY)

Average

Potential

Average

Potential

Lb/ton

Average

Potential

Increase

345,880

538,845

364,0084

567,205

0.45

82

128

46


Paper Machines PM-11, PM-12, PM-13, PM-14, and PM-15

Various methods have been used in the past to calculate emissions of VOC from chemicals used at the paper machines. One method used a site-specific evaluation by NCASI. Emissions from building vents and equipment vents were measured, certain worst-case assumptions were made, and uniform values applied to all machines. Mass balance methods have also been used, sometimes with restrictions as to the amount of VOC released, as opposed to VOC reacted or bound in some other fashion. The method used for this permit analysis is reflected in the section following this.


Paper Machine Additives

The additives to which the heading refers are chemicals used with paper machines, but that were not in use when the NCASI testing was performed in 1995. They include chemicals that enhance the product, such as softness aids, dyes, biocides, etc. Considerations similar to those in the preceding section were made in calculations of VOC emissions for the memorandum associated with the pending Part 70 permit.


The current application re-visits the preceding issues for several reasons. First, the current project is expected to increase paper production dramatically, with a concomitant increase in additive use. Second, a principal force behind the detailed analysis in earlier versions of the pending Part 70 permit was the presence of Part 5 of Subchapter 41 of Oklahoma’s Air Pollution Control Rules, which concerned emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants. Part 5 has been superseded by Subchapter 42 and no longer applies to toxics emitted by this facility. The facility has reviewed all chemical use in terms of VOC content, and has divided the VOC totals by paper production in each of 2002 and 2003. This analysis covers the chemicals covered by the NCASI study in the preceding section, as well as the additives used since the NCASI study. The worst-case results have been combined to produce a ratio, or emission factor, for all VOC as a function of paper production. Because of the uncertainty associated with formulations that may become available, the calculated factor was inflated by nearly 50% to provide a safety factor. The first table following shows the data used to calculate the ratio and the second table shows the effect of using the ratio in calculating emission changes due to the current project.





VOC Usage (TPY)

Additive

2002

2003

Maximum 2002/2003

Wet Strength

30.63

50.22

50.22

Softeners

4.67

1.76

4.67

Release Agents

0.26

0.44

0.44

Miscellaneous

10.11

7.03

10.11

Felt/Wire Conditioners

6.79

6.90

6.90

Defoamers

8.73

6.11

8.73

Biocides

0

9.94

9.94

Paper Machine Dyes

0.19

0.18

0.19

Total

61.39

82.58

91.21

ADT/yr*

342,202

349,558

345,880**

Lb VOC/ton paper

0.359

0.472

0.527


Download 2.8 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   27




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page