Prepared by: Kais Al‐Momani Nour Dados Marion Maddox Amanda Wise C



Download 16.24 Mb.
Page32/59
Date05.05.2018
Size16.24 Mb.
#47761
1   ...   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   ...   59

CONCLUSIONS: WHAT WORKS

The literature review outlines some more structural interventions such as constitutional changes that ensure greater minority representation and affirmative action policies that could be implemented by political parties.



However we are aware that changes such as these are unrealistic in the Australian context, and so the following discussion is largely confined to ‘softer’ options relating to education, capacity building, mentoring, and developing more inclusive mainstream forums.
It also needs to be understood that we did not undertake in‐depth evaluations of individual programs, as this was outside the scope of the study. The following summary of what works’ is based upon our analysis of available evaluation material; interviews with program managers and program participants; and insights from the literature. In a number of cases, case studies were of initiatives held more than two years ago, and thus, many of the insights from participants were of a retrospective/reflective nature and as we had no baseline data to work off, we were not able to track in any detail the specificities of program impact. Furthermore, we were unable to do any participant observation for similar reasons.
A final point to make is that interventions and approaches such as those detailed below, and later in the case studies and audit sections of this report, operate at different scales and target different audiences. For example, some leadership programs need and do target disadvantaged and disengaged youth so the yardstick of success will be quite different to a program focused on building further leadership capacity among those already successful in their respective professions, or with some background of political participation or participation in the public sphere. However both are important and legitimate and contribute at different sends of the spectrum’ of political participation we referred to earlier in the report. Likewise, not all people (Muslim or otherwise) would be capable of or wish to run for political office or become a high profile media commentator, however political participation occurs just as importantly at the ballot box or lobbying local council for better services. Thus, programs need to be targeted both at the ‘high end’ and the ‘everyday end’ of the spectrum of political participation and we have attempted to provide suggestions from across the available options accordingly.

INCLUSIVE COMMUNITY PROGRAMS AND PROVISION FOR MUSLIM PARTICIPATION


Programs that address a larger cross‐section of the community, rather than specifically targeting Muslims, but make provisions for Muslims to be able to actively participate, tend to be viewed more positively. Provision of halal food, facilities for prayer as well as some cultural awareness amongst other participants in these programs would better facilitate the inclusion of Muslim Australians into mainstream programs. In order to be as inclusive of participants as possible, cross‐cultural approaches would be more appropriate than inter‐faith approaches.

SUFFICIENT FUNDING FOR GRASSROOTS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS


Ensuring sufficient funding for proven grass‐roots programs that facilitate the involvement of Muslims, particularly Muslim youths from disadvantaged socio‐economic backgrounds, into mainstream programs, is important in ensuring a positive environment where Muslim Australians can feel equipped with the skills to contribute to debates in the wider community.

POLITICAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS


The content and delivery of political education programs, both at school level and as part of settlement programs for new migrants, should be reconsidered. The importance of education was stressed by many politically active Muslim Australians who felt that current initiatives do not sufficiently enable participants to take an active role in their societies and communities. In addition, the timing of political participation training for new migrants could be reviewed. The settlement process is a particularly difficult time and a period when new migrants do not always feel that they are able to give much thought to their social and communal commitments as they can later, once they are better established in a community. If information about the political system is delivered too early in the settlement process it may not be useful to participants at that time and so will be quickly forgotten. Civics and citizenship education in schools—for all Australian children—should be maintained and strengthened. The subsidy scheme for visits to Canberra should be maintained, and the Discovering Democracy units should be updated and their continued and systematic use strongly encouraged.

EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP TRAINING AND MENTORING


Based on the highly successful leadership programs that have been run in Australia, political participation amongst Muslim Australians has been shown to increase when opportunities are provided for leadership training for young people. In particular, evidence suggests that a mentor based leadership program where young Muslims work with local mentors on specific projects through which they acquire the skills for confident engagement in the media, political, and public spheres would be a highly supported model.

MEDIA TRAINING WORKSHOPS


Given the emphasis placed on how negative media perceptions affect the ability of Muslim Australians to participate fully in Australian society by many research participants, adequate training in dealing with media is a matter of importance. Further, media training has been demonstrated as effective through the initiatives discussed in our audit and case studies. Such training can empower not only individuals by allowing them to experience pride in contributing to public debate, but also their communities by making them feel that their voices are important and are listened to. Obviously quality varies, but initiatives such as the Australian Multicultural Foundation Leadership Australia program which had a concrete exercise requiring participants to secure a media appearance or publish an opinion piece in a major paper are excellent examples of programs with a clear outcome focus.

EFFECTIVE USE OF NONTRADITIONAL TECHNOLOGIES


Concerns raised by some participants suggest that it is important for government to consider how new technologies can be utilised effectively. This means thinking about incentives for participation in online forums and ways in which participant involvement can be shown to be as valuable.

ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES


Several participants mentioned that a small number of Muslims are, for religious reasons, reluctant to vote. They felt these non‐voters were best addressed by presenting them with Islamic arguments in favour of voting. Liverpool councillor Mazhar Hadid noted:
It does exist, I can’t deny it. But it’s a smaller percentage of the community. It’s a small percentage that believes it’s haram. Why? Because you may need to act, to go against Islamic Sharia law. Some of them believe in that. But to me, we work very hard on this group and lately they realise We are in the wrong,’ ... I’ve spoken to many people, religious leaders in the community, to explain to them, because there are too many verses in the Quran ... that give you permission [to be politically engaged, even in a nonMuslim society].
Some overseas programs, discussed below, have successfully addressed this issue from an Islamic perspective.

WOMEN‐ONLY WORKSHOPS


Examples from the audit of initiatives suggest that there are instances where women‐only programs may be of great benefit. These may facilitate the participation of women who may otherwise not feel comfortable attending mixed gender sessions or workshops.


Download 16.24 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   ...   59




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page