Textbook assignments


DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT CHICAGO



Download 1.71 Mb.
Page4/8
Date09.12.2017
Size1.71 Mb.
#35828
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8

DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT CHICAGO: When the Democrats met in Chicago for their party convention, it was clear that Hubert Humphrey had enough delegates to win the nomination. As vice president, he had loyally supported Johnson’s domestic and foreign policies. He controlled the convention, but the antiwar demonstrators were determined to control the streets. Chicago’s mayor Richard Daley had the police out in mass, and the resulting violence went out on television across the county as a “police riot.” Humphrey left the convention as the Democratic nominee, but early opinion polls showed that he was a clear underdog in a nation sick of disorder and protest.
WHITE BACKLASH AND GEORGE WALLACE: The growing hostility of many whites to federal desegregation, antiwar protests, and race riots was tapped by Governor George Wallace of Alabama. He was the first politician of contemporary, late 20th century America to marshal the general resentment against the Washington establishment (“pointy-head liberals,” as he called them) and the American Independent Party, hoping to win enough electoral votes to throw the election into the House of Representatives.
RETURN OF RICHARD NIXON: Many observers thought Richard Nixon’s political career had ended in 1962 after his unsuccessful run for governor of California. In 1968, however, a new, more confident, and less negative Nixon announced his candidacy and soon became the front-runner in the Republican primaries. He was also the favorite of the party regulars and had little trouble securing his nomination at the Republican conventions. For his running mate, he selected Governor Spiro Agnew of Maryland, whose rhetoric was similar to that of George Wallace. Nixon was a “hawk” on the Vietnam War and ran on the slogans of “peace with honor” and “law and order.”
RESULTS: Wallace and Nixon started strong, but the Democrats began to catch up, especially in northern urban centers, as Humphrey preached to the faithful of the old New Deal coalition. On election night, Nixon defeated Humphrey by a very close popular vote but took a substantial majority of the electoral vote (301 to 191), ending any threat that the three-candidate election would end up in the House of Representatives. The significance of the 1968 election is clear in the combined total of Nixon’s and Wallace’s popular vote of almost 57%. Apparently, most Americans wanted time out to heal the wounds inflicted on the national psyche by the upheavals of the sixties. Supporters of Nixon and Wallace had had enough of protest, violence, permissiveness, the counterculture, drugs, and federal intervention in social institutions. Elections in the 1970s and 1980s would confirm that the tide was running against New Deal liberalism in favor of the conservatives.

THE KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION
Young Ambition Eager to be Tried: John F. Kennedy

On January 20, 1961, the youngest of elected Presidents succeeded the oldest. John F. Kennedy (1917-1963), spoke proudly for a new generation that came of age in the thirties, fought the wra, and now demanded power to deal in its own way with the hopes and terrors of the nuclear age. As if to form a bond between past and present, Kennedy had invited the oldest and most honored of American poets, Robert Frost, to commemorate the day. Blinded by the glare from the sun and snow, the 87-year-old Frost could not read beyond the opening lines of his “tribute verse”: “Summoning artists to participate/ In the August occasion of the State/ Seems something for us all to celebrate.” The unspoken words drew from the history of “revolution and outlawry” that America began a prophecy of coming glory: “Of a power leading from its strength and pride/Of young ambition eager to be tried…/ A golden age of poetry and power/Of which this noonday’s the beginning hour.” Putting his manuscript aside, Frost recited from memory “The Gift Outright,” a meditation on the marriage of the American land and people that he had first read in a former time of trouble and published in A Witness Tree (1942). Moved by the promise of “young ambition,” Frost added an emphatic note of certainty to the final line, which he changed that day to read, “Such as she was, such as she will become.” Then Kennedy stepped forward with Chief Justice Earl Warren to take the oath of office.

At this moment the language of certainty might well have been discounted as poetic license. John Kennedy faced a hard test of nerve. Could he establish his leadership in a country that had given him the thinnest of margins over Richard Nixon, a fraction of one percent of the popular vote? Could the first Catholic President of the United States be sure that covert bigotry would not poison the political air? At the summit of world politics, where life or death decisions waited, could a young, untested President hold his own among the tough, experienced heads of the great powers? Kennedy gave no sign of doubt as he declared his purposes: “I do not shrink from this responsibility- I welcome it.” Indeed he had never seemed to doubt that high office and responsibility were his for the taking. In a series of brilliantly organized campaigns, Kennedy advanced from Congressman (1946-1953) to Senator (1953-1960) to Democratic presidential candidate. He recognized the vast resources of executive power and meant to use them. Intimates already knew his determination to rule his own administration. Kennedy’s moving Inaugural Address opened, in effect, a second campaign to win that broad popular understanding and support without which no President can lead the country into new political courses. From his vision of a golden age, “a new world of law” at the outer limits of human possibility, America (and all the nations) might take courage to begin the painful search for alternatives to a paralyzing Cold War.

John Kennedy’s “thousand days” ended on a terrible November afternoon in Dallas, Texas. The memory of murder and mourning is still too palpable to allow a cool judgment of the work he had begun. In due time historians will have to reckon with the eloquent arguments of Theodore Sorensen and Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., whose memoirs place their leader among the very great. “Lifting us beyond our capacity,” Schlesinger wrote in A Thousand Days, “he gave his country back to its best self…”


Kennedy’s Inaugural Address, January 20, 1961

… We observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedom- symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning- signifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three-quarters ago.

The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And ye the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe- the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God. We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch had been passed to a new generation of Americans-born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage- and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world. Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty. This much we pledge- and more.

To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United, there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided, there is little we can do- for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder. To those new States whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our words that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom- and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.

To those peoples in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling the break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required- not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge- to convert our good words into good deeds, in a new alliance for progress, to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our neighbors know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. And let every other power know that this hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house. To that world assembly by sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support- to prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective- to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak- and to enlarge the area in which its writ may run.

Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request; that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction. We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain doubt that they will never be employed. But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course- both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind’s final war.

So let us begin anew- remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate. Let both side explore what problems unite us instead of belaboring those problems which divide us. Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precious proposals for the inspection and control of arms- and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations.

Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the starts, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce. Let both sides unite to heed in all corners of the earth the command of Isaiah- to ‘undo the heavy burdens and to let the oppressed go free.” And if a beachhead of cooperation may push back the jungle of suspicion, let both sides join in creating a new endeavor, and a new balance of power…

Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance; North and South, East and west, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join us in that historic effort? In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility- I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it- and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you: Ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: Ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man. Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.


Carrying Forth Democracy- The Peace Corps

The Civil Rights Movement inspired many other types of activism for social injustice in the 1960s. In 1961, President John F. Kennedy challenged citizens to “ask not what your country can do for you- ask what you can do for your country.” Through Kennedy’s Peace Corps, Americans volunteered to serve in developing countries in the hope of spreading democracy. After Kennedy was assassinated in 1963, the Peace Corps became a large part of his legacy.
I didn’t go to a lot of speeches in college, but I went to head Kennedy because someone told me he was probably going to run for president. This was in 1959. I remember him quoting the line from the Robert Frost poem that went, “miles to go before I sleep,” and then dashing off the stage. It was like a meteor going through the room. I followed the campaign, and when he announced the Peace Corps idea, I wrote him a letter saying, “If you will do it, I will volunteer.”

I grew up in rural Michigan and I’d never been overseas before. I as at my mother’s house when the telegram came inviting me to train for Nigeria. I remember my hands were shaking as I opened it. I had never heard of Nigeria but I definitely felt I was participating in history. This was a new era of American participation in the world. Peace Corps volunteers were the frontiline people making fresh contact with a whole bunch of newly independent nations. There was a sense of exhilaration about maybe carrying forth democracy and establishing new relations with Asia, Africa, and South America.


– Roger Landrum, Nigeria 1961-65

I taught beginning English to boys between the ages of 16 and 25. I’d have 50 kids in a class and the assigned text as Gulliver’s Travels. It was very hard to maintain continuity because whenever the weather was good, the principal would say, “Mr. Burkhardt, it’s good weather. They must work the crops. When it rains they go to class. But now, they must go to the crops,” and he’d yank them out of class. But what was I to do? He was the boss.

In every class I gave, there would be an agent from the Savak [Iranian secret police] sitting among the students. At first, I was very insulted by this. Hadn’t they heard of the First Amendment? The other teachers would say to me, “You don’t understand.” In one class the students asked me what I thought of “Red China” joining the United Nations. I said that I though China should be part of the UN- after all, it’s a country. They all burst into applause and, of course, the Savak guy is busy writing down all these subversive thoughts…

Being in the Peace Corps, I felt a part of this incredible pattern going on- in the Philippines, Colombia, Kenya, Iran, Tunisia, and Guatemala- and I was just one little digit in the great wheel of history. It was a great sensation… The Iranians all knew for a fact that Lyndon Johnson had assassinated Kennedy. It happened in Texas, Johnson’s home state. Who had the most to gain? I kept saying to them, “No, You don’t understand.” And they would just say back, “No, YOU don’t understand.”


– Robert Burkhardt (Iran, 1962-64)

I remember staying up all night listening to the funeral on the radio. I also recall a beggar walking up to me in the street and I said, “No, I don’t have any money.” He said, “I don’t want money.” I just want to tell you how sorry I am that your young president died.”



I remember how difficult it was to sleep and I remember turning cold, which is one of the first signs of shock. Kennedy was the first president we had voted for. He represented a break with the past and we had bought all that. His assassination forced us to grow up.
– Donna Shalala (Iran, 1962-64)

THE LBJ ADMINISTRATION
The Great Society and Vietnam: from Lyndon B. Johnson, Third Annual Message, January 12, 1966

In the early spring of 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson declared himself out of the race for the Democratic nomination. The seemingly homelessness of administration policy in Vietnam was splitting the country and stirring revolt within the Democratic Party. Loss of confidence in the President threatened to undermine the authority of the presidential office. Jonson’s bold stroke, joining his retirement decision to a new peace initiative, sharply reminded Americans of the old political master who had taken charge in the black days following the Kennedy administration, had taken over and new-modeled Kennedy’s New Frontier program, and then had captured an amazing 61% of the popular vote and 46 states in the 1964 election. Barry Goldwater’s conservative position left the broad middle range of political opinion to Johnson. No President has used his strength more skillfully to drive through a sweeping reform program. The limits of federal responsibility and spending were stretched in every direction: over education and medical care, poverty and urban decay, civil and political rights. Out of a national consensus, Johnson had begun to build a second New Deal (called “the Great Society”) when foreign troubles overwhelmed him.

Born and bred in the hill country of southwestern Texas, Lyndon B. Johnson received his political education in the school of Franklin Roosevelt and those Southern New Dealers who could make the Congress work for Roosevelt. Johnson perfected the lessons over a long career as Representative (1837-1949) and Senator (1949-1961) from Texas. His incomparable mastery of the cranky legislative machine made him during the fifties a major power in the Democratic Party and the government. Yet he could not seriously challenge the junior Senator from Massachusetts for the Democratic nomination in 1960. If his views on important issues were national, and not very different from John Kennedy’s his political appeal remained chiefly seasonal. By accepting second place on the ticket, Johnson helped to hold essential Southern votes for Kennedy. After three years of loyal service to the young President, there was every reason to expect that Johnson would continue in the relative obscurity of the vice-presidency for a second term. And then the madness at Dallas I n1963 changed everything.

When President Johnson delivered his Third Annual Message in January of 1966, his administration had just passed a major turning point. The decision of the past April to commit American ground and air forces to a large-scale war in Vietnam would inevitably divert national resources and political concern from the “Great Society” program. His argument that America could and should support both enterprises was heard with growing skepticism as the national consensus of 1964 dissolved.

I come before you tonight to report on the state of the Union for the third time. I come here to thank you and to add my tribute once more to the Nation’s gratitude for this, the 89th Congress. This Congress had already reserved for itself an honored chapter in the history of America. Our Nation tonight is now engaged in a brutal and bitter conflict in Vietnam. Later on I want to discuss that struggle in some detail with you. It just must be the center of our concerns. But we will not permit those who fire upon us in Vietnam to win a victory over the desires and the intentions of all of the American people. This Nation is mighty enough, its society is healthy enough, its people are strong enough to pursue our goals in the rest of the world while still building a great society here at home. And that is what I have come here to ask of you tonight.

I recommend that you provide the resources to carry forward with full vigor the great health and education programs that you enacted into law last year. I recommend that we prosecute with vigor and determination our war on poverty. I recommend that you give a new and daring direction to our foreign aid program designed to make a maximum attack on hunger and disease and ignorance in those countries that are determined to help themselves, and to help those nations that are trying to control population growth.

I recommend that you make it possible to expand trade between the United Sates and Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. I recommend to you a program to rebuild completely on a scale never before attempted entire central and slum areas of several of our cites in America… I recommend that you attack the wasteful and degrading poisoning of our rivers, and as the cornerstone of this effort clean completely entire large river basins.

I recommend that you meet the growing menace of crime in the streets by building up law enforcement and by revitalizing the entire Federal system from prevention to probation. I recommend that you take additional steps to insure equal justice to all of our people by effectively enforcing nondiscrimination in Federal and State jury selection by making a serious federal crime to obstruct public and private efforts to secure civil rights and by outlawing discrimination in the sale or rental of housing. I recommend that you help me modernize and streamline the Federal Government by creating a new Cabinet level Department of Transportation and reorganizing several existing agencies…

Because of Vietnam we cannot do all that we should or all that we would like to do. We will ruthlessly attack waste and inefficiency. We will make sure that every dollar is spent with the thrift and with the commonsense with recognizes how hard the taxpayer worked in order to earn it. We will continue to meet the needs of our people by continuing to develop the Great Society.

Last year alone the wealth that we produced increased $47 billion, and it will soar again this year to a total over $720 billion. Because our economic policies have producing rising revenues, if you approve every program that I recommend tonight our total budget deficit will be one of the lowest in many years. It will be only $1.8 billion next year… I have not come here tonight to ask for pleasant luxuries and for idle pleasures. I have come here to recommend that you, the representatives of the richest nation on earth, you the elected servants of the people who live in abundance unmatched on this globe, you bring the most urgent decencies of life to all of your fellow Americans.

There are men who cry out that we must sacrifice. Well, let us rather ask them, who will they sacrifice? Are they going to sacrifice the children who seek the learning, or the sick who need medical care, or the families who dwell in squalor that are now brightened by the hope of home? Will they sacrifice opportunity for the distressed, the beauty of our land, the hope of our poor? Time may require further sacrifices, and if it does, then we will make them. But we will not heed those who wring it from the hopes of the unfortunate here in a land of plenty.

I believe that we can continue the Great Society while we fight in Vietnam. But if there are some who do not believe this, then in the name of justice let them call for the contribution of those who live in the fullness of our blessing, rather than try to strip it from the hands of those that are most in need. And let no one think that the unfortunate and the oppressed of this land stifled and alone in their hope tonight! Hundreds of their servants and their protectors sit before me tonight here in this Great Chamber.

The Great Society leads us along three roads- growth and justice and liberation. First is growth- the national prosperity which supports the well-being of our people and which provides the tools of our progress. I can report to you tonight what you have seen for yourselves already in almost every city and countryside. This Nation is flourishing. Workers are making more money than ever, with after-tax income in the past 5 years up 33%; in the last year alone up 8%. More people are working than ever before in our history, an increase last year of 2.5 million jobs. Corporations have greater after-tax earnings than ever in history. For the past 5 years those earnings have been up over 65%. Last year alone, they had a rise of 20%. Average farm income is higher than ever. Over the past 5 years, it is up 405. Over the past year, it was up 22% alone… As our economy surges toward new heights we must increase our vigilance against the inflation which raises the cost of living and which lowers the savings of every family in this land. It is essential to prevent inflation that we ask both labor and business to exercise price and wage restraint, and I do so again tonight…

The second road is justice. Justice means that a man’s hope should not be limited by the color of his skin. I propose legislation to establish unavoidable requirements for non-discriminatory jury selection in Federal and State courts, and to give the Attorney General the power necessary to enforce those requirements. I propose: Legislation to strengthen the authority of Federal courts to try those who murder, attack, or intimidate either civil rights workers or others exercising their constitutional rights and to increase penalties to a level equal to the nature of the crime. Legislation resting on the fullest constitutional authority of the Federal Government to prohibit racial discrimination in the sale or rental of housing.

For that other nation, within a nation, the poor whose distress has now captured the conscience of America, I will ask congress not only to continue but to speed up the war on poverty, and in so doing we will provide the added energy of achievement with the increased efficiency of experience to improve the life of our rural Americans and our farm population. We will plan for the future through the establishment of several new community development districts, improved education through the use of Teachers Corps teams, better health measures, physical examinations and adequate and available medical resources.

For those who labor I propose to improve unemployment insurance, to expand minimum wage benefits, and by the repeal of section 14b of the Taft Hartley Act to make the labor laws in all our States equal to the laws of the 31 States which do not have tonight right-to-work measures. I also intend to ask the Congress to consider measures which without improperly invading State and local authority will enable us effectively to deal with strikes which threaten irreparable damage to the national interest.

The third path is the path of liberation. It is to use our success for the fulfillment of our lives. A great nation is one which breeds a great people. A great people flower not from wealth and power but from a society which spurs them to the fullness of their genius- that alone is a great society. Yet slowly, painfully on the edge of victory has come the knowledge that shared prosperity is not enough. In the midst of abundance modern man walks oppressed by forces which menace and confine the quality of his life and which individual abundance alone will not overcome. We can subdue and we can master these forces by bringing increased meaning to our lives if all of us, Government and citizens, are bold enough to change old ways, daring enough to assault new dangers and if the dream is dear enough to call forth the limitless capacities of this great people.

This year we must continue to improve the quality of American life. Let us fulfill and improve the great health and education programs of last year, extending special opportunities to those who risk their lives in our Armed Forces. I urge the House of Representatives to complete action on three programs already passed by the Senate- the Teachers Corps, the rent assistance, and home rule for the District of Columbia.

In some of our urban areas we must help rebuild entire sections and neighborhoods containing in some cases as many as a hundred thousand people. Working together private enterprise and Government must press forward with the task of providing homes and shops, parks and hospitals, and all the other necessary parts of a flourishing community where people can come to live the good life. I will offer other proposals to stimulate and to reward planning for the growth of entire metropolitan areas.

Of all the reckless devastations of our national heritage none is really more shameful than the continued poisoning of our rivers and our air. We must undertake a cooperative effort to end pollution in several river basins, making additional funds available to help draw the plans and construct the plants that are necessary to make the waters of our entire river systems clean and make them a source of pleasure and beauty for all of our people.

To attack and to overcome growing crime and lawlessness I think we must have a stepped-up program to help modernize and strengthen our local police forces. Our people have a right to feel secure in their homes and on their streets, and that right just must be secured. Nor can we fail to arrest destruction of life and property on our highways. I will propose a Highway Safety Act of 1966 to seek an end to this mounting tragedy.

We must also act to prevent the deception of the American consumer, requiring all packages to state clearly and truthfully their contents; all interest and credit charges to be fully revealed; and keeping harmful drugs and cosmetics away from our stores. It is the genius of our Constitution that under its shelter of enduring institutions and rooted principles there is ample room for the rich fertility of American political invention.

We must change to master change, and I propose to take steps to modernize and streamline the executive branch, to modernize the relations between city and State and Nation… And as the process of election becomes more complex and more costly we must make it possible for those without personal wealth to enter public life without being obligated to a few large contributors.

Therefore, I will submit new legislation to revise the present unrealistic restriction on contribution, to prohibit the endless proliferation of committees, bring local and State committees under the act, to attach strong teeth and severe penalties to the requirement of full disclosure of contribution, and to broaden the participation of the people through added tax incentive, to stimulate small contributions to the party and to the candidate of their choice…

Tonight the cup of peril is full in Vietnam. That conflict is not an isolated episode, but another great event in the policy that we have followed with strong consistency since World War II. The touchstone of that policy is the interest of the United States. But nations sink when they see that interest only through a narrow glass. In a world that has grown small and dangerous, pursuit of narrow aims could bring decay and even disaster. An America that is mighty beyond description, yet living in a hostile or despairing world, would be neither safe nor free to build a civilization to liberate the spirit of man.

In this pursuit we helped rebuild Western Europe. We gave our aid to Greece and Turkey, and we defended the freedom of Berlin. In this pursuit we have helped new nations toward independence, we have extended a helping hand to the Peace Corps and carried forward the largest program of economic assistance in the world. In this pursuit we worked to build a hemisphere of democracy and of social justice. In this pursuit we have defended against Communist aggression- in Korea under President Truman, in the Formosa Straits under President Eisenhower, in Cuba under President Kennedy, and again in Vietnam.

Tonight Vietnam must hold the center of our attention, but across the world problems and opportunities crowd in on the American Nation. I will discuss them fully in the months to come, and I will follow the five continuing lines of policy that America has followed under its last four Presidents. The first principle is strength. Tonight I can tell you that we are strong enough to keep all of our commitments. We will need expenditures of $58.3 billion for the next fiscal year to maintain this necessary defense might…

A second principle of policy is the effort to control, to reduce, and to ultimately eliminate the modern engines of destruction. We will vigorously pursue existing proposals- and seek new ones- to control arms and stop the spread of nuclear weapons. A third major principle of our foreign policy is to help build those associations of nations which reflect the opportunities and the necessities of the modern world. By strengthening the common defense, by stimulating world commerce, by meeting new hopes, these associations serve the cause of a flourishing world.

We will take new steps this year to help strengthen the Alliance for Progress, the unity of Europe, the community of the Atlantic, the regional organizations of developing continents, and that supreme association, the United Nations. We will work to strengthen economic cooperation, to reduce barriers to trade, and to improve international finance. A fourth enduring strand of policy had ben to help improve the life of man. From the Marshall plan to this very moment tonight that policy has rested on the claims of compassion and the certain knowledge that only a people advancing in expectation will build secure and peaceful lands.

This year I propose major new directions in our program of foreign assistance to help those countries who will help themselves. We will conduct a worldwide attack on the problems of hunger and disease and ignorance. We will place the matchless skill and the resources of our own great America in farming and in fertilizers at the service of those countries committed to develop a modern agriculture. We will aid those who educate the young in other lands and we will give children in other continents the same head start that we are trying to give our own children…

I will also propose… a new effort to bring modern skills and knowledge to the uncared for, those suffering in the world, and by trying to wipe out smallpox and malaria and control yellow fever over most of the world during this next decade, to help countries trying to control population growth by increasing our research, and we will earmark funds to help their efforts. In the next year, from our foreign aid sources we propose to dedicate $1 billion to these efforts, and we call on all who have the means to join us in this work in the world.

The fifth and most important principle of our foreign policy is support of national independence, the right of each people to govern themselves and to shape their own institution. For a peaceful world order will be possible only when each country walks the way that it has chosen to walk for itself. We will follow this principle by encouraging the end of colonial rule. We follow this principle abroad as well as at home by continued hostility to the rule of the many by the few, or the oppression of one race by another. We follow this principle by building bridges to Eastern Europe. I will ask the Congress for authority to remove the special tariff restrictions which are a barrier to increasing trade between the East and the West.

The insistent urge toward national independence is the strongest force of today’s world in which we live. In Africa and Asia and Latin America it is shattering the designs of those who would subdue others to their ideas or their will. It is eroding the unity of what was once a Stalinist empire. In recent months a number of nations have cast out those who would subject them to the ambitions of mainland China. History is on the side of freedom and is on the side of societies as shaped from the genius of each people. History does not favor a single system or belief unless force is used to make is so.

And that is why it has been necessary for us to defend this basic principle of our policy- to defend it in Berlin and in Korea and in Cuba and tonight in Vietnam. For tonight, as so many nights before, young Americans struggle and young Americans die in a distant land. Tonight, as so many nights before, the American Nation is asked to sacrifice the blood of its children and the fruits of its labor for the love of its freedom. How many times in my lifetime and in yours have the American people gathered as they do now to hear their President tell them of conflict and tell them of danger? Each time they have answered, they have answered will all the effort that the security and freedom of this Nation required, and they do again tonight in Vietnam.

Not too many years ago Vietnam was a peaceful if troubled land. In the north was an independent Communist government. In the south a people struggled to build a nation with the friendly help of the United States. There were some in South Vietnam who wished to force Communist rule on their own people, but their progress was slight. Their hope of success was dim. Then little more than 6 years ago North Vietnam decided on conquest, and from that day to this soldiers and supplies have moved from north to south in a swelling stream that is swallowing the remnants of revolution and aggression. And as the assault mounted, our choice gradually became clear. We could leave, abandoning South Vietnam to its attackers and to certain conquest, or we could stay and fight beside the people of South Vietnam.

We stayed. And we will stay until aggression has stopped. We will stay because a just nation cannot leave to the cruelty of its enemies a people who have staked their lives and independence on America’s solemn pledge- a pledge which has grown through the commitments of three American presidents. We will stay because in Asia and around the world are countries whose independence rests in large measure on confidence in America’s word and in America’s protection. To yield to force in Vietnam would weaken that confidence, would undermine the independence of many lands, and would whet the appetite of aggression. We would have to fight in one land and then we would have to fight in another or abandon much of Asia to the domination of Communists. And we do not intend to abandon Asia to conquest.

Last year the nature of the war in Vietnam changed again. Swiftly increasing numbers of armed men from the North crossed the borders to join forces that were already in the South. Attack and terror increased, spurred and encouraged by the belief that the United States lacked the will to continue and their victory was near. Despite our desire to limit conflict, it was necessary to act to hold back the mounting aggression to give courage to the people of the South and to make our firmness clear to the North. Thus, we began limited air action against military targets in North Vietnam. We increased our fighting force to its present strength tonight of 190,000 men.

These moves have not ended the aggression, but they have prevented its success. The aims of the enemy have been put out of reach by the skill and bravery of Americans and their allies, and by the enduring courage of the South Vietnamese who I can tell you lost eight men last year for every one of ours. The enemy is no longer closer to victory. Time is no longer on his side. There is no cause to doubt the American commitment. Our decision to stand firm has been matched by our desire for peace.

In 1965 alone we had 300 private talks for peace in Vietnam with friends and adversaries throughout the world. Since Christmas your Government has labored again with imagination and endurance to remove any barrier to peaceful settlement. For 20 days now we and our Vietnamese allies have dropped no bombs in North Vietnam. We seek neither territory nor bases, economic dominance or military alliance in Vietnam. We fight for the principle of self-determination that the people of South Vietnam should be able to choose their own course, choose it in free elections without violence, without terror, and without fear. The people of all Vietnam should make a free decision on the great question of reunification.

And this is all we want for South Vietnam. It is all the people of South Vietnam want. And if there is a single nation on this earth that desires less than this for its people, then let its voice be heard. We have also made it clear from Hanoi to New York that there are no arbitrary limits to our search for peace. We stand by the Geneva Agreements of 1854 and 1962. We will meet at any conference table. We will discuss any proposals- 4 points or 14 or 40- and we will consider the views of any group. We will work for a ceasefire now, or once discussions have begun. We will respond if others reduce their use of force and we will withdraw our soldiers once South Vietnam is securely guaranteed the right to shape its own future.

We have said all this and we have asked and hoped and we have waited for a response. So far we have received no response to prove either success or failure. We have carried out quest for peace to many nations and peoples because we share this planet with others whose future, in large measures, is tied to our own action and whose counsel is necessary to our own hopes… Until peace comes, or if it does not come, our course is clear. We will act as we must to help protect the independence of the valiant people of South Vietnam. We will strive to limit the conflict, for we wish neither increased destruction nor do we want to invite increased danger.

But we will give out fighting men what they must have, every gun, and every dollar and every decision, whatever the cost or whatever the challenge. And we will continue to help the people of South Vietnam care for those that are ravaged by battle, create progress in the villages, and carry forward the healing hopes of pace as best they can amidst the uncertain terrors of war. And let me be absolutely clear. The days may become months and the months may become years, but we will stay as long as aggression commands us to battle.

There may be some who do not want peace, whose ambitions stretch so far that war in Vietnam is but a welcome and convenient episode in an immense design to subdue history to their will. But for others it must now be clear that the choice is not between peace and victory. It lies between pace and the ravages of a conflict form which they can only lose. The people of Vietnam, North and South, seek the same things, the shared needs of man- the needs for food and shelter and education- the change to build and work and till the soil free from the arbitrary horrors of battle- the desire to walk in the dignity of those who master their own destiny. For many painful years, in war and revolution and infrequent peace, they had struggled to fulfill those needs.

It is a crime against mankind that so much courage and so much will and so many dreams must be flung on the fires of war and death. To all of those caught up in this conflict we therefore say again tonight: Let us choose peace, and with it the wondrous works of peace, and beyond that, the time when hope teaches toward consumption, and life is the servant of life. In this work we plan to discharge our duty to the people whom we serve. This is the state of the Union.

But over it all- wealth and promise- and expectation- lies our troubling awareness of American men at war tonight. How many men who listen to me tonight have served their Nation in other wars? How very many are not here to listen? War in Vietnam is not like these other wars; yet, finally, war is always the same. It is young men dying in the fullness of their promise. It is trying to kill a man that you do not even know well enough to hate. Therefore, to know war is to know that there is still madness in the world.

Many of you share the burden of this knowledge tonight with me. But there is a difference. For, finally, I must be the one to order our guns to fire- against all the most inward pulls of my desire. For we have children to teach, and we have sick to be cured, and we have men to be freed. There are poor to be lifted up and there are cities to be built and there is a world to be helped. Yet, we will do what we must.

I am hopeful and I will try the best I can with everything I have to end this battle and to return our sons to their desires. Yet, as long as others will challenge America’s security and test the clearness of our belief with fire and steel, then we must stand or see the promise of two centuries tremble. I believe tonight that you do not want me to try that risk. And from that belief, your President summons his strength for the trials that lie ahead in the days to come. The work must be our work now. Scarred by the weaknesses of man, with whatever guidance God may offer us, we must nevertheless, and alone, with our mortality, strive to ennoble the life of man on earth.



“When You Start at the Bottom”: Giving Poor Children a Head Start by Tracy Whittaker

President Lyndon Johnson launched a “War on Poverty” in 1964 with legislation that authorized some $1 billion for programs for low-income Americans, to be administered through the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO). One of these programs was Project Head Start, which sponsored preschools to prepare poor children for kindergarten. Tracy Whittaker, a young man from Yale working as a resource teacher, describes the obstacles faced by one Head Start center in Mississippi in 1965.

Dear Dr. Levin,

This letter is written in response to your request for an evaluation of our experience at the Holly Grove Head Start Center with a view to extending the program into the fall. Any analysis of our center must consider what we started with- which was nothing. We held classes in the community church which had to be constantly converted to serve its dual role. We had no kitchen, no playground, no running water, and no telephone (in a very rural area that is difficult to find). The local staff was totally untrained in the operation and administration of a kindergarten.

At this writing we have a smoothly running preschool, with a capable teaching staff and a more than adequate physical plant. A kitchen and a playground was constructed entirely by volunteer workers. As the kitchen materials and its lack in the beginning absorbed about all of our petty cash and facilities money, we were thrown back on our own resources for any supplementary school supplies. While the men contributed their labor, the women made rag dolls and donated old clothes for the children’s “dress-up” play…

Running out of facilities money, we had to ask for contributions to outfit the kitchen with utensils. The response was overwhelming- pots, large spoons, towels, etc. were freely given (from people income of the lowest income areas in the country). It was not trip to the state park without donations of transportation and extra help. The trip is on.

To a degree, the enthusiastic community response is a reflection of gratitude for the social services provided… in the form of sorely needed welfare materials and the medical attention given their children. However, the response of the community is more than just gratitude, but instead the reaction of a people that have so long felt that any efforts to improve their lot were futile- doomed to failure and reprisals by an unsympathetic, hostile local autocracy. If for no other reason, Head Start would be money well spent because it serves as tangible evidence that their government in Washington is conscious of their oppressed condition and sympathetic to their advancement.

However, as important as the community unity fostered by Head Start is, it is a mere product of the larger aim of the project here at Holly Grove. The children’s advancement is the standard by which the program must ultimately be evaluated. Although eight weeks is, in fact, too short a period for any accurate conclusions, I cannot but feel that we have made great progress in the development of our children. From a mass of withdrawn, repressed preschoolers who had never ridden a seesaw, worked a puzzle, drawn a picture, we have, with few exceptions, a happy, cohesive group of kids full of vitality (and now, at last, food) who spend their day creating, pretending, playing, singing, looking, listening, and wondering. We don’t pretend to be a super educational machine at Holly Grove- the children didn’t learn to read and write in our eight weeks. However, we did expand their limited view of life; we did provide a chance to test their intellectual and physical muscles; we did provide a transition between mother and school as the children learned to work and play with others.

Finally, and perhaps the most important of all, we tried to show these children that they were important- that we cared about what they had to say, what they did, what they made. Some of our kids can’t read a word- some can’t count to ten- but almost all have a measure of human dignity that they didn’t have before. It is for this reason I must conclude we have succeeded admirably at Holly Grove, and it would be a sad mistake if it be denied to their successors.

If my evaluation sounds too glowing, I cannot pretend to be an uninterested observer. However, I hasten to point out that, when you start at the bottom, you can only go up. Indeed, it seems that our success at Holly Grove came almost as a matter of course. For people who have been held in semi-knowledge for so long, the progress must be rapid at the beginning. And at Holly Grove, progress is our most important product…



Download 1.71 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page