* Resource mobilization in ACP is almost entirely about responding to RFAs.
|
* ACP Responds effectively to RFAs
* Has a resource map indicating sites where HIV/AIDS investments (resources) are being directed.
|
* No institutional arrangement for resource mobilization. For example there is no particular staff charged with that responsibility and no plan for resource mobilization.
* Accountability for resources seem to be restricted to donors and development partners supporting ACP projects not to other stakeholders
* Similarly ACP does not hold stakeholders accountable for resources provided to them for HIV programs.
* Limited capacity for rapid absorption of funds in part due to differences in planning cycles with donors and sometimes weak management systems.
* Current sources of funds are tied to specific projects. Flexibility for reallocation to any pressing priorities is a long process.
|
* ACP should develop a plan for resource mobilization based on analysis of resource gap.
* Internal arrangement for resource mobilization should be developed, eg assignment of the function.
* Establish accountability frameworks and mechanisms to hold stakeholders accountable and to account to stakeholders.
* ACP should address the issue of absorptive capacity by improving internal management processes and advocacy.
* convene a forum to clarify resource mobilization functions between ACP and UAC
|