Interjurisdictional Coordination for Alternatives Assessment for the Northern Seaside of Virginia’s Eastern Shore, Accomack County Bibliography



Download 168.08 Kb.
Page4/5
Date01.02.2018
Size168.08 Kb.
#37699
1   2   3   4   5

model illustrates the hypothetical evolution of three barrier island morphologies as they evolve through a typical Category 1–2 hurricane, including poststorm recovery (days to weeks) and long-term evolution (years to decades). Primary factors in barrier island geomorphologic response to storms, regardless of location, are the elevation of the

island relative to storm (surge plus setup) elevation, and duration of the storm. Unique aspects of the NGOM barrier islands, compared with knowledge summarized for other barrier types, include (1) storm paths, wind speed, and large bays that create the potential for both Gulf and bayshore erosion and (2) in Louisiana and Mississippi, the potential for loading of the underlying substrate by the barrier island, which, through time, increases consolidation, relative sea level rise, overwash, morphologic change, and migration. We recommend that design of large-scale beach restoration projects incorporate the potential for (1) time-dependent consolidation of the underlying sediment due to project loading and future migration, (2) Gulf and bayshore erosion and overwash, and (3) eolian transport toward the Gulf from north winds.


Sallenger, A.H., 2000. Storm impact scale for barrier islands. Journal of Coastal Research, 16(3), 890-895.

A new scale is proposed that categorizes impacts to natural barrier islands resulting from tropical and extra-tropical storms. The proposed scale is different in that the coupling between forcing processes and the geometry of the coast is explicitly included. Four regimes, representing different levels of impact, are denned. Within each regime, patterns and relative magnitudes of net erosion and accretion are argued to be unique. Borders between regimes represent thresholds denning where processes and magnitudes of impacts change dramatically. Impact level 1 is the 'swash' regime describing a storm where runup is confined to the foreshore. The foreshore typically erodes during the storm and recovers following the storm; hence, there is no net change. Impact level 2 is the 'collision' regime describing a storm where the wave runup exceeds the threshold of the base of the foredune ridge. Swash impacts the dune forcing net erosion. Impact level 3 is the 'overwash' regime describing a storm where wave runup overtops the berm or, if present, the foredune ridge. Associated net landward sand transport contributes to net migration of the barrier landward. Impact level 4 is the 'inundation' regime describing a storm where the storm surge is sufficient to completely and continuously submerge the barrier island. Sand undergoes net landward transport over the barrier island; limited evidence suggests the quantities and distance of transport are much greater than what occurs during the 'overwash' regime.

Sanford, W.E., Pope, J.P., and Nelms, D.L., 2009, Simulation of groundwater-level and salinity changes in the Eastern Shore, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5066, 125 p.

Groundwater-level and salinity changes have been simulated with a groundwater model developed and calibrated for the Eastern Shore of Virginia. Groundwater is the sole source of freshwater to the Eastern Shore, and it is important that the groundwater supply be protected from overextraction and seawater intrusion. The best way for water managers to use all of the information available is usually to compile this information into a numerical model that can simulate the response of the system to current and future stresses. The purpose of this report is to describe the development and calibration of a groundwater model for the Eastern Shore of Virginia. The report includes discussions of (1) the hydro­geologic framework of the Eastern Shore, (2) the nature of the digital model used to simulate the aquifers, (3) the water-level and chemical conditions used to calibrate the model, (4) hydraulic characteristics of the calibrated model, (5) current and future water levels and chloride concentrations simulated with the model, and (6) potential errors and limita­tions of the model.


Schupp, C., September 2013. Assateague Island National Seashore Geologic Resources Inventory Report. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR-2013/708. Denver, Colorado: National Park Service Geologic Resource Division, 74 p.

The Natural Resource Report Series provides high-priority, natural resource management information with managerial application. The Geologic Resources Division held a Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) scoping meeting for Assateague Island National Seashore in Maryland and Virginia on 26-28 July 2005 to discuss geologic resources, the status of geologic mapping, and resource management issues and needs. This report synthesizes those discussions and is a companion document to the previously completed GRI digital geologic map data. The report discusses geologic issues of significance for resource management at Assateague Island National Seashore that were identified during a 2005 GRI scoping meeting. Those issues include the following: storm impacts; coastal vulnerability and sea-level rise; inlet impacts on transport processes; hydrology; benthic habitats; landscape and shoreline erosion; recreation and watershed land use; disturbed lands; archeological resources; paleontological resources; seismicity; wave and current activity; wind activity; tidal activity; sediment transport processes, and barrier island system units.


Sergent, E., Bond, T., Oakley, A. and Cornell, S., November 2012. Monitoring Sediment Transport and Grain Size Distribution along Wallops Island, Virginia, Pre and Post-Beach Replenishment. Paper No. 12. 2012 GSA Annual Meeting and Exposition. Geological Society of America, Inc.

Wallops Island has experienced severe erosion for more than a century. This erosion, combined with rising sea level, is causing the shoreline to retreat rapidly to within meters of NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility. A narrowing beach, wind-driven wave activity and storm surge periodically cause massive flooding and sand overwash on the island and threaten the existing infrastructure. In response to these threats, NASA began to replenish the beach in April 2012. Millions of cubic yards of sand from two shoals ~6-10 NM offshore are being added to the beach face and in front of the seawall to widen and elevate the beach. In order to understand how beach replenishment will affect sediment transport and deposition, as well as habitats for endangered species along the 12-km shoreline, researchers established baseline conditions pre-replenishment. They collected surface sediment samples along the dune and beach face from March 2011-April 2012 to determine sediment transport trends and grain size distribution. Research also included rapid storm response and biotic surveys. Pre-replenishment results show a south-north trend in grain size distribution with the coarsest sand (Phi = -2 to 2) dominating beaches to the south and the finest sand (Phi=3 to 4) north of the seawall. Severe erosion, averaging 3.7 m/yr since 1857, occurs on the southern portion of Wallops Island while significant accretion is occurring to the north. The observed south to north sediment transport trend is reversed from mid-Atlantic regional transport. This is in part caused by a local reversal in longshore current created by the interaction between tidal outflow from the Chincoteague Inlet and the geometry of Wallops Island and adjacent Assateague Island. Researchers continue to monitor post-replenishment grain size distributions along Wallops Island, and will use these data to compare pre-replenishment baseline conditions to post- replenishment conditions in order to determine how the addition of offshore sand will affect this barrier island system. This report presents baseline conditions and the first few months of post-replenishment data.


Shideler, G.L., Swift, D.J.P., Johnson, G.H., and Holliday, B.W., 1972. Late quaternary stratigraphy of the inner Virginia continental shelf: A proposed standard section. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 83, 1787-1804.

A continuous seismic reflection survey indicates that the post-Miocene section of the inner Virginia Shelf is 27 m in average thickness and unconformably overlies a discordant Tertiary substrate. Vibracore data and a faunal analysis reveal three distinct sedimentary sequences separated by prominent unconformities.



  • The oldest post-Miocene sequence has a radiocarbon age of more than 37,000 yrs B.P. It consists largely of a muddy, fine-grained sand and is characterized by lenticular stratification and prominent local channeling. It appears to represent a pre-Wisconsinan and early Wisconsinan assemblage, containing both a transgressive fluvial complex and a regressive coastal barrier complex.

  • The overlying sequence has a radiocarbon age ranging from 25,700 ± 800 yrs, to possibly as young as 20,400 ± 850 yrs B.P. It is comprised primarily of mud, and is characterized by relatively uniform horizontal stratification. The assemblage appears to represent a regressive paralicneritic sequence developed at the end of the mid-Wisconsinan interstadial.



The youngest sequence has yielded a radiocarbon age of 4,200 ± 140 yrs B.P. It is comprised of a discontinuous sand sheet that mantles the modern sea floor, and which appears to have been generated through the shore face erosion of a retrograding coastal barrier complex during the Holocene transgression. Evidence suggests that it accumulated as a lag deposit on the sea floor, where it was subsequently molded into a ridge and swale topography by the Holocene hydraulic regime.

Smith, C., April 2015. Community Leader Workshop Summary Report: Enhancing Coastal Resilience on Virginia’s Eastern Shore (November 12 and 13, 2014). Accomack-Northampton Planning District Commission.

This report represents the proceedings from the Enhancing Coastal Resilience on Virginia’s Eastern Shore Community Leader Workshop held on November 12 and 13, 2014 at the Chincoteague Bay Field Station in Wallops Island. This is the first of a series of stakeholder workshops and part of a comprehensive Coastal Resilience Project, both of which are described in the report. Community leaders from local, state, and federal governments and non-government organizations provided input to customize the Coastal Resilience planning tool that will address sea-level rise, marsh migration, storm surge, and seaside barrier island-inlet evolution. The storm surge application included in the Coastal Resilience tool will provide simulations for storm tracks and storm types/intensities. Participants provided information regarding locations of historic storm tracks and areas known to be most vulnerable to storm surge as well as areas expected to become increasingly vulnerable to future storm surge with accelerated sea-level rise. The seaside barrier island-inlet evolution application is expected to provide a perspective for how shoreline management actions along seaside barrier islands may impact adjacent barrier island shorelines.
Steele, C.W., Pontzer, P.R., and Antonelli, J., July 2012. Distribution of inland silversides, Menidia beryllina (Cope), as a function of wave crest velocity around Pelian Island, Virginia, USA. Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Science 28(2), 57-63.

The study examines the size distribution of inland silversides, Menidia beryllina, as a result of wave crest velocity around Pelican Island, a sand spit island located near the mouth of Chincoteague Inlet. Measurements were taken of wave crest height at six sampling sites. Water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen measurements were also taken at each site (no significant differences among sites were found for any of these variables). Fish were collected using three seine hauls per site during each collecting period (n = 50 fish per site, minimum). All water sampling and fish collecting were conducted during three consecutive afternoon high tides. Results of linear regression and analysis of variance of crest velocity and fish length, and of crest velocity and fish weight indicate that larger inland silversides are found predominantly in areas of lesser wave energy, while smaller inland silversides are found predominantly in areas of greater wave energy.



Stutz, M.L., and Pilkey, O.H., 2011. Open-ocean barrier islands: Global influence of climatic, oceanographic, and depositional settings. Journal of Coastal Research, 27(2), 207-222.

A satellite-based inventory of barrier islands was used to study the influence of depositional setting, climate, and tide regime on island distribution and morphology. The survey reveals 20,783 km of shoreline occupied by 2149 barrier islands worldwide. Their distribution is strongly related to sea level history in addition to the influence of tectonic setting. Rising sea level in the late Holocene (5000 YBP–present) is associated with greatest island abundance, especially on North Atlantic and Arctic coastal plains. Stable or falling sea level in the same time frame, a pattern typical of the Southern Hemisphere, is associated with a lower abundance of islands and a higher percentage of islands along deltas rather than coastal plains. Both coastal plain and deltaic island morphology are sensitive to the wave–tide regime; however, island length is 40% greater along coastal plains whereas inlet width is 40% greater on deltas. Island morphology is also fundamentally affected by climate. Island lengths in the Arctic are on average (5 km) only half the global average (10 km) because of the effect of sea ice on fetch and thus wave energy. Storm frequency in the high and middle latitudes is suggested to result in shorter and narrower islands relative to those on swell-dominated low-latitude coasts. The ratio of storm wave height to annual mean wave height is a good indicator of the degree of storm influence on island evolution. The potential for significant climate and sea level change this century underscores the need to improve understanding of the fundamental roles that these two factors have played historically in island evolution in order to predict their future impacts on the islands.
Tarr, J.H. September 9, 2011. Letter regarding Assateague Island National Seashore General Management Plan Alternative Concepts. Chincoteague, Virginia: Office of the Mayor. Web.September 20, 2015.

This document is a letter from the Mayor, Town of Chincoteague, Inc. to the Superintendent of the Assateague Island National Seashore, presenting comments and concerns regarding the General Management Alternative Concepts for the Assateague Island National Seashore. It identified eight elements which Chincoteague strongly opposes, 11 elements it supports, and requests ten additional items of information.


Titus, J.G., D.E. Hudgens, C.Hershner, J.M. Kassakian, P.R. Penumalli , M. Berman, and W.H. Nuckols, 2010. “Virginia”. In James G. Titus and Daniel Hudgens (editors). The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. Volume 1: Mid-Atlantic. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C., 691-888.

Sea level is rising 1 inch every 7 to 8 years (3-4 millimeters per year) along the coast of Virginia, and beaches are eroding along the Atlantic Ocean and Chesapeake Bay. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that by the end of the next century, sea level is likely to be rising 0 to 8 mm/yr (3 inches per decade) more rapidly than today (excluding the possible impacts of increased ice discharges from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets). Rising sea level erodes beaches, drowns wetlands, submerges low-lying lands, exacerbates coastal flooding, and increases the salinity of estuaries and aquifers. Coastal communities must ultimately choose between one of three general responses – (1) armor the shore with seawalls, dikes, revetments, bulkheads, and other structures; (2) elevate the land and perhaps the wetlands and beaches as well, or (3) retreat by allowing wetlands and beaches to take over land that is dry today. Each of these approaches is being pursued somewhere in Virginia; nevertheless, there is no explicit plan for the fate of most low-lying coastal lands as sea level rises. This report develops maps that distinguish shores that are likely to be protected from the sea from those areas that are likely to be submerged, assuming current coastal policies, development trends, and shore protection practices. The authors’ purpose is primarily to promote the dialogue by which society decides where to hold back the sea and where to yield the right of way to the inland migration of wetlands and beaches.


A key step in evaluating whether new policies are needed is to evaluate what would happen under current policies. The maps in this report represent neither a recommendation nor an unconditional forecast of what will happen, but simply the likelihood that shores would be protected if current trends continue. Their work resulted in a statewide series of maps that uses existing data, filtered through the local governments who plan and govern how land is used. By “shore protection” they mean activities that prevent dry land from converting to either wetland or water. Activities that protect coastal wetlands from eroding or being submerged were outside the scope of this study. This study does not analyze the timing of possible shore protection; it simply examines whether land would be protected once it became threatened. The maps divide the dry land close to sea level into four categories of shore protection:

• Shore protection almost certain;

• Shore protection likely;

• Shore protection unlikely; and

• No shore protection, i.e., protection is prohibited by existing policies.
Toscano, M.A., and York, L.L., 1992. Quaternary stratigraphy and sea-level history of the U.S. Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain. Quarternary Science Reviews 11, 301-328.

Middle-Atlantic, inner continental shelf stratigraphic studies document a regional, Late Pleistocene, fossiliferous mud deposit, from northern New Jersey to Cape Lookout, North Carolina. Seismic reconnaissance and detailed stratigraphic analyses reveal the nature of the mud, termed unit Q2, on the Maryland inner continental shelf. Extensive amino acid relative age determinations (from the single genus Mulinia), combined with additional amino acid analyses from onshore deposits having radiometric dates for calibration, indicate an age range for unit Q2 corresponding to Oxygen Isotope Stage 5. Ostracode assemblages delineate four distinct climatic episodes in unit Q2, enabling correlation of the zones in Q2 to the deep sea isotopic record of climatic fluctuations (substages) in Stage 5. Late Stage 5 is represented, on the Maryland shelf, by the 6 meter-thick mud of unit Q2, deposited in an open-shelf environment at slightly depressed sea levels relative to Substage 5e. Late Stage 5 sea levels (including sea-level minima) can be estimated for the mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain by direct measurement of the altitudes of ostracode zone boundaries offshore, and from peak transgressive facies in correlative deposits onshore. Late Stage 5 sea levels determined from the inner shelf and adjacent nearshore facies on the Atlantic coast comprise the most complete sea-level history for Stage 5 yet proposed. Some recent revisions of glacioeustatic sea-level models advocate slightly higher sea levels during late Stage 5 (Substage 5c in particular) than originally estimated from uplifting reef tracts, and support sea levels higher than estimates from deep-sea isotopic records. The sea-level record from the Maryland inner continental shelf confirms these recent estimates in an area of minimal tectonism, and adds sea-level minima estimates for Substages 5d and 5b. Offshore, a more complete record of Stage 5 is preserved than in onshore deposits, which are limited to peak transgressive facies. Discrepancies in correlation among emerged coastal plain facies therefore become resolvable within the context provided by the shelf stratigraphy.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, January 2013. NASA Wallops Island Post Hurricane Sandy Analysis Report. Norfolk, Virginia: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Norfolk District.

In October 2012, Wallops Island was hit by Hurricane Sandy, displacing a large volume of sand from the onshore beach. This report summarizes the Norfolk District’s analysis of the volume of sand lost/gained in three areas -- the Dune, the Berm, and offshore from the first 12,000 feet (construction stations 0+00 to 120+00) of the beach nourishment project. It contains a visual on how the shoreline has change and receded, and how beach profiles have changed due to Hurricane Sandy. The report concludes that approximately 550,000 cubic yards was displaced from the Dune and Berm areas of shoreline, and recommended that the 550,000 cubic yards be re-nourished to the first 12,000 feet of the Wallops Island shoreline.

U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, August, 2015. Chincoteague and Wallups Island National Wildlife Refuges Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. Chincoteague, Virginia: Chincoteague and Wallups Island National Wildlife Refuges. Web.September 25, 2015, 366p.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) finalized this Comprehensive

Conservation Plan (CCP) and draft Environmental Impact Statement for Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) and Wallops Island NWR that analyzes three alternatives to managing the Chincoteague NWR and Wallops Island NWR over the next 15 years. This document contains appendices providing additional information supporting the analysis. The alternatives are:

Alternative A -- maintain the status quo and current management alternative as required by the National Environmental Policy Act. This alternative would continue current management strategies as established by the Master Plan approved in 1992, and is referred to as the “No Action” alternative.

Alternative B -- continue established habitat and wildlife management strategies but focus them in light of the new goals and vision established by the CCP. This alternative balances habitat management, public use and access, and administration of the refuge. Alternative B is the preferred alternative.

Alternative C -- direct staffing and funding towards maximizing habitat and wildlife

management strategies. As a result of prioritizing habitat and wildlife management, public use activities and access may be reduced.

The final document has two volumes of supporting appendices, cited separately below.


U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, August 2015. Chincoteague and Wallups Island National Wildlife Refuges Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2: Appendix A through O. Chincoteague, Virginia: Chincoteague and Wallups Island National Wildlife Refuges. Web.September 25, 2015, 433p.

Volume 2’s appendices to the Chincoteague and Wallups Island National Wildlife Refuges Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement includes the following sections:



  1. The Proposed Assateague Wilderness

  2. Other Federal Mandates and Relevant Plans and Initiatives

  3. Laws and Executive Orders Applicable to Chincoteague and Wallops Island NWR CCP

  4. Interim Chincoteague Pony Management

  5. Memorandum of Agreement: Interagency Cooperate at Assateague Island National Seashore and Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge

  6. Biological Opinion on Monitoring and Management Practices for Piping Plovers, Loggerhead Sea Turtle, Green Sea Turtle, Leatherback Sea Turtle, and Seabeach Amaranth



  7. Download 168.08 Kb.

    Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page