Introduction 5 A. Remedies for breach 5
Download 383.87 Kb.
|
- Navigate this page:
- B). THE KINDS OF PROMISES LEGALLY ENFORCED 25
- Tudale Mining Explorations v. TECK 49 Baxter v. Jones 50
- WRITTEN DOCUMENTS 61
- PROTECTION OF WEAKER PARTIES 67
- PUBLIC POLICY 75
- PERFORMANCE AND BREACH 80
- FRUSTRATION 93
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 5 A). REMEDIES FOR BREACH 5 1). INTERESTS PROTECTED 5 GENERAL PRINCIPLES FROM CASES: 6 Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co. 6 Anglia TV v. Reid 6 Pitcher v. Shoebottom 7 Hawkins v. McGee 7 2). PROBLEMS IN MEASURING DAMAGES 8 Carson v. Willitts 8 Groves v. Wunder 8 Thompson v. Robertson, 1955 8 Charter v. Sullivan, 1957 9 3.) REMOTENESS 9 Hadley v. Baxendale 9 Victoria Laundry v. Newman Industries 10 The Heron II (Koufous v. Czarnikov) 10 Cornwall Gravel v. Purolator 10 Monroe Equipment & Canadian Forest Products 11 Scryup v. Economy Trailer 11 4). INTANGIBLE INJURIES (non-economic loss) 12 Addis v. Gramophone Co. Ltd. [1909] 12 Jarvis v. Swan Tours - loss of enjoyment 13 Newell v. Canadian Pacific Air 13 Vorvis v. Insurance Corp. of B.C.-non-enjoyment losses 14 Wallace v. United Grain Growers 15 Ridiero v. ICBC 15 5). MITIGATION OF LOSS 16 General rules of mitigation: 16 Payzu v. Saunders 16 Roth & co. v. Taysen Towsend 17 White and Carter Council v. McGregor 17 Asamera Oil v. Sea Oil 18 6). SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE 19 GENERAL PRINCIPLES: 19 Falke v. Gray 20 Sky Petroleum v. VIP Petroleum 20 Warner Bros. v. Nelson 20 Page One Records v. Britton 21 7). TIME IN MEASURING DAMAGES 21 Wroth v. Tyler 21 Semelhago v. Paramadevan 22 8). RESTITUTION 22 Deglman v. Guaranty Trust 24 McCamus Article: 25 B). THE KINDS OF PROMISES LEGALLY ENFORCED 25 A). BARGAINS 25 1). PRELIMINARY NEGOTIATIONS 26 Denton v. Great Northern Railway 26 Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis 26 Pharmaceutical Society v. Boots 27 General Principles: 27 W.H. Hillas and Co., Ltd. v. Arcos ltd. 27 May & Butcher v. King 28 Foley v. Classique Coaches ltd. 28 Brown v. Gould 28 Empress Towers v. Bank of Nova Scotia 28 2). ACCEPTANCE 29
Larkin v. Gardiner 29 Felthouse v. Bindley 29 Wheeler v. Klaholt 30 Eliason v. Henshaw 30 3). CONTRACTS BY CORRESPONDENCE 30 Household Insurance v. Grant 30 4). CONSIDERATION 33 White v. Bluett 34 Hamer v. Sidway 35 Thomas v. Thomas 35 5). MUTUAL PROMISES 35 Great Northern Railway Co. v. Witham 36 Tobias v. Dick and T. Eaton 36 Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff Gordon 36 6). PRE-EXISTING DUTY/ MODIFICATION CASES 36 GENERAL PRINCIPLES: 36 Harris v. Watson 37 Stilk v. Myrick 37 Smith v. Dawson 37 Raggow v. Scougall and Co. 38 Gilbert Steel Ltd. v. University Construction 38 Williams v. Roffey 39 Foakes v. Beer 39 7). COMPROMISES 40 Cook v. Wright 40 B). INTENTION 41 Balfour v. Balfour 41 3). NON-BARGAIN PROMISES 44 1). PAST CONSIDERATION 44 Lampleigh v. Brathwait 44 Roscorla v. Thomas 45 Pao On v. Lau Yiu Long 45 2). SUBSEQUENT RELIANCE 46 Summary of Principles: Estoppel and Reliance 46 Dalhousie College v. Boutilier Estate 47 Hedley Byrne v. Heller 47 Hughes v. Metropolitan Railway 47 Central London Property Trust v. High Trees 48 Combe v. Combe 48 D & C Builders v. Rees 49 John Burrows v. Subsurface Surveys 49 Tudale Mining Explorations v. TECK 49 Baxter v. Jones 50 D). UNILATERAL CONTRACTS 51 Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball 51 Errington v. Errington 51 Dawson v. Helicopter Exploration 52
1.Third Party Beneficiaries 57 Beswick v. Beswick [Agency] 57 New Zealand Shipping v. Satterthwaite [Agent] 58 London Drugs v. Kuehne & Nagle [Principle Exception to Privity Rule] 58 Frasier River v. Can-Dive 59 2.Mistake of Identity 59 Lewis v. Averay [Fraud = Voidable] 59 3.Documents Mistakenly Signed (Non Est Factum) 59 Marvco Colour Research v. Harris et al. 60 WRITTEN DOCUMENTS 61 1.Unsigned Documents 61 Parker v. South Eastern Railway: 61 McCutcheon v. MacBrayne 61 Thornton v. Shoe Lane Parking 62 2.Signed Documents: 62 Tilden Rent-a-Car v. Clendenning 62 3.Parol Evidence Rule: 62 Federal Commerce v. Tradex [Standard Form K] 63 Prenn v. Simmonds 63 Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal 64 Tilden Rent-a-Car v. Clendenning [Reasonable Notice] 64 Gallen v. Allstate Grain 65 4.Rectification 66 USA v. Motor Trucks 66 PROTECTION OF WEAKER PARTIES 67 1.Minors 67 2.Forfeitures and Penalty Clauses 67
3.Clauses Excluding/Limiting Liability 69 Karsalis v. Wallis (1956;Eng.CA) [FB] 69 Suisse Atlantique v. N.V. Rotterdamsche (1967;HL) [Eliminates FB] 69 Photo Production v. Securior (1980;HL) 70 Beaufort Realties v. Chomedey Aluminum (1980 few months after Photo; SCC) 70 Securicor (1982;HL) 70 George Mitchell v. Finney Lock Seeds (1983;HL) [Reasonableness] 70 Hunter Engineering v. Syncrude (1989;SCC) 71 4.Unconscionability 71 Lloyds Bank v. Bundy [Bargaining Power] 72 National Westminster v. Morgan [Undue Influence] 73 Macaulay v. Schroeder Music [Restraint of Trade] 74 Unconscionable Transactions Relief Act 74 PUBLIC POLICY 75 Christie v. York (Supp) 75 Ian Ayres: “Fair Driving: Gender and Race Discrimination in Retail Car Negotiations” 75 Farrar v. McPhee (Supp) 75 Jones v. Daly 76 Chrispen v. Topham 76 Quantum meruit: 2 ways to recover 76 Baby M 76 1.Illegality 77 Holman v. Johnson (1775) 77 Archbolds Ltd. v. Spanglett Ltd. (1961) [Performance] 77 Kiriri Cotton v. Dewani [Restitution] 79 PERFORMANCE AND BREACH 80 Cehave N.V. v. Bremer [Intermediate Stip] 81 Hongkong Shipping 81 Panoutsos v. Raymond Hadley Corp. [Waiver] 81 Turney v. Zhilka (1959) [Condition Precedent - Waiver] 82 Barnett v. Harrison 82 Sumpter v. Hedges 82 MISTAKE 84 1.Misrepresentation 84 Heilbut, Symons & Co. v. Buckleton [1913; H.L.] [Collateral K] 85 Bentley Productions v. Smith Motors 85 Esso Petroleum v. Mardon (1976) [Negligent Misrep] 86 Sealand of the Pacific v. McHaffie 86 Murray v. Sperry Rand 87 2.Mistake as to Terms 87 Hobbs v. Esquimalt Railway 87 Raffles v. Wichelhaus 88 Henkel v. Pape [3rd party mistake] 88 Smith v. Hughes 88 3.Mistake in Assumptions 89 Bell v. Lever Bros. 90 Solle v. Butcher [Equity] 90 Maggee v. Pennine Insurance (CA) 90 R. v. Ron Engineering 91 M.J.B. Enterprises v. Defence Construction 91 FRUSTRATION 93 Paradine v. Jane [Rule of Absolute Promises] 93 Taylor v. Caldwell [Relaxes the Rule of Absolute Promises] 93 Krell v. Henry 94 Aluminum Co. of America v. Essex Group 94 Fibrosa v. Fairburn Lawson 95 Download 383.87 Kb. Share with your friends:
|