CHAPTER 7
CONTROL AND
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMSlikelihood, and impact and assign them a numerical rating. An overall corporate assessment of risk is developed by aggregating all the rankings.
IDENTIFY CONTROLS
Management should identify controls that protect the company from each event. Preventive controls are usually superior to detective controls. When preventive controls fail, detective controls are essential for discovering the problem. Corrective controls help recover from any problems. A good internal control system should employ all three.
ESTIMATE COSTS AND BENEFITS
The objective in designing an internal control system is to provide reasonable assurance that events do not take place. No internal control system provides foolproof protection against all events, because having too many controls is cost-prohibitive and negatively affects operational efficiency. Conversely, having too few controls will not provide the needed reasonable assurance.
The benefits of an internal control procedure must exceed its costs. Benefits, which can
be hard to quantify accurately, include increased sales and productivity, reduced losses, better integration with customers and suppliers, increased customer loyalty, competitive advantages, and lower insurance premiums. Costs are usually easier to measure than benefits. A primary cost element is personnel, including the time
to perform control procedures, the costs of hiring additional employees to achieve effective segregation of duties, and the costs of programming controls into a computer system.
One way to estimate the value of internal controls involves
expected loss, the mathematical product of impact and likelihood:
Expected loss 5 Impact 3 Likelihood
The value of a control procedure is the difference between the expected loss with the control procedures) and the expected loss without it.
DETERMINE COST/BENEFIT EFFECTIVENESS
Management should determine whether a control is cost beneficial. For example, at Atlantic Richfield data errors occasionally required an entire payroll to be reprocessed, at a cost of $10,000. A data validation step would reduce the event likelihood from 15% to 1%, at a cost of $600 per pay period. The cost/benefit analysis that determined that the validation step should be employed is shown in Table In
evaluating internal controls, management must consider factors other than those in the expected cost/benefit calculation. For example, if an event threatens an organization’s existence, its extra cost can be viewed as a catastrophic loss insurance premium.
IMPLEMENT CONTROL OR ACCEPT, SHARE, OR AVOID THE RISK
Cost-effective controls should be implemented to reduce risk. Risks not reduced must be accepted, shared, or avoided. Risk can be accepted if it is within the company’s risk tolerance expected loss - The mathematical product of the potential dollar loss that would occur should a threat become a reality (called
impact or exposure) and the risk or probability that the threat will occur (called
likelihood).
TABLE 7-2
Cost/Benefit Analysis of
Payroll Validation ProcedureWITHOUT VALIDATION PROCEDURE
WITH VALIDATION PROCEDURE
NET EXPECTED DIFFERENCE
Cost to reprocess entire payroll
$10,000
$10,000
Likelihood of payroll data errors
15%
1%
Expected reprocessing cost
($10,000
× likelihood)
$1,500
$100
$1,400
Cost
of validation procedure$0
$600
$(600)
Net expected benefit of validation procedure
$800
PART II CONTROL AND AUDIT OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS
range. An example is a risk with a small likelihood and a small impact. A response to reduce or share risk helps bring residual risk into an acceptable risk tolerance range. A company may choose to avoid the risk when there is no cost-effective way to bring risk into an acceptable risk tolerance range.
Control Activities
Share with your friends: