Appendix B: Biographical details – Taskforce members Bruce Cohen (Chair of Taskforce)
Dr Bruce Cohen is a barrister and a principal in private practice in the area of public policy. He is also an Honorary Research Fellow with the Grattan Institute and currently the Chair of Victorian Rail Track (VicTrack), a Victorian government business with responsibility for the delivery of telecommunications, property development, freight and asset management services in the rail industry.
Bruce has previously served on the boards of Melbourne Water, VENCorp and Snowy Hydro Limited, and as a Commissioner with the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission for its Inquiry into Reform of Melbourne’s retail water sector. He holds a B. Comm., LLB (Hons) and M. Comm. (Hons) from the University of Melbourne, and a Ph. D. in Public Policy from The Australian National University.
Professor Caroline Chan
Professor Caroline Chan is Head of the School of Business IT and Logistics at RMIT University. Professor Chan undertakes research in eCommerce and Supply Chain Management. She has received numerous services awards include a 2007 GS1 Recognition of Excellence Award for Academic Advancements in Supply Chain Management.
Professor Chan holds a PhD in Information Systems (Deakin), MEng in Systems Engineering (RMIT) and an Ir (‘ingenieur’) equivalent to ‘Bachelor of Engineering (Hons)’ in Electronic Engineering (Petra).
Jim Marshall PSM
Jim Marshall previously held the position of the Executive General Manager, Postal Services for Australia Post which includes the mail, parcels and international mail businesses. He was appointed Sai Cheng (a Joint Venture Company established by China Post and Australia Post to provide one stop supply chain services) Board Director in February, 2011. From October 2009 until 1 July 2010, Mr Marshall was the Chief Operating Officer of Australia Post and was previously General Manager of Australia Post’s Mail and Networks Division.
He is also a Director of Australian Air Express and Star Track Express, two express freight companies that are joint ventures between Australia Post and Qantas. Mr Marshall has a B.A., B.Ec. and M.B.A. from Adelaide University and more than 25 years’ experience as an executive in Australia Post, focusing on operations strategy and management.
Appendix C: International mail initiatives C1. Kahala Posts Group Background
Australia Post and seven other national postal operators established the Kahala Posts Group (Kahala group) in 2003 to jointly explore the development of new integrated business models and commercial opportunities. The group now has 10 members comprising: Australia Post, China Post, Correos, Hong Kong Post, Japan Post, Korea Post, La Poste, Royal Mail, Singapore Post and the US Postal Service.
Initially, the Kahala group focused on the need for co-operative business practices that would assure performance standards for premium level services. In recent years, the group has focused on new logistics frameworks that can be applied to the processing of larger parcels (greater than 2 kg) and EMS mail items and which will give full expression to the client promise. The development of this framework has been closely aligned to UPU protocols relating to item level data transfer between postal organisations, and between postal organisations to Customs authorities.
Current focus
In Australia, Australia Post is currently working to implement an integrated phased approach to several key logistic changes to support the Kahala group objectives. In broad terms, Kahala group members are responsible for approximately 70 per cent of items coming into Australia in the mail categories in relation to which work is being undertaken. In regard to the changes that are being considered, potential developments include:
development of information transfer systems which will align to UPU protocols relating to item level data transfer between postal organisations, and between Australia Post and Customs and Border Protection; and
development of separate processing lines or processing some types of mail items through separate facilities to the traditional Gateway structure (with the possibility of separate entry facilities being developed to handle these items).
The current Kahala developments include a phased implementation of data capture protocols which will allow for item level data transfers. The information contained in the data transfer will allow for a degree of granularity about the item that will assist with border protection processes which is comparable to the types of information that are available to other commercial express courier operations.
Relationship to the low value parcel processing taskforce
The Taskforce has been actively investigating the options that these developments will present to advance reforms in the international mail handling environment in Australia. It is projected that these will represent a significant change to the way in which parcels over 2kg and EMS items may be received and processed. It is recognized that the scope of this will represent only a portion of the total volume of all parcel types that would be processed in the Gateway in the short term – however, these will incorporate the majority of parcels with relatively higher values.
Combined with the application of data transfer to Customs and Border Protection, including responses, in line with UPU recognised protocols, there is potential to advance key elements of process reform. It should be noted that the mail product range is currently limited to the EMS and parcels over 2kg categories and it is expected that this will be fully implemented for both products by the end of 2014.
C2. MEDICI - Mails Electronic Data Interchange and Customs Integration Background
The Mails Electronic Data Interchange and Customs Integration (Medici) Group is a group of Postal Administrations whose objective is to implement systems and data sharing protocols that will expedite Customs processes in the international mail environment. The systems and protocols are largely in common with the Kahala group, excepting that the Kahala group members have also organised themselves to achieve additional commercial outcomes. As with the proposed system to be used by the Kahala group, the Medici group uses the UPU standard item attributes message to exchange customs information.
The Medici group utilises systems that have been created and are administered by the International Post Corporation27 (IPC). It should be noted that not all of the 24 members28 of the IPC are involved in Medici group.
Current focus
The Medici group has recently focussed on developing a framework in which the participating postal operators capture and electronically exchange the data needed for customs processes and for duty and tax to be assessed. There have recently been trials amongst several member countries of these technologies and there is some progress towards the wider adoption of these processes in a business as usual approach.
Relationship to the low value parcel processing taskforce
The Taskforce is actively considering all developments but notes that Australia Post is not an active member of the Medici group. Nonetheless, the current developments in the Medici group bear close alignment to current activities in the Kahala group, and like Kahala group technologies align to UPU technology protocols and standards.
The Taskforce will continue to consider these activities in the development of reform solutions, particularly in light of the review of the Canadian mail processing environment, as Canada is one of the Medici group members. The Taskforce also notes that there is the capacity for the Kahala and the Medici groups to work together on issues of data sharing and expand the scope of application these data sets to further improve processes in the Australian international mail handling environment.
C3. UPU – Universal Postal Union Background
The UPU was established in 1874, and is the body that is responsible for setting the international framework of co-operation for almost all international postal operators. The scope of the policies and protocols is extensive and all member countries are bound to the service obligations that are set by the UPU.
Current focus
In recent times the UPU, like all large organisations, has recognised the growing importance of technology.29 Although the UPU was established to manage a physical process, that of handing and moving mail, there has been attention given to ensuring that postal operators have access to an agreed framework to build new and improved services.
In this regard, the UPU presented a paper in 2009 titled ‘E-Services Strategy and Action Plan’ in which it addressed a strategy for electronic-based postal services, telematic links and enhancing the use of existing UPU products (IPS, IFS, EDI). It is in this context that the UPU has been advancing the adoption of its EDI standards, which Kahala and Medici have largely both adopted.
Relationship to the low value parcel processing taskforce
Through the active consideration of all current international developments, the Taskforce is considering the alignment of potential solutions to broader international frameworks including the processes, standards and obligations that relate to member countries of the UPU, of which Australia is one.
For the purposes of this Taskforce’s activities, it is also necessary to note that the UPU EDI Messaging Standards sets out detailed description of the standard EDI messages that have been adopted through the UPU's standards approval process. It is produced and maintained by the Standards Board of the Postal Operations Council. The UPU EDI Messaging Standards include standards for:
postal item tracking messages;
postal dispatch pre-advice/response messages;
postal consignment pre-advice/response messages; and
carrier consignment pre-advice/response messages.
A complete Logical Data Model has also been developed, giving a structured overview of all information elements that can be exchanged through EDI, including definitions and lists of allowed values for every individual data element.
D1. Introduction
The purpose of this Appendix is to highlight key elements of Australia’s regulatory framework by reference to various stages of the import process for both international mail, and air and sea cargo, being:
the arrival of mail and cargo into Australia;
border control (security and biosecurity); and
the application of imposts (GST and customs duty).
These arrangements are determined by an extensive legislative framework which governs the way in which Australia’s border security, biosecurity and revenue assessment processes operate with respect to international mail, air and sea cargo, and goods brought into the country by international travellers. Relevant instruments that impact upon these processes include, but are not limited to:
A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999
A New Tax System (Luxury Car Tax) Act 1999
A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Act 1999
Australian Bureau of Statistics Act 1975
Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989
Australian Postal Corporation Regulations 1996
Australian Postal Corporation (Performance Standards) Regulations 1998
Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905
Copyright Act 1968
Customs Act 1901
Customs Administration Act 1985
Customs Regulations 1926
Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956
Customs Tariff Act 1995
Customs Tariff Regulations 2004
Crimes Act 1914
Financial Transactions Report Act 1988
Imported Food Control Act 1992
Import Processing Charges Act 2001
Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1999
Quarantine Act 1908
Quarantine Service Fees Determination 2005
Therapeutic Goods Act 1989
Trade Marks Act 1995
Wildlife Protection (Regulation of Exports and Imports) Act 1982
ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand FTA
Australia-Chile FTA
Australia-New Zealand Closer Economic Relations
Australia-United States FTA
Singapore-Australia FTA
Thailand-Australia FTA
International Treaties and other International Cooperative Arrangements
Universal Postal Union (UPU)
Universal Postal Convention
General Regulations of the Universal Postal Union
Postal Payment Services Agreement
World Customs Organization (WCO) Conventions (1952-2008), including the International Convention on the simplification and harmonization of Customs procedures (Kyoto Convention) as amended (2006)
World Trade Organization (WTO)
WTO Agreement on Valuation (1969)
WTO Agreement on Rules of Origin
MoU between the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service, Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (now known as DAFF Biosecurity) and Australia Post on administrative arrangements at the mail Gateways.
MoU between Australian Customs and Border Protection Service and the Australian Taxation Office in relation to the performance of functions that relate to the joint administration of the Goods and Service Tax (GST), Luxury Car Tax (LCT) and Wine Equalisation Tax (WET).
For the purposes of brevity, it is not intended that this Appendix detail every aspect of this regulatory framework. However, in considering its recommendations the Taskforce intends to assess such changes as may be required to these arrangements.
It is important to note that cargo is defined to include mail in certain circumstances, and that any differences that arise between the treatment of mail and cargo in those instances relate primarily to the availability of information that is available on individual consignments. All cargo has information available on each consignment, whereas mail is largely unknown until it reaches the mail gateways. For this reason it is reported and assessed differently to other cargo.
D2. Arrival of mail and cargo into Australia
Regulatory arrangements with respect to the arrival of goods arriving into Australia relate generically to the reporting requirements, and the movement of mail and cargo. Issues relating to prohibitions and restrictions of goods are dealt with separately below.
Inbound reporting requirements for cargo (including mail)
Generally, the arrangements governing the reporting of goods entering into Australia are:
Activity
|
Agency
|
Legislative Basis or Otherwise
|
All arrivals of cargo (defined to include mail items) into Australia must be reported to Customs and Border Protection.
|
ACBPS
|
See generally Pt IV Division 3 Customs Act 1901.
|
For the purposes of the Customs Act 1901, cargo includes “mail”.
|
ACBPS
|
See section 63A Customs Act 1901– definitions of “cargo” and “mail”.
|
For cargo arriving by ship or aircraft, reporting requirements may include:
an impending arrival report;
a cargo report;
a cargo list report (for sea cargo);
an actual arrival report.
Generally these reports are provided electronically through the ICS.
|
ACBPS
|
Sections 64, 64AA and 64AB Customs Act 1901;
Regs 25-27, 28-29 Customs Regulations 1926.
|
Air cargo is generally reported at a House Air Waybills (HAWB) level and sea cargo by a bill of lading. These provide details on the contents of individual consignments. However, since 2002 international mail items arriving by aircraft is reported at the Master Air Waybill (MAWB) level based on the data elements available in existing industry documents.
|
ACBPS
|
As to the general reporting requirements with respect to cargo, see generally section 64AB Customs Act 1901.
It is a Customs and Border Protection Policy Decision generally to only report mail at the MAWB level as mail does not have data available on what it contains.
| Dealing and moving cargo and mail upon arrival
The movement of cargo and mail is strictly controlled on entering Australia to ensure clear accountability through border assessment processes. Generally, the arrangements governing the reporting of goods entering into Australia are:
Activity
|
Agency
|
Legislative Basis or Otherwise
|
Generally, it is an offence to move cargo (including mail) that is subject to Customs control.
|
ACBPS
|
Section 33 Customs Act 1901
|
When unloading cargo (including mail) (the Customs and Border Protection terminology is outturn), an outturn report is required to be communicated to Customs and Border Protection at the level at which it was initially reported (MAWB or otherwise).
|
ACBPS
|
Sections 64ABAA, 64ABAB of the Customs Act 1901.
It is a Customs and Border Protection policy requirement that mail can be outturned at the MAWB level; other cargo arriving by air is generally required to be outturned at the HAWB level.
|
Subsequent movements of cargo prior to release (including mail) may only be undertaken when permission has been granted by Customs and Border Protection (noting that the movement of individual mail items between mail gateways after deconsolidation is done on a manual underbond movement with Customs and Border Protection approval).
|
ACBPS
|
See generally section 71E of the Customs Act 1901.
|
Generally, declarations are required to be made with respect to cargo other than mail prior to its release. The form of declaration will depend upon the nature of the cargo, and include:
|
|
|
- import and warehouse declarations;
|
ACBPS
|
See Pt IV Division 4 Subdivision B Customs Act 1901; reg 43 Customs Regulations 1926.
|
- self assessed clearance declarations;
|
ACBPS
|
See Pt IV Division 4 Subdivision AB Customs Act 1901.
|
- unaccompanied personal effects statement.
|
ACBPS
|
See Pt IV Division 4 Subdivision AA Customs Act 1901.
|
Goods may only be taken from designated locations (“Customs places”) once an authority to deal with the goods has been provided by Customs and Border Protection.
|
ACBPS
|
See, for example, sections 71; 71C (import declarations); 71DE (request for cargo release); 71DJ (warehouse declarations) Customs Act 1901.
As to definition of “Customs place”, see section 183UA Customs Act 1901.
|
Generally, only mail items with a value of above $1000 are required to have an import declaration prior to them being released.
|
ACBPS
|
See Pt IV Division 4 Subdivisions AA, AB; reg 41B Customs Regulations 1926.
|
D3. Border Control (security and biosecurity)
The following section details the high level framework by which Customs and Border Protection Service and DAFF Biosecurity address their obligations in the border control process.
Mail opening
Specific reference is made to mail opening because, in the international mail environment, border processes have been designed having regard to the requirement that, in most circumstances, Australia Post is the only entity authorised to open mail items for inspection by Customs and Border Protection, or DAFF Biosecurity.
Activity
|
Agency
|
Legislative Basis or Otherwise
|
Only authorised examiners (Australia Post employees) may open the mail for inspection.
|
Australia Post
|
Sections 90M-90X of the Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989.
|
Articles reasonably believed to contain drugs (or pre-cursor chemicals) may be opened by a Customs officer.
|
ACBPS
|
Section 90T of the Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989.
| Inspection of mail and cargo (and related activities)
A suite of legislative and regulatory arrangements govern both the capacity and manner in which Australia’s border agencies may undertake their responsibilities (for example, inspection, seizure, etc), and more generally the nature of the goods and risks which are the primary subjects of their attention.
Activity
|
Agency
|
Legislative Basis or Otherwise
|
Border security
|
|
|
Generally all goods (including mail) imported into Australia are subject to Customs and Border Protection control until they have been authorised for release.
|
ACBPS
|
See sections 30, 35 of the Customs Act 1901.
As to powers of Customs Officers generally, see Pt XII Division 1 Customs Act 1901.
|
A range of goods are prohibited – either absolutely or subject to certain circumstances – from being imported into Australia and generally will not be released. These include, but are not limited to:
- firearms;
- asbestos;
- objectionable goods; and
- drugs and precursors.
|
ACBPS
|
See generally Pt IV Division 1 Customs Act 1901; Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulation 1956.
|
In addition to these prohibited goods, there are a number of other legislative instruments that may result in goods being prevented from being imported into Australia. Goods that may be subject to such constraints include goods that are not as described; do not meet Australian standards; are pirated or counterfeit goods, cash, and substances subject to the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989.
|
ACBPS
|
See, for example:
Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905;
Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989;
Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (for example, sections 14B (application of Customs Act 1901); 42E (which includes an offence with respect to the import of counterfeit therapeutic goods);
Trade Marks Act 1995 (see generally Pt 13).
|
In addition to Australian regulatory instruments, the UPU Convention also has a list of items prohibited from being sent in the mail including but not limited to: narcotics; obscene or immoral articles; counterfeit or pirated articles; explosives, radioactive materials or dangerous goods; live animals; insertion of correspondence into parcels; and coins banknotes and other valuable articles. There are exceptions to some of these and in many cases prohibitions may be far wider depending on the laws of the country.
|
Australia Post (UPU)
|
Articles 15 and 16 of the UPU Convention.
|
Border security fees and charges
Border security fees and charges are subject to a range of regulatory instruments that affect their level (and limits).
|
ACBPS
|
See generally:
Customs Depot Licensing Charges Act 1997;
Import Processing Charges Act 2001;
Customs Act 1901 (e.g. section 85 – fees for warehouse licence), 183CL (fees for licensing of customs brokers); see also Customs Regulations 1926 (regs 50-51 (warehouse licence); 158 (broker’s licence).
|
Biosecurity
|
DAFF - Biosecurity
|
|
Goods entering into Australia – whether as cargo or through the international mail stream – are treated uniformly for the purposes of biosecurity.
|
|
As to relevant Acts, see generally Quarantine Act 1908, Export Control Act 1982, Imported Food Control Act 1992.
|
Generally, the scope of quarantine arrangements in Australia are wide, and encompass measure:
(a) for, or in relation to -
(i) the examination, exclusion, detention, observation, segregation, isolation, protection, treatment and regulation of vessels, installations, human beings, animals, plants or other goods or things; or
(ii) the seizure and destruction of animals, plants, or other goods or things; or
(iii) the destruction of premises comprising buildings or other structures when treatment of these premises is not practicable; and
(b) having as their object the prevention or control of the introduction, establishment or spread of diseases or pests that will or could cause significant damage to human beings, animals, plants, and other aspects of the environment or economic activities.
|
|
See generally section 4 of the Quarantine Act 1908.
As to relevant provisions, see also:
section 18(2) Quarantine Act 1908 (goods subject to quarantine)
sections 44C and 44D Quarantine Act 1908 (examination of goods);
section 48AA Quarantine Act 1908 (treatment and destruction of goods);
section 68 Quarantine Act 1908 (effect of unlawful importation);
see also: Pt 5 (Importation of goods); Pt 6A (Import Risk Analysis); and
Pt 7 Div 3 (Forfeiture and seizure of animals, plants and other goods) Quarantine Regulations 2000.
|
Biosecurity fees and charges
Biosecurity fees and charges are subject to a range of regulatory instruments that affect their level (and limits).
|
DAFF Biosecurity
|
See generally:
section 86E Quarantine Act;
Quarantine Service Fees Declaration 2005;
See also Australian Government’s Cost Recovery Guidelines 2005.
| D4. Application of imposts
Under current arrangements, goods imported into Australia are subject to the imposition of customs duty and/or GST unless otherwise relieved of that obligation. Of particular relevance for this report is the relief that is granted with respect low value goods.
Key provisions relating to the manner in which customs duty and/or GST are applied on import, and the relief provided to low value goods, are:
Activity
|
Agency
|
Legislative Basis or Otherwise
|
Liability for duty and/or GST
|
|
|
Goods consigned through the Post Office by one person to another or goods consigned other than through the Post Office with a value not exceeding $1,000 will not be subject to formal entry.
In addition a duty rate of Free is applied those goods and in such circumstances the goods are also free of liability for GST.
|
ACBPS
|
Entry
Entry
S68(1)(e),(f) of the Customs Act 1901; Regs 31AB and 31AC of the Customs Regulations 1926.
GST and Customs Duty Assessment for Low Value Goods
A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax)
Act 1999 s42-5
Customs Tariff Act 1995 – Schedule 4 Items 32A and 32B Customs By-laws 0540003 and 0540004.
|
Customs inspection and determination of Duty and/or GST
|
|
|
Customs inspects the goods and assesses their declared value. If this value does not exceed $1000 then customs duty and GST is not payable except in relation to certain goods.
If the goods are wine, other alcoholic beverages, or tobacco products customs duty, GST and WET is applied at all times regardless of value and is not subject to the threshold – it is not considered in this assessment of imposts.
Other prescribed items with a value less than $1000 (e.g. goods that form part of a bulk order) may also be liable to pay customs duty and GST.
Are all importations taxable under the GST Legislation?
Some goods imported into Australia are not subject to GST.
These are:
goods that would have been GST-free or input taxed if supplied within Australia, such as basic food, certain medical aids and appliances, cars for use by certain people with disabilities, and precious metals, and
goods that qualify for certain customs duty concessions.
goods that qualify for certain customs duty concessions.are also non-taxable for GST purposes and include the following items in Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995.
Customs will assess the value of the good through the inspection process and assess in order:
1. Customs duty
2. GST / WET.
Generally, the overall effect is that ‘the importer’ pays at the same time, at the same place, and in the same manner as for customs duty (if the goods are subject to customs duty).
|
ACBPS
|
Customs Act 1901; see Part VIII (The duties), and section/s 68, 69, 70, 71.
|
Customs Tariff Act 1995.
|
A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax)
Act 1999
Division 7 - 7-1 GST and input tax credits
Division 13 - 13-20 How much GST is payable on taxable importations?
Division 38 - Subdivision 38-Q - International mail
Division 114 - 114-5 Importations without entry for home consumption
Payments of amounts of GST where delivery into home consumption is authorised under section 71 of the Customs Act 1901.
|
A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Act 1999
Division 2 - Overview of the wine tax legislation
2-1 What this Act is about - 2-20
Division 5 - General rules for taxability
5-5 General rules for taxing assessable dealings
5-30 Local entry of imported wine (AD10)
Division 23 - Wine tax on customs dealings
A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax Imposition - Customs) Act 1999
3 Imposition
4 Rate
|
A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax)
Act 1999
Part 2-2 Supplies and Acquisitions
GST free supplies
Part 3-2- Non-taxable importations
42-5 Non-taxable importations – Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995
42-10 Goods returned to Australia in an unaltered condition.
|
D5. Other matters Return of mail
Australia Post has service standards that it is required to meet in relation to in-bound and out-bound international mail.
The Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989 provides that “Subject to subsection (3), if, under a convention, Australia is permitted to return a letter or postal article, Australia Post may return the article in accordance with the convention despite its obligations under this Division.”
Under the Universal Postal Convention, “Member countries shall ensure that their designated operators redirect postal items if an addressee has changed his address, and return undeliverable items to the sender. The charges and other conditions are laid down in the Regulations.”
The UPU Letter Post Regulations detail what happens to undeliverable items, return to country of origin or to sender and period of retention. In general the period of retention should not exceed one month except in special cases where the designated operator of destination considers it necessary to extend it to two months at most.
|
Australia Post
|
Article 4 of the UPU Convention;
Sections 28C and 29 of the Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989;
Pt 2 of the Australian Postal Corporation (Performance Standards) Regulations 1998.
Article 5(3) of the UPU Convention
Section 28A(2) of the Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989
UPU Letter Post Regulations, Article RL 147.
| Collection of statistical information
The ABS draws on the statistical segment of the complete tariff code to measure types of goods that are being imported in the mail and cargo environments, and relies on information provided to it by Customs and Border Protection for a range of statistical products, including balance of payments and merchandise trade. As most goods under the threshold value are not required to be fully declared, those goods are generally not currently counted for statistical purposes (although estimates may be made based on sampling data).
Activity
|
Agency
|
Legislative Basis or Otherwise
|
There is no specific mention of the collection of statistics on international mail in the ABS Act, only a generic section on the functions of the Bureau.
(It should be noted, however, that any new proposal for the collection of statistics must be laid before both Houses of Parliament before implementation unless it is on a voluntary basis.)
|
ABS
|
See section 6 of the Australian Bureau of Statistics Act 1975.
|
The World Customs Organization has developed the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, popularly known as the Harmonized System or HS, as a multipurpose goods nomenclature used as the basis for customs tariffs and for the compilation of trade statistics all over the world.
|
ACBPS
|
See International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonization of Customs Procedures (as amended) (2006).
|
Share with your friends: |