Medical Protective Company (A.M. Best #: 00591 NAIC #: 11843)
Rating Rationale: The rating reflects Medical Protective's weakened risk-adjusted capitalization, precipitated by continued strong net premium growth and further reserve strengthening in 2003, which were not anticipated. The company is a wholly owned subsidiary of GE Global Insurance Holding Corporation, but serves as one of the operating platforms for ERC's commercial insurance division, providing professional medical liability insurance coverage for individual and small group physicians and dentists.
Underwriting results were again impacted by prior year development in 2003, as the company
reported $42 million of additional strengthening primarily for 1999 through 2001 accident years. The company continued to mirror loss trends observed in the medical-malpractice market which has been beset by sharp increases in loss costs, compounded by frequency in recent years.
Notwithstanding, Medical Protective has historically generated strong pre-tax earnings supported by a stable and substantial level of invested asset base. To strengthen its risk-adjusted capitalization, the company has entered into a 25% quota share agreement in 2004 to manage growth. Furthermore, Medical Protective's capitalization is supported by an aggregate stop-loss protection from its affiliate, Employers Reinsurance Corporation, through accident year 2003, which will serve to manage any unforeseen deterioration in the 2001 through 2003 accident years. A.M. Best expects that Medical Protective will build capital organically as it maintains fundamental profitability through underwriting discipline and stable investment returns. Accordingly the outlook is stable.
National Interstate Insurance Company (A.M. Best #: 10829 NAIC #: 32620)
The following text is derived from the report of National Interstate Group.
Rating Rationale: The rating reflects National Interstate's favorable underwriting results, solid
capitalization and management's expertise in the transportation risk market. These positive rating factors are partially offset by the group's aggressive premium expansion and above average
underwriting leverage measures. Nonetheless, due to the group's adequate capital position for the current rating and strong earnings prospects, A.M. Best views the rating outlook as stable.
National Interstate's capitalization is being driven by its conservative investment risk profile, equity in unearned premium reserves as well as growth in surplus from operating profits and contributed capital. In 2004, the group received a capital contribution of $15 million from its parent, further enhancing its overall capitalization. Management's underwriting philosophy is focused on strict adherence to rate integrity, controlled distribution and claims handling and detailed segmentation of risks enabled through sophisticated technology resources. Additionally, the rating considers National Interstate's broad product and program offerings within the commercial auto segment and diversified operating territories. Management has increased the group's product base over recent years by identifying and responding to market opportunities which it believes have above average profit potential, which include growth in its captive programs. As a result of the aforementioned factors, the disciplined underwriting approach and extensive market knowledge within the transportation segment, the group has consistently reported solid earnings.
Negative rating factors include the group's significant premium expansion which has resulted in high underwriting leverage although much of the premium growth has been attributable to continued price firming within the commercial automobile industry. The group has experienced significant growth in new policies through the introduction of new products and additional penetration into existing markets. Growth in recent years has also been attributable to expansion of its captive programs for small truck fleets, public transportation vehicles, and agency and single member programs. As a result, the growth in unseasoned business generally carries higher loss ratios. Further, the group faces inherent risk in adjusting its infrastructure to handle this growth and above average reinsurance dependence.
The rating is based on and applies to the consolidation of National Interstate Insurance Company (NIIC) and its wholly owned and substantially reinsured subsidiary, National Interstate Insurance Company of Hawaii (NIIC-HI).
NIPPONKOA Insurance Company of America (A.M. Best #: 01909 NAIC #: 12190)
Rating Rationale: The rating reflects NIPPONKOA Insurance Company of America's (NKA) strong capital position and excellent liquidity. An offsetting factor is the decision of its parent company, NIPPONKOA Insurance Company, Limited (NKJ), to suspend the underwriting activities of NKA for two years, through March 31, 2006. However, this is mitigated by NKJ's commitment to allow NKA to retain 100% of its capital during this two year period. The outlook is stable.
Occidental F & C Co of NC (A.M. Best #: 02312 NAIC #: 23248)
The following text is derived from the report of McM Group.
Rating Rationale: The rating reflects the group's strong capitalization and operating performance, both of which have improved in the last two years, and solid balance sheet liquidity. Partially offsetting these positive rating factors are the company's recently strong premium growth, concentration within the competitive commercial automobile market segment and dependence on quota share reinsurance. Given the improved capitalization and operating performance, combined with the implicit backing of its financially sound parent, partially offset by the inherent risk in diversifying its revenue until new programs are fully established, the rating outlook is viewed as stable.
The positive rating factors are derived from the financial support and investment expertise received from its parent, IAT Reinsurance Company, Ltd., a Bermuda-based company. Upon its initial investment in McM Corporation in 1998, IAT immediately strengthened the capital and loss reserve position of the group through a capital contribution. To further protect its capital base, IAT has contributed capital to the group when necessary, as evidenced by a capital infusion to replace the impact of the unrealized depreciation of its common stock portfolio in 2002. The rating also recognizes management's ongoing initiatives to improve operating profitability through implementing rate increases, tightening risk selection, setting loss reserves at the high end of the independent actuary's select ultimate, and improving operating efficiencies through investments in technology. In conjunction with more favorable market conditions, the group has exhibited more controlled loss reserve development and an improvement in underwriting and operating performance through 2003. Management believes that with the aforementioned actions, combined with continued favorable near-term market conditions, should manifest in continued improvement in underwriting results and internal capital generation.
Prior to the improvement in operating performance, the group recorded considerable underwriting losses from fierce price competition within the commercial auto market segment. However, the ease in competition and the continued hardening of the commercial automobile market in more recent years has led to robust growth in premium and associated liabilities. In addition, the reinsurance dependence stems from the group's implementation of a quota share reinsurance agreement with its parent in 2002 in order to control its premium leverage and better utilize IAT's capital. While this has served to control its net leverage, total underwriting leverage is higher than historical levels. Partially offsetting the associated credit risk exposure is the strong credit quality of IAT as well as the establishment of collateral for all reinsurance receivables related to the quota share. Furthermore, since acquisition by IAT, the group has increased its investment allocation in common stock to nearly 100% of surplus through 2003, which has produced fluctuation in realized and unrealized gains over the past five years. What would have otherwise been declines in surplus has been mitigated by IAT's capital support and investment expertise, and the availability of significant tax loss carry-forwards to limit taxes on these gains. To address its business concentration, the group will begin writing multi-peril crop insurance (MPCI) through the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. While there is inherent risk in executing this program, management feels it maintains a sizeable competitive advantage, and should generate additional profit opportunities. A.M. Best will monitor for the sustainability of better loss reserve development, and continued profitability in ongoing and new business in order to maintain strong capitalization for its rating.
Old Republic National Title Ins Co (A.M. Best #: 11924 NAIC #: 50520)
The following text is derived from the report of Old Republic Title Insurance Group.
Rating Rationale: The rating is based on the group's strong capitalization and favorable operating results. These positive rating factors are partially offset by the inherent risks associated with managing significant premium advances in recent years and the challenge to manage future
economic cycles. Due to the group's strong capitalization, favorable operating earnings and support from its parent, A.M. Best views the group's rating outlook as stable.
The positive factors are derived from the group's conservative investment policy, commitment to technology advancement and recently strong demand for title products reflective of a favorable real estate environment. Furthermore, the group benefits from the financial flexibility from its
publicly-traded parent, Old Republic International Corporation, which maintains low financial
leverage.
The positive rating factors are partially offset by the risk associated with absorbing significant
premium advances in recent years and the challenges in handling earnings and revenue volatility stemming from the fluctuating dynamics of the real estate market. However, the group's title
premium is nationally diversified, which limits volatility to regional changes in real estate markets. In addition, the majority of the group's title premium is generated from the agency sector that enables the group to manage down cycles as fixed costs are generally lower as compared to competitors with larger allocations of direct business.
Preferred Professional Insurance Company (A.M. Best #: 03699 NAIC #: 36234)
Rating Rationale: This rating reflects Preferred Professional Insurance Company's (PPIC)
adequate risk-adjusted capitalization, good geographic risk and elevated policyholder retention through its high level of customer service to its seventeen owner hospitals and health care
organizations. Partially offsetting these positive rating factors is PPIC's limited operating profitability by design, substantial increase in underwriting exposures and high ceded reinsurance leverage. Management has responded to the recent deterioration in profitability and surge in exposures with improved underwriting controls and rate adjustments in problematic territories. A.M. Best views the rating outlook as stable.
PPIC's primary objective is to support the Catholic Healthcare Ministry of its owners by providing a wide array of insurance products and related services to its shareholders, physicians, and other
affiliated entities. The company does have access to additional capital as PPIC has shareholder agreements in place which require each owner to maintain a maximum net premium written to
surplus ratio of 1.6 times. If this threshold is exceeded, the shareholder agreements require the
affected owner institution(s) to provide a capital infusion into PPIC thereby correcting this out of
balance situation.
PPIC's operating profitability is limited as its primary operating goal is to maintain insurance pricing levels that, after consideration of investment income, provides slightly better than breakeven financial performance measures for the exclusive benefit of its tax-exempt corporate owners. The significant rise in underwriting exposures is a result of the additional market of eligible physicians from new shareholders and the increased number of insured physicians from existing shareholders due to the inability of physicians to obtain professional liability insurance as writers of this line pulled out of areas and/or stopped writing new business.
Providence Washington Insurance Co of NY (A.M. Best #: 03784 NAIC #: 35726)
Providence Washington Insurance Company (A.M. Best #: 02411 NAIC #: 24295)
Providence Washington Insurance Cos (A.M. Best #: 00786)
York Insurance Company (A.M. Best #: 02409 NAIC #: 24325)
The following text is derived from the report of Providence Washington Insurance Companies.
Under Review Rationale: Effective May 28, 2004, A.M. Best Co. downgraded the financial strength rating to B- (Fair) from B+ (Very Good) of Providence Washington Insurance Companies (PW) (Providence, RI). The rating remains under review with negative implications. The rating applies to the four inter-company pool members led by Providence Washington Insurance Company.
This rating action follows PW's announcement today regarding the company's decision to cease all new and renewal business (to the extent permitted by law). In addition, PW has entered into a
renewal rights transaction with OneBeacon Insurance Company which, upon finalization, would
include the rights to a significant portion of PW's commercial package business. Management has already received approval from the Rhode Island Insurance Department and is in the process of meeting other state regulators over the next few weeks.
This action also takes into consideration the additional reserve charge taken in the first quarter of 2004, the continued decrease in policyholders' surplus and the considerable loss reserve
development reported in recent years. In light of the aforementioned reserve charge and the
potential for further adverse loss reserve development, the rating remains under review pending A.M. Best's meeting with management and a review of Providence Washington's run-off plan.
This rating action follows the rating downgrade in March 2004, the substantial reserve charge
reported by Providence Washington at year-end 2003 and the resulting deterioration in risk-adjusted capitalization. As a consequence, A.M. Best placed the rating under review with negative implications and has been in discussions with management concerning potential capital raising alternatives. At that time, the negative implication signaled the risk associated with the capital raising initiatives and the likelihood of a further downgrade. In the absence of new capital, management determined that an orderly run off would be in the best interest of the company and its policyholders.
Rating Rationale: The rating applies to the four inter-company pool members, led by Providence Washington Insurance Company. The rating reflects the group's decision to cease writing all new and renewal business effective July 1, 2004, while taking into consideration the group's weak
capitalization and poor underwriting results driven by significant reserve charges relating primarily to accident years 1999-2001. The group recorded a reserve charge of $43.9 million in the fourth
quarter of 2003 which drove the group's policyholders' surplus down by 35%. Subsequently, there was an additional $11 million of adverse reserve development in the first quarter of 2004.
Providence Washington has reported considerable unfavorable loss reserve development in recent years. Other negative factors include PW's modest earnings history and the payment of stockholder dividends that has hampered internal capital generation. While dividends from Providence Washington are necessary to service the debt at PW Acquisition Company, this is tempered by the fact that the debt held is predominantly long-term and payable in kind.
Ulico Casualty Company (A.M. Best #: 02623 NAIC #: 37893)
The following text is derived from the report of Ulico Insurance Group.
Rating Rationale: The rating reflects Ulico Insurance Group's volatile and overall unfavorable
operating results and decline in statutory surplus, elevated risk surrounding numerous levels within the entire organization, including the limited financial flexibility of the parent holding company, ULLICO, Inc. as well as credit risk related to reinsurance recoverable amounts from its sister companies, Union Labor Life Insurance Company and Ulico Standard of America Casualty
Company. Partially offsetting these negative rating factors is the group's supportive risk-adjusted capitalization, its satisfactory liquidity position and the initial positive effects of a corporate-wide
restructuring effort begun by a new management team installed in mid-2003. While management
expects improved profitability at the group in the mid-term, A.M. Best views the rating outlook as negative. Until consistent profitability is restored at the group and other affiliated companies of the corporation, capital demands on ULLICO Inc. exist. Given the limited financial flexibility of ULLICO Inc., the group may not be able to rely as heavily as in the past for support from its parent. A.M. Best will look for the group to restore operating profitability and growth in statutory surplus while maintaining a conservative balance sheet.
Although the group's focus is on operations in its core fiduciary and union liability lines of business, operating earnings continue to be weighed down historically by the discontinued traditional workers' compensation, surety and contractors' liability as well as group accident and health lines of business which have generated poor underlying loss ratios and sizeable one-time expenses. More recently, sizeable losses have been generated in its core fiduciary liability and union hall lines and its most recently discontinued ADR workers' compensation and commercial multi-peril lines of business. Much of the operating loss generated in 2003 resulted from new management's adoption of more conservative reserving practices across all lines, with loss reserves being increased by more than $20 million. The sizeable operating losses generated in more recent years has contributed to the 36% drop in surplus over this period, resulting in elevated net and gross leverage measures. The group maintains a conservative investment philosophy with the majority of its assets invested in fixed income securities, including government and corporate bonds, and cash.
The rating is based on the consolidated operating performance and financial condition of Ulico Casualty Company (UCC) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ulico Indemnity Company (UIC).
Ulico Indemnity Company (A.M. Best #: 11329 NAIC #: 24319)
Rating Rationale: The rating reflects Ulico Indemnity Company's volatile and overall unfavorable operating earnings and elevated risk surrounding numerous levels within the entire organization,
including the limited financial flexibility of the ultimate parent holding company, ULLICO, Inc., and sister company, Union Labor Life Insurance Company. Partially offsetting these negative rating
factors is the company's adequate risk-adjusted capitalization and favorable overall liquidity position. However, given the concerns regarding the entire organization, A.M. Best views the rating outlook as negative.
The company's operating results have been plagued by adverse loss reserve development and the 2003 change in actuarial methodology, sizeable one-time expenses associated with the non-core business in Ulico Standard of America Casualty Company (USACC) and continued reduction in net investment income. The company maintains adequate risk-adjusted capitalization, largely attributable to its low net premium and loss reserve leverage, and conservative investment portfolio. The reinsurance pooling agreement between Ulico Indemnity and its parent, Ulico Casualty Company was terminated effective September 30, 2003. The company recorded a net reinsurance payable of $14.2 million (nearly two-thirds of statutory surplus) to Ulico Casualty as of December 31, 2003, which will be paid in 2004. Ulico Indemnity is currently in run-off and management plans on selling the company in 2004 due to the decreased need for a surplus lines insurer within the group.
Share with your friends: |