Nemo dat one cannot transfer a better legal title than they own at the time of transfer unless an equitable estoppel leads to the result Implicit limitations



Download 20.57 Kb.
Date18.12.2019
Size20.57 Kb.



Common Law Priority Rules Outside PPSA World
NEMO DAT

One cannot transfer a better legal title than they own at the time of transfer unless an equitable estoppel leads to the result



Implicit limitations:

(1) A legal interest trumps an equitable interest;

(2) Possibility of equitable estoppel

FIRST LEGAL VS SECOND LEGAL



  • Nemo dat resolves dispute

  • Exception for goods sold in a “market overt”

  • Estoppel may be raised if first interest holder acts in bad faith (e.g. gross negligence)

  • BMO v Innovation Credit Union at para 51: “BMO could only take its interest subject to [Credit Union’s] prior interest.”

FIRST EQUITABLE VS SECOND EQUITABLE

  • Nemo dat generally resolves disputes

  • Court has a discretion which may result in second equitable interest being granted priority

  • Priority of first interest does not extend to a “mere equity”

    • Mere equity = A right affecting property that is less significant than an equitable right or a legal right; it does not affect anyone except the parties to the transaction in which it is contained.

IRST LEGAL VS SECOND EQUITABLE

  • Nemo dat will normally resolve dispute; regardless, a legal interest normally trumps an equitable interest

  • Court has discretion which can grant second equitable interest holder priority

FIRST EQUITABLE VS SECOND LEGAL

  • Exception to nemo dat

  • To claim priority, subsequent legal interest holder MUST be a BFPFVWN

    • Bona fide

    • Purchaser  either an owner or a security interest holder

    • Value  cannot be a gift; low consideration relative to value can relate to a lack of good faith

    • Without notice  actual knowledge; imputed knowledge (through agent); constructive notice at common law (prudent person making normal inquiries would have discovered the existence of prior equitable interest, which can be altered by statute)

Exceptions:

Negotiability  relates to status of goods, money a great example



Purchaser can receive better title than transferee had; “holder” may acquire good title from a thief

Market Overt  relates to environment where goods purchased

Share with your friends:


The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2019
send message

    Main page