120spillers inanimate, collapsed by contiguity to the same text of realism carries a disturbingly prominent item of misplacement. To that extent, the project of liberation for African-Americans has found urgency in two passionate motivations that are twinned)
to break apart, to rupture violently the laws of American behavior that make such
syntax possible; 2) to introduce anew
semantic field/
fold more appropriate to his/her own historic movement. I regard this twin compulsion as distinct, though related, moments of the very same narrative process that might appear as a concentration or a dispersal.
The narratives of Linda Brent, Frederick Douglass, and Malcolm El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz (aspects of which are examined in this essay) each represent both narrative ambitions as they occur under the auspices of “author.”
Relatedly, we might interpret the whole career of African-
Americans, a decisive factor in national political life since the mid- seventeenth century, in light of the
intervening,
intruding tale, or the tale—like Brent’s garret space—“between the lines
which are already inscribed, as a
metaphor of social and cultural management. According to this reading, gender, or sex-role assignation, or the clear differentiation of sexual stuff, sustained elsewhere in the culture, does not emerge for the African-American female
in this historic instance, except indirectly, except as away to reinforce through the process of birthing, the reproduction of the relations of production that involves the reproduction of the values and behavior patterns necessary to maintain the system of hierarchy in its various aspects of gender, class, and race or ethnicity (Margaret Strobel, Slavery and Reproductive Labor in Mombasa Robertson and Klein 121). Following Strobel’s lead, I would suggest that the foregoing identifies one of the three categories of reproductive labor that African-American females carryout under the regime of captivity. But this replication of ideology is never simple in the case of female subject-positions, and it appears to acquire a thickened layer of motives in the case of African-American females.
If we can account for an originary narrative and judicial principle that might have engendered a “Moynihan Report many years
into the twentieth century, we cannot do much better than look at
Goodell’s reading of the
Share with your friends: