Original: english
APPENDIX IV ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE PRESENT DOCUMENT
Download 2.64 Mb.
|
APPENDIX IVACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE PRESENT DOCUMENT ACE Advisory Committee on Enforcement ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution AGICOA Association of International Collective Management of Audiovisual Works AIPMS Arab IP Management System AMFIE Association Coopérative Financière des Fonctionnaires Internationaux ANPEI National Association of Research and Development of Innovative Enterprises APEC Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation ARDI Access to Research for Development and Innovation ARIPO African Regional Intellectual Property Organization ASEAN Association of South East Asian Nations ASEF Asia-Europe Foundation ASHI After-Service Health Insurance ASPI Access to Specialized Patent Information ATRIP Association for the Advancement of Teaching and Research in Intellectual Property CASE Centralized Access to Search and Examination Results CBD Convention on Biological Diversity ccTLDs country code Top-Level Domain CDIP Conference on Development and Intellectual Property CEIPI Centre d’Études Internationales de la Propriété Intellectuelle CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research CISAC Confederation of International Societies of Authors and Composers CLIR Cross Lingual Information Retrieval CMG Crisis Management Group CMOs collective management organizations CTCN Climate Technology Center and Network CWS Committee on WIPO Standards DA Development Agenda DAG Development Agenda Group DAS Digital Access Service for Priority Documents DIGEPIH IP Office of Honduras DL distance learning
ECOSOC Economic and Social Council EDMS Electronic Document Management System EGEDA Entidad de Gestión de Derechos de los Productores Audiovisuales EPM enterprise performance management EPO European Patent Office ERM enterprise risk management ERP enterprise resource planning EU European Union
FI patent classification assigned by the Japanese Patent office FIT Fund-in-Trust
GDA software for collective management of copyright and neighboring rights GEW Global Entrepreneurship Week GII Global Innovation Index GIs geographical indications GNIPA Global Network of IP Academies GRs genetic resources gTLDs generic Top-Level Domains HLCM High Level Committee on Management HRMD Human Resources Management Department
IAOC Independent Advisory and Oversight Committee IOD Internal Oversight Division ICANN Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ICE International Cooperation on Examination ICS Individual Contractual Servies ICSEI International Cooperation for the Search and Examination of Inventions ICSC International Civil Service Commission ICT Information and Communication Technology IGC Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore IGF Internet Governance Forum IGOs inter-governmental organizations IIA Institute of Internal Auditors ILO International Labour Organisation IP Intellectual Property IPAS IP Office Administration System IPC International Patent Classification IPO Intellectual Property Office IPRs Intellectual Property Rights IPSAS International Public Sector Accounting Standards IT Information Technology ITIL Information Technology Infrastructure Library ITU International Telecommunications Union
LTSEs long-serving temporary employees MDGs Millenium Development Goals MGS Madrid Goods and Services Manager MoU Memorandum of Understanding MTSP Medium Term Strategic Plan NGOs non-governmental organizations NPO National Professional Officer OAPI l’Organisation Africaine de la Propriété Intellectuelle (African Intellectual Property Organization) OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OHIM Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Community Trademarks) OIC Organisation of Islamic Cooperation OIF Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie OPD One Portal Dossier system PCT Patent Cooperation Treaty PLR Patent Landscape Reports PLT Patent Law Treaty PMSDS Performance Management and Staff Development System PPR Program Performance Report
R&D research and development RFPs Requests for Proposals RO Receiving Office SCCR Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights SCP Standing Committee on the Law of Patents SCT Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications SLC Special Labor Contract SMEs small and medium sized enterprises SSA Special Service Agreements SRP Strategic Realignment Program
TAPTA Translation Assistant for Patent Titles and Abstracts TAD IP Technical Assistance Database TCEs Traditional Cultural Expressions/Folklore TIGAR Trusted Intermediary Global Accessible Resources TISCs Technology Innovation Support Centers TK Traditional Knowledge TTO Technology Transfer Office UDRP Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy UN United Nations UNAH Honduras National Autonomous University UNCDF United Nations Capital Development Fund UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UN CEB United Nations Chief Executives Board UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNFCCC UN Framework Convention on Climate Change UNICC UN International Computing Centre UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organization UNPFII United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues USPTO United States Patent and Trademark Office UNTT UN Task Team (on the Post-2015 Development Agenda) VIP Visually Impaired Persons and other persons with print disabilities WBO WIPO Brazil Office WCT WIPO Copyright Treaty WHO World Health Organization WINS WIPO Inquiry Notification System WIPOCOS software for collective management of copyright and neighboring rights WJO WIPO Japan Office WPIS WIPO Patent Information Services WPPT WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty WSIS World Summit on the Information Society WSO WIPO Singapore Office WTO World Trade Organization [End of Appendix IV and of document] 1 In line with Member States’ requests, Programs were provided an opportunity to define targets that had not been defined in the Program and Budget 2014/15, i.e. “tbd” targets, during the baseline update exercise (launched in July 2014), using the year-end 2013 data as the basis. Targets that were not defined during this process remain undefined, and performance data are consequently rated as “not assessable.” 2Renamed WIPO Translate. 3 In the PPR 2012/13, it was reported that reference to the annual World IP Day campaign was reported in 89 countries. The actual number of countries reporting was 93. 4 Corrigendum: The number of requests for communication under Article 6ter dealt with in 2012 was actually 69, as reported in the PPR 2012/13. 5 Corrigendum: The number of signs published in Article 6ter database at the end of 2012 was actually 84, as reported in the PPR 2012/13. 6 The target refers to the number of signs published during the biennium 2014/15. 7 Corrigendum: It was reported that there were 18 copyright offices using GDA at the end of 2013. The cumulative number was actually 15, which was in line with the target of 15 offices set or the 2012/13 biennium. 8 http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_1043.pdf 9 Exceptionally, the original target “Decisions by appropriate PCT bodies up to the end of 2015” has been changed in order to better enable the measurement of the progress made towards further developing the PCT system in line with the PCT roadmap recommendations. 10 A record copy is a PCT application transmitted to the International Bureau (IB) by a receiving Office after its filing at, and its processing by, that Office. Because record copies are only received at the IB after processing at a receiving Office, the figures are strongly influenced by processing times at these Offices. For this reason, trends in the receipt of record copies, while valid indicators of IB workloads, do no exactly match trends in the filing of PCT applications. 11 Following an independent review of PCTIS performance metrics, its definition slightly changed from the one described in the Program and Budget 2014/15 12 The scale in 2012 used a different set of criteria. The set of criteria was refined for 2013 to consider more relevant factors. This change explains the differences in the ratings for 2013 and 2014 (e.g. 38 and 39 respectively) and 2012 (79). 13 See “Total workload” above. 14 See “Total workload” above. 15 Corrigendum: The actual number of designs contained in 2012 was 12,454 and not 12,506 as published in the Program and Budget 2014/15 or 11,971 (the number of international registrations in 2012), as published in the PPR 2012/13. 16 Corrigendum: The PPR 2012/13 reported renewals and grant of protection as the two automated processes. The grant of protection process was not automated at the end of 2013. 17 The Madrid System provides support to the Hague System, in particular in translation and IT activities. These costs were disregarded in this method. 18 See “Total workload” above 19 See the ratios for applications and renewals in “Total workload”, above. 20 http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/rules/newrules.html 21 http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=208882 and http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=239806 22 http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/cooperation/en/pdf/ta_manual.pdf 23 http://www.wipo.int/cooperation/en/south_south/ 24 In the PPR 2012/13, it was reported that the NIPS-D database was in use at the end of 2013, following completion of the development phase. Implementation of the database did not begin until 2014. 25 Corrigendum: In the PPR 2012/13, it was reported that Ethiopia had adopted an IP policy in 2012/13. The IP Policy was finalized in 2014 for consideration in the national approval process. 26 Corrigendum: In the PPR 2012/13, it was reported that a national IP innovation strategy was under development in Tunisia. In 2014, Tunisia began discussions on the possibility of developing such a strategy. 27 Corrigendum: In the PPR 2012/13, it was reported that Algeria was in the course of adopting a national IP strategy in 2012/13. At the end of 2014, Algeria was in the process of reformulating a national IP strategy. 28 The process was delayed because of structural changes in the Government. 29 The process had stalled in 2011. In 2014, a consultative process was re-initiated. 30 The IP strategy was country-led. In 2014, WIPO assistance was provided on the innovation component of the strategy. 31 Idem. 32 The number of applications is based on the country of origin. Figures for 2014 are estimated. The percentage of increase/decrease is in comparison to 2013. 33 Idem. 34 Idem. 35 The higher level of participation from Latin America and the Caribbean is primarily due the customized versions of the General Course on IP (DL101) in Portuguese and Spanish. 36 Available is defined as having been translated into the language and able to be offered to partner IP Offices. It should be noted that in a given year not all available courses are offered in all language versions, depending on when the new language version might become available in the year and/or the preparedness of the partner IP Offices with whom the courses are run. 37 Contribution to this publication was done under the FIT US SMEs, which was closed during Q1 2015. 38 See Program 10. 39Renamed WIPO Translate. 40 The number of users refers to unique ‘users’ rather than unique ‘visitors’, which avoids the risk of counting the number of unique visitors who only view the page and do not perform searches, and thus provides a more accurate representation of the database usage. 41 Idem. 42 http://etisc.wipo.org/ 43 http://www.wipo.int/tisc/en/etutorial.html 44 http://www.wipo.int/tisc/fr/etutorial.html 45 Corrigendum: In the PPR 2012/13 it was reported that there were seven Offices using WIPO CASE at the end of 2013. The actual number of Offices using the platform at the end of 2013 was nine. 46 The average monthly figure is extrapolated from data from January to May 2014. In June 2014, a new version of the IP Statistics Data Center was implemented, resulting in the inability to track the data for the second half of the year. 47 Corrigendum: The actual number of Partners at the end of 2013 was 36 and the actual number of uploads 820, as opposed to the 37 and 800 reported in the PPR 2012/13. 48 In the PPR 2012/13, it was reported that reference to the annual World IP Day campaign was reported in 89 countries. The actual number of countries reporting was 93. 49 Because a WIPO Stakeholders Perceptions Survey was not conducted in 2013, the data reported in the PPR 2012/13 were extrapolated from the WIPO Service Orientation Survey, which uses a different methodology and is sent to a different stakeholder group. As such, the updated baseline for 2013 is not comparable with the data for 2014. 50 The 2014 performance data is comparable with the Original Baseline P&B 2014/15 of 65 per cent, which was based on the WIPO Stakeholders Perceptions Survey 2012. 51 In the 2012/13 PPR, it was reported that there were 226 videos. The actual number of videos at the end of 2013 was 228. The average number of views has been updated accordingly. 52 The original baseline in the Program and Budget 2014/15 was calculated using estimated figures as at mid-2013. These figures have now been updated. 53 Link to 2014 WIPO Assemblies Survey: http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/about-wipo/en/assemblies/pdf/survey_2014.pdf 55 Corrigendum: In the 2012/13 PPR, it was reported that 53 per cent of Programs were using performance data for managing program performance. 56 Data available on a biennial basis only. 57 Only staff members in the Professional and higher categories. 58 The Coordination Committee is yet to reach a conclusion on whether or not a formal system should replace the 1975 accord on geographical distribution. 59 Appendix III contains an overview of progress in 2014 on the four CMP projects falling under premises management. 60 Corrigendum: Due to a typographical error, the target date as published in the Program and Budget 2014/15 reflected the December 31, 2013 instead of December 31, 2015. 61 http://www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/oversight/iaod/ 62 http://www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/oversight/iaod/audit/reports.html 63 http://www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/oversight/iaod/evaluation/reports.html 64 Review of Budgetary Process Applied to Projects Proposed by the Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) for the Implementation of the Development Agenda Recommendations (A/48/5 REV.) 65 In order to streamline the financial management of the multiple funds-in-trust from the Government of Finland, which were received in multiple currencies, in 2014, the funds were consolidated into one fund, FIT Finland (CHF), based in Swiss francs. 66 Finland Copyright I 67 Finland Copyright II 68 Finland Copyright III 69 In October 2012, a Memorandum creating the FIT/IBERO was signed as a financial instrument of the Ibero-American Program of Industrial Property 70 Expected date of completion: May 2016. 71 Due to fluctuations in the foreign exchange rates, the amount of 20,935 Swiss francs was absorbed by WIPO in 2014, resulting in a zero balance. 72 http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/a_51/a_51_16.pdf 73 http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/govbody/en/wo_pbc_22/wo_pbc_22_21.pdf Directory: edocs -> mdocs -> govbody govbody -> Original: english govbody -> E wo/GA/48/11 original: English date: september 20, 2016 wipo general Assembly Forty-Eighth 26 govbody -> World intellectual property organization govbody -> Original: français / English govbody -> Original: français / English govbody -> Original: francais / english govbody -> Original: English/French govbody -> États membres/member states (dans l’ordre alphabétique des noms français des États) govbody -> WO/pbc/13/10 annexe i/annex I Download 2.64 Mb. Share with your friends:
|