13NFL1-Compulsory Voting Page 159 of 163 www.victorybriefs.com BECAUSE ALTRUISM MAYBE A REASONABLE JUSTIFICATION TO FORGO SELF-INTEREST, IT IS UNREASONABLE TO FORCE PEOPLE TO DO SOMETHING JUST BECAUSE IT IS IN THEIR BEST INTERESTS Annabelle
Lever Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method London School of Economics and Political Science, Compulsory Voting A Criminal Perspective
British Journal of Political Science (December, 2008). People have interests in protecting themselves from the spite, negligence and from the well- meaning,
but demeaning and intrusive, actions of others. Where they are otherwise capable of looking after themselves, these interests in self-protection have an important role to play in justifying democratic voting rights,
as well as rights to form, join and leave political parties, rights to stand as apolitical representative of others, rights to express one’s
political opinions, to demonstrate one’s political dissatisfaction, and to refuse to identify or justify one’s political beliefs, interests and loyalties. People are not always good
judges of their own interests, individually or collectively. Still, respect for people’s freedom and equality and capacities for reasoned judgement, generally tells against forcing them to exercise their rights, or to make the most of their liberties and opportunities. This is partly because there are normally other,
less intrusive, ways to promote people’s self-interest than forcing them to act in a self-interested manner But the difficulty with forcing people to pursue their self interest is, also, that informed, intelligent and reasonable people can disagree about the importance of self-interested ends relative to altruistic ones and can disagree about the merits of self-interested
behaviour in particular, as well as in general. Consequently, unless people have a duty to pursue their self-interest by voting, there is no justification
for forcing them to vote, simply because voting would be good for them.
Share with your friends: