INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMETRICS II ECO 306 NOUN 63
In the second line, the second expected value rule has been used to bring
( ) out of the expression as a common factor, and the first rule has been used to breakup the expectation of the sum into the sum of the expectations.
In the third line, the term involving has been brought out because
X is non-stochastic. By virtue of the first
Gauss–Markov
condition,
( is , and hence ( ) is also 0. Therefore
, ( )- is 0 and
(
)
…[2.34] In other words,
b2
is an unbiased estimator of . We can obtain the same result with the weak version of the fourth Gauss–Markov condition (allowing
X to have a random component but assuming that it is distributed independently of
u), unless the random factor in the
nobservations
happens to cancel out exactly, which can happen only by coincidence.
b2
will be different from
for any given sample, but in view of unbiased
regression coefficient, there will be no systematic tendency for it to be either higher or lower. The same is true for the regression coefficient
b1
Using [2.22]
̅
̅
…[2.35] Hence
(
) ( ̅) ̅ (
)
…[2.36] Since
is determined by
We have
(
)
(
)
…[2.37] because ( is 0 if the first Gauss–Markov condition is satisfied. Hence
( ̅)
̅
…[2.38] Substituting this into [2.36],
and using the result that (
)