What is the difference between a Red Team and a real-world attacker A
Red Team will provide a report, or other deliverables, with the goal of understanding threat-based risks. Organizations that use
Red Teams effectively do not need to wait and learn from a real-world breach. Red Teams are beneficial in analyzing systems for security weaknesses that may not be known or understood. The mindset and thought processes used by a professional Red Team Operator can breakthrough common assumptions that severely weaken a system's security. Red Teams ask the "what if" questions to challenge system defenses at its core. Effectively using Red Teams can bring to light security flaws that have plagued a system for years and allow an organization to develop highly effective mitigating solutions.
Although there are tremendous
benefits to Red Teams, they can be challenging to use. They are commonly used in name only. The activities performed during an engagement are no more than a vulnerability test or penetration test. The output maybe something as simple as a list of findings. Red
Teams must be able to think and act like a threat being portrayed. These engagements could be a gloves-off, advanced threat, or limited actions to emulate a single or straightforward threat. We will discuss how to do this by "adjusting the volume" of attacks and Indicator of Compromise (IOC)
management later. For now, understand that a Red Team must operate within its rules and boundaries and focus on goals outlined in the engagement plan.
Red Teaming is about the overall story. Red Teams can document vulnerabilities and weaknesses identified during an assessment but focus on the whole story of the attacker throughout an engagement.
Share with your friends: