.............................................................................
.............................................................................
Elsevier US
Job code KIB
Chapter: Ch11-H7983 6-12-2006 9:22 p.m.
Page:380
Trimsize:7.25 in in
Fonts used Sabon & Frutiger
Margins:Top:36 pt
Gutter:66 pt
Font Size pt
Text
Width PCDepth:43 Lines
380
International Business
Application of the above equations will produce the following results:
Activity
Normal
Time
Crash
Time
Normal
Cost
($)
Crash
Cost
($)
Maximum
Time
Reduction
Crash
Cost/Week
A
4 3
3000 3300 BC DEF G 4
3000 3650 HI J 2
800 800 The activities to be shortened must be on the critical path. This means that the operations manager should start the crashing process by concentrating on the four activities on the critical path. The activity with the lowest crash cost/week should be selected, provided that
its maximum time reductionfigure is not zero.
Activity E has the lowest crash cost/week and a maximum time reduction of two weeks. This is therefore the activity that should be crashed first.
Its normal time now becomes six weeks while its maximum time reduction
figure decreases to one week.
Having reduced the expected duration of the project by one week (from twenty to nineteen weeks, we have an extra cost of $250. As the bonus of
exceeds this cost, the operations manager should go for the bonus.
To reduce the expected duration of the project by a second week, the operations manager needs to go through the same process again. Note,
however, that there are now two critical paths. The original one (BEHJ) and anew
one made up of activities AD, Hand J. Two activities should then be crashed, one on each path (unless the crash cost/week figure indicates that one activity which is common in both paths would be more economical to crash. Thus, the activities to be crashed should be activity E from the original critical path and activity A from the new one.
Having reduced the expected duration of the project by a second week
(from twenty to eighteen weeks, we have an extra cost of $550
$250
+
$300
. Again, as the bonus of $600 exceeds this cost, the operations manager should go for the bonus.
.............................................................................
.............................................................................
Elsevier US
Job code KIB
Chapter: Ch11-H7983 6-12-2006 9:22 p.m.
Page:381
Trimsize:7.25 in in
Fonts used Sabon & Frutiger
Margins:Top:36 pt
Gutter:66 pt
Font Size pt
Text Width PC
Depth:43 Lines
International
Operations Management381
Finally, to reduce the expected duration of the project by a third week,
activity Ha common activity in both paths) should be chosen. This implies an additional cost of $750. This time, however, the operations manager should not go for the bonus, as a bonus of $600 for reducing the expected duration of the project to seventeen weeks would not justify the additional cost of the reduction.
The operations manager should therefore use extra resources in order to reduce the project’s expected completion time from twenty to eighteen weeks and receive a total bonus of $1200. Reducing the project’s duration further to seventeen weeks
would not be economical to do, as the extra cost required for this reduction would exceed the bonus.
For further discussion of the concepts of project management, refer to
L.V. Tavares.
24
Share with your friends: