Marks
2(a)Identify and explain using examples why an audit
firm may not seek re-electionGenerally
1
/
2
mark for identification and 1 mark for explanation/example, any FOUR:
–
Disagreement
–
Lack of integrity
–
Fee level
–
Late payment of fees
–
Resources
–
Overseas
expansion–
Competence
–
Independence
–
Conflict of interest
Maximum marks
6
(b)Contents of tender document
Up to 1 1
/
2
marks per matter described:
–
Outline of firm
–
Specialisms
–
Audit
requirement of Dragon–
Outline audit approach (max 3 marks if detailed description)
–
QC
–
Communication with management
–
Timing
–
Key staff/resources
–
Fees
–
Extra services
Maximum marks
10
(c)Matters
to consider re acceptanceProfessional marks to be awarded for clarity of evaluation, use of headings, and conclusion based on points discussed.
2
Generally
1
/
2
mark for identification (to a maximum of 3 marks).
1
further mark for explanation, from ideas list.
–
Large and expanding group – availability of staff now and in the future
–
Use of overseas offices
–
Visits
to overseas audit teams–
Skills/experience in retail/foreign subsidiaries consolidation
–
Timing – tight deadline
–
Mermaid Ltd – implication
of prior year qualification–
Minotaur Ltd – implication of different business activity
–
Highly regulated – risk/additional reporting requirements
–
Reason for previous
auditors leaving officeMaximum marks
7
Share with your friends: