Proposed pebble bed modular reactor


INTRODUCTION 1.1Need for the PBMR Demonstration Module (The Plant)



Download 3.55 Mb.
Page4/44
Date02.02.2017
Size3.55 Mb.
#14922
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   44

1.INTRODUCTION

1.1Need for the PBMR Demonstration Module (The Plant)


This Chapter provides background on the need for the proposed Plant, Scoping Phase milestones, governance issues, and public participation.

Eskom plans to broaden (diversify) the primary energy mix for the supply of electricity, for both the addition of future generation capacity (anticipated between 2005 and 2007) as well as the replacement of existing power stations (around 2020).

This diversification will take cognisance of the following considerations:



  • To reduce over the longer term, the dominant rate of coal in the generation mix from the current level of 90% to 50% in the future.

  • To provide a better geographical spread of generating stations as well as cost effective off grid (stand alone) generation installations for remote supply.

  • To maintain and improve cost effectiveness, social acceptability and environmental suitability of generation options.

In terms of Eskom’s Integrated Strategic Electricity Plan (ISEP) various supply and demand technologies are under investigation for techno-economic evaluation. Some of the supply side technologies include:

  • The Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR)

  • Renewables such as Wind, Solar thermal and Biomass Technologies

  • Fluidised Bed Combustion Technology based on discard coal

For the final stage of feasibility assessment, demonstration plants are proposed to be established to fully test the techno-economics9 of the plant(s) under South African conditions. The proposed demonstration module 110MWe class PBMR is now in this phase of development together with wind and solar.

The results of the PBMR will inform Eskom’s ISEP as well as government’s Integrated Resource Plan and Programme (IRPP), as will other demonstration plants for wind and solar thermal.

The developers of the PBMR plant, together with their co-investors i.e. Eskom, the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) and British Nuclear Fuel Limited (BNFL), state that there is significant scope for the international application of this technology. The stated commercial potential of the PBMR for global application, although outside the scope of this EIA, is addressed to some degree within the EIR.

From the outset it needs to be emphasised that the justification for the proposed Plant is to test the techno-economics and to inform future decisions on energy technology applications for electricity generation. The proposed Plant will be linked to the national transmission grid (i.e. electricity generated by the Plant will be sold commercially to recover the investment cost and to enable demonstration) and will remain a demonstration plant for its full life cycle (i.e. 40 years although the first 5 to 6 years will be more important in terms of deciding on its techno-economic performance). The rationale for the prolonged period of demonstration is to obtain and assess the techno-economic information on maintenance and refurbishment of continued operation as well as materials behaviour. This information will be incorporated into the design optimisation process, provided that the Plant proves viable.


1.2Purpose of the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT


This EIR primarily addresses, assesses and evaluates the issues and impacts related to the proposed Plant as defined within the Plan of Study for the EIA which was accepted by the DEAT in early March 2002 (see Annexure 1 for a copy of the PoS for EIA). The EIR forms part of the overall Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) that is mandatory in terms of the Environmental Conservation Act (Act No. 73 of 1989) and the National Environmental Management Act (Act No. 107 of 1999).

The Report also pays attention to strategic issues, namely policy imperatives, international treaties, radiological safety and health issues including HIV/AIDS.

The complete range of issues and impacts covered in the EIR, were defined through the Scoping process which started in April 2000 and terminated in December 2001 when the Scoping Report was accepted by DEAT. For a record of this process the reader is referred to the Scoping Report and Annexures that are available on the website: http//www.pebble-bed.co.za. (The major milestones of the Scoping Phase of the EIA are listed below).

The EIR furthermore reports on the significance of identified issues/impacts and recommended mitigating measures to reduce the risk of adverse impacts and enhance beneficial aspects/impacts. These mitigating measures are incorporated in the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) which details the construction and operation/maintenance phases of the proposed Plant.



This EIR also incorporates a Social Impact Assessment (SIA), to more fully inform and understand the socio-cultural and economic perceptions of the public about the proposed Plant, together with recommendations for mitigation.

1.3Major Milestones of the Scoping Phase


The milestones of the Scoping Phase are summarised below:

  • Completion, submission and acceptance of the application for the proposed Plant by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) in June 2000.

  • Completion and acceptance by the DEAT of the Plan of Study (PoS) for Scoping for the proposed Plant in January 2001. Alternative sites that were considered for investigation included the Thyspunt site located near Cape St Francis in the Eastern Cape Province; Bantamsklip site near Hermanus in the Southern Cape region of the Western Cape Province and Koeberg near Blaauwbergstrand in the Western Cape.

  • Announcement of the proposed Plant in the print media (national, regional and local newspapers) and electronic media (radio).

  • Registration of I & APs and public consultations to disseminate information and register public issues, concerns and/or suggestions.

  • A Background Information Document (BID) as well as an Information Document (Volume I) were distributed for public information. Both documents were available in hard copy and electronically (compact disc and web site).

  • Capacity Building Workshops were held in the Cape Town, Pelindaba, Johannesburg and Durban areas between November 2000 and January 2001. These workshops informed interest groups on various topics and issues including the proposed development; nuclear related issues, especially safety and alternative energies/technologies. Opportunities were provided to NGOs to present alternative view points.

  • Consultation was conducted via open days; public meetings; focus group meetings (individuals or organisations with a common interest) and personal interviews

A broad range of interest groups were covered including:

  • Government at national, provincial & local level

  • Professional institutions and persons

  • NGOs and CBOs

  • Commerce and Industry

  • Local communities

In all, about 2600 I & APs were registered on a national basis.

  • A comprehensive Issues Report was compiled that contained the name of the person/organisation, the nature of the issue and comment on the issue from the EIA Consortium as provided from various sources.

  • Compilation and issue of the Draft Scoping Report for public review in March 2001. The Report was distributed in hard copy (public libraries) and electronically (CD & website). This report was also reviewed by the Review Panel established by the DEAT. The Panel consisted of international and national members.

  • A number of conclusions and recommendations were made by the Review Panel. The most important being that the NECSA Pelindaba Campus in the North West Province, must also be scoped and assessed as an alternative site for the proposed Plant (See Annexure 15 for the Report on the Investigation of Pelindaba as an alternative site).

  • Compilation and submission of the final Scoping Report for DEATs’ consideration and acceptance in October 2001. The Report was available to the public (hard copy and electronically) and was also reviewed by the DEAT, the provincial environmental authorities and the Review Panel.

  • Acceptance of the Scoping Report by the DEAT in mid December 2001 and an instruction to proceed with the EIA phase through the submission of a Plan of Study (PoS) for the EIA (Annexure 1). No appeal against the acceptance of the Scoping Report was received from any party.


Download 3.55 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   44




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page