Rao bulletin 1 October 2014 html edition this bulletin contains the following articles


VA Disability Compensation Update 10



Download 479.35 Kb.
Page9/10
Date19.10.2016
Size479.35 Kb.
#4818
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

VA Disability Compensation Update 10: Q&A

How VA Disability Compensation Affects Military Retirement Pay. If you have a VA service-connected disability rating of 10% or higher, you are eligible to receive a monthly compensation check from the VA. The monthly compensation payments vary by your disability rating—and if your rating is 30% or higher—the rates are increased, depending number of dependents you have filed on your claim. You can be eligible to receive VA disability compensation even if you didn’t retire from the military. But if you are retired from the military and are also eligible for VA disability compensation, determining how much you get paid, and from where, can seem complicated. You see, until 2004, it was against the law to receive military retirement pay and VA disability compensation at the same time. Retirees had to choose which pay they wanted to receive, and if they chose to receive their VA disability compensation, those funds were “offset,” or deducted, from their military retirement pay. There have been two major changes to this law in the past decade, and some veterans may be eligible to receive their full military retirement pay along with their VA disability compensation. These laws are:

  • Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay (CRDP) (2004), which applies to military retirees who have a combined VA disability rating of 50% or greater, and

  • Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) (2008), which applies to military retirees who have a service-connected disability rating of at least 10% that stems from a combat-related incident.

It is possible to be eligible for both of these programs, however, you can only receive the additional monetary compensation from one of them. Veterans who qualify for both plans will be given the choice of which they wish to receive when they apply for their benefits. But you can also change your election if your situation changes. CRDP sends out open season letters annually each December; veterans must select their choice by the end of January. Let’s examine your options if you are eligible for military retirement pay and VA disability compensation: There are a lot of rumors, myths, and misconceptions about how VA disability compensation affects military retirement pay. So let’s take a look at some of those rumors and misconceptions and break them down so you have a clear understanding of how these forms of compensation work together.
How Do VA Disability Compensation and Military Retirement Pay Differ? Military retirement pay and VA disability compensation are entirely separate forms of compensation. They are paid from different agencies, and paid from different buckets of money. They also represent two different forms of compensation. Military retirement pay is a pension that is based on your years of service. VA disability compensation is a monetary award that is based on your decreased ability to perform work after leaving the military. Military retirement pay is taxable by the federal level, and is taxed by most states (some states do not have an income tax or do not tax military retirement pay). VA disability compensation, however, is considered non-taxable income by the federal government (I am not aware of any states that tax VA disability compensation). This has a big advantage: dollar for dollar, VA disability compensation gives veterans more spending power than military retirement pay because VA compensation is never taxed.
What Happens When You Are Eligible to Receive Retirement Pay & Disability Compensation? The answer to this question is dependent upon your disability rating.

  • If you have a combined disability rating of 50% or greater, you should be eligible to receive Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay (CRDP).

  • If you receive CRDP, you will receive your full military retirement pay along with your full VA disability compensation. There will be no reduction to your military retirement pay.

  • If you have a combined VA service-connected disability rating of 40% or lower, then you are not eligible for CRDP. However, if you have a service-connected disability that is considered a combat-related disability, then you may be eligible for Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC). CRSC also replaces the VA disability offset, and will increase your total compensation, even if you don’t have a combined rating of at least 50%.

  • If your combined disability rating is 40% or lower and you do not have a combat-related disability, then your military retirement pay will be offset, or deducted, by the amount of VA service-connected disability compensation you receive.

What is Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay (CRDP)? Up until 2004, the law prevented military retirees from receiving part or all of their military pay if they also received disability compensation from the VA. Military members had to choose which payment they wanted to receive: military retirement pay, or VA disability compensation. If they chose to receive both forms of payment, they had to offset, or waive, a portion of their military retirement pay equal to the amount they received from the VA. Basically, it prevents servicemembers from double-dipping and receiving compensation from both the VA and the military. In 2004, the law was changed, and military retirees were eligible to receive both military retirement pay and VA disability compensation, but only if they had a VA service-connected disability rating of 50% or higher. Here is how the compensation breaks down if you are eligible to receive both types of compensation:

  • VA disability rating of 40% or lower. Military retirees who choose to receive VA disability compensation will have their military retirement pay offset by the amount of compensation they receive from the VA. Most retirees choose to receive their VA disability compensation because it is tax-free income, while their military pension is taxed by the federal government and by most states. They still receive the same amount of total compensation they otherwise would have received, however, the VA compensation portion is tax-free, giving them more spending power.

  • VA disability rating of 50% or greater. Military retirees with a disability rating of greater than 50% are eligible to receive both payments under CRDP. They will receive their full military retirement pension, along with 100% of their VA disability compensation. They do not need to offset their military pay by the amount of the compensation they receive from the VA.

What is the difference in compensation difference between a 40%% and 50% disability Rating? Thousands of dollars per year because the difference comes in the form of the increased disability compensation at the higher rate, along with the full military pension that is not offset by the concurrent receipt laws. Let’s run through an example.
How is Military Retirement Pay Offset by VA Compensation? If your VA disability rating is 40% or lower, your military retirement pay is offset by the amount of your VA compensation. In other words a 40% disability rating doesn’t mean 40% of your retirement pay is tax free. It means you receive tax-free compensation from the VA at the 40% rate, and your military retirement pay is deducted by that amount. (Refer to http://www.benefits.va.gov/COMPENSATION/resources_comp01.asp for current rates.) For example. Let’s say a retiree earns a monthly retirement check of $2,000. Let’s also assume he has a VA service-connected disability rating of 40%, and he has one dependent (a spouse). His VA disability compensation would be $641.28/mo. He would receive $641.28 from the VA, which would be tax-free. He would then receive $1,358.72 as his military retirement pay ($2,000 – $641.28 = $1,358.72). The total amount still equals $2,000 per month. But $641.28 of that is tax-free income. The overall affect gives the veteran more spending power. You can also see how this uniform method for computing the VA disability offset is easier than awarding retirees a percentage of their pay as tax free.
What is the Value of Concurrent Receipt? As you can see from the example above, the main benefit of the VA disability offset is receiving the tax-free pay from the VA. The final dollar amount is the same, but the tax-free portion gives the veteran greater spending power than if he received the full value of his pension from the military with no VA offset. But the amount would be much greater if the veteran received both forms of compensation under Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay laws. The increase would mean the full value of the military retirement pay, plus the full value of the VA disability compensation. Going from a 40% rating ($641.28) to a 50% rating ($901.83) is huge. Not only does the VA disability compensation increase by $260.55 per month, but the $641.28 is not deducted from the military retirement pay. The net effect is this: 40% disability rating: $2,000 total ($1,358.72 taxable; $641.28 non-taxable) and 50% disability rating: $2,901.83 total ($2,000 taxable; $901.83 non-taxable). The difference is an increase of $10,821.96 per year, none of which is taxable income.
How do you qualify for Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Pay? To qualify for CRSC, you must have a service-connected disability rating that is considered combat-related. There are a few other eligibility criteria:

  • You must be a military retiree (Active or Reserve with 20 years or creditable service; Chapter 61 medically retired with less than 20 years of service; Retired under Temporary Early Retirement Act (TERA); or retired under the Temporary Disabled Retirement List (TDRL)).

  • You must have a VA service-connected disability rating of at least 10% that is considered to be combat-related.

  • Your military retirement pay must currently be reduced by the VA disability offset.

The injury doesn’t have to be from direct combat. Disabilities may be considered combat-related for CRSC purposes if they are a direct result of:

  • Armed Conflict / Combat: direct or indirect wounds that happened during armed conflict.

  • Hazardous Duty: demolition duty, diving, parachuting, aerial flight, and more.

  • An Instrumentality of War: An injury sustained from exposure to an instrumentality of war, such as a weapon or weapon systems specifically designed for military duty or warfare. This can include certain military combat vehicles, vessels, aircraft, or an injury or sickness caused by exposure to fumes, gases, or chemicals. Agent Orange exposure would qualify as an instrumentality of war.

  • Simulated War: Activities such as military training, exercises, airborne ops, live fire exercises, hand-to-hand combat training, and more. This does not include standard physical training such as running, jogging, or group sports activities.

Anyone can be eligible so long as they meet the above criteria. This includes military retirees who have been retired for decades, or someone who retired last month. There is even the possibility of back pay, however, it can only be extended back to the effective dates of the laws, which are June 1, 2003 for those with 20 years of service, or January 1, 2008, for those who were medically retired under Chapter 61 with less than 20 years of service. You must apply with your branch of service. Concurrent Receipt is automatically applied by DFAS and the VA. However, the CRSC program is administered by each branch of the military. You will need to complete an application and send in supporting documentation to receive this benefit.
Will Concurrent Receipt Be Extended to Everyone? In a perfect world, all military retirees who have a VA service-connected disability rating would be eligible to receive the disability pay in addition to their retirement pay. Unfortunately, the government budget isn’t limitless and the current payment methods are being used to help control budgets. Concurrent Receipt was phased in over a ten year period, with veterans receiving incrementally larger amounts of VA compensation added to their retirement pay each year. If the government were to open Concurrent Receipt to everyone, they would likely do something similar, as it would otherwise be a massive budget increase.
Will Concurrent Receipt Laws Change? There are many military organizations and lobbying groups that are working hard to get the Concurrent Receipt laws extended to all retirees, regardless of their disability rating. But it has yet to be approved by Congress. The Military Officer’s Association of America (MOAA) has repeatedly attempted to get the law repealed that requires military retirees to forfeit their military retirement pay in order to receive their VA disability pay. You can read about their most recent efforts at http://www.moaa.org/Main_Menu/Take_Action/Top_Issues/Enjoying_Retirement/Concurrent_Receipt_of_Military_Retired_Pay_and_VA_Disability_Compensation.html.
[Source: Military Wallet | Ryan Guina | Sept. 16, 2014 ++]
********************************
Money Flipping ScamHow It works
Get rich quick schemes promising high returns in minimal time are not a new phenomenon. But clever scammers are now promoting these "money flipping" scams on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter to target a younger audience.
How the Scam Works:

  • You see a photo of a pile of cash on Instagram or another social media site. The caption brags about an easy money flipping scheme. This person claims to have "flipped" a couple hundred dollars into thousands, and he or she offers to do the same for you.

  • Money's been tight lately, so the post piques your interest. You check out the profile behind the post, and he or she appears to be a real person with photos and followers. The account may even have dozens of "thank you" comments from satisfied past "investors." You decide to give it a shot, and send him or her a message.

  • This "investor" tells you that it's easy to get started. All you need to do is put $100 or more on a prepaid debit card from your local convenience store. The greater the value, the more money you can make. Then, share the card number and PIN, and the "investor" will do the rest.

http://ih.constantcontact.com/fs120/1102814513330/img/1091.png

Money flipping on Instagram. Caption reads: "Who trying to make some money? Flip 200 to 2,000 fast and quick money. Only business."
Unfortunately, giving out the card number and PIN allows the "investor" to withdraw money from the card. Typically, the scammer drains the card and then blocks you from contacting their social media account. Here are some tips to avoid money flipping scams:

  • Do a quick search. Before contacting the potential scammer, do a web search of their username or phone number. If it's a scam, chances are that other victims have posted complaints and information online.

  • Be wary of prepaid debit cards. Wire transfers used to be a scammer's favorite way to collect payment, but prepaid debit cards are the new preferred method. Treat prepaid debit cards like cash. Once you give away the account info, you will not be able to get that money back.

  • Don't trust your friends' taste online. It might not actually be them "liking" or sharing these scam posts. Their account may have been hacked. But it may also be clickjacking, a technique that scammers use to trick you into "liking" something that you wouldn't otherwise.

  • If it sounds to good to be true... Well, you know the rest. Use common sense when seeking ways to supplement your income. Anyone who claims to be able to turn a small investment into piles of cash in mere minutes is a scam artist.

To find out more about scams or report one, check out BBB Scam Stopper website http://www.bbb.org/council/bbb-scam-stopper. [Source: BBB Scam alert Aug 22, 2014 ++]
*********************************
Click Bait ScamHow It works
Nothing inspires scammers like the headlines. Con artists are always finding ways to cash in on breaking trends. This week, watch out for teasers on social media promoting fake ALS Ice Bucket Challenge videos.
How the Scam Works:

  • You are on Facebook, and a news item catches your attention. It appears to be a teaser for a shocking video. "Tragic: Ice Bucket Challenge kills girl," reads the headline. 

  • You click the link, thinking it leads to a video site. Instead, a pop up appears prompting you to "update your video player." But when you click "OK," you aren't getting a new version of some software. You are really downloading malware.

 

Like all scams, this has many variations. Not all fake videos lead to viruses. Some link to spammy websites, which may prompt you to take a survey before viewing the video. In the worst case, sharing your information can open you up to identity theft. More likely, your information will end up getting sold to spammers.  This scam is also not limited to Facebook. Watch out for similar links posted on Twitter, through other social media or sent by email.  


Take the following steps to protect yourself and others from scam links shared through email and social media: 

  • Don't take the bait. Stay away from promotions of "exclusive," "shocking" or "sensational" footage. If it sounds too outlandish to be true, it is probably a scam.

  • Hover over a link to see its true destination. Before you click, mouse over the link to see where it will take you. Don't click on links leading to unfamiliar websites.

  • Don't trust your friends' taste online. It might not actually be them "liking" or sharing scam links to photos. Their account may have been hacked. But it may also be clickjacking, a technique that scammers use to trick you into clicking something that you wouldn't otherwise (especially the Facebook "Like" button).

  • On Facebook, report scam posts and other suspicious activity by following their instructions at https://www.facebook.com/help/205730929485170.

  • On Twitter, if another user is sending you links to malware or other spam, report it to Twitter by following their instructions at https://support.twitter.com/groups/33-report-abuse-or-policy-violations/topics/122-reporting-violations/articles/64986-how-to-report-spam-on-twitter#

For More Information heck out the Detroit Free Press's article on ice bucket challenge scams, featuring an interview with the Better Business Bureau of Detroit and Eastern Michigan at http://www.freep.com/article/20140822/BUSINESS07/308220096/ice-bucket-challenge-scam-ALS. To find out more about scams or report one, check out BBB Scam Stopper at http://www.bbb.org/council/bbb-scam-stopper. [Source: BBB Scam Alert Aug 29, 2014 ++]


*********************************
Tax Burden for North Carolina Retirees As of Sep 2014
Many people planning to retire use the presence or absence of a state income tax as a litmus test for a retirement destination. This is a serious miscalculation since higher sales and property taxes can more than offset the lack of a state income tax. The lack of a state income tax doesn’t necessarily ensure a low total tax burden. States raise revenue in many ways including sales taxes, excise taxes, license taxes, income taxes, intangible taxes, property taxes, estate taxes and inheritance taxes. Depending on where you live, you may end up paying all of them or just a few. Following are the taxes you can expect to pay if you retire in North Carolina. Note - This state has a statutory provision for automatic adjustment of tax brackets, personal exemptions or standard deductions to the rate of inflation.
Sales Taxes

State Sales Tax: 4.750% Prescription drugs, medical equipment exempt, food subject to 2% county tax.  Counties may add an additional 2% to 3% tax.
Gasoline Tax: 56.2 cents/gallon (Includes all taxes)
Diesel Fuel Tax: 62.2 cents/gallon (Includes all taxes)
Cigarette Tax: 45 cents/pack of 20
Personal Income Taxes

Tax Rate Range: - 1%; High – 6.9%
Income Brackets: Seven. Lowest – $2,600; Tax Rate Range: Low – 6.0%; High – 7.75%
Income Brackets: Lowest – $12,750; Highest – $60,000. The tax brackets reported are for single individuals. For married taxpayers, the same rates apply to income brackets ranging from $21,250 to $200,000. An additional middle income tax credit is allowed.
Number of Brackets: Three. The tax brackets reported are for single individuals.  For married taxpayers the same rates apply to income brackets ranging from $21,250 to $100,000.  Lower exemption amounts allowed for high-income taxpayers. For tax year 2012 the starting point for calculating a taxpayer’s taxable income is the taxpayer’s federal adjusted gross income (AGI).  The previous starting point was the taxpayer’s federal; taxable income.
Personal Exemptions:  Single – $1,200; Married – $2,500; Dependents – $0. Refer to

http://www.dornc.com/taxes/individual/exemption.html for more information. Taxpayers who claim standard deduction or itemize deductions on federal return must make adjustments.


Standard Deduction: Single – $3,000; Married filing jointly – $6,000. If you or your spouse are 65 or older you may claim an additional deduction  (See state tax instruction booklet at http://www.nd.gov/tax/indincome/forms/2012/taxtables.pdf?20140921234446 ).
Medical/Dental Deduction: Federal amount.  Income tax credit for premiums paid on long-term care insurance that covers the individual, a spouse or dependent.  Credit is equal to 15% of premium cost but may not exceed $350.
Federal Income Tax Deduction: None
Retirement Income Taxes: Social Security is exempt.  At least $4,000 in exclusions for federal, state and local pensions (depending on dates and length of service); up to $2,000 also qualify for the $4,000 exemption.  State retirees with at least 5 years of creditable service as of August 12, 1989, will be permanently exempt from state income tax on their retired exemption for qualified private pensions, including IRAs.  Out-of-state government pensions /retainer pay.  Be sure to investigate the Bailey Decision http://www.dornc.com/taxes/individual/benefits.html. Taxable income also includes income derived from gaming in North Carolina.  For more details on retirement income deductions, refer to http://www.dornc.com/taxes/individual/retirement.html and on the tax form page 13 at http://www.dornc.com/downloads/D401.pdf .
Retired Military Pay: If an individual had five years of creditable service as of August 12, 1989, all military retired pay is exempt from taxes.  Otherwise, a deduction of up to $4,000 is allowed for military pay or survivor’s benefits.
Military Disability Retired Pay: Retirees who entered the military before Sept. 24, 1975, and members receiving disability retirements based on combat injuries or who could receive disability payments from the VA are covered by laws giving disability broad exemption from federal income tax. Most military retired pay based on service-related disabilities also is free from federal income tax, but there is no guarantee of total protection.
VA Disability Dependency and Indemnity Compensation: VA benefits are not taxable because they generally are for disabilities and are not subject to federal or state taxes.
Military SBP/SSBP/RCSBP/RSFPP: Generally subject to state taxes for those states with income tax. Check with state department of revenue office.

also has a circuit breaker property tax deferment program.  Under this program, taxes for each year are limited to a percentage of the qualifying owner’s income.  The qualifying owner must either be at least 65 years of age or be totally and permanently disabled.  For an owner whose income amount for the previous years does not exceed the income eligibility limit for the current year, which for tax year 2012 is $27,100, the owner’s taxes will be limited to 4% of the owner’s income.  For an owner whose income exceeds the income eligibility limit, which for tax year 2010 is $40,650, the owner’s taxes will be limited to 5% of the owner’s income.


Property Taxes

All property, real and personal, is subject to taxation and is assessed based on 100% of appraised value.  Taxes are collected by cities and counties. For tax rates refer to http://www.dornc.com/publications/effective_rates.html.


All property (real or personal) is subject to state and local taxes.  The assessed valuation of real property is based on 100% of its fair market value, then reduced by a phase-in factor and taxed as a percentage thereof.  The state established the tax rate to determine the assessed valuation while local taxing units establish the mill levies to determine the property tax.  Personal property is also taxed, the most common being motor vehicles.  All residential properties receive a 34% exemption but residents must file for the exemption. Residential property of certain disabled veterans, and the spouses of deceased veterans, is exempt from property taxation.  Montana property owners can have their property taxes reduced if they meet certain qualifications.  Any homeowner or renter age 62 or over can apply for a credit if they have lived in Montana for 9 months, occupied a residence for 6 months, and had a gross household income of less than $45,000. For a better understanding of property taxes, refer to http://ravalli.us/196/Property-Tax. Refer to.http://revenue.mt.gov/home/property/propertytax-relief.aspx more information on property tax relief programs,
Inheritance and Estate Taxes

On June 27, 2011, a bill was signed into law by North Carolina governor Beverly Perdue.  This law clarifies that the North Carolina estate tax does not apply to the estates of decedents who died in 2010 but will apply to the estates of decedents dying on or after January 1, 2011 with a $5,000,000 exemption, which is indexed for inflation in 2012 so that the 2012 exemption is $5,120,000.


For further information, visit the North Carolina Department of Revenue site www.dor.state.nc.us. [Source: http://www.retirementliving.com/taxes-new-york-wyoming#NORTHCAROLINA Sep 2014 ++]
*********************************
Tax Fraud IRS Still Struggles With Identify Theft
Tax fraud committed by identity thieves cost the government $5.2 billion in 2013, according to a Government Accountability Office report released on the heels of a hard-hitting “60 Minutes” segment on the problem. The 60 minute segment is available for viewing at http://www.cbsnews.com/news/irs-scam-identity-tax-refund-fraud-60-minutes. Though the CBS feature was harsher in tone, the auditors’ report—the first in a coming series—gave the Internal Revenue Service credit for preventing $24 billion in unmerited tax refunds. But GAO said the tax agency’s estimate of $5.2 billion in tax fraud by identity thieves is incomplete because it is “based on duplicate returns, information return mismatches, and criminal investigations identified after the refunds are paid. However, for cases where there are no duplicate returns, information returns, or criminal investigations associated with a tax return, IRS has been unable to estimate the amount of [identity theft] refund fraud.”
http://cdn.govexec.com/media/img/upload/2014/09/22/092214irs/medium.jpg
Criminals, as dramatized on “60 Minutes” by U.S. attorneys, buy or steal hundreds of Social Security numbers and then file for multiple tax refunds on electronic devices in the name of another individual—before the actual taxpayer has filed. As many as 40 percent of the refund applications are approved by the IRS, one reformed perpetrator said. If one of those fraudulent applications happens to contain your social security number and you file for your refund after the fraudulent return is processed you will not get your refund on time. You will eventually get it after an extensive delay during which an IRS investigation is conducted involving massive paperwork from you. The problem, GAO explained, stems from procedures under which the IRS conducts only selected reviews of refund applications, issuing many refunds quickly rather than waiting for all compliance checks. “While there are no simple solutions, one option is earlier matching of employer-reported wage information to taxpayers' returns before issuing refunds," GAO wrote. “IRS currently cannot do such matching because employers' wage data (from Form W-2s) are not available until months after IRS issues most refunds.”
Possible solutions involve accelerating employers’ deadlines for submitting W-2 wage summaries to the IRS, moving tax filing season up and allowing more employers to file W-2 forms electronically to better allow cross-checking of income claims with third parties. The tax agency, however, has “not fully assessed the impacts” of accelerating deadlines, auditors said. “Without this assessment, Congress does not have the information needed to deliberate the merits of such a significant change to W-2 deadlines or the use of pre-refund W-2 matching,” GAO wrote. “Such an assessment is consistent with IRS' strategic plan that calls for analytics-based decisions, and would help IRS ensure effective use of resources.” Allowing ever-smaller employers (those filing as few as five to 10 W-2 forms, as opposed to the current threshold of 250 and up) to file W-2’s electronically would save money, according to the Social Security Administration. GAO recommended that Congress consider providing Treasury with authority to lower the annual threshold for electronic filing of W-2s, and that IRS provide a cost estimate on shifting W-2 deadlines. IRS neither agreed nor disagreed with GAO's recommendations.
Internal Revenue Commissioner John Koskinen told Steve Kroft on “60 Minutes” that he hadn’t heard of the identity theft problem before signing on to lead the agency. “What happened was a lot of people discovered that Social Security numbers are either easy to steal or find or buy and then you can file a false return,” he said. The reason few anticipated the problem, he said, “goes back to the fact that people didn't anticipate Social Security numbers were going be so readily available. The assumption, until fairly recently, was [that Social Security numbers were] a part of your identity that you protected and took great care of so that no one actually expected they would be this easy to get ahold of.” [Source: GovExec.com | Charles S. Clark | Sept. 22, 2014 ++]
******************************
Thrift Savings Plan 2014 Share Prices + YTD Gain or Loss
TSP Share Prices for Sept. 26, 2014
Close YTD

G Fund

$14.5331

+1.72%

F Fund

$16.4680

+4.61%

C Fund

$26.0177

+8.97%

S Fund

$34.4888

+2.43%

I Fund

$25.4289

-0.53%

L 2050

$14.7056

+4.57%

L 2040

$25.9285

+4.41%

L 2030

$24.4307

+4.14%

L 2020

$22.6040

+3.71%

L Income

$17.2733

+2.72%



thrift savings plan returns
[Source: www.myfederalretirement.com/public/237.cfm & http://tspcenter.com/tspReturns.php?view=year

* General Interest *

http://ts4.mm.bing.net/th?id=h.4782760691108435&pid=15.1

Notes of Interest 16 thru 30 Sep 2014

  • COLA. The Consumer Price Index dipped 0.2 percent in August, falling to 234.030. It now stands 1.6 percent above the FY2014 COLA baseline of 230.327. The July, August, and September CPIs will be used to calculate the 2015 COLA. Predictions on the 2015 COLA are it will fall somewhere between 1.6 and 1.8 percent. The new COLA will be announced 22 OCT.

  • USS Saratoga. The decommissioned aircraft carrier arrived 12 SEP at its final destination in South Texas, where it will be scrapped at a cost of one penny to the U.S. Navy.

  • Garnishment. According to a new ADP report, 7.2 percent of U.S. workers had wages garnished in 2013 to pay off child support and other debt, including credit cards, medical bills and student loans.

  • Toothpaste. Dental hygienists say that all you really need is a pea-sized dab. So why do commercials show a toothbrush completely covered with dentifrice? Because the faster you use it up, the quicker you have to buy more.

  • USAF Enlistment Oath. The Air Force has withdrawn a requirement that all airmen who take the oath of enlistment and officer appointment conclude with “so help me God,” the service announced 17 SEP 2014.

  • Vets Jobs. The U.S. will train at least 50,000 veterans to become solar panel installers in the next six years, the White House said 18 JAN.

  • WWII Japan. Check out the 94 min “Japan's War in Colour”, a 2004 documentary on Japan’s eight year holy war, at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJLE2pnN9WY.

  • US-RP Defense Pact. A new defense pact between the U.S. and the Philippines faces years in limbo due to legal challenges, frustrating plans to strengthen bilateral ties by dispatching American troops to the Southeast Asian country.

  • VA. Rebecca Wiley, the former director of the Charlie Norwood VAMC, was paid more than $75,000 when she retired last October, one week after Congress began investigating her administration for its role in nine preventable patient deaths in Augusta and Columbia.

  • Golf. Check out https://www.youtube.com/embed/QFEYC4Z44v0?feature=player_detailpage to see what's happening to golf in today’s world.

  • State Tax. To see where your state ranks in the in Wallet Hub’s 2014′s Most & Least Fair State Tax Systems go to http://wallethub.com/edu/most-least-fair-tax-systems/6598.

  • ISIS. The United States is spending between $7 million and $10 million each day in the battle against ISIS, and the Pentagon said 26 SEP it needs more money from Congress.

  • VA Firing. The DVA proposed firing the director of its medical center in Dublin, Georgia, on 25 SEP, the same day the official began his retirement. In August that Goldman approved the "batch" closing more than 1,500 veteran appointments with non-VA healthcare providers in order to meet organizational goals.

********************************


Vet Toxic Exposure~Lejeune Update 47 ► Financial Relief Coming
The Department of Veterans Affairs on 23 SEP announced it will soon start to cover out-of-pocket health care costs for Marine dependents who contracted cancer and other illnesses from toxic water at Camp Lejeune, as promised two years ago by law. In 2012, Congress passed the landmark Honoring America’s Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act. It provided health care for Marines and family members who had lived on the base near Jacksonville, N.C., from 1957-1987 and who suffered from any of 15 illnesses named in the law. These included cancer related to the lungs, bladder, breasts, kidneys and esophagus, as well leukemia and problems involving female infertility. An estimated 750,000 people were exposed to drinking water at the base that was polluted with chemicals that included industrial solvents and benzene from fuels. The chemicals resulted from spills, a dump site on base, leaking underground storage tanks on base and an off-base dry cleaner.
Under the 2012 law, the VA immediately offered full care for veterans who had been stationed at Camp Lejeune, but it told their dependents who suffered from covered illnesses that they would have to wait to be reimbursed. The announcement of final rules on Tuesday meant that the VA later this year will start to reimburse family members under the 2012 law for costs since March 26, 2013, that were not covered by insurance. The date is when Congress appropriated funding. The rules first must be published in the Federal Register, to be followed by a 30-day waiting period before people can file claims. The VA also planned to release a document about health care services to veterans who were on active duty at the base for at least 30 days in the three-decade period.
Retired Marine Jerry Ensminger, whose 9-year-old daughter, Janey, died of leukemia in 1985, and Mike Partain, who was born at the base and suffered from male breast cancer, led a long fight to get the law passed. Both said Tuesday that they were dismayed it took two years to put it into effect. “As far as I’m concerned, so many people have already died. They just keep dragging this thing out,” Ensminger said. Partain said “institutional apathy and incompetence” were the reasons it took two years to write and approve the regulations for how the law would be administered. The VA wrote the regulations, and then the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, part of the White House Office of Management and Budget, had to approve them. The office’s website said approval was made on 9 SEP. The White House referred questions to the VA, and the VA didn’t respond to a question about the length of time required for the implementation of the law.
Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), who proposed the legislation and fought for it to become law and for its promises to be fulfilled, said in a statement that the final regulation “has been a long time coming.” “Unfortunately, many who were exposed to the contaminated water have already died as a result of their exposures and will not be able to receive the help this law provides,” Burr said. “I fully expect VA will now move swiftly to implement all the regulations and extend a helping hand to the victims of this tragic episode in our nation’s history.” Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., who joined Burr in pushing for the legislation when she became a senator in 2009, said her office had been urging the VA to finalize the regulations since Congress passed the bill. “I am relieved that action has finally occurred today,” Hagan said. “Our veterans and their families exposed to toxic water contamination have waited too long for answers, and I am pleased they will now begin to receive the critical health care benefits they deserve.”
For veterans, any reimbursement of co-payments would go back to Aug. 6, 2012, when the law was signed. The law does not provide veterans with disability compensation. Veterans and family members can apply for the Camp Lejeune benefits by enrolling with the VA online or at a local VA health facility. The VA said they would have to prove they lived or worked at the base during the prescribed period. Burr and Hagan have proposed legislation that would expand the eligibility dates for veterans and families to 1953. A study by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry in 2013 estimated that the water was contaminated with carcinogens as early as that date, four years earlier than previously thought. [Source: McClatchy Washington Bureau | Renee Schoof | Sept. 23, 2014 ++]
********************************
Presidential Salute ► Obama’s Latte Salute | Cut Some Slack
On his way to participate in a United Nations talk on Climate Change, and coming from his national address on airstrikes in Syria, President Barack Obama stepped off Marine One and proceeded to salute Marines with a coffee cup in his hand. White House aides later posted that video to Instagram, and that’s when things went downhill. The White House press department didn’t immediately respond to queries about the salute. ABC published a story dubbing it the “Latte Salute.” Washington Times ran a headline that incorporated the words “Semper Latte.” Finally, a Daily Caller story cited the manual for Marine officer candidates stating the salute is “the most important of all military courtesies.” Of course the comment sections in each of these posts featured more than a few disgruntled folks. Twitter also hosted a horde of trolls.
http://blogs.militarytimes.com/battle-rattle/files/2014/09/lattesalute.jpg http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/10/31/opinion/01obama_ready/articleinline.jpg
President Obama on his recent trip to the United Nations for a climate control meeting and at the Dover Air Force Base transfer of Afghanistan KIA’s in Delaware, Oct. 29, 2009.

Obama isn’t the only president who’s had a salute snafu (or two). Then-President George W. Bush was somewhat infamously captured awkwardly saluting while holding his dog. The presidential salute, while not required, has become somewhat of a protocol since the Reagan years. Carey Winfrey, the retired editor of Smithsonian Magazine and a former Marine, wrote an outstanding article for the New York Times about the presidential salute (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/01/opinion/01winfrey.html?_r=1&) . In it, he asserts, “when it comes to salutes (and one or two other matters), presidents deserved to be cut some slack.” [Source: MarineCorpsTimes | Battle Rattle | Sept. 23, 2014 ++]



http://www.snopes.com/politics/graphics/obamaheli2.jpg http://www.snopes.com/politics/graphics/obamaheli.jpg
Bush Scottish terrier Salute Obama Cellphone Salute
********************************
Unconditional Surrender Statue Update 01: On 1-Year Loan to France
A sculpture honoring a photograph of a kiss in Times Square that captured New York’s celebration as World War II ended has gone up in Normandy for a one-year visit. Cranes and construction crews in the French city of Caen on Tuesday hoisted and locked together pieces of “Unconditional Surrender,” an 8-meter (25-foot) cast-bronze sculpture in color of a sailor and a nurse in a lip-locked embrace. The sculpture by Seward Johnson is based on a Navy photographer’s black-and-white snapshot taken Aug. 15, 1945, according to the Sculpture Foundation, a U.S.-based nonprofit that owns the work. It also resembles a famous photo taken by Life magazine’s Alfred Eisenstaedt on that day. The sculpture is to spend a year outside the Caen Memorial, a museum focusing on World War II.
workers hoist and lock together pieces of \'unconditional surrender,\' an 8-meter (25-foot) cast-bronze sculpture in color of a sailor and a nurse in lip-locked embrace, outside the caen memorial on sept. 23 in normandy, france.

Workers hoist and lock together pieces of 'Unconditional Surrender,' an 8-meter (25-foot) cast-bronze sculpture in color of a sailor and a nurse in lip-locked embrace, outside the Caen Memorial
[Source: Associated Press article Sept. 23, 2014 ++]
********************************

Lighthouses Coast Guard Selling Them Off

The Coast Guard has lots of lighthouses it is looking to unload. Technological advances and a desire to purge unneeded properties have paved the way for the federal government to get rid of more than 100 lighthouses over the past 14 years, and it intends to keep selling and giving them away. The sold lighthouses, located on both coasts and in the Great Lakes states, have become everything from museums to bed-and-breakfasts. Sixty-eight of the lighthouses have gone for free to preservationists, while 36 others sold at public auction, thanks to the National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act of 2000, which allows the government to dispose of federally owned lighthouses. The Coast Guard, which maintains lighthouses, has 71 other lighthouses queued up to go through the transfer process. All told, the Coast Guard owns 254 lighthouses, officials said. The question is more about which ones it will keep than which ones it will eventually sell, said Jeff Gales, executive director of the non-profit U.S. Lighthouse Society.



http://navytimes.va.newsmemory.com/newsmemvol2/virginia/navytimes/20140922/ggmtab_nav_09-22-2014_b_a_024.pdf.0/img/image_3.jpg as of friday afternoon, round island passage lighthouse had garnered a top bid of $21,500 on the gsa website. peck ledge light
(1) (2) (3)

Boon Island Light Station (1), New England’s tallest lighthouse at 133 feet, is about six miles off the coast of York, Maine. It was auctioned off in August for $78,000. As of 5 SEP, Round Island Passage Lighthouse (2) had garnered a top bid of $21,500 on the GSA website. Peck Ledge Light (3) has no bidders.

“There is an end in sight,” Gales said. “There’s a limited number of lighthouses.” The federal General Services Administration, which actually sells the lighthouses, does not have a target number of how many lighthouses it would like to sell and give away, but the Coast Guard is always looking to shed excess lighthouses that “are often no longer critical” to the guard’s work, said Patrick Sclafani, a spokesman for the agency. Buyers and preservationists typically allow the Coast Guard access to the lighthouses so it can maintain the lights, all of which are automated. Some of the lighthouses — typically those that are easily accessed on land — are transferred swiftly to historic preservation groups, while others that are off-shore or in need of heavy maintenance languish on the auction block with no interested bidders. Still others attract the eye of private investors, such as Boston’s Waller. Officials say the GSA’s Boston office is responsible for about 80 percent of lighthouse conveyances and those transfers have netted $3.35 million for the Coast Guard.

The government also is auctioning lighthouses in Massachusetts, Michigan and Wisconsin. [Source: The Associated Press Sept. 4, 2014 ++]

********************************



Obesity Mission Readiness Retreat Is Not an Option Report

Obesity among active duty forces up 61 percent in less than 10 years. Armed with a new report documenting the staggering impact of obesity on America’s military, more than 450 retired admirals and generals urged Congress last week to not backtrack on or delay updated nutrition standards for foods and beverages served and sold in schools. The healthier meals standards—put in place following the enactment of the bipartisan Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010—have been implemented successfully by more than 90 percent of school districts nationwide, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The report, “RETREAT IS NOT AN OPTION,” was released by Mission: Readiness, a nonpartisan national security organization calling for smart investments in America’s children. It includes new and previously unreported state-by-state data from the Department of Defense showing the number of young adults who are likely to be ineligible to join the military. More than 70 percent are ineligible in many states.

The report also notes obesity has become the leading medical reason why more than 70 percent of young adults nationwide cannot qualify for military service, and spotlights its negative impact on active duty personnel as well. Key statistics include:


  • Obesity rates among active duty personnel rose 61 percent between 2002 and 2011.

  • Twelve percent of active duty service members are obese.

  • The military spends more than $1.5 billion annually treating obesity-related health conditions and replacing those discharged because they are unfit.

  • More than 1 in 4 young adults ages 17 to 24 are too heavy to serve in the military.

  • One study of more than 2,000 men in a U.S. Army light-infantry brigade in Afghanistan found 14 percent were obese. The overweight and slower runners in the brigade were 1.5 times more likely to be injured than their healthier and fitter counterparts.

Mission Readiness has been a leading voice in the effort to improve school nutrition. In 2010, its members released “Too Fat to Fight,” the landmark report that revealed the number of young Americans too heavy to join the military and called for passage of what became the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act. A 2010 follow-up report, “Still Too Fat to Fight,” was released with General Richard Myers, United States Air Force (Ret.), a former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. In June 2014, General Richard Hawley, United States Air Force (Ret.) testified before the Senate Agriculture Committee on the connection between child nutrition programs and our national security.

With “RETREAT IS NOT AN OPTION,” the organization continues its fight to protect the updated school nutrition standards for students, many of whom consume as much as 50 percent of their daily calories at school. The report also describes significant measures the military is taking to address the rising rates of obesity within its own ranks. “We need to protect kids’ health from day one, and we have to do this now!” said Rear Admiral Casey W. Coane, U.S. Navy (Retired). “The military is doing everything in our power to address obesity among our service members—from nutrition programs that go back to square one to teach people how to eat healthily, to specially-fitted shoes for every Navy recruit in basic training and specially built running tracks to reduce injuries.” “Taxpayers foot the bill for both school nutrition and the military, so it makes no sense to subsidize meals filled with salt, sugar and fat while children are growing up and then pay so much more to treat the resulting health problems for those who serve our nation,” Admiral Coane added. “How can we expect young people to serve and protect their country—in whatever profession they choose—if we don’t first serve and protect them at school?”

The “RETREAT IS NOT AN OPTION” report comes on the heels of recent polling and research showing significant national support for healthier meals:


  • A poll released last week by the Pew Charitable Trusts, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and American Heart Association found that 72 percent of parents nationwide favor updated nutrition standards for school meals and school snacks, while 91 percent favor requiring schools to serve fruits or vegetables with every meal.

  • The first national studies examining students’ reactions to the healthier meals, released in July by Bridging the Gap, found widespread student acceptance across all grade levels, according to school administrators.

  • A Harvard University study found that plate waste (food thrown away) decreased when the updated nutrition standards were implemented in a large school district. The study also found that, post-implementation, children’s fruit selection increased by 23 percent and vegetable consumption rose by 16 percent.

Recent efforts to weaken or delay implementation of the standards fostered a blunt response from the retired military leaders. “Look, plenty of students don’t like algebra. Does that mean we stop teaching math? Of course not,” said Major General D. Allen Youngman, U.S. Army (Retired). “Change can be hard, but if we want kids to grow up fit and healthy, it’s just plain common sense to serve nutritious meals in schools.”

“Congress showed bipartisan leadership when it voted overwhelmingly to improve school nutrition in 2010,” said Major General Don C. Morrow, U.S. Army (Retired). “Nearly four years later, we know that this great success story is transforming our nation’s schools. That’s why we have a simple message for Congress: when we are this close to victory, retreat is not an option.” [Source: From Washington: News for the Enlisted Sept. 22, 2014 ++]

********************************
Guantanamo Bay Navy Base Extension of the U.S.? | Yes & No
U.S. troops blare The Star Spangled Banner across this 45-square-mile base each morning at 8 o’clock sharp. Fireworks crackle overhead on the Fourth of July. Marines control the fence line opposite Cuba’s minefield and American sailors check visitors’ passports or Pentagon ID cards as they arrive by plane. So why then did U.S. officials recently advise some Chinese journalists who report from Washington that, by traveling to Guantánamo as guests of the Pentagon, they would see their visas to visit and work in the United States expire? The answer is that, while the U.S. Navy base functions like an extension of the United States, sometimes it is and sometimes it isn’t — mostly to the benefit of those in government. Consider this: Defense Department contractors who work and live here and don’t set foot onto U.S. soil for more than 30 days a year get a tax break, like any American living and working abroad. Army guards at the prison don’t get the tax exclusion, but they do get bonuses of $425 a month in allowances, imminent danger and hardship duty pay — plus $250 a month if they leave family behind.
http://media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2014/09/09/11/34/layjn.st.56.jpeg

A U.S. Marines Humvee patrols the fence line that divides the U.S. Navy base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba

Those dollars buy time scuba diving, Pizza Hut delivery and drinks in the base bars, all Navy-run enterprises, as are the free rides home to avoid the base’s drunk-driving checkpoints. Navy base and prison guests are put up in two-story townhouses that ooze American — patios for barbecues, a downstairs powder room for guests, private laundry rooms. But over at “Camp Justice” — the place where the Pentagon is putting on the death-penalty trials — visitors are put up in a crude tent city evocative of Bagram airbase in Afghanistan circa 2001. It all creates a certain dissonance, says retired Army Lt. Col. Chris Jenks, who observed some Sept. 11 pretrial hearings recently, his first foray back to “the battlefield” since leaving service and becoming a law professor at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. At one moment, the West Point grad said, you can see families at McDonald’s or the bowling alley or take a sunset sail on the bay. But the war court compound where he was put up was so reminiscent of his last forward operating base in Iraq that one morning he groggily reached for his M16 in the latrine tent, and briefly panicked because it wasn’t there. Guantánamo, he says, is made up of “puzzle pieces from three or four sets” that don’t fit together.


Jenks is a former infantryman turned lawyer in the Judge Advocate General (JAG) corps who handled detainee abuse and friendly fire cases — and looks to precedent and the law to try to parse the question. “If you look at the lease, it’s America as long as we want it to be America,” he says. “I’m not sure how that functionally is any different than Puerto Rico.” In 1965, he said, the U.S. declared the base a special maritime jurisdiction and brought a Cuban to federal court in Miami for the machete killing of another non-U.S. citizen on base. For that crime, Guantánamo was subject to the prosecutorial jurisdiction of the United States. Since the Bush administration chose to imprison war-on-terror captives seized across the globe, it has sought to make sure the opposite applies. That’s why moments before boarding a U.S. military charter to Guantánamo at Andrews Air Force Base — the place where the Pentagon parks the president’s plane, Air Force One — an airman warned two Chinese journalists that going to Guantánamo would amount to entering a foreign country, and their single-entry work visas would be invalid on their return. They were invited by the Office of the U.S. Secretary of Defense to report on some war crimes hearings and were scheduled back a week later, on a nonstop flight. They didn’t go.
Had they gone, they could’ve purchased a souvenir plastic cup at the base commissary for $6.99 — duty free by federal code covering “articles of foreign origin” at GTMO, the military’s shorthand for the base. A study in schizophrenia, the souvenir is stamped GTMO, USA, Cuba. It is for this base of about 6,000 residents that the U.S. military is building a $40 million undersea fiberoptic link to Florida so data can reach the Pentagon as swiftly as any office on U.S. soil. And while there has been a continuous American presence at Guantánamo Bay since U.S. forces took it in a Spanish-American war battle in 1898, it’s technically leased territory. From Cuba, whose landlord, Fidel Castro, told the tenants to go home long ago. The U.S. government says it’s a tenant barricaded behind a Cuban minefield and, as though to prove it, cuts a check each year for $4,085 — rent, based on a 1934 treaty made public by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. It’s a one-way transaction. The Cuban government does not cash the checks.
http://media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2014/09/09/11/34/joehu.st.56.jpeg http://media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2014/09/09/11/52/o7i8c.st.56.jpeg http://media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2014/09/09/11/40/dbolg.st.56.jpeg
Babies born to Americans at the base hospital are automatically citizens. A diplomat from the U.S. Embassy in Kingston, Jamaica, the closest to the base, periodically visits to process paperwork for Guantánamo’s American babies, says Kelly Wirfel, the Navy base public affairs officer. But that’s not a privilege passed along to Filipino or Jamaican guest laborers who work as waitresses at the Irish Pub or clean the officers’ guest quarters. Were one to get pregnant at Guantánamo, she’d probably get a ticket home to avoid the issue of her baby’s citizenship. Which is why nobody was willing to speculate on that baby’s theoretical nationality. Would that baby be Cuban? Guantánamite? Stateless? Guantánamo is not like Puerto Rico, says the State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs. It’s more like a U.S. embassy (with school, golf course, church and prison), and babies born to non-citizens at embassies aren’t entitled to citizenship, either. And that pretty much reflects the pick-and-choose approach that’s become all the more pronounced as the war court hears pretrial motions in six death-penalty cases.
Defense attorneys are asking the military judges to decide which portions of the U.S. Constitution apply at the court that George Bush built and Barack Obama froze, then reformed to exclude some, but not all, self-incriminating statements made in the years before the men got lawyers.


  • Habeas corpus? Yes, because the U.S. Supreme Court said so in the landmark 2008 Boumediene v. Bush decision. “In every practical sense Guantánamo is not abroad,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority. “It is within the constant jurisdiction of the United States.”

  • Ex post facto? At least sometimes because a federal appeals court decided recently that Osama bin Laden’s 9/11-era “media secretary” couldn’t be convicted in 2008 of providing material support for terror in 2001 because Congress created it as a war crime in 2006. Separately, a military court of appeals panel in the same case has ruled out his First Amendment free speech right to produce an al-Qaida recruiting video — one of his crimes.

  • Confrontation? That’s still playing out at the war court, where defense lawyers are arguing to exclude the hearsay evidence of a man who was interrogated by the FBI in Yemeni custody in 2001, then killed by a missile launched from a U.S. drone 11 years later.

“I always feel silly doing this,” said Cheryl Bormann, defense attorney for a Yemeni man accused in the 9/11 plot, as she filled out a U.S. Customs form aboard a Miami Air charter hired by the Pentagon to shuttle lawyers from a war court hearing. She had left Andrews Air Force Base two weeks earlier on a nonstop Pentagon flight to the U.S. Navy base, never left U.S.-controlled territory, and was now returning to Andrews. “The reason that we’re filling out those stupid forms is they want to pretend this isn’t the United States,” she said later. “As though those forms are going to help an argument down the line that Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, is a foreign country; and somehow their establishment of this commission in a foreign country can avoid U.S. law. And I think they’re wrong on all counts.”


She calls it pick-and-choose patriotism. “It’s America when the environmental protection laws prohibit us from killing an iguana or committing drunken driving,” she said. “But it’s not America when they can get away with paying less than minimum wage” to the Jamaicans or Filipinos who clean the officers’ Guest Quarters. “It’s not America when they want to violate American law regarding torture. And it’s not America when they avoid applying the Geneva Conventions.” So what did she write as the country she visited prior to her return to Andrews Air Force Base? Guantánamo Bay Naval Air Station. Bormann wrote not the name of the entire base, where a secret prison has jailed her client since 2006. She wrote in the airport — a single airstrip on the edge of the sea a ferry ride away from the main portion of the base. [Source: Miami Herald | Carol Rosenberg | Sept. 13, 2014 ++]
********************************
Photos That Say it AllNo Swimming
http://www.dumpaday.com/?attachment_id=86237
*******************************
Normandy Then & Now Utah Beach at Les Dunes de Varreville

june 6, 1944: us army troops make a battle plan in a farmyard amid cattle, killed by artillery bursts, near the d-day landing zone of utah beach in les dunes de varreville, france farmer raymond bertot, who was 19 when allied troops came ashore in 1944, poses on his property near the former d-day landing zone of utah beach in les dunes de varreville, france

June 6, 1944: US Army troops make a battle plan in a farmyard amid cattle, killed by artillery bursts, near the D-Day landing zone of Utah Beach in Les Dunes de Varreville, France. Here farmer Raymond Bertot, who was 19 when allied troops came ashore in 1944, poses on the property which he owned
*********************************
WWII Ads Buick
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_8sawkbxmh2s/s1smn8oczbi/aaaaaaaafqg/rp38iutrjwy/s1600/hellcat+one+two+punch.jpg
*******************************
Baby Powder Ways You Can Use
A bottle of baby powder only costs a buck at the dollar store, which makes it a great budget-friendly investment for tucking under your sink. You’ll be amazed with all the helpful ways you can use this fresh-smelling powder around your home.


  • Pet cleaner. Get your pet clean using baby powder as a dry shampoo, which will leave him smelling nice and fresh without having to toss him in the tub.

  • Cool sheets. On hot summer nights, sprinkle baby powder over the sheets to keep them nice and cool. And the powder will absorb any sweat, making for a refreshing night’s sleep.

  • Absorb grease. The next time you dribble some grease on your favorite shirt or edge of the carpet, sprinkle with baby powder. It absorbs the oil and refreshes the fabric.

  • Refresh books. Give old books new life by sprinkling them with baby powder. It absorbs the moisture, getting rid of any mold, and leaves books fresh.

  • Plump lashes. Dust baby powder over eyelashes before applying mascara for a fuller look.

  • Chafe-free. Give your inner thighs a dusting of baby powder before your next big run to prevent chafing.

  • Smell-buster. When your shoes aren’t smelling their best, fill with baby powder and let set overnight. Dump out and enjoy like-new shoes.

  • No more squeaks. If you’ve got a wood floor that squeaks, sprinkle with baby powder, and then sweep into gaps. No more squeaks!

  • Repel ants. Ants don’t care for the scent of baby powder, so sprinkling a line around doors or windows will keep them from busting into your home. It works the same when having a picnic.

  • Reduce waxing pain. Dust legs with baby powder before waxing. It creates a layer that helps protect against the burn.

  • Face fix. Instead of paying for expensive finishing powder, dust a touch of baby powder over your face to set makeup.

  • Stay fresh. Use baby powder instead of deodorant. It absorbs sweat while whisking away any lingering scent.

  • Kitty litter help. Sprinkle baby powder over your kitty’s litter for a quick refresh.

  • Hair help. When in a bind, use equal parts baby powder and baking powder as a DIY dry shampoo. Your hair will thank you!

  • Smell good. If you’re not a fan of how baby powder smells, mix it with a few drops of your favorite essential oil, and leave out in small containers to give a lovely scent.

[Source: MoneyTalksNews | Sarah Lipoff | Sept. 16, 2014 ++]
********************************
Have You Heard?Grandpa’s IRS Audit
The IRS decides to audit Grandpa, and summons him to the IRS office. The IRS auditor was not surprised when Grandpa showed up with his attorney.

The auditor said, 'Well, sir, you have an extravagant lifestyle and no full-time employment, Which you explain by saying that you win money gambling. I'm not sure the IRS finds that believable.'

I'm a great gambler, and I can prove it,' says Grandpa. 'How about a demonstration?'

The auditor thinks for a moment and said, 'Okay. Go ahead.'

Grandpa says, 'I'll bet you a thousand dollars that I can bite my own eye.'

The auditor thinks a moment and says, 'It's a bet.'

Grandpa removes his glass eye and bites it. The auditor's jaw drops. Grandpa says, 'Now, I'll bet you two thousand dollars that I can bite my other eye.'

Now the auditor can tell Grandpa isn't blind, so he takes the bet.

Grandpa removes his dentures and bites his good eye.

The stunned auditor now realizes he has wagered and lost three grand with Grandpa's attorney as a witness. He starts to get nervous.

'Want to go double or nothing?' Grandpa asks 'I'll bet you six thousand dollars that I can stand on one side of your desk, and pee into that wastebasket on the other side, and never get a drop anywhere in between.'

The auditor, twice burned, is cautious now, but he looks carefully and decides there's no way this old guy could possibly manage that stunt, so he agrees again.

Grandpa stands beside the desk and unzips his pants, but although he strains mightily, he can't make the stream reach the wastebasket on the other side, so he pretty much urinates all over the auditor's desk.

The auditor leaps with joy, realizing that he has just turned a major loss into a huge win.

But Grandpa's own attorney moans and puts his head in his hands.

'Are you okay?' the auditor asks.

'Not really,' says the attorney. 'This morning, when Grandpa told me he'd been summoned for an audit, he bet me twenty-five thousand dollars that he could come in here and piss all over your desk and that you'd be happy about it!'

I keep telling you! Don't Mess with Old People!


*********************************
  They Grew Up to Be? ► Christina Ricci (Addams Family)
http://images.complex.com/complex/image/upload/t_article_image/ib3w6k1h2fslszod66ku.jpg

 

*********************************


Words You Don't Hear anymore:


Download 479.35 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page