Turkey-Greece relations good: NATO cohesion
Greece-Turkey conflict hurts NATO cohesion Uslu 03 (Nasuh, “The Turkish-American relationship between 1947 and 2003: The History of a Distinctive Alliance”, pg 282)
Turkish-Greek disagreements on the Aegean, the Cyprus question, and the Turkish minority in the Western Thrace did not only cause headaches for Turkish rulers but also concerned the Western powers. The eruption of a serious fight between the two members of NATO might harm the cohesion of the Western alliance and might open the way to further conflicts inside the boundaries of the West. Turkish rulers argued in this matter that if Turkey was left outside the Western integration process, the possibility of solving Turkish-Greek problems might decrease with serious repercussions for the Western security. They also worried that their problems with Greece might hurt their relations with Western powers. Protecting their interests in the Aegean and Cyprus and not alienating their Western allies at the same was a difficult goal, which they needed to reach.
A2: relations with Turkey Key- Middle East/Balkans Greece Solves middle east and Balkans Borowiec 05 [Andrew Borowiec, staff writer for the Washington Times, “Greece expects closer ties with U.S.” 4/5/05, Lexis]
According to the Greek press, the Washington visit established a "warm personal relationship" between Miss Rice and Mr. Molyviatis, prompting hopes for closer future cooperation. Official Greek sources said the government of Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis is prepared to adapt itself "as far as possible" to U.S. foreign policy objectives in the Balkans and in the Middle East. Mr. Molyviatis praised "the American initiative to foster and encourage the expansion of democracy and freedom in the world." In talks with Miss Rice and National Security Adviser Stephen J. Hadley, Mr. Molyviatis apparently also conveyed a message from Greek-Cypriot President Tassos Papadopoulos, who opposes further involvement "by foreigners" in efforts to solve the Cyprus problem. Political contacts between the two Cypriot communities have been suspended since the Greek-Cypriot rejection last year of the latest United Nations' plan to end the division of the east Mediterranean island.
US-Turkey relations Bad- Democracy (Mid East) Turkey Relations Kill Middle East Democratic Modeling
Bagci & Kardas 03
[Hüseyin Bagci and Saban Kardas, Middle East Technical University, “Post-September 11 Impact: The Strategic Importance of Turkey Revisited” 5/12/03, http://www.eusec.org/bagci.htm]
Yet the argument that Turkey could be a role model for Islamic world is also controversial in some aspects. First, Turkish ambitions in this direction are not new and we have enough evidence to judge how they are perceived in other parts of the Islamic world. Turks themselves are proud of being the only secular country in the Islamic world; and from time to time, Turkey is offered as a role model from the outside as well. Yet, it is also equally true that Turkey's perception of itself as a model could not go beyond being an illusion, and those Western ideas promoted by Turkey have hardly penetrated into other Muslim societies. Arab countries' criticism of the secular Turkish model, and other problems dominating Turkish-Arab relations are no secret. In this sense, any fundamental shift in the perceptions of other Muslim societies, which would ease the objections to adapting a Turkish style system, cannot be observed. To the contrary, considering the growing anti-American feelings it is hard to expect that such a role for Turkey would be welcomed. Moreover, American way of dealing with terror through primarily military means or through supporting the existing non-democratic regimes in the Islamic world may hinder the burgeoning reformist movements in those countries and set fallbacks to the natural transformation of those societies, with a result that radicalism in the Islamic world could be given a new impetus. In this sense, Turkey's attempts to carry the Western values into the region might even widen the existing gap between Turkey and other Islamic societies.
Democracy is critical to preventing extinction
Larry Diamond, senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, 95
[“Promoting Democracy in the 1990s”]
This hardly exhausts the lists of threats to our security and well-being in the coming years and decades. In the former Yugoslavia nationalist aggression tears at the stability of Europe and could easily spread. The flow of illegal drugs intensifies through increasingly powerful international crime syndicates that have made common cause with authoritarian regimes and have utterly corrupted the institutions of tenuous, democratic ones. Nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons continue to proliferate. The very source of life on Earth, the global ecosystem, appears increasingly endangered. Most of these new and unconventional threats to security are associated with or aggravated by the weakness or absence of democracy, with its provisions for legality, accountability, popular sovereignty, and openness. LESSONS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY The experience of this century offers important lessons. Countries that govern themselves in a truly democratic fashion do not go to war with one another. They do not aggress against their neighbors to aggrandize themselves or glorify their leaders. Democratic governments do not ethnically "cleanse" their own populations, and they are much less likely to face ethnic insurgency. Democracies do not sponsor terrorism against one another. They do not build weapons of mass destruction to use on or to threaten one another. Democratic countries form more reliable, open, and enduring trading partnerships. In the long run they offer better and more stable climates for investment. They are more environmentally responsible because they must answer to their own citizens, who organize to protest the destruction of their environments. They are better bets to honor international treaties since they value legal obligations and because their openness makes it much more difficult to breach agreements in secret. Precisely because, within their own borders, they respect competition, civil liberties, property rights, and the rule of law, democracies are the only reliable foundation on which a new world order of international security and prosperity can be built.
Share with your friends: |