Request for Project Type


ANNEX A: PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK



Download 0.55 Mb.
Page3/4
Date20.05.2018
Size0.55 Mb.
#49842
TypeRequest
1   2   3   4

ANNEX A: PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK


This project will contribute to achieving the following Country Programme Outcome as defined in CPAP or CPD:

Country Programme Outcome Indicators:

Primary applicable Key Environment and Sustainable Development Key Result Area (same as that on the cover page, circle one): 1. Mainstreaming environment and energy OR

2. Catalyzing environmental finance OR 3. Promote climate change adaptation OR4. Expanding access to environmental and energy services for the poor.



Applicable GEF Strategic Objective and Program: GEF-5 CCM Strategic Program SP2: promote market transformation for energy efficiency in industry and the building sectors

Climate change (energy efficiency)



Applicable GEF Expected Outcomes: Appropriate policy, legal and regulatory frameworks adopted and enforced; Sustainable financing and delivery mechanisms established and operational

Applicable GEF Outcome Indicators: Energy efficiency policy and regulation in place; Investment mobilized; Energy savings achieved




Strategy

Objectively Verifiable Indicators

Source of Verification

Critical Risks

Indicator

Baseline

Target (End-of Project)

Project Objective:

Facilitation of the enhanced production and widespread application of quality solid state lighting (SSL) products in China



  • Annual direct energy savings in China (GWh)

  • Annual direct CO2 emissions reduced in China (kilotons)

  • No. of new jobs available in the ESL industry

  • No. of women employed in new jobs in the ESL industry

•158

•143




  • 0




  • 0

• 937.2

• 850.4


•1000
•200

  • Progress reports on the demonstrations

  • Project monitoring and evaluation reports

  • Project Final Report

  • Survey Report

  • Stable economic growth in China will be sustained

Outcome 1

Enabling of enhanced and strategic SSL technology and market developments based on comprehensively assessed and documented up-to-date status of the SSL industry and market in China

  • Value of quality standards compliant SSL products produced in China (billion RMB)

  • Export value of quality standards compliant SSL products produced in China (billion USD)

• 58.6

• 5.4


•184

•13.8


  • Annual reports on China SSL industry

  • Annual export reports on China SSL products




Outcome2

Facilitation of support and incentives in the local production of quality SSL products, and in the application of SSL products compliant with established quality and energy performance standards.

  • No. of policy recommendations adopted and enforced by relevant government agency departments

  • Percentage of lighting products in the domestic lighting market that are quality standards compliant SSL products

• 3

•50%


• 6

•70%


  • Documents on the recommendations referred in related policy

  • Monitoring reports on SSL product quality

  • Sustained support of Chinese government for SSL industry

Outcome 3

Increased penetration rate of SSL products especially in the residential sector in China

•8.2%


•28%


  • Market research reports on the SSL market




  • Demonstration projects can be completed as scheduled

Outcome 4

Enhanced quality and energy performance of locally produced SSL products both for the domestic and international markets

  • No. of SSL quality and energy efficiency certificates issued by state-certified institutions

  • No. of local SSL manufacturers that are complying to the new EE standard/label for SSL products

•1200

• 0




•1500

•100




  • Records of the issuance of certificates of energy efficiency and quality

  • The government strengthen the supervision of SSL market continuously



ANNEX B: RESPONSES TO PROJECT REVIEWS
Response to GEFSec Comments (12 February 2016)



Comments and Responses

Reference

7. At CEO endorsement: Has co-financing been confirmed?

Comment:

Not at this time. At the PIF stage, all co-financing amounts were in cash or grant. But in the CEO ER, a number of co-financing amounts became in-kind.

Specifically, the UNDP co-financing letter does not show in cash. Please provide another letter.

The National Lighting Test Center (NLTC) co-financing ($380,000) is in cash as shown in the CEO ER but in in-kind as shown in the co-financing letter. Please ask the Center to revise the letter.

For the China Solid State Lighting Alliance (CSA) co-financing ($300,000), the name of the co-financier and the amount of grant in the CEO ER are not consistent with the letter. (The letter shows the following organization: Beijing Solid State Lighting Science and Technology Promotion Center.) Please provide a new letter.
Response:

The project proponents acknowledge the non-clarity and some inadvertent mistakes in the classification of the committed co-financings in their respective co-financing letters. These has now been rectified and the new co-financing letters have been re-issued and included in Annex 2 of the Project Document. Also the explanations to the changes in the names of the co-financers, the classification of co-financing, and in the estimated co-financing amounts in the PIF have been provided in the revised CEO Endorsement Request (CER) Document.



CER Doc: Part I, Secs. A, B & C.

Part II, Sec. A

ProDoc: Annex 2



23. Has the Agency adequately responded to comments from: STAP?

Comment:

Not completed at this time. See the comments from the STAP: GEF. Agency should discuss the issues with STAP to clarify them and possible solutions. Please provide evidence (emails or letters) showing that STAP has reviewed the CEO ER and cleared the issues raised in the PIF stage.
Response:

The responses to the STAP comments on the PIF were shared with the responsible STAP reviewer. He commented that the STAP comments were adequately addressed in the responses provided.


Annex 1


(of this document)

24. Is PIF clearance/approval being recommended?

Comment:

Not at this time. Please address comments in Boxes 17 and 23.
Response:

The remaining comments have already been addressed and relevant changes are now reflected in the revised Project Document and CER Document. Looking forward to the CEO endorsement of this project.








ANNEX 1: Acceptance of Responses to STAP Comments – by STAP Reviewer



Download 0.55 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page