Review of projects and contributions on statistical methods for spatial disaggregation and for integration of various kinds of geographical information and geo-referenced survey data


Small area model for binary and count data



Download 446.1 Kb.
Page8/9
Date18.10.2016
Size446.1 Kb.
#2585
TypeReview
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

4.2.3 Small area model for binary and count data

Let be the value of the outcome of interest, a discrete or a categorical variable, for unit j in area i, and let denote a vector of unit level covariates (including an intercept). Working within a frequentist paradigm, one can follow Jiang and Lahiri (2001) who propose an empirical best predictor (EBP) for a binary response, or Jiang (2003) who extends these results to generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). Nevertheless, use of EBP can be computationally challenging (Molina and Rao, 2010). Despite their attractive properties as far as modelling non-normal outcomes is concerned, fitting GLMMs requires numerical approximations. In particular, the likelihood function defined by a GLMM can involve high-dimensional integrals which can- not be evaluated analytically (see Mc Culloch 1994, 1997; Song et al. 2005). In such cases numerical approximations can be used, as for example in the R function glmer in the package lme4. Alternatively, estimation of the model parameters can be obtained by using an iterative procedure that combines Maximum Penalized Quasi-Likelihood (MPQL) and REML estimation (Saei & Chambers 2003). Furthermore, estimates of GLMM parameters can be very sensitive to outliers or departures from underlying distributional assumptions. Large deviations from the expected response as well as outlying points in the space of the explanatory variables are known to have a large influence on classical maximum likelihood inference based on generalized linear models (GLMs).

For discrete outcomes, model-based small area estimation conventionally employs a GLMM for of the form

\* MERGEFORMAT (..)

where g is a link function. When is binary-valued a popular choice for g is the logistic link function and the individual values in area i are taken to be independent Bernoulli outcomes with

and . When is a count outcome the logarithmic link function is commonly used and the individual values in area i are assumed to be independent Poisson random variables with

and . The q-dimensional vector is generally assumed to be independently distributed between areas according to a normal distribution with mean 0 and covariance matrix This matrix depends on parameters which are referred to as the variance components and in is the vector of fixed effects. If the target of inference is the small area i mean (proportion), and the Poisson or Bernoulli GLMM is assumed, the approximation to the minimum mean squared error predictor of is . Since depends on and , a further stage of approximation is required, where unknown parameters are replaced by suitable estimates. This leads to the Conditional Expectation Predictor (CEP) for the area i mean (proportion) under logarithmic or logistic,

\* MERGEFORMAT (..)

where or , , is the vector of the estimated fixed effects and denotes the vector of the predicted area-specific random effects. We refer to in this case as a ‘random intercepts’ CEP. For more details on this predictor, including estimation of its MSE, see Saei and Chambers (2003), Jiang and Lahiri (2006a) and Gonzalez-Manteiga et al. (2007). Note, however, that is not the proper Empirical Best Predictor by Jiang (2003). The proper EBP does not have closed form and needs to be computed by numerical approximations. For this reason, the CEP version is used in practice as is the case with the small area estimates of Labour Force activity currently produced by ONS in the UK.
4.3 Geostatistical methodsEquation Chapter 4 Section 3

Geostatistics is concerned with the problem of producing a map of a quantity of interest over a particular geographical region based on, usually noisy, measurement taken at a set of locations in the region. The aim of such a map is to describe and analyze the geographical pattern of the phenomenon of interest. Geostatistical methodologies are born and apply in areas such as environmental studies and epidemiology, where the spatial information is traditionally recorded and available. In the last years the diffusion of spatially detailed statistical data is considerably increased and these kind of procedures - possibly with appropriate modifications - can be used as well in other fields of application, for example to study demographic and socio- economic characteristics of a population living in a certain region.

Basically, to obtain a surface estimate one can exploit the exact knowledge of the spatial coordinates (latitude and longitude) of the studied phenomenon by using bivariate smoothing techniques, such as kernel estimate or kriging. Bivariate smoothing deals with the flexible smoothing of point clouds to obtain surface estimates that can be used to produce maps. The geographical application, however, is not the only use of bivariate smoothing as the method can be applied to handle the non-linear relation between any two continuous predictors and a response variable. (Cressie, 1993; Ruppert et al., 2003) Also kriging, a widely used method for interpolating or smoothing spatial data, has a close connection with penalized spline smoothing: the goals of kriging sound very much like nonparametric regression and the understanding of spatial estimates can be enriched through their interpretation as smoothing estimates (Nychka, 2000).

However, usually the spatial information alone does not properly explain the pattern of the response variable and we need to introduce some covariates in a more complex model.


4.3.1 Geoadditive models

Geoadditive models, introduced by Kammann and Wand (2003), answer this problem as they analyze the spatial distribution of the study variable while accounting for possible non-linear covariate effects. These models analyse the spatial distribution of the study variable while accounting for possible covariate effects through a linear mixed model representation. The first half of the model formulation involves a low rank mixed model representation of additive models; then, incorporation of the geographical component is achieved by expressing kriging as a linear mixed model and merging it with the additive model to obtain a single mixed model, the geoadditive model (Kammann and Wand, 2003; on kriging see also part 1 of this report).

The model is specified as

\* MERGEFORMAT (..)

where in the first part of the model , and represents measurements on two predictors s and t and a response variable y for unit i, f and g are smooth, but otherwise unspecified, functions of s and t respectively; the second part of the model is the simple universal kriging model with representing the geographical location, is a stationary zero-mean stochastic process. Since both the first and the second part of model can be specified as a linear mixed model, also the whole model can be formulated as a single linear mixed model that can be fitted using standard mixed model software. Thus, we can say that in a geoadditive model the linear mixed model structure allows to include the area-specific effect as an additional random components. In particular, a geoadditive SAE model has two random effect components: the area-specific effects and the spatial effects (Bocci, 2009). See Kammann and Wand (2003) for more details on geoadditive model specifications. Having a mixed model specification, geoadditive models can be used to obtain small area estimators under a non-parametric approach (Opsomer at al., 2008; see also part 4.2 of this report).

In this respect, Bocci et al. (2012) a two-part geoadditive small area estimation model to estimate the per farm average grapevine production, specified as a semicontinuous skewed variable, at Agrarian Region level using data from the fifth Italian Agricultural Census. More in detail, the response variable, assumed to have a significant spatial pattern, has a semicontinuous structure, which means that the variable has a fraction of values equal to zero and a continuous skewed distribution among the remaining values; thus, the variable can be recorded as

\* MERGEFORMAT (..)

and


. \* MERGEFORMAT (..)

For this variable, Bocci et al. (2012) specify two uncorrelated geoadditive small area models, one for the logit probability of and one for the conditional mean of the logarithm of the response .

Another extension to the work of Kammand and Wand (2003) is the geoadditive model proposed by Cafarelli and Castrignanò (2011), used to analyse the spatial distribution of grain weight, a commonly used indicator of wheat production, taking into account its nonlinear relations with other crop features.
4.3.2 Area-to-point kriging

Under a more general approach of changing of support for spatial data, Kyriakidis (2004) proposed an area-to-point interpolation technique that is a special case of kriging. This technique is a geostatistical framework that can explicitly and consistently account for the support differences between the available areal data and the sought point predictions, yields coherent (i.e. mass-preserving or pycnophylactic) predictions. Under this approach, a variable at point with coordinate vector u is considered a realization of a random variable . The collection of spattially correlated random variables , where A denotes the study region, is termed a random function. consists of two parts: a deterministic component , indicating the geographical trend or drift, and a stochastic residual component , autocorrelated in space:

. \* MERGEFORMAT (..)

Given a lag vector h, the expected difference between and is 0. The variance of the difference is

where is the so-called semivariogram of residuals. Considering the variance , the covariance between and is given by

.

Kyriakidis (2004) considers kriging of two types of data pertaining to the same attribute: the target residual , of point support and partially sampled, and the source residual , providing ancillary information and defined on a areal support. This kriging is called area-to-point residual kriging. Under this approach, any source residual is functionally linked to the point residual within it as

\* MERGEFORMAT (..)

where is the number of points within areal unit , is the weight associated with , assumed to be known. On different specifications and applications of area-to-point kriging see also Yoo and Kyriakidis (2006), Liu et al. (2008), Yoo and Kyriakidis (2009), Goovaerts (2010).




References

Anselin, L. (1992): Spatial Econometrics: Method and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

Battese, G., Harter, R. and Fuller, W. (1988): An Error-Components Model for Prediction of County Crop Areas Using Survey and Satellite Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 28-36.

Banerjee, S., Carlin, B.P. and Gelfand, A.E. (2004): Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data. Chapman & Hall, New York.

Best, N., Richardson, S. and Thomson, A. (2005). A comparison of Bayesian spatial models for disease mapping. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 14(1), 35–59.

Bocci, C. (2009) Geoadditive models for data with spatial information. PhD Thesis, Department of Statistics, University of Florence.

Bocci C., Petrucci A., Rocco E. (2012). Small Area Methods for Agricultural Data: A Two-Part Geoadditive Model to Estimate the Agrarian Region Level Means of the Grapevines Production in Tuscany. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 66(1), 135-144

Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A.S. and Charlton, M., (1998): Geographically weighted regression-modelling spatial non-stationarity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D 47 (3), 431-443.

Cafarelli B., Castrignanò A. (2011). The use of geoadditive models to estimate the spatial distribution of grain weight in an agronomic field: a comparison with kriging with external drift, Environmetrics 22, 769-780.

Chambers, R. L. (1986): Outlier robust finite population estimation. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 81, 1063-1069.

Chambers, R. and Dunstan, P. (1986): Estimating distribution function from survey data. Biometrika, 73, 597-604.

Chambers, R. and Tzavidis, N. (2006): M-quantile models for small area estimation. Biometrika, 93, 255-268.

Chambers, R. Chandra, H. and Tzavidis, N. (2011): On bias-robust mean squared error estimation for pseudo-linear small area estimators. Survey Methodology, 37, 153-170.

Chambers, R. Chandra, H., Salvati, N. and Tzavidis, N. (2013): Outlier robust small area estimation. J.R. Statist. Soc. B, 75, 5, 1-28.

Chandra, H., Salvati, N., Chambers, R. and Tzavidis, N. (2012): Small area estimation under spatial nonstationarity. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 56, 2875–2888.

Comber, A.J., Proctor, P. and Anthony S.(2007) A combined pycnophylactic-dasymetric method for disaggregating spatial data: the example of agricultural land use. Prooceedings of the Geographical Information Science Research UK Confernce (ed. Winstanley A.C.) pp. 445-450, National Centre for Geocomputation, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, 11th-13th April.

Cressie, N. (1993): Statistics for spatial data, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Datta, G. S. and Ghosh, M. (1991): Bayesian prediction in linear models: Appli- cations to small area estimation. The Annals of Statistics 19, 1748–1770.

Datta, G. and Ghosh, M. (2012) Small Area Shrinkage Estimation. Statist. Sci., 27, 95-114.

Do, V.H., Thomas‐Agnan C. and Vanhemsz A. (2013): Spatial reallocation of areal data ‐ a review. Toulouse School of Economics.

Eicher, C. L., Brewer, C. A. (2001): Dasymetric mapping and areal interpolation, implementation and evaluation, Cartography & Geographic Information Science, 28(2), 125-138

Estevao, V.M. and Sarndal, C.E (2004): Borrowing strength is not the best technique within a wide class of design-consistent domain estimators. Journal of Official Statistics, 20, 645-669.

European Commission (2013) Development of inventory datasets through remote sensing and direct observation data for earthquake loss estimation. Editors: Patrizia Tenerelli and Helen Crowley Reviewers: Amir M. Kaynia. Publishing Editors: Fabio Taucer and Ufuk Hancilar

Fay, R.E. and Herriot, R.A. (1979): Estimates of income for small places: an application of James-Stein procedures to census data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 269-277.

Flowerdew, R. and Green, M., 1992, Statistical methods for inference between incompatible zonal systems. In The Accuracy of Spatial Databases, M.F. Goodchild and S. Gopal (Eds), pp. 239–247 (London, UK: Taylor and Francis).

Fotheringham, A.S., Brunsdon, C. and Charlton, M., (2002): Geographically Weighted Regression. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex.

Fuller, W.A. (1981) Regression estimation for small areas. In D.M. Gilford, G.L. Nelson and L. Ingram (eds), Rural America in Passage: Statistics for Policy, pp. 572–586. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Fuller, W.A. (1999): Environmental Surveys Over Time, Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 4, 331-345.

Ghosh, M. and Rao, J.N.K. (1994): Small area estimation: An appraisal (with discussion). Statist. Sci., 9, 1, 55-93.

Ghosh, M., Natarajan, K., Stroud, T. W. F. and Carlin, B.P. (1998). Generalized linear models for small-area estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 93, 273–282.

Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. and Spiegelhalter D.J. (Eds.) (1995). Markov Chain Monter Carlo in Practice. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.

Giusti, C., Marchetti, S., Pratesi, M. and Salvati, N. (2012): Semiparametric Fay-Herriot model using Penalized Splines. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 66, 1-14.

Gomez-Rubio, V., Best, N., Richardson, S., Li, G. and Clarke, P. (2010): Bayesian Statistics Small Area Estimation. Technical Report. Imperial College London.

González-Manteiga, W., Lombarda, M., Molina, I., Morales, D. and Santamara, L. (2007): Estimation of the mean squared error of predictors of small area linear parameters under logistic mixed model. Comp. Statist. Data Anal., 51, 2720-2733.

Goovaerts P. (2010) Combining Areal and Point Data in Geostatistical Interpolation: Applications to Soil Science and Medical Geography. Mathematical Geosciences, 42, 535–554

Gregory, I.N., Paul, S.E. (2005): Breaking the boundaries, geographical approaches to integrating 200 years of the census, Journal of the Royal Statistic Society, 168, 419- 437

Henderson, C. (1975): Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model, Biometrics, 31, 423-447.

Huang, Z., Ottens, H. and Masser, I. (2007): A Doubly Weighted Approach to Urban Data Disaggregation in GIS: A Case Study of Wuhan, China. Transaction in GIS, 11, 197

Jiang, J. (2003): Empirical best prediction for small-area inference based on generalized linear mixed models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 111, 117-127.


Jiang, J. and Lahiri, P. (2001): Empirical best prediction for small area inference with binary data. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 53, 217–243.

Jiang, J. and Lahiri, P. (2006a): Mixed Model Prediction and Small Area Estimation. Test, 15, 1-96.

Jiang, J. and Lahiri, P. (2006b): Estimation of finite population domain means: a model-assisted empirical best prediction approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 301–311.

Jiang, J., Nguyen, T. and Rao J.S. (2011): Best Predictive Small Area Estimation, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106, 732-745.

Kammann, E.E. and Wand, M.P. (2003). Geoadditive models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 52, 1-18

Kempen, M., Heckelei, T., Britz, W, Leip, A., Koeble, R. (2005) A Statistical Approach for Spatial Disaggregation of Crop Production in the EU. Proceedings of the 89th EAAE Seminar, Modelling agricultural policies: state of the art and new challenges. Faculty of Economics, Parma.

Kim, H. and Yao, X. (2010) Pycnophylactic interpolation revisited: integration with the dasymetric-mapping method. International Journal of Remote Sensing. Vol. 31, No. 21, 10 November 2010, 5657–5671

Knotters, M., Heuvelink, G.B.M., Hoogland, T. and Walvoort D.J.J. (2010): A disposition of interpolation techniques. Werkdocument 190. Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu

Kott P. (1989): Robust small domain estimation using random effects modelling. Survey Methodology, 15, 1-12.

Kyriadikidis, P.C. (2004): A Geostatistical Framework for Area-to-Point Spatial Interpolation. Geographical Analysis, 36, 259-289

Lam, N. (1983) Spatial interpolation methods: a review. American Cartographer 10,129-149.

Langford, M. (2006): Obtaining population estimations in non-census reporting zones, An evaluation of the three-class dasymetric method, Computers, Environment & Urban Systems, 30, 161-180

Langford, M. (2003): Refining methods for dasymetric mapping. In Remotely Sensed Cities, V. Mesev (Ed.), pp. 181–205 (London, UK: Taylor & Francis).

Langford M. and Harvey J.T. (2001): The Use of Remotely Sensed Data for Spatial Disaggregation of Published Census Population Counts. IEEE/ISPRS Joint Workshop on Remote Sensing and Data Fusion over Urban Areas

Langford M., Maguire, D., Unwin, D. (1991): The areal interpolation problem: estimating population using remote sensing in a GIS framework. In Handling geographic information: Methodology and potential applications edited by Masser E and Blakemore M, Longman, 55-77.

Langford, M., Fisher, P. F. (1996): Modelling sensitivity to accuracy in classification imagery, a study of areal interpolation by dasymetric mapping, Professional Geographer, 48(3), 299-309

Langford, M., Unwin, D. J. (1994): Generating and mapping population density surfaces within a GIS, The Cartographic Journal, 31, 21-26

Lehtonen, R. and Veijanen, A. (1999): Domain estimation with logistic generalized regression and related estimators. IASS Satellite Conference on Small Area Estimation. Riga: Latvian Council of Science, 121-128.


Lehtonen, R., Sarndal, C.E. and Veijanen, A. (2003): The effect of model choice in estimation for domains, including small domains. Survey Methodology, 29, 33-44.

Lehtonen R. and Pahkinen, E. (2004): Practical methods for design and analysis of complex surveys. Wiley, New York.

Li, T., Pullar, D., Corcoran, J. & Stimson, R. (2007): A comparison of spatial disaggregation techniques as applied to population estimation for South East Queensland (SEQ), Australia, Applied GIS, 3(9), 1-16

Li, J. and Heap, A.D. (2008): A Review of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Environmental Scientists. Geoscience Australia, Record 2008/23, 137 pp.

Liu, X.H., Kyriakidis, P.C. and Goodchild M. F. (2008): Population-density estimation using regression and area-to-point residual kriging. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22, 431–447

Longford, N.T. (1995). Random coefficient models. Clareton Press, London.

Marchetti, S., Tzavidis, N. and Pratesi, M. (2012): Non-parametric Bootstrap Mean Squared Error Estimation for M-quantile Estimators of Small Area Averages, Quantiles and Poverty Indicators., Computational Statistics & Data Analysis,vol. 56, 2889-2902.

Mehrotra, R. and Singh, R.D. (1998): Spatial disaggregation of rainfall data. Hydrological Sciences—Journal des Sciences Hydrologiques, 43(1) February 1998

McBratney A.B. (1998) Some considerations on methods for spatially aggregating and disaggregating soil information. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 50: 51–62, 1998.

McCullogh, C. E. (1994). Maximum likelihood variance components esti- mation for binary data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 330-335.

McCullogh, C. E. (1997). Maximum likelihood algorithms for generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, 162-170.

McCullogh, P. and Searle, S.R. (2001). Generalized, Linear and Mixed Models. John Wiley, New York.

Mennis, J. (2003): Generating surface models of population using dasymetric mapping, The Professional Geographer, 55(1), 31-42

Mennis, J. and Hultgren, T. (2006): Intelligent dasymetric mapping and its application to areal interpolation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 33, pp. 179–194.

Mohammed, J.I., Comber, A. and Brunsdon C. (2012): Population estimation in small areas: combining dasymetric mapping with pycnophylactic interpolation. GIS Research UK (GISRUK) Conference, Lancaster University, 11th-13th April.

Molina, I., Salvati, N. and Pratesi, M. (2009): Bootstrap for estimating the MSE of the Spatial EBLUP. Comp. Statist, 24, 441-458.

Molina, I. and Rao, J.N.K. (2010): Small area estimation of poverty indicators. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 38, 369-385.

Nychka, D. (2000): “Spatial Process Estimates as Smoothers.” Smoothing and Regression. Approaches, Computation and Application, ed. Schimek, M. G., Wiley, New York, 393-424.

Opsomer, J. D., Claeskens, G., Ranalli, M. G., Kauermann, G., and Breidt, F. J. (2008): Nonparametric small area estimation using penalized spline regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 70, 265-286.

Petrucci, A., Pratesi, M., and Salvati, N. (2005): Geographic Information in Small Area Estimation: Small Area Models and Spatially Correlated Random Area Effects. Statistics in Transition, 7, 609-623.

Petrucci, A. and Salvati, N. (2006): Small area estimation for spatial correlation in watershed erosion assessment, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 11, 169-182.

Pfeffermann, D. (2002): Small area estimation - New developments and directions. Intern. Statist. Rev., 70, 1, 125-143.

Prasad, N. and Rao, J. (1990): The estimation of mean squared error of small_area estimators. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 85, 163-171.

Prasad, N.G.N. and Rao, J.N.K. (1999): On robust small area estimation using a simple random effects model. Survey Methodology, 25, 67-72.

Pratesi, M. and Salvati, N. (2008): Small Area Estimation: the EBLUP Estimator Based on Spatially Correlated Random Area Effects. Statistical Methods & Applications, 17, 113-141.

Pratesi, M., Ranalli, M. G. and Salvati, N. (2008). Semiparametric M-quantile regression for estimating the proportion of acidic lakes in 8-digit HUCs of the Northeastern US. Environmetrics 19, 687–701.

Pratesi, M. and Salvati, N. (2009): Small area estimation in the presence of correlated random area effects, Journal of Official Statistics, 25, 37-53.

R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Rao, J.N.K., Kovar, J.G. and Mantel, H.J. (1990). On estimating distribution functions and quantiles from survey data using auxiliary information. Biometrika 77, 365-375.

Rao, J.N.K. (2003): Small area estimation, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Rao, J.N.K. (2010): Small-area estimation with applications to agriculture in Benedetti, R., Bee, M., Espa, G. and Piersimoni, F. (Eds): Agricultural Survey Methods. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication, UK.

Reibel, M., Aditya, A. (2006) - Land use weighted areal interpolation, GIS Planet 2005 International Conference, Estoril, Portugal

Ruppert, D., Wand, M.P. and Carroll, R. (2003): Semiparametric Regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.

Saei, A. and Chambers, R. (2003): Small area estimation under linear and generalized linear mixed models with time and area effects. In S3RI Methodology Working Papers, pp. 1–35. Southampton: Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute.

Saei, A and Chambers, R. (2005): Empirical Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Out of Sample Areas, Working Paper M05/03, Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton.

Salvati, N. (2004): Small Area Estimation by Spatial Models: the Spatial Empirical Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (Spatial EBLUP). Working Paper n 2004/04, 'G. Parenti' Department of Statistics, University of Florence.

Salvati, N., Tzavidis, N., Pratesi, M. and Chambers, R. (2012): Small area estimation via M-quantile geographically weighted regression. TEST, 21, 1-28.

Sarndal, C.E. (1984): Design-consistent versus model-dependent estimation for small domains. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 624–631.

Searle, S.R., Casella, G. and McCullogh, P. (1992): Variance Components. John Wiley, New York.

Shu, Y. and Lam N.S.N. (2011): Spatial disaggregation of carbon dioxide emissions from road traffic based on multiple linear regression model. Atmospheric Environment 45 (2011) 634-640

Singh, B.B., Shukla, G.K., and Kundu, D. (2005): Spatio-Temporal Models in Small Area Estimation. Survey Methodology, 31, 183-195.

Schmid, T., Münnich, R. (2013): Spatial Robust Small Area Estimation, Statistica Papers. DOI: 10.1007/s00362-013-0517-y, accepted.

Silvan-Cardenas J.L., Wang, L., Rogerson, P., WU, C., FENG, T., and KAMPHAUS B.D. (2010): Assessing fine-spatial-resolution remote sensing for small-area population estimation. International Journal of Remote Sensing Vol. 31, No. 21, 10 November 2010, 5605–5634

Singh, M.P., Gambino, J., and Mantel, H.J. (1994): Issues and Strategies for Small Area Data, Survey Methodology, 20, 3-22.

Sinha, S.K. and Rao, J.N.K. (2009): Robust small area estimation. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 37, 381-399.

Song, P. X., Fan, Y. and Kalbfleisch, J. (2005): Maximization by parts in likelihood inference (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association 100, 1145-1158.

Tassone E.C., Miranda, M.L. and Gelfand A.E. (2010): Disaggregated spatial modelling for areal unit categorical data. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2010 January 1; 59(1): 175–190.

Tobler, W. (1979) Smooth Pycnophylactic Interpolation for Geographical Regions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 519-529.

Turner, A. and Openshaw, S (2001) Disaggregative Spatial Interpolation. Paper presented at the GISRUK 2001 conference, Glamorgan, Wales, April, 2001.

Tzavidis, N., Marchetti, S. and Chambers, R. (2010): Robust estimation of small-area means and quantile. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 52, 167-186.

Ugarte, M.D., Goicoa, T., Militino, A.F. and Durban, M. (2009): Spline smoothing in small area trend estimation and forecasting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53, 3616-3629.

Yoo, E.H. and Kyriakidis P. C. (2009): Area-to-point Kriging in spatial hedonic pricing models. Journal of Geographical Systems, 11, 381-406

Yoo, E.H. and Kyriakidis P. C. (2006): Area-to-point Kriging with inequality-type data Journal of Geographical Systems, 8, 357–390

You, Y. and Rao, J.N.K. (2002): A pseudo-empirical best linear unbiased prediction approach to small area estimation using survey weights. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 30, 431-439.

Yuan, Y., Smith, R.M. and Limp, W.F., (1997): Remodeling census population with spatial information from Landsat TM imagery. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 21, pp. 245–258.

Wang, J. and Fuller, W.A. (2003): Mean Squared Error of Small Area Predictors Constructed With Estimated Area Variances, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 716-723.

Welsh, A. H. and Ronchetti, E. (1998): Bias-calibrated estimation from sample surveys containing outliers. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 60, 413-428.

Wolter, K. (1985): Introduction to Variance Estimation. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Wright, J.K. (1936): A method of mapping densities of population. The Geographical Review, 26, 103-110.

Wu, S., Qiu, X. and Wang L. (2005): Population Estimation Methods in GIS and Remote Sensing: A Review. GIScience and Remote Sensing, 2005, 42, No. 1, p. 58-74.



Download 446.1 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page