Review of the International Literature

Bibliography

Andersen, Ida Elisabeth, and Birgit Jaeger. 1999. “Danish Participatory Models. Scenario Workshops and Consensus Conferences: Towards More Democratic Decision-making.” Science and Public Policy 26 (5): 331–340.

Appiah, Kwame Anthony, Seyla Benhabib, Iris Marion Young, and Nancy Fraser. 2007. Justice, governance, cosmopolitanism, and the politics of difference: reconfigurations in a transnational world (distinguished W.E.B. Du Bois lectures 2004/2005). Berlin: Humboldt-Univ.

Bainbridge, William Sims. 2002. “Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 4 (6): 561–570.

Baldoz, Rick, Charles Koeber, and Philip Kraft. 2001. The Critical Study of Work: Labor, Technology, and Global Production. Temple University Press.

Balmer, Andrew, and Paul Wood. 2008. “Synthetic Biology: The Social and Ethical Challenges”. BBSRC Report. University of Nottingham.

Banse, Gerhard, Arnim Grunwald, Imre Hronszky, and Gordon Nelson, ed. 2007. Assessing Societal Implications of Converging Technological Development. edition sigma.

Barnett, J., H. Cooper, and V. Senior. 2007. “Belief in Public Efficacy, Trust, and Attitudes Toward Modern Genetic  Science.” Risk Analysis 27 (4) (August): 921–933. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00932.x.

Besley, J. 2010. “Current Research on Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology.” Emerging Health Threats Journal 3.

Besley, John C., Victoria L. Kramer, and Susanna H. Priest. 2008. “Expert Opinion on Nanotechnology: Risks, Benefits, and Regulation.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10 (4) (April): 549–558. doi:10.1007/s11051-007-9323-6.

Betz, Frederick. 2011. Managing Technological Innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change. John Wiley & Sons.

Bhattachary, Darren, Juliet Pascall Calitz, and Andrew Hunter. 2010. “Synthetic Biology Dialogue”. London: TNS-BMRB. http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/society/dialogue/activities/synthetic-biology/synthetic-biology-dialogue.aspx.

Bhattachary, Darren, Richard Stockley, and Andrew Hunter. 2008. “Nanotechnology for Healthcare”. BMRB.

Blaine, K., S. Kamaldeen, and D. Powell. 2002. “Public Perceptions of Biotechnology.” Journal of Food Science 67 (9) (December): 3200–3208. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb09566.x.

BMRB Social Research. 2004. “Nanotechnology: Views of the General Public. Quantitative and Qualitative Research Carried Out as Part of the Nanotechnology Study”. London: The Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering Nanotechnology Working Group.

Boenink, Marianne. 2012. “Debating the Desirability of New Biomedical Technologies: Lessons from  the Introduction of Breast Cancer Screening in the Netherlands.” Health Care Analysis 20 (1) (March): 84–102. doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0173-0.

Bogner, Alexander. 2012. “The Paradox of Participation Experiments.” Science, Technology & Human Values 37 (5) (September 1): 506–527. doi:10.1177/0162243911430398.

Bottini, Massimo, Nicola Rosato, Fulvia Gloria, Sara Adanti, Nunziella Corradino, Antonio Bergamaschi, and Andrea Magrini. 2011. “Public Optimism Towards Nanomedicine.” International Journal of Nanomedicine 6: 3473–+. doi:10.2147/IJN.S26340.

Bowman, Diana M., and Graeme A. Hodge. 2007. “Nanotechnology and Public Interest Dialogue: Some International Observations.” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 27 (2): 118–132. doi:10.1177/0270467606298216.

Brossard, Dominique, Dietram A. Scheufele, Eunkyung Kim, and Bruce V. Lewenstein. 2009. “Religiosity as a Perceptual Filter: Examining Processes of Opinion Formation About Nanotechnology.” Public Understanding of Science 18 (5): 546–558.

Burgi, B. R., and T. Pradeep. 2006. “Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in Developing  Countries.” Current Science 90 (5) (March 10): 645–658.

Burri, R.V., and S. Bellucci. 2008. “Public Perception of Nanotechnology.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10 (3): 387–391.

Burri, Regula Valerie. 2007. “Deliberating Risks Under Uncertainty: Experience, Trust, and Attitudes in a Swiss Nanotechnology Stakeholder Discussion Group.” NanoEthics 1 (2): 143–154.

Cacciatore, M. A., D. A. Scheufele, and E. A. Corley. 2009. “From Enabling Technology to Applications: The Evolution of Risk Perceptions About Nanotechnology.” Public Understanding of Science (October). doi:10.1177/0963662509347815.

Carter, Michael. 1981. “Technological Change In Australia: A Review of the Myers Report.” Australian Economic Review 14 (2): 55–64.

Ceccoli, Stephen, and William Hixon. 2012. “Explaining Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Foods in the European  Union.” International Political Science Review 33 (3) (June): 301–319. doi:10.1177/0192512111418788.

Chung, Yoonsuhn, Jungil Lee, and Ilki Han. 2010. “Public Engagement in Nanotechnology Policy.” In 2010 10th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), 1223 –1226. doi:10.1109/NANO.2010.5698043.

Cobb, M. D. 2011. “Creating Informed Public Opinion: Citizen Deliberation About Nanotechnologies for Human Enhancements.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (4): 1533–1548.

Cobb, Michael D., and Jane Macoubrie. 2004. “Public Perceptions About Nanotechnology: Risks, Benefits and Trust.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6 (4): 395–405.

Cohen, Emma R. M., Hassan Masum, Kathryn Berndtson, Vicki Saunders, Tom Hadfield, Dilzayn Panjwani, Deepa L. Persad, et al. 2008. “Public Engagement on Global Health Challenges.” Bmc Public Health 8 (May 20). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-168.

Conti, Joseph, Terre Satterfield, and Barbara Herr Harthorn. 2011. “Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US  Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions.” Risk Analysis 31 (11) (November): 1734–1748. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01608.x.

Corner, Adam, Nick Pidgeon, and Karen Parkhill. 2012. “Perceptions of Geoengineering: Public Attitudes, Stakeholder  Perspectives, and the Challenge of ‘Upstream’ Engagement.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change 3 (5) (October): 451–466. doi:10.1002/wcc.176.

Davies, Sarah R., Matthew B. Kearnes, and Phil Macnaghten. 2010. “Nanotechnology and Public Engagement: a New Kind of (social) Science?” In Nano Meets Macro, edited by Kamilla Kjolberg and Fern Wickson, 473–499. Singapore: Pan Stanford.

Davies, Sarah R., and Phil Macnaghten. 2010. “Narratives of Mastery and Resistance: Lay Ethics of Nanotechnology.” NanoEthics 4 (2) (August): 141–151. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0096-5.

Dijkstra, Anne M., and Jan M. Gutteling. 2012. “Communicative Aspects of the Public-Science Relationship Explored:  Results of Focus Group Discussions About Biotechnology and Genomics.” Science Communication 34 (3) (June): 363–391. doi:10.1177/1075547011417894.

Dijkstra, Anne M., Jan M. Gutteling, Jac A. A. Swart, Nicolien F. Wieringa, Henny J. van der Windt, and Erwin R. Seydel. 2012. “Public Participation in Genomics Research in the Netherlands: Validating  a Measurement Scale.” Public Understanding of Science 21 (4) (May): 465–477. doi:10.1177/0963662510381036.

Doherty, Brian, Alexandra Plows, and Derek Wall. 2007. “Environmental Direct Action in Manchester, Oxford and North Wales: A Protest Event Analysis.” Environmental Politics 16 (5): 805–825.

Druckman, James N., and Toby Bolsen. 2011. “Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions About Emergent Technologies.” Journal of Communication 61 (4) (August): 659–688. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01562.x.

Dryzek, John S., and Aviezer Tucker. 2008. “Deliberative Innovation to Different Effect: Consensus Conferences in Denmark, France, and the United States.” Public Administration Review 68 (5) (September 1): 864–876. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00928.x.

Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. 2010. “The Narratology of Lay Ethics.” NanoEthics 4 (2) (August): 153–170. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0097-4.

Evers, Johan, and Joel D’Silva. 2009. “Knowledge Transfer from Citizens’ Panels to Regulatory Bodies in the  Domain of Nano-enabled Medical Applications.” Innovation-the European Journal of Social Science Research 22 (1): 125–142. doi:10.1080/13511610902770685.

Fagerberg, Jan, and Bart Verspagen. 2009. “Innovation studies—The Emerging Structure of a New Scientific Field.” Research Policy 38 (2) (March): 218–233. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006.

Ferrari, Arianna. 2008. “Is It All About Human Nature? Ethical Challenges of Converging  Technologies Beyond a Polarized Debate.” Innovation-the European Journal of Social Science Research 21 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/13511610802002171.

———. 2010. “Developments in the Debate on Nanoethics: Traditional Approaches and the Need for New Kinds of Analysis.” NanoEthics 4 (1) (April 1): 27–52. doi:10.1007/s11569-009-0081-z.

Fleischer, Torsten, Michael Decker, and Ulrich Fiedeler. 2005. “Assessing Emerging technologies—Methodological Challenges and the Case of Nanotechnologies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72 (9) (November): 1112–1121. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.005.

Fontes, Margarida. 2005. “The Process of Transformation of Scientific and Technological Knowledge into Economic Value Conducted by Biotechnology Spin-offs.” Technovation 25 (4) (April): 339–347. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2003.08.004.

Freeman, Christopher, and Luc Soete. 1994. Work for All or Mass Unemployment?: Computerised Technical Change into the Twenty-first Century. Pinter Publishers.

Freeman, R, and K Shukla. 2008. “Science and Engineering Work- Force Project Digest: Jobs in Nanotech—creating a Measure of Job Growth”. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/*sewp/SEWPDigestJun2008.pdf.

Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-normal Age.” Futures 25 (7) (September): 739–755. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L.

Gaskell, G., T. Ten Eyck, J. Jackson, and G. Veltri. 2005. “Imagining Nanotechnology: Cultural Support for Technological Innovation in Europe and the United States.” Public Understanding of Science 14 (1): 81–90.

Gavelin, Karin, Richard Wilson, and Rob Doubleday. 2007. “Democratic Technologies? The Final Report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG)”. London: Involve.

Geuna, Aldo, and Alessandro Muscio. 2009. “The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Minerva 47 (1) (March 1): 93–114. doi:10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2.

Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. SAGE.

Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press.

Giorgi, Liana. 2009. “Converging Technologies - What Future? The Views of the Science and  Policy Communities.” Innovation-the European Journal of Social Science Research 22 (4): 427–442. doi:10.1080/13511610903462399.

Godman, Marion, and Sven Ove Hansson. 2009. “European Public Advice on Nanobiotechnology—Four Convergence Seminars.” NanoEthics 3 (1) (April 1): 43–59. doi:10.1007/s11569-009-0054-2.

Goorden, Lieve, Michiel Van Oudheusden, Johan Evers, and Marian Deblonde. 2008. “Lose One Another ... and Find One Another in Nanospace. ‘Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow’s Society: A Case for Reflective Action Research in Flanders (NanoSoc).” NanoEthics 2 (3): 213–230.

Goven, Joanna, E. R. Langer, Virginia Baker, James Ataria, and Alan Leckie. 2012. “Community Engagement in the Management of Biosolids: Lessons from Four  New Zealand Studies.” Journal of Environmental Management 103 (July 30): 154–164. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.007.

Gupta, Nidhi, Arnout R. H. Fischer, Ivo A. van der Lans, and Lynn J. Frewer. 2012. “Factors Influencing Societal Response of Nanotechnology: An Expert  Stakeholder Analysis.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 14 (5) (May). doi:10.1007/s11051-012-0857-x.

Guston, David H., and Daniel Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (1-2): 93–109. doi:10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1.

Gutmann, Amy. 2011. “The Ethics of Synthetic Biology: Guiding Principles for Emerging Technologies.” Hastings Center Report 41 (4): 17–22. doi:10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00118.x.

Hagendijk, Rob, and Alan Irwin. 2006. “Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe.” Minerva 44 (2) (June): 167–184. doi:10.1007/s11024-006-0012-x.

Hamlett, Patrick W., Michael D. Cobb, and David H. Guston. 2009. “National Citizens’ Technology Forum: Nanotechnologies and Human Enhancement”. Arizona State University: The Center for Nanotechnology in Society, Arizona State University.

Hellström, Tomas. 2003. “Systemic Innovation and Risk: Technology Assessment and the Challenge of Responsible Innovation.” Technology in Society 25 (3) (August): 369–384. doi:10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1.

Hodge, G.A., and D.M. Bowman. 2007. “Engaging in Small Talk: Nanotechnology Policy and Dialogue Processes in the UK and Australia.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 66 (2): 223–237.

Horlick-Jones, T., John Walls, Gene Rowe, Nick Pidgeon, Wouter Poortinga, and Tim O’Riordan. 2006. “On Evaluating the ‘GM Nation?’ Public Debate About the Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops in Britain.” New Genetics and Society 25 (3): 265–288.

Horlick-Jones, Tom, John Walls, Gene Rowe, Nick Pidgeon, Wouter Poortinga, Graham Murdock, and Tim O’Riordan. 2007. The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement. New York: Routledge.

Van Horn, Carl, and Aaron Fichtner. 2008. “The Workforce Needs of Companies Engaged in Nanotechnology Research in Arizona”. CNS-ASU Report #R08-0005. Center for Nanotechnology in Society.

Horst, Maja, and Alan Irwin. 2010. “Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge: On Consensus, Consensusing and False Consensusness.” Social Studies of Science 40 (1) (February 1): 105–126.

Ile-de-France. 2007. “Citizens Recommendations on Nanotechnology.” Paris: Espace Projets. http://espaceprojets.iledefrance.fr/jahia/Jahia/NanoCitoyens/site/projets.

Invernizzi, Noela. 2011. “Nanotechnology Between the Lab and the Shop Floor: What Are the Effects on Labor?” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (6) (March 18): 2249–2268. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0333-z.

Invernizzi, Noela, Guillermo Foladori, and Donald Maclurcan. 2008. “Nanotechnology’s Controversial Role for the South.” Science Technology & Society 13 (1) (May 1): 123–148.

Ipsos MORI. 2010. “Experiment Earth? Report on a Public Dialogue on Geoengineering.” http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering-dialogue-final-report.pdf.

Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs On Nature: Science And Democracy In Europe And The United States. Princeton University Press.

Joly, Pierre Benoit, and Alain Kaufmann. 2008. “Lost in Translation? The Need for Upstream Engagement with Nanotechnology on Trial.” Science as Culture 17 (3): 225–247.

Jones, Barry O. 1990. Sleepers, Wake!: Technology and the Future of Work. Oxford University Press.

De Jong, Stefan, Kate Barker, Deborah Cox, Diana Person, and Peter van den Besselaar. 2011. “Societal Impact of Enabling Research Fields: ICT Research: A Dutch and a UK Case.” In Rome.

Joss, Simon, and John Durant. 1995. Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum.

Kahan, Dan M., Donald Braman, Paul Slovic, John Gastil, and Geoffrey Cohen. 2009. “Cultural Cognition of the Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology.” Nat Nano 4 (2) (February): 87–90. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.341.

Katz, Evie, Fiona Solomon, Wendy Mee, and Roy Lovel. 2009. “Evolving Scientific Research Governance in Australia: a Case Study of Engaging Interested Publics in Nanotechnology Research.” Public Understanding of Science 18 (5): 531–545.

King, Suzanne., and Tara Webster. 2009. “Synthetic Biology: Public Dialogue on Synthetic Biology”. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.

Kline, SJ, and Nathan Rosenberg. 1986. “An Overview of Innovation.” In The Positive Sum Strategy, edited by R Landau and Nathan Rosenberg, 275–305. Academy of Engineering Press.

Kuzma, Jennifer. 2007. “Moving Forward Responsibly: Oversight for the Nanotechnology-biology  Interface.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9 (1) (January): 165–182. doi:10.1007/s11051-006-9151-0.

Kuzma, Jennifer, Jordan Paradise, Gurumurthy Ramachandran, Jee-Ae Kim, Adam Kokotovich, and Susan M. Wolf. 2008. “An Integrated Approach to Oversight Assessment for Emerging Technologies.” Risk Analysis 28 (5): 1197–1220. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01086.x.

Kyle, Renee, and Susan Dodds. 2008. “Avoiding Empty Rhetoric: Engaging Publics in Debates About Nanotechnologies.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1) (September 30): 81–96. doi:10.1007/s11948-008-9089-y.

Landau, Ralph, and Nathan Rosenberg. 1986. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. National Academies Press.

Lentzos, Filippa. 2009. “Synthetic Biology in the Social Context: The UK Debate to Date.” Biosocieties 4 (2-3) (September): 303–315. doi:10.1017/S1745855209990172.

Levitt, M. 2003. “Public Consultation in Bioethics. What’s the Point of Asking the Public  When They Have Neither Scientific nor Ethical Expertise?” Health Care Analysis 11 (1) (March): 15–25. doi:10.1023/A:1025381828650.

Lloyds. 2007. “Nanotechnology, Recent Developments, Risks and Opportunities”. London: Lloyds Emerging Risks Team Report.

López, José Julián. 2008. “Nanotechnology: Legitimacy, Narrative and Emergent Technologies.” Sociology Compass 2 (4): 1266–1286. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00121.x.

Lundvall, Bengt-Åke, and Susana Borrás. 2005. “Science, Technology and Innovation Policy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 599–631.

Lynch, Z. 2004. “Neurotechnology and Society (2010-2060).” In Coevolution of Human Potential and Converging Technologies, edited by M. C. Roco and C. D. Montemagno, 1013:229–233. http://lifeboat.com/ex/neurotechnology.and.society.

Lyons, K., and J. Whelan. 2010. “Community Engagement to Facilitate, Legitimize and Accelerate the Advancement of Nanotechnologies in Australia.” NanoEthics 4 (1): 53–66.

Macnaghten, Phil. 2010. “Researching Technoscientific Concerns in the Making: Narrative Structures, Public Responses, and Emerging Nanotechnologies.” Environment and Planning A 42 (1): 23 – 37. doi:10.1068/a41349.

Macnaghten, Phil, and Julia S. Guivant. 2011. “Converging Citizens? Nanotechnology and the Political Imaginary of Public Engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (2) (March 1): 207–220. doi:10.1177/0963662510379084.

Macnaghten, Phil, and Richard Owen. 2011. “Good Governance for Climate-engineering.” Nature 479: 293.

Macnaghten, Phil, and John Urry. 1998. Contested Natures. London: Sage.

Mali, Franc. 2009. “Bringing Converging Technologies Closer to Civil Society: The Role of the Precautionary Principle.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 22 (1): 53–75. doi:10.1080/13511610902770586.

Malsch, Ineke. 2008. “Which Research in Converging Technologies Should Taxpayers Fund?  Exploring Societal Aspects.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (1): 137–148. doi:10.1080/09537320701726833.

Mayer, Sue. 2003. “GM NATION? Engaging People in Real Debate? A GeneWatch UK Report on the Conduct of the UK’s Public Debate on GM Crops and Food”. Buxton: Genewatch UK.

Mehta, Michael D. 2009. “Engaging the Public: Results of a Canadian Consensus Conference on a Nanomedical Device for Genetic Analysis.” Journal of Nano Education 1 (March): 109–115. doi:doi:10.1166/jne.2009.014.

Michael, Gilding, and Christine Critchley. 2003. “Technology And Trust: Public Perceptions Of Technological Change In Australia.” Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 1 (1): 52–69.

Miller, Evonne, Lorraine M. Bell, and Laurie Buys. 2007. “Public Understanding of Carbon Sequestration in Australia: Socio-demographic Predictors of Knowledge, Engagement and Trust.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 5 (1): 15–33.

Miller, Georgia, and Gyorgy Scrinis. 2012. “The Role of NGOs in Governing Nanotechnologies: Challenging the ‘Benefits Versus Risks’ Framing of Nanotech Innovation.” In International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, edited by Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman, and Andrew D. Maynard, 409–455. Edward Elgar Pub.

Mir, L. 2007. “Perception of the Dangers of Nanotechnologies by Experts and the Uninformed.” Environnement Risques & Sante 6 (5): 331–332.

Molster, C., T. Charles, A. Samanek, and P. O’Leary. 2009. “Australian Study on Public Knowledge of Human Genetics and Health.” Public Health Genomics 12 (2): 84–91. doi:10.1159/000164684.

NanoJury UK. 2005. “NanoJury UK: Provisional Recommendations”. Newcastle upon Tyne: PEALS. http://www.nanojury.org.uk/.

National Enabling Technologies Strategy Expert Forum. 2012. “Enabling Technology Futures: a Survey of the Australian Technology Landscape”. Prepared by the Australian Institute for Commercialisation  For the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education.

Noble, David F. 1995. Progress Without People: New Technology, Unemployment, and the Message of Resistance. Between The Lines.

Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Oxford: Polity.

Nye, David E. 2004. America As Second Creation: Technology and Narratives of New Beginnings. MIT Press.

O’Connor, M., and S. van den Hove. 2001. “Prospects for Public Participation on Nuclear Risks and Policy Options:  Innovations in Governance Practices for Sustainable Development in the  European Union.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 86 (1-3) (September 14): 77–99. doi:10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00256-4.

Opinion Leader. 2008. “Report on the Citizens Panel Examining Nanotechnologies.”

Owen, Richard, and Nicola Goldberg. 2010. “Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.” Risk Analysis 30 (11): 1699–1707. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01517.x.

Parkhill, Karen, and Nick Pidgeon. 2011. “Public Engagement on Geoengineering Research: Preliminary Report on the SPICE Deliberative Workshops”. Technical Report (Understanding Risk Group Working Paper, 11-01). Cardiff: School of Psychology, Cardiff University. http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs/Climate%20change/Stratospherics/spice%20public%20views.pdf.

Peter D.Hart Research Associates. 2009. “Nanotechnology, Synthetic Biology, & Public Opinion: A Report Of Findings Based On A National Survey Among Adults”. Washington DC: Hart Research Associates. http://www.nanotechproject.org/events/archive/8284/.

Petersen, A, and D Bowman. 2012. “Engaging Whom and for What Ends? Australian Stakeholders’ Constructions of Public Engagement in Relation to Nanotechnologies.” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 12 (2) (June 8): 67–79. doi:10.3354/esep00124.

Pidgeon, Nick, Adam Corner, Karen Parkhill, Alexa Spence, Catherine Butler, and Wouter Poortinga. 2012. “Exploring Early Public Responses to Geoengineering.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 370 (1974) (September 13): 4176–4196. doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0099.

Pidgeon, Nick, Barbara Herr Harthorn, Karl Bryant, and Tee Rogers-Hayden. 2009. “Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom.” Nature Nanotechnology 4 (2) (February): 95–98. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.362.

Pidgeon, Nick, and Tee Rogers-Hayden. 2007. “Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication  or ‘Upstream Engagement’?” Health Risk & Society 9 (2): 191–210. doi:10.1080/13698570701306906.

Plows, Alexandra. 2010. “What Is Public Engagement with Human Genetics and What Is It for? Differentiating Between Policy Practice and ‘social Movement’”. The Menai Papers Working Papers Series 2010-01. Bangor: School of Social Sciences, Bangor University.

Plows, Alexandra, and M Reinsborough. 2011. “Encountering ‘the Politics of Technology’: Public Engagement from the Bottom Up.” In Quantum Engagements: Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies, edited by TB Zülsdorf, Christopher Coenen, Ulrich Fiedeler, Arianna Ferrari, Colin Milburn, and Matthias Wienroth, 91–108. IOS Press.

Porter, Alan L., Scott W. Cunningham, Jerry Banks, A. Thomas Roper, Thomas W. Mason, and Frederick A. Rossini. 2011. Forecasting and Management of Technology. John Wiley & Sons.

Priest, S. 2006. “The North American Opinion Climate for Nanotechnology and Its Products: Opportunities and Challenges.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8 (5): 563–568.

Priest, Susanna, Ted Greenhalgh, and Victoria Kramer. 2010. “Risk Perceptions Starting to Shift? US Citizens Are Forming Opinions  About Nanotechnology.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 12 (1) (January): 11–20. doi:10.1007/s11051-009-9789-5.

Priest, Susanna, Thomas Lane, Ted Greenhalgh, Lindsey Jo Hand, and Victoria Kramer. 2011. “Envisioning Emerging Nanotechnologies: A Three-Year Panel Study of South  Carolina Citizens.” Risk Analysis 31 (11) (November): 1718–1733. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01705.x.

Randles, Sally. 2008. “From Nano-Ethicswash to Real-Time Regulation.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 12 (3): 270–274.

DG Research. 2011. “DG Research Workshop on Responsible Research & Innovation in Europe”. Brussels.

Retzbach, Andrea, Joachim Marschall, Marion Rahnke, Lukas Otto, and Michaela Maier. 2011. “Public Understanding of Science and the Perception of Nanotechnology:  The Roles of Interest in Science, Methodological Knowledge,  Epistemological Beliefs, and Beliefs About Science.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (12) (December): 6231–6244. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0582-x.

Rey, Lucienne. 2006. “Public Reactions to Nanotechnology in Switzerland: Report on ‘Publifocus’ Discussion Forum ‘Nanotechnology, Health and the Environment’”. Bern: Centre for Technology Assessment at the Swiss Science and Technology Council. http://www.ta-swiss.ch/e/them_nano_pfna.html.

Roco, Mihail C., Barbara Harthorn, David Guston, and Philip Shapira. 2011. “Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal  Development.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (9) (September): 3557–3590. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4.

Roco, Mihail C., Chad A. Mirkin, and Mark C. Hersam. 2011. “Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020: Summary  of International Study.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (3) (March): 897–919. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0275-5.

Rogers-Hayden, Tee, and Nick Pidgeon. 2008. “Developments in Nanotechnology Public Engagement in the UK: ‘Upstream’  Towards Sustainability?” Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (8-9): 1010–1013. doi:10.1016/j.jelepro.2007.04.013.

Rollin, Fanny, Jean Kennedy, and Josephine Wills. 2011. “Consumers and New Food Technologies.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 22 (2-3) (March): 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2010.09.001.

Ronteltap, Amber, Arnout R. H. Fischer, and Hilde Tobi. 2011. “Societal Response to Nanotechnology: Converging Technologies-converging  Societal Response Research?” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (10) (October): 4399–4410. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0473-1.

Russell, A. Wendy, Frank M. Vanclay, Janet G. Salisbury, and Heather J. Aslin. 2010. “Technology Assessment in Australia: The Case for a Formal Agency to Improve Advice to Policy Makers.” Policy Sciences 44 (2) (July 30): 157–177. doi:10.1007/s11077-010-9120-4.

Sandel, Michael J. 2007. The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. London: Harvard University Press.

Sandler, Ronald. 2009. “Nanotechnology: The Social and Ethical Issues”. Washington: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. http://www.nanotechproject.org/publications/archive/pen16/.

Sardar, Ziauddin. 2010. “Welcome to Postnormal Times.” Futures 42 (5) (June): 435–444. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.028.

Satterfield, Terre, Milind Kandlikar, E.H. BeaudrieChristian, Joseph Conti, and Barbara Herr Harthorn. 2009. “Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies.” Nat Nano 4 (11) (November): 752–758. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.265.

Scheufele, Dietram A., Elizabeth A. Corley, Sharon Dunwoody, Tsung Jen Shih, Elliott Hillback, and David H. Guston. 2007. “Scientists Worry About Some Risks More Than the Public.” Nature Nanotechnology 2 (12): 732–734.

Scheufele, Dietram A., Elizabeth A. Corley, Tsung Jen Shih, Kajsa E. Dalrymple, and Shirley S. Ho. 2009. “Religious Beliefs and Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology in Europe and the United States.” Nat Nano 4 (2): 91–94. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.361.

Schibeci, Renato, Jeff Harwood, and Heather Dietrich. 2006. “Community Involvement in Biotechnology Policy?: The Australian Experience.” Science Communication 27 (3): 429–445.

Sclove, Richard. 2010. “Reinventing Technology Assessment.” Issues in Science and Technology (Fall 2010): 34–38.

Seear, Kate, Alan Petersen, and Diana Bowman. 2009. “The Social and Economic Impacts of Nanotechnologies: A Literature Review.” http://www.innovation.gov.au/Industry/Nanotechnology/NationalEnablingTechnologiesStrategy/Documents/SocialandEconomicImpacts_LiteratureReview.pdf.

“SIAMPI.” 2013. Accessed February 14. https://research.mbs.ac.uk/innovation/Research/Currentprojects/SIAMPI.aspx.

Siegrist, M., C. Keller, H. Kastenholz, S. Frey, and A. Wiek. 2007. “Laypeople’s and Experts’ Perception of Nanotechnology Hazards.” Risk Analysis 27 (1): 59–69.

Siegrist, Michael. 2010. “Predicting the Future: Review of Public Perception Studies of Nanotechnology.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 16 (4): 837–846. doi:10.1080/10807039.2010.501255.

Silberglitt, Richard, Philip S Anton, David R Howell, and Anny Wong. 2006. “The Global Technology Revolution 2020, In-Depth Analyses: Bio/Nano/Materials/Information Trends, Drivers, Barriers, and Social Implications”. RAND: National Security Research Division.

Stilgoe, Jack. 2012. “Taking Care of the Future – the Imperative of Responsible Innovation.” People and Science June 2012: 22.

Sutcliffe, Hilary, and Simon Hodgson. 2006. “Briefing paper:An Uncertain Business: The Technical, Social and Commercial Challenges Presented by Nanotechnology.”

Sylvester, Douglas J., Kenneth W. Abbott, and Gary E. Marchant. 2009. “Not Again! Public Perception, Regulation, and Nanotechnology.” Regulation & Governance 3 (2) (June): 165–185. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01049.x.

Terwel, Bart W., Fieke Harinck, Naomi Ellemers, and Dancker D.L. Daamen. 2011. “Going Beyond the Properties of CO2 Capture and Storage (CCS) Technology: How Trust in Stakeholders Affects Public Acceptance of CCS.” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 5 (2) (March): 181–188. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.10.001.

Toni Ahlqvist, Asta Bäck. 2010. “Road-mapping the Societal Transformation Potential of Social Media.” Foresight 12 (5): 3–26. doi:10.1108/14636681011075687.

Tödtling, Franz, and Michaela Trippl. 2005. “One Size Fits All?: Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation Policy Approach.” Research Policy 34 (8) (October): 1203–1219. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018.

“UK National Consensus Conference on Biotechnology: Final Report of the Lay Panel.” 1994. London. http://www.ncbe.reading.ac.uk/ncbe/gmfood/conference.html.

Waldron, Anna M., Douglas Spencer, and Carl A. Batt. 2006. “The Current State of Public Understanding of Nanotechnology.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8 (5): 569–575.

Wehling, Peter. 2012. “From Invited to Uninvited Participation (and Back?): Rethinking Civil Society Engagement in Technology Assessment and Development.” Poiesis & Praxis 9 (1-2) (November 16): 43–60. doi:10.1007/s10202-012-0125-2.

Wei, Max, Shana Patadia, and Daniel M. Kammen. 2010. “Putting Renewables and Energy Efficiency to Work: How Many Jobs Can the Clean Energy Industry Generate in the US?” Energy Policy 38 (2) (February): 919–931. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.044.

Weinberg, Alvin M. 1972. “Science and Trans-science.” Minerva 10 (2): 209–222.

Whitmarsh, Lorraine, Gill Seyfang, and Saffron O’Neill. 2011. “Public Engagement with Carbon and Climate Change: To What Extent Is the  Public ‘Carbon Capable’?” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 21 (1) (February): 56–65. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.011.

Woirol, Gregory Ray. 1996. The Technological Unemployment and Structural Unemployment Debates. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Yearley, S. 2009. “The Ethical Landscape: Identifying the Right Way to Think About the Ethical and Societal Aspects of Synthetic Biology Research and Products.” Journal of The Royal Society Interface 6 (Suppl 4): S559–S564.

Yuthas, K., and J. F. Dillard. 1999. “Ethical Development of Advanced Technology: A Postmodern Stakeholder  Perspective.” Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1) (March): 35–49. doi:10.1023/A:1006145805087.

Appendix A: Search Terms (Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar)

(‘enabling tech*’ OR ‘converging tech*’ OR ‘emerging tech*’ OR ‘platform tech*’ OR ‘nano*’ OR ‘synthetic bio*’ OR ‘biotech*’ OR ‘ICT’)
AND (‘public perception’ OR ‘public opinion’ OR ‘survey’ OR ‘narrative’)	AND (‘public engagement’ OR ‘deliberation’ OR ‘stakeholder engagement’ OR ‘public participation’ OR ‘dialogue’ OR ‘consensus conference’)	AND (‘societal implication’ OR ‘ethic*’)

1^ These reviews all focus specifically on nanotechnology (though see Siegrist 2010 for a discussion of how perceptions of nanotechnology relate to those of other technologies, such as biotechnology). Perceptions studies of other technologies (such as synthetic biology or genetic technologies) have shown similar results (Barnett et al 2007; Druckmen and Bolsen 2011; Peter D Hart Research Associates 2009).

2^ See http://www.etcgroup.org

Directory: industry -> IndustrySectors
industry -> Standards and guidelines for making accessible software
industry -> Computer Industry Analysis
industry -> Application for Classification of a computer game
IndustrySectors -> Department of Industry, Innovation and science Australian space industry capability
IndustrySectors -> Cocoa/chocolate 13 Confectionery 14
IndustrySectors -> Economics References Committee Future of Australia’s Automotive Industry
IndustrySectors -> Key Automotive Statistics 2012 acknowledgements
IndustrySectors -> Key Automotive Statistics 2011 acknowledgements
IndustrySectors -> Global Space Industry Dynamics

Download 102.05 Kb.

Share with your friends: