Description: DoD organizations exchange military or civilian personnel with other countries
Purpose: Required overall authority for the exchange of DoD personnel with allied and friendly countries and international organizations.
Authorization: Section 1082, NDAA, FY1997, P.L.104-201, 23 September 1997 (with no stated expiration)
Appropriation: DoD, defense agency, or MilDep funding
Guidance:
DoDD 5530.3, International Agreements
Each major DoD organization generally has a similar supporting agreement directive
Implemented using a negotiated and concluded international agreement
The exchanges are to be reciprocal one-for-one with the exchange officer performing, as the law allows, as a member of the host organization
The DoD organization performing the exchange normally funds the U.S. person(s) provided to the partner nation
An exception are costs of temporary duty or training directed by the host nation
Countries Eligible: Any allied or friendly country or international organization as determined by SecDef
Value of Program: Restrictions: U.S.-only technology transfer and delegation of disclosure authority letters (DDLs) must be generated and approved for each international agreement
Key Players: Country team (SDO/DATT), any major DoD organization, DTSA, SecDef
Execution:
The SDO/DATT or DoD organization identifies an opportunity for the exchange of military officers or DoD civilian personnel with the partner nation in a specific professional discipline
The partner nation shows specific interest in the exchange
The SDO/DATT forwards the proposed exchange to the GCC and prospective DoD organization
The DoD organization to conduct and host the prospective exchange generates an proposed international agreement to be further negotiated and concluded
DTSA reviews the proposed agreement for technology transfer authority considerations and coordinates any further required decision making for disclosure authorities
SecDef approves the exchange and forwards to SecState for concurrence and any required notification to Congress
The DoD organization conducting the exchange implements in coordination with the partner nation, country team, and applicable GCC.
Example: The following types of exchanges are possible:
Professional Exchanges (PEP)
Administrative Professional Exchanges (APEP)
Intelligence Professional Exchanges
Engineer and Scientist Exchanges (ESEP)
Foreign liaison officers (FLO)
The affected personnel officially represent their own nations are not specifically members of the host nation organizations
Non-Reciprocal Exchange of Defense Personnel
Description: DoD or MoD organizations assign military or civilian personnel with the other country(s)
Purpose: Required overall authority for the assignment of DoD or MoD personnel with allied and friendly countries and international organizations with no reciprocity
Authorization: Section 1207, NDAA, FY2010, as amended, P.L.111-84, 28 October 2009
Appropriation: Same as for reciprocal exchanges
Guidance: Same as for reciprocal exchanges
Countries Eligible: Same as for reciprocal exchanges
Value of Program: Restrictions: This is a temporary authority to expire at the end of FY2016
Key Players: Same as for reciprocal exchanges
Execution: Same as for reciprocal exchanges
Example: USCENTCOM staff has non-reciprocal exchange officers assigned to the Staff performing, as authorized by law, as U.S. military members. Recent announcement of an Australian army general officer (MG Richard Burr) to serve on the U.S. Army, Pacific staff as the deputy for operations . Another recent announcement included the integration of U.S. advisors into the Peruvian Defense Ministry for C/N and C/T planning.
Payment of Foreign Nation Liaison Officer Expenses
Description: Authorizes provision of administrative services and payment other personal expenses to a liaison officer of another nation
Purpose: U.S. support of foreign liaison officers involved in a military operation with the U.S. while the officer is temporarily assigned to a COCOM, COCOM component, or subordinate operational command in connection with the planning or conducting a military operation, or the mission of joint war fighting experimentation and joint forces training.
Authorization: 10 U.S.C. 1051a
Appropriation: DoD O&M
Guidance:
SecDef may pay the following expenses for a liaison officer of a developing country in the connection of his assignment to the Hqtrs of a COCOM if the assignment is requested by the Cdr of the COCOM.
Travel and subsistence
Personal expenses in carrying out his assignment
Medical care at a civilian medical facility if determined adequate care is not available at a local military facility, determined in the best interests of the U.S., and the care is not otherwise available pursuant to any treaty or other agreements.
May also pay mission-related travel expenses.
May provide administrative services and support to the liaison officer determined as appropriate to include base or installation support services, office space, utilities, copying services, fire and police protection, and computer support.
Countries Eligible: As requested by the COCOM to SecDef (OSD)
Value of Program:
Restrictions: For liaison officers only from developing countries.
Key Players: Applicable country(s), COCOM, SecDef (OSD), local base commander
Execution: COCOM determines and recommends to the SecDef that the temporary assignment of a foreign liaison officer is to the best interests of the U.S./
Example: Vast majority of liaison officers are from the USCENTCOM AOR countries with assignment to CENTCOM or component staffs.