Social Network Construction and Competitiveness in Global Value Chain Network Analysis Perspective on Chinese Aerospace Industry



Download 161.15 Kb.
Page4/4
Date28.01.2017
Size161.15 Kb.
#9605
1   2   3   4

6. Discussion and Conclusion

To interpret the practical implication of regression outcomes, following conclusions can be derived from our empirical evidence:

1. In China, aerospace industry is strongly demand-driven, final customers occupy the most central positions in supply chain and exert their influence back to the OEMs and suppliers.

2. In primary manufacturing sector, a few amount of OEM dominate the control and coordination power in partnership network and supply chain. Comparatively, downstream supplier take a less advantageous position in both networks, but in general they are better off than upstream suppliers which spread over the peripheral space in the supply chain.

3. Firm specialized in support activities have a strong mitigation effect in the supply chain network between OEMs and multiple-tier suppliers, but their impact in partnership network is not significant.

4. For foreign firms, country-of-origin effect do have a significant impact. Firms from developed economies have a stronger position in supply chain network, because of their innovation capacity and knowledge spill-over. But in partnership network, firms form other emerging economies have a significantly better off position due to the political intervention. They benefit inter-governmental reciprocal protocol assuring effective connection with the most competent domestic partners.

5. For domestic firms, location in provinces that have intensive output in aviation products significantly contribute to the position in both partnership and supply chain networks.

6. Coreness of business sector in the networks, year of market presence and headquarter identity have a significant positive effect on individual firms in partnership network, while embeddedness in both horizontal partnership and vertical supply chain network contributes to firm’s position in supply chain network.

7. Cognitive attributes such as similar legal system do not have a significant impact on the position in partnership network and supply chain.

Reference
Albert, R. & Barabási, A.-L. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of modern physics, 74(1): 47.

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic management journal, 23(11): 979-96.

Arnold, D. J. & Quelch, J. A. 1998. New strategies in emerging markets. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(1): 7.

Bales, R., Maull, R., & Radnor, Z. 2004. The development of supply chain management within the aerospace manufacturing sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(3): 250-55.

Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1): 99-120.

Bathelt, H. & Glückler, J. 2012. Wirtschaftsgeographie. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer KG.

Boeing. 2015. Boeing Current Market Outlook 2015-2034. Seattle, WA: Boeing Commercial Airplanes Market Analysis.

Boisot, M. & Meyer, M. W. 2008. Which way through the open door? Reflections on the internationalization of Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 349-65.

Bonacich, P. 1972. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1): 113-20.

Bonaglia, F., Goldstein, A., & Mathews, J. A. 2007. Accelerated internationalization by emerging markets’ multinationals: The case of the white goods sector. Journal of World Business, 42(4): 369-83.

Borgatti, S. P. 2005. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1): 55-71.

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. 2013. Analyzing social networks: SAGE Publications Limited.

Bourdieu, P. 1986. The Forms of Capital.In Richardson, John G., (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Buckley, P. J. & Casson, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London [etc.]: The Macmillan Press.

Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes : the social structure of competition. Cambridge [etc.]: Harvard University Press.

Cantwell, J. & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic management journal, 26(12): 1109-28.

Cantwell, J. A. 2013. Blurred boundaries between firms, and new boundaries within (large multinational) firms: the impact of decentralized networks for innovation. Seoul Journal of Economics, 26: 1-32.

Chen, H., Griffith, D. A., & Hu, M. Y. 2006. The influence of liability of foreignness on market entry strategies: An illustration of market entry in China. International Marketing Review, 23(6): 636-49.

Coleman, J. S. 1994. Foundations of social theory: Harvard university press.

Coviello, N. E. 2006. The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5): 713-31.

Cowan, R. & Jonard, N. 2004. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(8): 1557-75.

Dhanaraj, C. & Parkhe, A. 2006. Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of management review, 31(3): 659-69.

Dunning, J. H. 2001. The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future. International journal of the economics of business, 8(2): 173-90.

Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of international business studies: 1-31.

Dunning, J. H. 1977. Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for an eclectic approach: Springer.

Durlauf, S. N. 1999. The case" against" social capital: Social Systems Research Institute, University of Wisconsin.

Ellis, P. 2000. Social Ties and Foreign Market Entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3): 443-69.

Ernst, D. 2002. Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems. Implications for developing countries. Economics of innovation and new technology, 11(6): 497-523.

Ernst, D. & Kim, L. 2002. Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research policy, 31(8): 1417-29.

Fortunato, S. 2010. Community detection in graphs. Physics reports, 486(3): 75-174.

Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. 1983. The Liability of Newness: Age Dependence in Organizational Death Rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5): 692-710.

Freeman, L. C. 1978. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3): 215-39.

Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of international political economy, 12(1): 78-104.

Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. A. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of management review, 15(4): 603-26.

Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology: 1360-80.

Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic management journal, 20(5): 397-420.

Gupta, A. K. & Govindarajan, V. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic management journal, 21(4): 473-96.

Hobday, M. 1998. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research policy, 26(6): 689-710.

Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of management journal, 43(3): 249-67.

Hymer, S. H. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment: MIT press Cambridge, MA.

Iammarino, S. & McCann, P. 2013. Multinationals and economic geography: Location, technology and innovation: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Inkpen, A. C. & Tsang, E. W. 2005. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of management review, 30(1): 146-65.

Jackson, M. O. 2008. Social and economic networks: Princeton university press Princeton.

Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of international business studies: 23-32.

Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J.-E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of international business studies, 40(9): 1411-31.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. 2004. Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes: Harvard Business Press.

Katz, L. 1953. A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika, 18(1): 39-43.

Khanna, T. & Palepu, K. G. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets.

Kogut, B. 2000. The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic management journal, 21(3): 405-25.

Kossinets, G. & Watts, D. J. 2009. Origins of homophily in an evolving social network1. American journal of sociology, 115(2): 405-50.

Malhotra, N. & Hinings, C. 2010. An organizational model for understanding internationalization processes. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 330-49.

Manski, C. F. 2000. Economic analysis of social interactions: National bureau of economic research.

Mitchell, J. C. 1969. Social networks in urban situations: analyses of personal relationships in Central African towns: Manchester University Press.

MoFC. 2012. Notice of the Ministry of Finance and the National Development and Reform Commission on Issuing the Interim Measures for the Administration of Special Funds for the Development of Strategic Emerging Industries.In China, Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of, (Ed.), No. 1111 [2012]. Beijing.

Mudambi, R. & Santangelo, G. D. 2014. From Shallow Resource Pools to Emerging Clusters: The Role of Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries in Peripheral Areas. Regional Studies: 1-15.

Nieminen, J. 1974. On the centrality in a graph. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 15(1): 332-36.

Niosi, J. & Zhegu, M. 2005. Aerospace clusters: local or global knowledge spillovers? Industry & Innovation, 12(1): 5-29.

Nohria, N. & Garcia‐Pont, C. 1991. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic management journal, 12(S1): 105-24.

Nohria, N. & Ghoshal, S. 1997. The differentiated network: Organizing multinational corporations for value creation: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: Cambridge university press.

Padgett, J. F. & Ansell, C. K. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American journal of sociology: 1259-319.

Podolny, J. M. & Page, K. L. 1998. Network forms of organization. Annual review of sociology: 57-76.

Porter, M. E. 1998. Cluster and the new economics of competition.

Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology Annual Review of Sociology. 24. 1-24.

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly: 116-45.

Reagans, R. & McEvily, B. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative science quarterly, 48(2): 240-67.

Roger Cliff, C. J. R. O., David Yang. 2011. Ready for Takeoff: China's Advancing Aerospace Industry. Santa Monica, CA: RAND National Security Research Division.

Rugman, A. & D'Cruz, J. 1997. The theory of the flagship firm. European Management Journal, 15(4): 403-12.

Scott, J. 1991. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook: SAGE Publications.

Sturgeon, T., Van Biesebroeck, J., & Gereffi, G. 2008. Value chains, networks and clusters: reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of economic geography: lbn007.

Sturgeon, T. J. 2007. How globalization drives institutional diversity: the Japanese electronics industry's response to value chain modularity. Journal of East Asian Studies, 7(1): 1-34.

Teece, D. J. 1985. Multinational Enterprise, Internal Governance, and Industrial Organization. The American Economic Review, 75(2): 233-38.

Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative science quarterly: 35-67.

Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American sociological review: 674-98.

Uzzi, B. & Gillespie, J. J. 2002. Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: Embeddedness and the firm's debt performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(7): 595-618.

Wasserman, S. & Faust., K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and applications: Cambridge University Press.

Watts, D. J. & Strogatz, S. H. 1998. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. nature, 393(6684): 440-42.

Williams, T., Maull, R., & Ellis, B. 2002. Demand chain management theory: constraints and development from global aerospace supply webs. Journal of Operations Management, 20(6): 691-706.

Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic intstitutions of capitalism: Simon and Schuster.

Winter, S. 1998. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets, The strategic management of intellectual capital. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Witt, M. A. & Lewin, A. Y. 2007. Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints. Journal of International business studies: 579-94.

Yiu, D. W., Lau, C., & Bruton, G. D. 2007. International venturing by emerging economy firms: the effects of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 519-40.

Zaheer, A., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic management journal, 21(3): 203.



Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management journal, 38(2): 341-63.

1 Source: European Central Bank: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/tasks/international/emerging/html/index.en.html

2 All state-owned enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises with an annual income over 20 million yuan (approximately 3 million US dollar) since 2011 (National Bureau of Statistics of China, NBSC)

Download 161.15 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page