Notwithstanding the positive advances made by PRP, the system of implementation has not been without its complications. For instance, the difference between
MTs and regular
police stations is stark, and the impact this has on both available resources and delivery has been significant. Those officers and citizens in neighborhoods that don’t benefit from the resource boost are often left questioning why the next
thana over has received not only an increase in resources, but also invisibility, as a result of the change. As part of this, there are also concerns that the method for deciding in which districts MTs will be placed is opaque,
and even politically motivated, and recent allegations of corruption have brought under question the entire process. Specifically, a March 2015 article in the Daily Mail claimed that the DFID funding for police
thanas was actually being used to help corrupt regimes stamp out political opposition in multiple countries where it operates around the world. The article cites a study by the Independent Commission on Aid Impact, which warned that many of the
thanas, which received enhanced equipment,
training and financial support, were also the same locations that saw an increase in victimization
(48%) and a tripling in the number of bribes paid to officers (Groves Beyond issues surrounding the MTs; however, there are also questions regarding what the 2007 Police Ordinance never passed. This draft ordinance was created under PRP by a reform committee led by ex-IGP A.S.M. Shahjahan, and included a vision for an eleven-member National Police Commission, a Police Complaints Line, Police Tribunal and separation of police operations
from political intervention (BD News 24 2008
). However, after awaiting approval within the Ministry of Home Affairs for over 3 years, the Additional Secretary eventually gave a public statement that the proposed ordinance is unrealistic and impractical in nature, and could not be implemented. Based on this public statement, and closed door discussion held amongst a number of district commissioners at the time, it is believed that the ordinance was tabled for fear of creating too much political independence among the police (Daily Star Besides the UNDP / DFID supported PRP, a number of other organizations have also provided technical assistance to the Bangladesh National Police, especially as it relates to community-based policing practices. These include the Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA), the Department of Justice’s International Criminal Investigative Training and Assistance Program (ICITAP) and The Asia Foundation (TAF), the latter of which has been quietly promoting a grassroots approach to community policing in 20 locations communities since 2008. TAF’s efforts received significant recognition and an increase in funding in early 2011, when USAID backed a three million dollar TAF-led
Community-Based Policing (CBP) initiative in 518 communities across northwest Bangladesh. CBP was paired by the US Embassy as the citizen or community-led arm of the ICITAP’s classroom- based approach taught at the police academy to all new incoming police officers. More about these efforts to promote community policing are discussed in the section below however, it’s important to note that these other programs receive only limited commitment from the Bangladesh National Police, being that they could not offer the significant equipment and financial incentives provided by PRP.
6 The Not So Exemplary Example – Bangladesh National Police