The Humanist 1000 Summers



Download 0.94 Mb.
Page23/25
Date20.10.2016
Size0.94 Mb.
#6058
1   ...   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25
· The surface is cloud covered; with little or no solar energy
· Poisonous atmosphere of primarily carbon dioxide, with nitrogen and clouds of sulphuric acid droplets.

However, viewed in a different way, the problem with Venus is merely that the ground level is too far below the one atmosphere level. At cloud-top level, Venus is the paradise planet. At an altitude slightly above fifty km above the surface, the atmospheric pressure is equal to the Earth surface atmospheric pressure of 1 Bar. At this level, the environment of Venus is benign.


· above the clouds, there is abundant solar energy
· temperature is in the habitable "liquid water" range of 0-50C
· atmosphere contains the primary volatile elements required for life (Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen, and Sulphur)
· Gravity is 90% of the gravity at the surface of Earth.

While the atmosphere contains droplets of sulphuric acid, technologies to avoid acid corrosion are well known, and have been used by chemists for centuries.


In short, the atmosphere of Venus is most the earthlike environment in the solar system. Although humans cannot breathe the atmosphere, pressure vessels are not required to maintain one atmosphere of habitat pressure, and pressure suits are not required for humans outside the habitat.

It is proposed here that in the near term, human exploration of Venus could take place from aerostat vehicles in the atmosphere, and that in the long term, permanent settlements could be made in the form of cities designed to float at about fifty kilometre altitude in the atmosphere of Venus.

Is Floating Difficult? On Venus, breathable air (i.e., oxygen/nitrogen mixture at roughly 21:78 mixture ratio) is a lifting gas. The lifting power of breathable air in the carbon dioxide atmosphere of Venus is about half kg per cubic meter. Since air is a lifting gas on Venus: the entire lifting envelope of an aerostat can be breathable gas, allowing the full volume of the aerostat to be habitable volume. For comparison, on Earth, helium lifts about one kg per cubic meter, so a given volume of air on Venus will lift about half as much as the same volume of helium will lift on Earth.).

Science on Venus


Venus, the "greenhouse planet", is a scientifically fascinating place (Landis 2001, Landis et al. 2002). In many ways it can be considered "Earth's evil twin." A huge number of important scientific questions need to be answered:
· Before the runaway greenhouse effect, was early Venus temperate?
· Did Venus once have an ocean? If so, did it ever have life?
· What causes the geological resurfacing of the planet?
· What is the nature of the atmospheric superrotation?
· What are the aerosol particles in the atmosphere?
· What is the “snow” on Venus mountaintops?
· Can we learn about Earth’s climate from Venus?
· What is the nature of the disequilibrium chemistry in the Venusian atmosphere? Could it indicate atmospheric life?

At a temperature of 450 Celsius, and with 90 atmospheres of pressure of carbon-dioxide atmosphere, the surface of Venus is far too hostile to land humans upon, but we can put humans in the atmosphere to explore the surface via rugged telerobot.


Venus Telescience Technologies

In the telerobotic exploration scenario (Landis 2003), the humans remain in a habitat, and use teleoperation to rove across the surface of Venus and explore. This requires a high-fidelity, high-bandwidth connection to give the humans a fully-detailed virtual presence in the robotic body.

Humans participate in the exploration both by direct operation of the telerobots across a high-fidelity virtual presence link, and also by analyzing samples collected by the teleoperated robots in a fully-equipped on-site laboratory. Because of the high wind velocity in the middle atmosphere of Venus, an atmospheric aerostat habitat would not stay over the same surface location, but would constantly move. Although this would have some disadvantages, such as requiring a relay station if long exploration of a single spot is required, it would also have some advantages in constantly moving over new ground.
A robot to explore the surface of Venus will require new technologies; specifically, it will require electronics, scientific instruments, power supplies, and mechanical linkages designed to operate at a temperature above 450 C hot enough to melt the solder on a standard electronic circuit board. This will require devices made from advanced semiconductor materials, such as silicon carbide, or even new approaches, such as micro-vacuum tube electronics. Such materials are now being developed in the laboratory. In addition, for a fully immersive virtual reality, high-bandwidth virtual-presence technologies will have to be developed, as well as highly capable exploratory robotics.

While the human explorers could live in a habitat/laboratory in orbit around Venus, a better location for exploration is an aerostat habitat. Teleoperation from the atmosphere allows near "real time" operation with minimum time delay, giving a virtual presence on the surface. An atmospheric habitat has an advantage over an orbital habitat of advantages of gravity (90% of Earth surface gravity) and atmospheric protection against cosmic radiation (same equivalent mass as Earth’s atmosphere), and the presence of useful atmospheric gasses, including carbon dioxide and nitrogen.


Breathing oxygen for life support can be easily provided by separation of oxygen from atmospheric carbon dioxide, either by zirconia electrolysis or by Sabatier processes. So it should be possible to explore the surface of Venus remotely from an aerostat habitat. An atmospheric location for the habitat has the addition advantage that it will be easy to bring samples up from the surface to be analyzed in the habitat. The atmospheric pressure is high enough that both airplanes (Landis 2001) or balloons could lift samples (assuming, of course, that the vehicles are adapted for high-temperature and pressure operation).

SETTLING VENUS


In the long term, permanent settlements could be made in the form of cities designed to float at about fifty kilometre altitude in the atmosphere of Venus.

The thick atmosphere provides about one kilogram per square centimetre of mass shielding from galactic cosmic radiation and from solar particle event radiation, eliminating a key difficulty in many other proposed space settlement locations. The gravity, slightly under one Earth gravity, is likely to be sufficient to prevent the adverse affects of microgravity. At roughly one atmosphere of pressure, a habitat in the atmosphere will not require a high strength pressure vessel. Humans would still require provision of oxygen, which is mostly absent from the Venusian atmosphere, but in other respects the environment is perfect for humans (although on the habitat exterior humans would still require sufficient clothing to avoid direct skin exposure to aerosol droplets). Since breathable air is a lifting gas, the entire lifting envelope of an aerostat can be breathable gas, allowing the full volume of the aerostat to be habitable volume. For objects the size of cities, this represents an enormous amount of lifting power. A one-kilometre diameter spherical envelope will lift 700,000 tons (two Empire state buildings). A two-kilometre diameter envelope would lift 6 million tons. So, if the settlement is contained in an envelope containing oxygen and nitrogen the size of a modest city, the amount of mass which can be lifted will be, in fact, large enough that it could also hold the mass of a modest city. The result would be an environment as spacious as a typical city. The lifting envelope does not need to hold a significant pressure differential. Since at the altitudes of interest the external pressure is nearly one bar, atmospheric pressure inside the envelope would be the same as the pressure outside. The envelope material itself would be a rip-stop material, with high-strength tension elements to carry the load. With zero pressure differential between interior and exterior, even a rather large tear in the envelope would take thousands of hours to leak significant amounts of gas, allowing ample time for repair. (For safety, the envelope would also consist of several individual units).


Solar power is abundant in the atmosphere of Venus, and, in fact, solar arrays can produce nearly as much power pointing downward (toward the reflective clouds) as they produce pointing toward the sun. The Venus solar day, 116.8 terrestrial days, is extremely long; however, the atmospheric winds circle the planet much more rapidly, rotating around the planet in four days. Thus, on the habitat, the effective solar "night" would be roughly fifty hours, and the solar "day" the same. This is longer than an Earth day, but is still comfortable compared to, for example, the six-month night experienced in terrestrial near-polar locations. If the habitat is located at high latitudes, the day and night duration could be shortened toward a 24-hour cycle.

A permanent settlement will need access to the resources required for human life and for greenhouses to provide food and oxygen, and the atmosphere of Venus has these in abundance. Atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrogen are a plentiful resource. Along with hydrogen reaped from condensing atmospheric sulphuric acid droplets, the basic elements needed for human survival can be found in the atmosphere. A settlement will require structural and industrial materials as well. These materials, such as silicon, iron, aluminum, magnesium, calcium, potassium, sodium etc. can be mined from the surface material, which is apparently
primarily a basaltic silicate.
Access to the surface is relatively simple from an aerostat, since the thick atmosphere allows flight by airplanes (Landis 2001) or balloons (already demonstrated on Venus during the Russian VEGA mission (Bougher, Hunten and Phillips 1997)). In an alternative scenario, a cable in the form of a high-temperature fullerine tether could be used to directly lift ore from the surface to the habitat. Since the habitat will be stationary with respect to the middle-atmosphere wind, the lifting will be done with the habitat in motion with respect to the surface. It may simplify the process if the habitat temporarily lowers its altitude to take it out of the high altitude wind levels; while this will move it toward the higher temperature region of the atmosphere, a habitat of the size considered would have an enormous heat capacity, and would likely have little difficulty with a temporary dwell at higher temperature levels.
Finally, with surface area 3.1 times the land area of Earth, Venus has plenty of room. A billion habitats, each one with a population of hundreds of thousands of humans, could be placed to float in the Venus atmosphere.
Accessibility of Asteroids from Venus

One possible economic objective for space colonization is to serve as habitats from which humans can prospect and mine asteroidal resources. It would be intuitive to think that a base to mine asteroids should be close to the asteroid belt, and hence further from the sun than the Earth, but detailed consideration of astrodynamics brings this conclusion into some question. In terms of flight time, Venus is closer to the asteroid belt than either the Earth or Mars.


For example, the minimum-energy trajectory to the largest main-belt asteroid, Ceres, takes 0.95 years from Venus, and 1.05 years from Earth. In terms of flight time, the closer you are to the sun, the more accessible the asteroids are. The asteroids are not actually close to each other, and hence if a habitat is to support prospecting and mining more than one asteroid, the asteroid belt is in some ways the worst location for it. An asteroid is as likely as not to be on the opposite side of the sun, and although the Earth is further from the sun, that does not put it closer, on the average, to any given asteroid. The higher orbital velocity of Venus actually makes transfer orbits somewhat faster, as well as increasing the number of transfer opportunities (that is, decreasing the synodic period).

CONCLUSION


In the long term, permanent settlements could be made in the form of cities designed to float at about fifty kilometre altitude in the atmosphere of Venus. The advantages of the Venus atmosphere over other proposed space settlement locations includes an abundance of atmospheric volatiles, sufficient for life support, benign temperature and pressure, shielding from cosmic and solar-flare radiation, plentiful solar energy, and nearby access to the rocky (silicate) surface materials.

REFERENCES

Bougher, S. W., Hunten, D. M., and Phillips R. J., editors, Venus II, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1997.
Fimmel, R. O., Colin, L., and Burgess, E., Pioneer Venus, NASA SP-461 (1983).
Landis, G. A., "Exploring Venus by Solar Airplane," presented at the STAIF Conference on Space Exploration Technology, Albuquerque NM, Feb. 11-15, 2001. AIP Conference Proceedings Volume 552, pp. 16-18.
Landis, G. A., LaMarre C. and Colozza, A.: "Atmospheric Flight on Venus," paper AIAA-2002-0819, AIAA 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno NV, January 14-17 2002.
Landis, G. A., "Robots and Humans: Synergy in Planetary Exploration," Conference on Human Space Exploration, Space Technology & Applications International Forum, Albuquerque, NM, Feb. 2-6

Allan Boehm could see the puzzlement on his fellow board members faces, looked at his watch and asked if they could extend the meeting for an hour while they considered these new developments, and all agreed. He then turned back to the subject of the colonization of Venus.


"As a businessman the first question that might come up here is how does anyone make any money doing this? This isn't something where we’re going to see an ROI in seven years, which is what the MBAs would want. So let me try to answer my own question first. Toshi has mentioned that the Indian scientist claims a competitive situation between, who is it? – India, China and Japan, maybe Russia and others. Fair enough, what if each of those countries undertook to build their own city in the Venusian atmosphere? Martin here has laid out his call for 1000 summers of peaceful cooperation on Earth, ostensibly for the purpose of balancing our ecology amid the simple absence of war and pollution. Maybe the UN could expand the Space Station or use the Moon as a shared platform from which these nations could direct their efforts to build individual cities on Venus? The way each American state built a warship here in WWII? I mention this because there are obvious business implications and contracts to be had if that ever becomes a case, then we’d be back working with a familiar business model."
McGlade had been quiet during this process, but at the mention of his name thought he should contribute.
"It really would be a chance to channel our efforts as a species into something extraterrestrial, other than military satellites, and soak up a few centuries of that 1000 years, yes. I do know that Ban was worried that we were pushing the nations and races together a little expeditiously; that was one of his motivations when he wrote Canton - he wanted the races to become comfortable first inside their traditional territories. He offered that political structure so that they might be buffered from each other, naturally and legally, gaining time by working through a central hub like the UN. But I agree with Al's idea here, this would be outward looking and it would sure fire up the imagination of the world's youth - science might even come back into fashion."
Tom Leahy had been watching all this with more than a little interest, and he decided that this was an opportune time to ask if a larger envelope for this scheme might lend it some credibility.
"As you know Martin and I have been discussing a new project for the Jesuits, and yourselves - I was going to present some ideas for this to you today, as well as outline a pilot project we are starting in Vancouver around the refurbishing of an old church, so as Caroline Kennedy's dad might've said in his good Bostonian accent "Let me say this about that."
The board listened with interest.
“We Jesuits have always been known for our grasp of science, if I can be immodest for a moment, being teachers historically - it always helps to have the facts at your command - and we'd like nothing better than to see our organization involved in just such a project. Let's recall the good work that the Jesuits have done in past centuries in India, China and Japan. We've never been afraid to go where the action is; and by my estimation it was just as dangerous in those countries 200 years ago as the Venusian atmosphere is today. But we need stewardship here beyond simple administration. Our species needs a mature and built-out, universally understood humanism that allays any notions of the supernatural, or the stealth hegemony of the Roman Catholic Church - the usual suspects that atheists are continually bringing to our attention. Martin and I are well past that, I'm happy to say, and I hope I can gain your confidence over time. He and I recently drew up a rough model for the philosophy that we could present to the members of the little church we’re restoring in East Vancouver.”
He looked over at McGlade, who waved him on.
“Martin has written that any philosophy consists of it its metaphysics and its ethics, and we have pretty much accepted science as the foundation of any metaphysics that we have to consider. As an example, we would have to evaluate this colonization project as a major piece of our metaphysics - what we're doing as a species for the next few hundred years - and of course that's all science-based and I think we're all comfortable with that.
Long story short - Martin I are leaving to each individual something we call the Privum, a metaphorical container within humanism within which an adherent retains their personal beliefs, sense of duty and responsibility. This is where they develop their personal ethics, spirituality and any elements of the supernatural which they want to consider. So the philosophy is modularized in this fashion, and we envision separate but equal flavours of humanism we provisionally call Jesuan, Muslan, Hinduan, Bhuddhan, Shintoan etc., you get the idea - to preserve our religious traditions. Our humanism is inclusive of course, and it has to make sense, and be familiar in every culture. So that's an abbreviated description of what we’re working toward instantiating; a kind of variable religious humanism, if need be, beginning with our little church project.
We all understand that this intermediate institution would remain independent of the HU, the Jesuits and the Roman Catholic Church per se; we're doing this because we know that the human animal seeks fellowship in ideas and with his own kind. Finally, getting back to Mr. Yamanaka's revelation here; and Mr. Boehm's comments about the business aspects of colonizing Venus - I'd like to propose that the Jesuits be considered for the contract." he smiled.
May Biersten applauded Leahy for his vision.
"I would certainly be comfortable with all of that, Tom, we do need structure in the humanist movement; something that is a counterweight to orthodox religion or blind atheism for that matter. The other day I was giving some thought to the matter, and asked myself what we’d teach the kids in our ‘Sunday schools’ as it were. And right away the notion of a catechism came to mind, a handbook for our species and our humanist credo. Teach them everything we know about our own evolution, history, bodies, health topics, and from there, the rule of law and their responsibilities as world citizens.”
She took a sip of water, a lifetime lecturer giving one more lesson. “There has to be something here for everybody, the era of antihuman crusades for any reason has ended, and I can't think of a more deserving body of people to work with than your Jesuits. I spoke at an atheism conference in Burbank last month, out of curiosity, and one of the speakers there was a Jesuit who was working with the poor in El Salvador. He said he had lost his faith and was more Marxist than Christian, and he was hoping that the ‘humanists’ he was addressing would consider supporting him there in solidarity with his newfound atheism. I sat beside him that afternoon; we were both appearing on their panel, and he was continuously being ridiculed by just about everybody attending, for having been a priest. By extension I imagined what it must be like for all of your 15,000 members, Tom, to be mocked as outdated pedophiles, or whatever they would muster today as hate references - always by implication and innuendo of course - it was disgusting! He was no more dealing with humanists than Lenin was. I gave my talk, rather colourfully I might add, and got up and left. And he went with me."
Leahy was visibly moved by Biersten's account.
"To be a member of a priesthood these days - it does take more courage than faith, I grant you that. Say what you will, this is indeed a secular age insofar as members of the clergy are concerned, and I feel bad for every one of them. Clergymen and priests are not individual arbiters of truth and falsehood; they are people who want to work within an organization that has vision and charity as its mission. For centuries they did that, and they did it ever so effectively regardless of the grounds on which they might be criticized today. You always have to judge these people against the backdrop of the larger societies and times that they were working in, we are not a pantheon of saints but nor are we members of some grand conspiracy - nonetheless the time has come to refocus and rededicate the Society of Jesus around more contemporary tenets and directions. We need more flexibility than can be found within the confines of the Catholic Church, and a narrower purpose than the ‘Greater Glory of God’, a nebulous concept at best. Jesuits would grant us all these limitations, we are like an army looking for a just war, not some crusade directed against fellow human beings nor some inchoate and arbitrary beings characterized as infidels. I am here to tell you that the Jesuits are pretty much tabula rasa in this regard; we are ready to redefine ourselves around exclusively human projects. We seek only the right pathway to that place."
McGlade was taken aback by the starkness of Leahy's statements. Here in this board meeting was one of the most powerful members of the Catholic hegemony, espousing outright heresy before the leaders of the humanist movement, which was itself at risk of dissolving into internal acrimony should the larger membership ever get wind of such discussions prematurely.
“Tom and I broke this proposition down as follows – humanism is an inclusive sensibility for our species, planet and lives. We are born into a miracle – life. We can choose to just spend all our capital or better, create some alliances and institutions to keep life’s window open. Ergo we have the Archenteron as our holding facility; from there we have the Jesuits looking after - well - our afterlife. It’s that simple. And it would excite me to know that we had someone as dedicated and totally capable as the Jesuits in our wheelhouse.”
Boehm concurred. “If we’re going to have the Archenteron, then we may as well have a plan for its processes and destiny, a catechism as May mentioned. And I fully agree that a trained cadre of people overseeing developments makes all kinds of sense. I congratulate Tom and Martin for what they have put together so far.”
The board made a motion to fully investigate some integration 'toward defined organizational status' , then moved to the last item on the agenda, which was how to support Obama's possible bid to become the Secretary-General of the United Nations, given the Security Council issues that stood in its way.
62. Basecamp
The winter winds had built up a steep chop on the west side of Valdes Island, so McGlade decided to land in its lee, and then taxied around the corner into his bay. Kody ambled down from his cabin accompanied by Cal's dog to catch his lines and to welcome some now-regular visitors.


Download 0.94 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page